Critically Reviled Albums Due A Re-evaluation : Stone Roses - Second Coming

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Panned by everyone for 'going' retro rock and not producing 3 minute pop songs or making a dance album like 'Screamadelica Except For melody Makers Everett True...

I think it's time this album was given some props. Maybe not as good as the debut but it wouldn't have been far off if a couple of the acoustic songs in the middle had been left off.
Top tracks:
Love Spreads(Glorious comeback single)
Breaking Into Heaven
Ten Storey Love Song
Begging You
Tightrope
Goodtimes
Tears
How Do You Sleep.
Daybreak wasnt bad either.

An underrated album IMO, Am I going to be slaughtered for this? I expect noone will agree with me at all, but let me know what you think anyway. Perhaps give it a listen first.

Colin Markin, Monday, 22 March 2004 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Agreed, there wasn't really need for "Love Spreads" AND "Drivin' South". Or 86 tracks of silence

Nick H (Nick H), Monday, 22 March 2004 20:26 (twenty-one years ago)

REM, Monster

Prude (Prude), Monday, 22 March 2004 20:29 (twenty-one years ago)

this record is cheap EVERYWHERE. I am big fan of the first record, but FEAR hearing/owning this.

I've been thinking maybe it's time to give it go.

or maybe not.

ddb, Monday, 22 March 2004 20:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd rather listen to Second Coming than anything by Oasis if that means anything. It probably doesn't mean anything though cuz I don't think I own Second Coming or anything by Oasis.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 22 March 2004 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)

It's certainly an album Noel Gallagher could only dream of making. I still think NME deliberately gave it a bad review as the Roses wouldnt grant them an interview(they gave their only interview to The Big issue) and NME didn't *need* Stone Roses anymore as Oasis were massive by then.

I know a few people who saw the Second Coming tour and they said it was amazing. ANY ILXors see that tour?

Colin Markin, Monday, 22 March 2004 20:41 (twenty-one years ago)

ddb, It's an album that doesn't hit you immediately but I must confess It's the roses album that I keep going back to.
I definitely think it's worth you checking it out. Either by buying or getting from Kazaa.

Colin Markin, Monday, 22 March 2004 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Thx Colin...
I think i'll D/L it tonight...fingers crossed.

ddb, Monday, 22 March 2004 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)

If you're a fan of Squire's guitar playing, you'll cream your pants multiple times. None of the songs themselves have managed to stick with me, though (even after 10 years of trying).

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Monday, 22 March 2004 21:03 (twenty-one years ago)

not a huge Stone Roses fan but Second Coming was far superior to their debut, IMO.

don, Monday, 22 March 2004 21:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I like "Drivin' South" - craptacular lyrics alert. "Ten Storey Love Song" is crap, though.

edward o (edwardo), Monday, 22 March 2004 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)

"Ten Storey Love Song" is the song that fans of the debut album liked best.

Colin Markin, Monday, 22 March 2004 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I liked it. I didn't like it as a Stone Roses album (I mean as the Roses album I wanted it to be) but thinking of it outside of the context of being the follow up to the first Stone Roses album and it's really OK as an album in its own right.

I went to three shows on the Second Coming tour (Wembley Arena and the two at the Barrowlands) and thought they were spectacularly average.

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 22 March 2004 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it's bloody fantastic. One of the great opening tracks - ambient babble, river noises and then into an uber-baggy vs Sly Stone groove. Then it gets better and better.....

Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 22 March 2004 21:56 (twenty-one years ago)

(apologies for my disgraceful grammar btw)

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 22 March 2004 21:57 (twenty-one years ago)

It's a great record. I keep meanign to write something about it. Voodoo techno swamp blues. The opening track is, as Dr C says, fucking outstanding, and while there are some definite dips ("Good Times", for heaven's sake) the good bits more than make up for it. I still can't understand why people creamed themselves for "Firestarter" and "Breathe" by Prodigy when they'd ignored "Begging You" mere months before.

Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Monday, 22 March 2004 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)

its definitely a grower, but still not a patch on the first album. who'd have thought that when they split up ian brown would produce the real quality, whilst squire has turned out some really bad stuff

fishcox, Monday, 22 March 2004 23:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, but Ian Brown solo is shite too.

Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Monday, 22 March 2004 23:46 (twenty-one years ago)

music of the spheres is an awesome album, one of the best of the past few years

fishcox, Monday, 22 March 2004 23:51 (twenty-one years ago)

"ten storey love song" = only good track. horribly ugly music. don't know what came over them with this album. i'm not *particularly* infatuated with the debut, but there was a lot of nice, shimmering pop on it - don't know why they abandoned that approach so readily. there were signs that they were a little too fond of long boring solos, though - waterfall and i am the resurrection go on for much too long. silly billies.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 22 March 2004 23:58 (twenty-one years ago)

"Ten Storey Love Song" is one of the weaker tracks on the album. The solos weren't boring in the least either.
I don't see why they HAD to 'remain pop' either.

Colin Markin, Tuesday, 23 March 2004 01:03 (twenty-one years ago)

it's still disappointing tiresome bluesy nonsense to my ears, just as it was at the time.

the surface noise (electricsound), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 01:16 (twenty-one years ago)

even "so young" is more appealing than anything on this album

the surface noise (electricsound), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 01:16 (twenty-one years ago)

jim is right, it's awful. it's a wank record and the lyrics are ridiculous and nothing sounds as effortless as the first album. your star will shine is the only song that isn't out and out bad but then it's a b-side. even one love was better than this.

keith m (keithmcl), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 01:22 (twenty-one years ago)

this album (apart from Ten Storey Love Song, which is booooring) R0XX0R U ALL R GAY.

Seriously. It hardly seems like a quantum leap from the first album - just more muscular and looser - I've always been befuddled by the level of vitriol directed at it. It's a Classic Rawk album in the very best way.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 23 March 2004 01:24 (twenty-one years ago)

"Your Star Will Shine" is an album cut, what does it matter that it was on the b-side to "Love Spreads"? Incidentally, it is also my fave track on the record, rilly beautiful that one.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 23 March 2004 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)

"ten storey love song" = boring, weak retread of the first album, or perhaps more accurately, some of the B-sides around its release.

I didn't buy this when it first came out and a few years later felt a strange need to listen to 'Love Spreads'. I think that's still my favourite track, but I can't say I put it on very often.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 01:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Begging You is the best, followed by Breaking Into Heaven and Ten Storey Love Song.

Love Spreads is just the worst.

samuel bloch, Tuesday, 23 March 2004 02:30 (twenty-one years ago)

The only review I remember getting this album right was Musician magazine, which called it a "groove record" (as opposed to the first album, which was mostly a song record), and thought it was a very nice groove record at that. I wasn't disappointed by it, really, since by then I didn't believe they were ever going to do anything so I was impressed it came out at all. I guess I thought of it kind of as a better-than-expected reunion album -- you know, they get the band back together and, yeah, it's not like it was, but by crikey those boys can still play and they even kinda sound like they're having fun.

spittle (spittle), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 03:13 (twenty-one years ago)

i prefer my groove records to not feature baboons and jimmy page want a be's

the surface noise (electricsound), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 03:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I think a groove record is just the right place for baboons and Jimmy Page wannabes!

spittle (spittle), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 03:24 (twenty-one years ago)

hmm well when you put it that way...

the surface noise (electricsound), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 03:27 (twenty-one years ago)

i'll agree about the baboon

the surface noise (electricsound), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 03:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Or baboons who want to be Jimmy Page.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 03:27 (twenty-one years ago)

"i've been dazed and confused so long it's not true... ook"

http://home.egge.net/~savory/ook.jpg

the surface noise (electricsound), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 03:32 (twenty-one years ago)

And I thought it was just Brits who hated the Second Coming.

Colin Markin, Tuesday, 23 March 2004 04:11 (twenty-one years ago)

The Jews were mad as hell about it.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 04:13 (twenty-one years ago)

"Love Spreads" is probably their best single.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 04:31 (twenty-one years ago)

i noticed the end of the year it came out (94?) that it only made i think greg tate's top ten that i saw, most of the rest of which was the killer wu tang releases that year and other good hip hop (remember?). otherwise you'd see nerdy couples at tower going, "um , i think they're kind of...OVER" and then snickering. seriously i saw this happen. i don't think i want to break things down along any lines here but it's music heavily influenced by blues, unabashed singing of that type all over this album by ian. it ain't no more byrds-y bromides. as much as i too love the first one it seemed like both an object lesson in the surprising but natural musical progression of one of my favorite groups of the time, and in how corny the collegiates in my midst really were/are, at all times. it's certainly better to me than the also then prevalent green day, sebadoh, et al.

duke stone, Tuesday, 23 March 2004 05:10 (twenty-one years ago)

The first Stone Roses' album is brilhant. But "Second Coming" is boring. It has good moments, but not enough to a re-evaluation.

