Madvanilla's a bad flava (Pitchfork bashing here)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Madvillain

"one of the most anticipated releases in underground rap history"

Ha Ha Ha! Oh that's a good one! You guys are just flooring me....

Yeah, uh, I suppose that's the case if URB (and once you're on the cover of URB, you're not really underground anymore, are you?) is your hip-hop bible and you're some indie rock boob who just recently jumped on the hip-hop bandwagon and backed it up by re-writing your entire "Best of" history to include the scores of hip-hop releases you previously ignored. Oh wait, I get it, you weren't "ignoring" them, you just didn't have room because all those articles chasing the same Pretty Girls Make Graves tour and endless MBV editorial nods took precedence.

What's worse, the same knob slobbering Pitchfork review quoted above excuses Madlib's own instance of musical sacrilege and chalks it up to his being a "distracted" artist. This prick get THE ENTIRE TROJAN RECORDS BACK CATALOG and what does he do with it? He whips up a half-assed mix in a day, showing zero respect for the very medium he claims to represent. The results check that attitude- a career of lazy, uninspired beats for ingnorant suburban hip-hop enthusiasts. The real crime here is that the rather talented MF Doom gets suckered into working with this poseur and takes a serious step down from his impressive prior outing. Madvillainy is a tepid, vanilla album that tricks the unknowing with scattered concepts and loads of run-up hype. Fools. Go back to the suburbs.

jsoulja, Thursday, 25 March 2004 23:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Do you think you'll be bringing us these screeds as often when Starbucks starts charging for net access?

Dare, Thursday, 25 March 2004 23:15 (twenty-two years ago)

zzzzzzz

oops (Oops), Thursday, 25 March 2004 23:16 (twenty-two years ago)

"a half-assed mix "!!???

that is an idiotic sentiment.

duke lib, Thursday, 25 March 2004 23:17 (twenty-two years ago)

No Starbucks here. Not ever. But I do respect your using it as an insult. And this was actually my first screed (outside the few I've sent to Pitchfork directly). And I say the mix is half-assed because IT IS. True, it has some competent moments (I didn't say it was a "shit" mix), but can you honestly say that it blew your mind?

jsoulja, Thursday, 25 March 2004 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)

yes

duke yes, Thursday, 25 March 2004 23:42 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread needs more Wilco.

Dare, Thursday, 25 March 2004 23:43 (twenty-two years ago)

what are you, an 'indie rock boob'? this guy is going to take you to town

duke warning, Thursday, 25 March 2004 23:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Fools. Go back to the suburbs.

Oh snap we've been out-gangsta'd.

(PS: Madvillian is the best album of the year)
(PPS: Instead of talking shit, can you NAME a more anticipated underground hip-hop release? Fantastic Damage is the only one I can think of that would come close, recently)

djdee2005, Thursday, 25 March 2004 23:59 (twenty-two years ago)

hey dudes --

the trojan mix is half-assed but jackson picked good songs; i thought we said that! as far as anticipation of this release: i don't know man, sure, everything's relative, but that enough people were so desperate to get their hands on private madlib mixtapes (which is what the demos were, in reality), that the demos were heard by as many people as they were (a simple search on $L$K would reveal that a lot people had dl'ed them), and that the demos were just that, demos that took were sat on, and took so long to be finished, i'd say there was an unusual sort of anticipation for this record. are you not stateside? maybe that's the issue.

Nick Sylvester, Thursday, 25 March 2004 23:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, you DO realize that Pfork != Rollie Pemberton?

djdee2005, Friday, 26 March 2004 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not some indie rock kid who just randomly started reviewing rap, if that's what you're wondering. If you wanted to put a real argument, you should've backtracked and noted that I've reviewed every relevant rap album in the last year or so. So I can't say I've been ignoring anything.

Since you're such an underground rap prodigy, let me in on the secret: what is a more anticipated underground (and yes, in my estimation, a record on an independant label with less than major distribution is underground, sorry I'm not reviewing like Genelec and Memphis Reigns or something) album this year? Or in the last four years? If you speak to any actual hip-hop heads (which I doubt), they probably can't name the last big long-awaited underground rap album.

