― Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 10 March 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 16:35 (twenty-one years ago)
He looks like someone's ex-wife.
― maypang (maypang), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 16:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian Christe (Ian Christe), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 16:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 16:53 (twenty-one years ago)
i take it he's not going to prison then
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 16:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― maypang (maypang), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― robin (robin), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 17:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)
(playing devil's advocate here - may start a new thread out of this...)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)
why does it seem that hip hop is more homophobic and mysogynist than rock n' roll anyway? if this is really a myth what allows it to be perpetuated?
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)
Are you sure?
― Ricardo (RickyT), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 17:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― dean! (deangulberry), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 18:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 18:01 (twenty-one years ago)
Do you actually think this?
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 18:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 18:03 (twenty-one years ago)
i can't say for sure but it seems likely. i've never met a gay man who was really into rap in the same way straight guys i know are and have been. i'm willing to concede that's just my experience though, and not an absolute truth.
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 18:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― bill stevens (bscrubbins), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 18:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 18:07 (twenty-one years ago)
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Psychoanalytic theory holds that homophobia -- the fear, anxiety, anger, discomfort and aversion that some ostensibly heterosexual people hold for gay individuals -- is the result of repressed homosexual urges that the person is either unaware of or denies. A study appearing in the August 1996 issue of the Journal of Abnormal Psychology, published by the American Psychological Association (APA), provides new empirical evidence that is consistent with that theory.
Researchers at the University of Georgia conducted an experiment involving 35 homophobic men and 29 nonhomophobic men as measured by the Index of Homophobia scale. All the participants selected for the study described themselves as exclusively heterosexual both in terms of sexual arousal and experience.
Each participant was exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual and lesbian videotapes (but not necessarily in that order). Their degree of sexual arousal was measured by penile plethysmography, which precisely measures and records male tumescence.
Men in both groups were aroused by about the same degree by the video depicting heterosexual sexual behavior and by the video showing two women engaged in sexual behavior. The only significant difference in degree of arousal between the two groups occurred when they viewed the video depicting male homosexual sex: 'The homophobic men showed a significant increase in penile circumference to the male homosexual video, but the control [nonhomophobic] men did not.'
Broken down further, the measurements showed that while 66% of the nonhomophobic group showed no significant tumescence while watching the male homosexual video, only 20% of the homophobic men showed little or no evidence of arousal. Similarly, while 24% of the nonhomophobic men showed definite tumescence while watching the homosexual video, 54% of the homophobic men did.
When asked to give their own subjective assessment of the degree to which they were aroused by watching each of the three videos, men in both groups gave answers that tracked fairly closely with the results of the objective physiological measurement, with one exception: the homophobic men significantly underestimated their degree of arousal by the male homosexual video.
Do these findings mean, then, that homophobia in men is a reaction to repressed homosexual urges, as psychoanalysis theorizes? While their findings are consistent with that theory, the authors note that there is another, competing theoretical explanation: anxiety. According to this theory, viewing the male homosexual videotape may have caused negative emotions (such as anxiety) in the homophobic men, but not in the nonhomophobic men. As the authors note, 'anxiety has been shown to enhance arousal and erection,' and so it is also possible that 'a response to homosexual stimuli [in these men] is a function of the threat condition rather than sexual arousal per se. These competing notions can and should be evaluated by future research.'
― maria b (maria b), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 18:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 19:08 (twenty-one years ago)
There's a decent amount of them, usually (in my experience) the "I'm not gay because I only sleep with drag queens (but I hang out in the Gayborhood)" variety.
― anode (anode), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 19:19 (twenty-one years ago)
We could take up a collection. Somebody set up a paypal account.
BTW, his hair looks like Michael Jackson's in that pic.
― boldbury, Wednesday, 10 March 2004 19:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― SexyDancer, Wednesday, 10 March 2004 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken taylrr, Wednesday, 10 March 2004 19:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 10 March 2004 21:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 22:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― paulhw (paulhw), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 23:13 (twenty-one years ago)
Wha? If this were true, I'd probably be walking around with a permanent hard-on.
― Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Thursday, 11 March 2004 00:36 (twenty-one years ago)