Elvis is Dead, Tuesday, 23 March 2004 05:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I bought this when it came out as a double lp, was kinda underwhelmed.

More recently (i.e. 6 ears ago), got it as a cheapie off e-bay with the first album (both CD, both USA editions, both mint).

And you know, I think it's great. Would not change any of it...

This tends to happen with double albums. First impressions are "Urr its too long, can't take it all in", and so it takes a good two months before it really hits.

Or maybe the LP wasn't as good in sound quality as the CD...

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 09:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it's great, and it rocks as well. I'd probably be as happy listening to the drum and bass tracks in isolation, mind, I don't think the songs, or the singing are that great, I just like the overall feel of the thing.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 10:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Right, I've got a quiet day at work today, and I'm gonan grapple with this. I don't even need to hear it to write about it, it's in my head forever from when I was 16.

Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 10:06 (twenty-one years ago)

from ET's review linked above:

"A wailing Jew’s Harp welcomes in "Good Times" – "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned..."

Doesn't the jew's harp go "boing boing twang twang", instead of wailing?

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 10:10 (twenty-one years ago)

"I don't see why they HAD to 'remain pop' either."

they don't HAVE to do anything, but in my opinion they ditched a style that suited them rather well, and adopted one that didn't. simple enough.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 11:47 (twenty-one years ago)

It sort of like there's a missing lp in the middle as far as moving from one 'style' to another is concerned...

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)

They got stoned and listened to Led Zep lots, that's about it I think. I like it Ok, haven't heard it in years. I remember being all poised to hate it and being happily (mostly) surprised, tho Driving South and some other pretty similar tracks are incredibly bad tracks for such a competent band. More Ian Brown needed mostly

Mr Mime (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 12:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't remember the reviews being that bad. The NME gave it 6/10 or 7/10 but the overall message was to prepare yourself for disappointment because the album was merely "good" as opposed to "incredible", like the first album.
The gestation period was responsible for this -- had the album come out in 1991, it would have been considered a strong follow-up to the debut. But after five years of waiting, the expectations ran too high (but that's the Roses own fault).

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 12:45 (twenty-one years ago)

aye, i remember select gave it 4/5 and said "this is a really good record, it's just not quite good enough to satisfy expectation after all this time". i personally think it's just disappointing in it's own right (i bought the first stone roses album in the late 90's, enjoyed it, then heard the second coming a few months later and really disliked it - it was nothing to do with me building massive expectations over a long period of time, more to do with it not being so hot).

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 12:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Really including "Begging You" (a good one, dancey etc whatever) makes it seem a bit strange they also stuck in so many bad attempts at badass rock, maybe they thought "BY" was the filler

Mr Mime (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Thing here.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)

a) Second Coming was never critically reviled. Critics bent over backwards to try and like it.

b) The problem being that The Stone Roses weren't that good in the first place.

c) No they weren't. Admit it.

d) Led Zep are allowed to sound like Led Zep. It was the early 70s.

e) Seriously. Half a dozen good-ish songs, tops.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Thursday, 27 May 2004 22:33 (twenty-one years ago)

f) C'mon. Funky fucking Drummer? Gosh, how cutting edge.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Thursday, 27 May 2004 22:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I love this record. The only really weak song for me is that Stairway to Heaven ripoff, "Tracks of My Tears"...? That might not be the right title...

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 27 May 2004 22:36 (twenty-one years ago)

"When Electricity Came to Arkansas" >>>

dave q, Friday, 28 May 2004 04:06 (twenty-one years ago)

The guitar solo in "How do you sleep?" reminds me of a teabag advert that was on at the time it came out.

Keith Watson (kmw), Friday, 28 May 2004 18:43 (twenty-one years ago)

seven months pass...
I'm listening to this in its entirety for the first time since it came out. It's interesting because at the time I was nowhere near ready to get into Zeppelin, so I didn't have any kind of direct Zep experience to draw on like I do now. And it seems like there are a few other influences going on here too that I was not aware of back then (Can? Curtis Mayfield? late 60's funky jazz?). Hindsight 20/20, etc. What immediately struck me as strange was how on the first two tracks it sounds like Ian is the one who is drugged or can't be bothered, rather than Squire. He just simply doesn't seem into it. The riff for Driving South just irks me as well. The whole song is just so cliched and stereotypical, even going as far as mentioning crossroads, etc. - it's just a parody.