The way you villify Madlib's style of beatmaking tells me not to take you very serious. Your whole criticism is weak to begin with. Scattered concepts? Expecting a completely linear from Doom or Madlib is like expecting you to come up with solid arguments: not likely. And what's wrong with the mix, exactly? I don't see what's wrong with it. And tell me how Madlib's beats are sloppy. I mean, surely considering you're like a train-jumping New York cypher slayer, you've got to have some idea of the internal workings of hip-hop production. Let me know why Jackson's loops and layers are shitty and lowly mixed and why RZA's (hypothetically) are considered classic by the hip-hop canon.

Your constant speak of me being suburban because I write rap reviews on an indie rock oriented site highlights your own insecurity. I'm inclined to think you're putting up a much bigger front than Madlib hypothetically is. You're just talking shit with no backup. Plus the whole "(PITCHFORK BASHING IN HERE, PLEASE BEFRIEND ME)" thing is a little more than awkward. There are real people out there that can supply you attention.

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Friday, 26 March 2004 00:02 (twenty-two years ago)

But I never left the suburbs!

oops (Oops), Friday, 26 March 2004 00:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm moving out of the hood next month, back to the suburbs (or at least a nicer neighborhood) and am fucking thrilled about it. The Madvillian record is crap though.

adam (adam), Friday, 26 March 2004 00:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Hahaha

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 26 March 2004 00:14 (twenty-two years ago)

if you're concerned with something like madlib's mix being "half-assed," such transparently athletic terminology will not effectively belie the possibilty that you just may not enjoy music like you think you do. this is what i meant.

duke athletic, Friday, 26 March 2004 00:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I like the threat aspect here. What are you going to "take me town with"- the Pitchfork Thesaurus Musicarum? Please don't- I might never recover from the onslaught of witty anecdotes....

Ok, first: indie does not equal underground. I could see the argument if we were talking about those demos, but how much hype have MF Doom and Madlib received since they dropped? Only enough to make them two of the biggest names in hip-hop out there today. And I'm not going to bow to some call-out for me to one-up a bigger underground release- I'm not saying I'm a walking encyclopedia of hip-hop history above and below ground. What I'm saying is that for anyone who has ever picked up their hip-hop from a street vendor's mixtape as opposed to a retail store, Madvillain is not underground, neither of them, not at this point anyway. Yes, agreed, good songs were picked for the Trojan mix, but half you guys could have done the same thing and you know it. If you don't agree- fine, whatever. Maybe I heard wrong. Maybe Madlib had that whole catalog for like three days and had to bust ass to drop that mix. If that's the case, I got no problem admitting error with the facts. But I've heard different from the same sources that praise him, and it made no sense to me that nobody bothered to call him on the fact that what he did was kind of insulting to Trojan. As for the RZA vs. Madlib beats- at least the RZA is wholly original. I've yet to hear a Madlib production that I could recognize as entirely his own. My opinion, again, but I'd take a bet on that one. And as for my insecurity via my tagging the screed "Pitchfork bashing"- nope, I'm afraid you've got that wrong. I just did that because I heard you guys hang out on this site. That was just me inviting a little debate, instigating it with the 'burbs. Not my fault you went for the bait. I actually like Pitchfork sometimes (especially the guy that brought back "oh snap"), but sometimes the writing is more ego than review (but again, my opinion). Your taking such offense suggests maybe that you're the insecure one, but I'm not even going to say that, because I don't know you. I'm just saying that the Madvillain Pitchfork review doesn't hold up. What I'm not hearing is anyone saying why it does......

jsoulja, Friday, 26 March 2004 00:38 (twenty-two years ago)

oh, I just got told it was bad form to write big posts like that on this site

my bad

jsoulja, Friday, 26 March 2004 00:44 (twenty-two years ago)

"I like the threat aspect here. What are you going to "take me town with"- the Pitchfork Thesaurus Musicarum? Please don't- I might never recover from the onslaught of witty anecdotes...."

well i was implying that you were the threat, as he was likely fodder for your rather immense arsenal. i was urging him to get out before the blast. some of us don't have enough anecdotes left in the clip.

duke limn, Friday, 26 March 2004 00:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I've yet to hear a Madlib production that I could recognize as entirely his own.

What?!? I can indentify a Madlib production from the first few bars usually.

