Obviously both classic, that's a no brainer, but who do you prefer? This could be the new Beatles vs. Elvis. What does your choice say about you?
It's tough (duh) but I'm more of a Beefheart guy. Sun Ra is more consistent, and there are few things I wouldn't rather listen to that the Singles double disc, but aesthetically, Beefheart takes the prize.
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 11 March 2004 07:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Roger in Mokum (Roger T), Thursday, 11 March 2004 08:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 11 March 2004 09:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 11 March 2004 10:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 11 March 2004 11:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 11 March 2004 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)
The main point of comparison is that both were bullies who locked musicians together and got 'em to play/arrange their 'weird' stuff, and that both did fairly accessible stuff then avant-garde type stuff too (they'd zig-zag between those fields): I like 'em both and won't choose.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 11 March 2004 14:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 11 March 2004 16:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 11 March 2004 16:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Thursday, 11 March 2004 16:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― David Allen (David Allen), Thursday, 11 March 2004 16:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jeff Sumner (Jeff Sumner), Thursday, 11 March 2004 17:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Thursday, 11 March 2004 17:13 (twenty-two years ago)
(I think Monk takes it, but it's a nail-biter.)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 11 March 2004 17:38 (twenty-two years ago)
(now this officially reads like the editorial chatroom of the wire)
― vahid (vahid), Thursday, 11 March 2004 17:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 11 March 2004 17:49 (twenty-two years ago)
my answers were YES and NO, the rankings ran: perry > beefheart > sun ra > stockhausen.
for the record, i like sun ra better than beefheart.
― vahid (vahid), Thursday, 11 March 2004 18:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 11 March 2004 18:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 11 March 2004 18:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Thursday, 11 March 2004 19:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 12 March 2004 09:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 12 March 2004 09:11 (twenty-two years ago)
Beefheart. Better tunes.
This is just mind-boggling. Sun Ra produced a whole catalog of catchy tunes. I don't hear anything equivalent in Beefheart. I have to wonder how much Sun Ra Alex "I saw Sun Ra perform in Central Park (opening for Sonic Youth) in the summer of `91 or so" in NYC has heard or had heard when he made that comment.
― _Rudipherous_, Monday, 18 January 2010 02:33 (sixteen years ago)
right?
― The Book of Eli Porter (ojo), Monday, 18 January 2010 02:38 (sixteen years ago)
The truth about the people of the planet earth is a BAD truth.
― _Rudipherous_, Monday, 18 January 2010 03:19 (sixteen years ago)
Judging by talent alone I would think it would be easy to choose Sun Ra over Beefheart?? But maybe I'm just saying that because he's a jazz musician... nahh he's definitely more talented
― CaptainLorax, Monday, 18 January 2010 03:38 (sixteen years ago)
I'd definitely take Sun Ra. Dude's a trip.
― dynamicinterface, Monday, 18 January 2010 05:02 (sixteen years ago)
Sun Ra. Because I am headache prone.
― Fuck Indiana. Seriously. (u s steel), Monday, 18 January 2010 11:41 (sixteen years ago)