Daybreak is extraordinary, though, and I don't recall it being one of those that really stood out for me before. Ten Storey Love Song is nice, of course, but it makes me think that it might just have been an even worse thing if the Roses had come back with an album of substandard stuff in the same STYLE they had for the first album. Tightrope is great and I recall liking that one last time round. Begging You is just an explosion of infectious energy, can't argue with that one. Good Times & Straight To The Man are just filler. Tears is another Led Zeppelin ripoff/embarassment, although it does feature some fine guitar playing towards the end. "Love Spreads" sounded good when I heard it out-of-the-blue in a club a few years ago, and I remember liking it back in the day quite a bit. But unfortunately now it just sounds like yet more superfluous ZEPPELINWANK.

Well this is just something I had to do, hear this album again, and now I have. Also I recall now seeing the Roses live on this tour. That was when I found out Ian couldn't sing live. But they played a few old numbers, so it was alright overall.

WHAT THE HELL IS THIS PIANO/VIOLIN SHIT AT THE END OF THIS ALBUM?

Christ even Tom Waits is better than that.

POMPOUS!

Bimble... (Bimble...), Monday, 17 January 2005 01:05 (twenty-one years ago)

i can't believe it's been almost 11 years since this record broke my heart.

keith m (keithmcl), Monday, 17 January 2005 01:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Happy Anniversary!!!!

Bimble... (Bimble...), Monday, 17 January 2005 01:48 (twenty-one years ago)

two years pass...

This sounds good right now but I'm not sure it actually IS good but I like it. Nostalgia is starting to sound good so the endtimes are probably nigh.

admrl, Monday, 16 July 2007 22:47 (eighteen years ago)

13 years now and I still can't work out whether or not this is a good record.

Keith, Monday, 16 July 2007 22:49 (eighteen years ago)

it is a record

admrl, Monday, 16 July 2007 22:54 (eighteen years ago)

Bloody great record. Still listen to it regularly , even more so than the debut. Saw them at the Barras and loved the gig.

If they ever reform I hope they just give a big fuck you to the people who only want to hear the 1st album and play this instead.

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy, Monday, 16 July 2007 22:58 (eighteen years ago)

Saw them at the Barras and loved the gig.

Me too!

Keith, Monday, 16 July 2007 22:59 (eighteen years ago)

it could do with losing that noisome run of tracks in the middle (daybreak, your star will shine, straight to the man), and 'good times'. then, move 'the foz' from track 90 to track 4 (thus becoming the centrepiece), sit back, and watch as people run screaming from the stereo.

if we're being honest, though, the only songs I *love* on this album are the first two and 'begging you'. most of the rest are ok.

Just got offed, Monday, 16 July 2007 23:01 (eighteen years ago)

it has some redeeming features, but not many.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 23:17 (eighteen years ago)

Dump your star will shine and straight to the man and its a great album. But you can't dump daybreak! Man that was soooo good live.

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy, Monday, 16 July 2007 23:24 (eighteen years ago)

I went on holiday and whilst away, the barrowlands tickets went on sale. I still remember the harsh laugh the woman at virgin tickets gave me when i phoned up a week later and asked if there were any tickets left.

not good times.

Hamildan, Monday, 16 July 2007 23:25 (eighteen years ago)

Critically Reviled Shite Albums Due A Re-evaluation Somebody Saying It's Shite : Stone Roses - Second Coming

Noodle Vague, Monday, 16 July 2007 23:33 (eighteen years ago)

lol Jim. I knew you would be along.

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:13 (eighteen years ago)

lol autopilot

Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 13:43 (eighteen years ago)

Did you actually buy it when it came out?

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 13:44 (eighteen years ago)

It was Mondays vs Roses when I were a lad. I was on Bez's side.

Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 13:47 (eighteen years ago)

"Ten Storey Lovesong" is gorgeous.

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 17:59 (eighteen years ago)

it's a decent record. miles worse than the debut, but still really fun to listen to from time to time. i particularly like 'ten storey love song', 'how do you sleep' and 'love spreads', all of which are testament to the fact they still had some spirit and energy left.

Charlie Howard, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 18:03 (eighteen years ago)

I also like the fact it's a darker record. Shakey otm upthread though.