Sure there are people less well-known than Madlib and MF, thereby making them---in your eyes--the "real underground" or some shit. But, um, when's the last time you saw either of them on BET or MTV or on your hip hop radio station?

oops (Oops), Friday, 26 March 2004 00:50 (twenty-two years ago)

"most anticipated in underground hip-hop history" is kind of a weird statement to make i guess ... hardcore hip-hop fans are usually most excited about new Gang Starr or Nas shit than Doom. i feel like the people who get really excited about new Doom or Madlib are either Doom and Madlib fanatics or indie kids who happen to dig independent hip-hop. definitely an anticipated album but that's not really saying a whole lot considering who's anticipating it. it's going to keep fans happy and it won't exactly court new audiences, so it's probably not going to change anyone's mind.

that said the review was pretty on point. i just wish there'd been more discussion about just how the album's "forward looking" with the "roots" it stays close to. what i love about it is that it's basically a series of fragments (vs. full songs) that (despite Madlib's minimalist tack) keeps up the feeling of "sampled-ness" which has been totally contrived in most boom-bap since 1997 or so.

ryan kuo (ryan kuo), Friday, 26 March 2004 00:53 (twenty-two years ago)

who cares whether it's the most anticipated album or not?

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 26 March 2004 01:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Chronic anticipaters?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 26 March 2004 01:02 (twenty-two years ago)

actuaries?

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 26 March 2004 01:02 (twenty-two years ago)

good point- definitely not on MTV or the like, but I did grow up listening to hip-hop radio that played this level of exposure (and much lower) regularly, so this is just not what I'd consider underground

jsoulja, Friday, 26 March 2004 01:03 (twenty-two years ago)

"most anticipated in underground hip-hop history" is kind of a weird statement to make i guess ... hardcore hip-hop fans are usually most excited about new Gang Starr or Nas shit than Doom. i feel like the people who get really excited about new Doom or Madlib are either Doom and Madlib fanatics or indie kids who happen to dig independent hip-hop. definitely an anticipated album but that's not really saying a whole lot considering who's anticipating it. it's going to keep fans happy and it won't exactly court new audiences, so it's probably not going to change anyone's mind.

I donno about that. Nas and Gang Starr are both on major labels and get video play from MTV. I think tons of underground heads dig Doom and Madlib...I mean, anyone who remembers KMD would want to hear this album. If you ask pretty much anyone down w/ underground hip-hop about doom, they'll at least have an opinion about him, in my experience.

djdee2005, Friday, 26 March 2004 01:03 (twenty-two years ago)

And as far as beat-diggers and anyone into that sorta thing, Madlib is like god.

djdee2005, Friday, 26 March 2004 01:04 (twenty-two years ago)

HE IS GOD

duke christ, Friday, 26 March 2004 01:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah but when ILMers are anticipating something there's emphatic care-ing. Why rain on someone else's parade?

Dare, Friday, 26 March 2004 01:10 (twenty-two years ago)

these threads are tedious alright.

Hi! I like MadVillain! Hi! Does it sound like the King Gedorah? Hey! I'm spotting samples!

Use a chatroom...

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 26 March 2004 01:12 (twenty-two years ago)

i am an underground head and i don't like madlib. "shades of blue" was yawnsome. "blunted in the bomb shelter" i don't really think of as production work. not so enthused by lootpack or quasimoto, either.

can someone here do a madlib POX or something? he's done a shitload of productions that i haven't heard and i'd like someone to convince me otherwise.

madlib POX rollie, please!!

vahid (vahid), Friday, 26 March 2004 01:13 (twenty-two years ago)

One wonders what mullygrubber thinks of all this.

Dare, Friday, 26 March 2004 01:14 (twenty-two years ago)

jsoulja you can write at any length you feel like here as far as I'm aware.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 26 March 2004 01:14 (twenty-two years ago)

anticon is double negative

duke prop, Friday, 26 March 2004 01:19 (twenty-two years ago)

I donno about that. Nas and Gang Starr are both on major labels and get video play from MTV. I think tons of underground heads dig Doom and Madlib...I mean, anyone who remembers KMD would want to hear this album. If you ask pretty much anyone down w/ underground hip-hop about doom, they'll at least have an opinion about him, in my experience.

i get what you mean about Nas and Gang Starr, i guess the idea of an underground release being anticipated by underground heads doesn't seem all that impressive to me ... although i guess you're right on the latter point. now that i think of the ones i've talked to.

ryan kuo (ryan kuo), Friday, 26 March 2004 01:20 (twenty-two years ago)

i was in fat beats on tuesday and their sales blurb for madvillain sure did make it sound like the most anticipated underground hip hop release in a while (if that means anything at all.)

a, Friday, 26 March 2004 01:58 (twenty-two years ago)

i wish i was a REAL internet hip hop head like jsoulja.

And the whole thing about Madlib not being recongnizable or wholly original is suspect. Regardless of whether or not you like him, Madlib is both one of the most original producers in the "underground" or elsewhere.

s>c>, Friday, 26 March 2004 02:34 (twenty-two years ago)

"what is a more anticipated underground (and yes, in my estimation, a record on an independant label with less than major distribution is underground, sorry I'm not reviewing like Genelec and Memphis Reigns or something) album this year?"

But you said "ever." I just think you're way off on this one.

ppp, Friday, 26 March 2004 02:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Yea, no one cared when these guys put out: Dr. Octagon, El-P, Gravediggaz, Jedi Mind Tricks, Mr. Lif, MURS, Prince Paul presents, Beatnuts, Jeru The Damaja ...

jack pot, Friday, 26 March 2004 03:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Gravediggaz was some underground shit! Like, underground in the sewers!

Dare, Friday, 26 March 2004 03:08 (twenty-two years ago)

hey rollie did you mention the comic books just to assure pfor readers that dorkery was o.k. even if you liked hip hop or was there y'know, some sort of POINT?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 26 March 2004 03:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Honestly, I thought it was just catering to readership.

Dare, Friday, 26 March 2004 03:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I dunno, I think both the producer and rapper of this album are complete shit. The beats are boring and the mf raps like he is reading his raps after dicovering em for the first time since he wrote 'em in a drunken stupor (drunken because his raps are usually dumb). Not sure why the indie folks here like such boring bullshit. Has anyone heard raw produce or the cadence album? And that's a goddamn shame, because those dudes are really putting something down that took time.

jack pot, Friday, 26 March 2004 03:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Apparently its not just "indie folks" falling for it, cuz every hip-hop head I talk to pretty much loves it.

djdee2005, Friday, 26 March 2004 03:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I've yet to hear a Madlib production that I could recognize as entirely his own.

This pretty much killed your argument. People can talk all the shit they want about Madlib, but he has an obvious, individual style. Chances are, you, underground hip hop genius, haven't really heard much of Madlib's work and are just dissing him about a good mark on this review and some demo he whipped up.

What I'm saying is that for anyone who has ever picked up their hip-hop from a street vendor's mixtape as opposed to a retail store

I go to Harlem frequently and pay for overpriced mixtapes. That doesn't make my opinion on the underground anymore important though.

Yea, no one cared when these guys put out: Dr. Octagon, El-P, Gravediggaz, Jedi Mind Tricks, Mr. Lif, MURS, Prince Paul presents, Beatnuts, Jeru The Damaja ...

I'm talking in recent years. El-P was the last underground album I saw major anticipation for in the underground. Dr. Octagon was not anticipated a lot before it dropped. Jedi Mind Tricks? Who can't wait to hear Vinnie Paz kill gay people? Mr. Lif is not someone that people wait for an album from, to be honest. I'm a fan but people aren't going to freak out when he drops some shit. Same with Murs. And since when are Jeru, Beatnuts, Gravediggaz and Prince Paul underground? They were near-gold selling artists in most cases, at one point. Fuck, I'm totally sick of the whole underground cred discussion anyway, just stating some opinions.

hey rollie did you mention the comic books just to assure pfor readers that dorkery was o.k. even if you liked hip hop or was there y'know, some sort of POINT?

It connects directly to the concept of the album, the review style and it was something to draw in the reader. You're grasping at straws. Is there a point to your constant antagonism?

madlib POX rollie, please!!

Quasimoto "Microphone Mathematics (Remix)"
Madlib "Stepping Into Tomorrow" (i know you didn't like the Blue Note stuff, but I love this song)
Jaylib "Champion Sound" (quite a raw beat)
Yesterday's New Quintet "Visions"
Lootpack "Questions" (one of his definitive beats, real stripped down)
Cappadonna "Slang Editorial (Madlib Remix)"
Beastie Boys "Shake Your Rump (Madlib Remix)"
Peanut Butter Wolf "Definition of Ill (Remix)"
Vast Aire "Look Ma No Hands"

How familiar are you with the Quasimoto record? Cause those are some of his strongest beats.