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 18:06 (eighteen years ago)

Not about 'Tears' he's not. Beautiful track. They're like Ride to me, though - no matter how much I love 'em, there's no getting away from the fact that there's not a single great vocal on any of their tunes.

Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 21:47 (eighteen years ago)

Oh yeah, I like Tears shakey almost OTM then

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 21:50 (eighteen years ago)

'Tears' is more Fleetwood Mac than Led Zep.

Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 21:54 (eighteen years ago)

I loved the part in Shaun of the Dead when they're trying to figure out which of Shaun's LPs to throw at the zombies, and Shaun stops his friend from throwing Second Coming. His friend gives him a look and Shaun sheepishly says, "I liked it!"

The Deacon, Thursday, 19 July 2007 16:18 (eighteen years ago)

"Your Star Will Shine" and "Ten Story Love Song" rank among their best, if you ask me. At first I thought the latter was subpar and kind of schlocky, but I now find it very moving, particularly the lyrics. Maybe it's because of that whole bizarre One Love Story thing (in which the author claims the Stone Roses are messengers of God's love, the story of which, incidentally, would make a really great movie), but anyway, when I start paying attention to the lyrics of "Ten Story Love Song," in this new context, I find it incredibly poignant and touching.

Richard Wood Johnson, Thursday, 19 July 2007 16:41 (eighteen years ago)

ILM's fave britpop album POLL: Best Britpop Record based on AMG's Top Britpop Albums

Herman G. Neuname, Thursday, 26 July 2007 23:37 (eighteen years ago)

was this supposed to be the "joke vote" selection?

Richard Wood Johnson, Friday, 27 July 2007 12:42 (eighteen years ago)

No.

Herman G. Neuname, Friday, 27 July 2007 12:44 (eighteen years ago)

I'm really surprised then. While I like this album, I pretty much thought everyone else thought it mediocre and not really worthy of much attention. I voted for the first one, and I figured that anyone who liked the Stone Roses at all would have voted for that one.

Richard Wood Johnson, Friday, 27 July 2007 14:13 (eighteen years ago)

Like I said up above (on my other account) it's a very underrated album that just needs 2 songs removed from it.

Herman G. Neuname, Friday, 27 July 2007 14:14 (eighteen years ago)

Louis needs to hear this classic 90s lp.

Herman G. Neuname, Friday, 27 July 2007 14:17 (eighteen years ago)

hahahaha, i've already said what i think of it! first two tracks and 'begging you' classic, rest variable.

Just got offed, Friday, 27 July 2007 14:38 (eighteen years ago)

I know you play air guitar to this album.

Herman G. Neuname, Friday, 27 July 2007 14:42 (eighteen years ago)

for my sins, i will confess to dusting off the old air guitar for 'breaking into heaven'

Just got offed, Friday, 27 July 2007 14:46 (eighteen years ago)

It's not bad, but it's not compelling.

It just sits at the back of my record collection being slooowly squashed between other not bad but not compelling vinyl.

I bet the inner jacket is starting to smell now.

PhilK, Sunday, 29 July 2007 19:44 (eighteen years ago)

I'm surprised that so few people see "Your Star Will Shine" as one of the standout tracks.

Richard Wood Johnson, Sunday, 29 July 2007 23:27 (eighteen years ago)

So. Will there be any other albums in this series? "Tales From Topographic Oceans", "Their Satanic Majesties Request" and "The Elder" all need threads like this one.

Geir Hongro, Monday, 30 July 2007 00:59 (eighteen years ago)

I don't think Their Satanic Majesties Request needs one on ILM. Didn't it do rather well on the best albums poll?

Herman G. Neuname, Monday, 30 July 2007 01:01 (eighteen years ago)

Still critically reviled.

Geir Hongro, Monday, 30 July 2007 01:02 (eighteen years ago)

Nothing stopping you doing the thread yourself.

Herman G. Neuname, Monday, 30 July 2007 01:04 (eighteen years ago)

Phil K OTM. I honestly still cannot see any reason to return to this album. Ever. Again.

Bimble, Monday, 30 July 2007 01:20 (eighteen years ago)

I already did a TSMR thread, not so long ago.

Mark G, Monday, 30 July 2007 06:44 (eighteen years ago)

I'm sure the Yes album gets much love on ILM too.

Herman G. Neuname, Monday, 30 July 2007 09:02 (eighteen years ago)

It's probably only a matter of time until a dave matthews one exists,sadly.

Herman G. Neuname, Monday, 30 July 2007 09:04 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.