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:12 (twenty-two years ago)

haha rollie when i go to harlem i pay for cheap mixtapes! i pay for cheap mixtapes over at the village too, or on canal st!

i also pay for cheap mixtapes in boston!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:19 (twenty-two years ago)

fuck of all the overpriced music i've bought in my life, mixtapes have never been among it.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:20 (twenty-two years ago)

um, fairly familiar with quasimoto. honestly, i wouldn't be surprised if madlib just didn't do it for me. i'll check out the POX and get back to you. if i was snarky i'd point out there's no madvanilla on it (i'm a nice guy, though). would any of the tracks on this project make the POXX at least??

vahid (vahid), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Canal Street is good for everything on the cheap, is it not?

WHAT I'M SAYING IS, in Harlem, I find that the prices of mixtapes have raised over the years. From like $10 for 3 to like $20 for 3 in some spots. It's a crazy shift, that's why I say that.

vahid, I didn't put it on there because I assumed you already heard it. Madvillain is TOTALLY necessary:

"Raid"
"Meat Grinder"
"Figaro"
"ALL CAPS"
"Great Day"
"Supervillain Theme" (ridiculous beat)

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:31 (twenty-two years ago)

The "Definition of Ill" remix lives up to its title.

oops (Oops), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:35 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah and gum used to be a nickel too.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:38 (twenty-two years ago)

.....

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:39 (twenty-two years ago)

honestly, i'm sort of put off by the mask. 'king geedorah' was sort of nice, but i wasn't going to pick this up. i'm more interested in the madlib debate.

love the cover design, though. very classy.

vahid (vahid), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:42 (twenty-two years ago)

what is the madlib debate? some people think he's super-neato, some think he's boring. some people smoke weed, some people don't.

oops (Oops), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:44 (twenty-two years ago)

FUCK YOU

vahid (vahid), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:46 (twenty-two years ago)

now that's a debate

vahid (vahid), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, but arguments about undie rap are always really amusing cuz of the "you don't know real hip hop", "this shit ain't the 'real underground'", "hey I buy my mixtapes in Harlem" and "I know lots of headz who are into this", etc bullshit which goes along with them. It's very cute.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:48 (twenty-two years ago)

that's not bullshit!! that's a debate in itself that's been fun for going on two years now.

vahid (vahid), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:49 (twenty-two years ago)

YOU FUCK.

the floor is yours (Oops), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Hahaha it's bullshit, but that doesn't mean it isn't amusing.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:50 (twenty-two years ago)

haha that was masterful, oops. ;)

vahid (vahid), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:52 (twenty-two years ago)

anyway, what's up with the "Madvanilla" thing?

oops (Oops), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:55 (twenty-two years ago)

i think he was just calling madlib + mf doom bland. i think it's catchy. though i love french vanilla better than many more pungent iced creams.

vahid (vahid), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:56 (twenty-two years ago)

No, it's the hotly anticipated dancehall-dub collab between Snow and the Mad Professor!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:56 (twenty-two years ago)

"one of the most anticipated releases in canadian music history"

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:57 (twenty-two years ago)

oh so he's like trife except not funny

oops (Oops), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, but he actually argued points, so I give him some credit.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:58 (twenty-two years ago)

also you could say that about lots of people on this board, and while trife's humor is pretty fucking formidable but far from the best thing about him.

also mf doom not smooth and buttery enough to be french vanilla.

vahid (vahid), Friday, 26 March 2004 04:58 (twenty-two years ago)

jsoulja you still around? I have a question.
What do you want out of a record, generally speaking: to soothe you or to excite you? Cause I find that a lot of the music I like gets criticized as being boring, sleep-inducing. Do you use music as weed or as coke? (of course, one can do both, but oftentimes one has a strong preference. I myself use it as a soother, and rarely listen to anything with a BPM over 110)

oops (Oops), Friday, 26 March 2004 05:04 (twenty-two years ago)

You can throw the same "so there, Mr. Underground genius..." diss all night long (which I've already said that I wasn't, from the start, though your hammering it home over and over sure suggests that you think YOU are), but you're not going to get around the fact that saying "underground...in history" is way out of proportion. You can throw it back at me for trash talking, you can argue that YOU think Madlib and/or the Madvillain record is the shit (where we definitely disagree), but there are just too many rappers out there who got their start on those mix tapes or demos that floated around before they dropped their smaller label debut to hold up your end of this argument. I don't want to get into any debate about what constitutes "underground", either. I don't even think it has the same meaning as it would have in, say, '85. But you did say "underground...in history" and I think that's laughable. And, yes, actually, I have heard much of Madlib's output, and I don't think he's canon fodder, but I do think he's way over-hyped, way generic, and that whole Trojan issue (which nobody has touched with a 10-ft-pole because they know that's messed up) leaves me sour on him.

jsoulja, Friday, 26 March 2004 05:17 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, oops, that's right- Madvanilla was me thinking I was all clever and shit, basically saying the record doesn't dazzle. At least I'm arguing a point here. I guess I could have been all happy and made my first entry "Dude, how about those strings on 'Curtis'? Amazing...", but Pitchfork's hip-hop coverage still stirs me up sometimes. Someone please tell me what the Madlib "style" is! Everyone who's shot back at me makes this one of their points, but nobody has yet to identify....

jsoulja, Friday, 26 March 2004 05:32 (twenty-two years ago)

I must have missed this (I am definitely not an Underground genius obv haha) but is this Madlib/Trojan Records some sort of Laswell remixes Miles Davis thing (or Madlib remixes Blue Note thing glah) or is it just a straight mix of hits from the Trojan vaults?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 26 March 2004 05:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't see what the Trojan thing (which I haven't heard, since I have a lot of those songs anyway) has to do with Madlib the producer.

oops (Oops), Friday, 26 March 2004 05:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Does anyone want to talk about the record? We have TWO motherfucking threads going and they are BOTH about the merits of the fucking Rollie Pemberton review. I personally thought it was a good review, but so what?

Let's talk about the record, bashing reviews is boring.

The record is great; I enjoy the way Madlib kind of apes doom's style without losing his distinctive sounds (yeah, madlib is distinctive). It's not immediately as catchy or upbeat as former doom efforts, but his flow is still hysterically great.

Or you can go to the other Madvillian thread and talk about the record there.

OR we could have a big party and write angry letters to pitchfork!

Scott, Friday, 26 March 2004 05:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Or you could just start another thread?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 26 March 2004 05:42 (twenty-two years ago)

(jk please don't)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 26 March 2004 05:43 (twenty-two years ago)

someone explain to me what the point of a track like "horny" is? ok its sorta novel to sample really grotty sounding out of tune jazz and its sort of noval to mumble through a simple rhyme scheme but...?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 26 March 2004 05:50 (twenty-two years ago)

novel that is.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 26 March 2004 05:51 (twenty-two years ago)

i mean after the "ooh you can sample lounge music" rush wears off, what's left?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 26 March 2004 05:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha and I was gonna get my Pitchfork Thesaurus Musicarum and check what "noval" is, dammit.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 26 March 2004 05:52 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe they liked how it sounds.

oops (Oops), Friday, 26 March 2004 05:54 (twenty-two years ago)

1. The Illest Villains (Dumile/Jackson)
2. Accordion (Dumile/Jackson)
3. Meat Grinder (Dumile/Jackson)
4. Bistro (Dumile/Jackson)
5. Raid performed by Madvillain / M.E.D. AKA Medaphoar
6. America's Most Blunted performed by Madvillain / Lord Ques
7. Sickfit [instrumental] (Jackson)
8. Rainbows (Dumile/Jackson)
9. Curls (Dumile/Jackson)
10. Do Not Fire! [instrumental] (Jackson)
11. Money Folder (Dumile/Jackson)
12. Shadows of Tomorrow performed by Madvillain / Lord Ques
13. Operation Lifesaver AKA Mint Test (Dumile/Jackson)
14. Figaro (Dumile/Jackson)
15. Hardcore Hustle performed by Madvillain / Wildchild
16. Strange Ways (Dumile/Jackson)
17. Fancy Clown performed by Madvillain / Viktor Vaughn
18. Eye performed by Madvillain / Stacy Epps
19. Supervillain Theme [instrumental] (Jackson)
20. All Caps (Dumile/Jackson)
21. Great Day Today (Dumile/Jackson/Lord Scotch 79)
22. Rhinestone Cowboy (Dumile/Jackson)

"horny"?

djdee2005, Friday, 26 March 2004 06:07 (twenty-two years ago)

jsoulja, i just talked to rollie, and we want to make your rap debut the most anticipated record in history – like, even more anticipated than the next busdriver album -- let's talk

Nick Sylvester, Friday, 26 March 2004 06:36 (twenty-two years ago)

mush(y)

a reassessment of cher is playing right now eastvillaegradio.com

duke bono, Friday, 26 March 2004 06:38 (twenty-two years ago)

eastvillageradio.com

duke reassessed, Friday, 26 March 2004 06:39 (twenty-two years ago)

hey, jsoulja, "Don't be hatin'!"

http://malibusmostwanted.warnerbros.com/assets/gallery/20.jpg

JaXoN (JasonD), Friday, 26 March 2004 07:05 (twenty-two years ago)

http://malibusmostwanted.warnerbros.com/assets/gallery/20.jpg

JaXoN (JasonD), Friday, 26 March 2004 07:06 (twenty-two years ago)

one of the trax on the bootleg dj.Ä

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 26 March 2004 07:18 (twenty-two years ago)

released as "all caps" which i think is the single?›

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 26 March 2004 07:21 (twenty-two years ago)

while we're at it how corny are the lyrics on "shadows of tomorrow"?

this is like everything that people make fun of undie rap for being.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 26 March 2004 07:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Jason..your wrong. That photo should have been Pro-Zach which was recently dumped from Dreamworks...except for the fact that Foreign Legion rocks. Where's DJ Design in that photo?

cRaiG (craig!), Friday, 26 March 2004 07:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Ahh yeah. What a great track. How about
1. Doom's rapping is superb - clever, it has character, and it sounds just awesome
2. the loop is beautiful...its a great beat? I mean, criticizing Madlib for sampling "grotty sounding out of tune jazz" is like criticizing the RZA for his off-kilter production.

djdee2005, Friday, 26 March 2004 07:51 (twenty-two years ago)

it's pretty obvious madlib has a "sound". it's all those things people keep critisizing & praising him for on this thread. he's got a stoned, kinda sloppy sound and great, obscure or slightly off samples. i mean, he calls himself the loopdigger. when he started getting big under his own name, he was rolling with kids from LA that were doing the same thing (Thes, Einstein). sorta throwback 95 era looped beats, but i think he's far surpassed them.

JaXoN (JasonD), Friday, 26 March 2004 17:50 (twenty-two years ago)

“Someone please tell me what the Madlib "style" is!”

It's kinda hard to talk about a Madlib aesthetic because he employs so many different styles, but here are my impressions of his hop productions: loop heavy - Madlib rarely chops his shit up, listen to him lifting the "Dharmatma Theme Music (sad)" for "Champion Sound" for an example - and I think that a lot of the appeal is context rather than technique (obviously), records like Quasimoto and Madvillain almost have this late-nite dial surfing quality and it seems that he functions in some nether region between a DJ and a producer where his incredible ear for samples is just as important as anything that he’s going to do with them individually, although he does get creative with what he choses to use and where he uses it (i.e., the percussive elements); his earlier stuff was more focused on traditional hip hop song structures and beat building, but with Quas he started to improvise more and employ looser jazz breaks, but then he moved way beyond that for the Jaylib and Madvillain records as far as the scope of what he samples; he has a generally uncluttered sound, although obviously not clean; on the Quasimoto and Madvillain albums esp., he has a lot of segue ways between songs and reuses similar spoken samples throughout to create this sort of self-contained world (ala RZA). Despite the ADD focus and lack of song structure, his albums have a narrative quality to them, really…there seems to be motifs that weave in and out of of the album and he’s working within these parameters that aren’t entirely evident at first, but emerge on repeated plays; I think that Sterling is right and that a lot of Madlib’s initial appeal is one of novelty and on a conceptual tip (like “oh shit, he’s doing what?”) but it’s both how well the novelties work and the slow/ hypnotic/ head-nodding quality of the beats that keeps bringing you back; I also think that it works to his advantage that his productions is often so “off” or sloppy…for one thing it gives off this really unselfconscious vibe that makes it seem kinda experimental and different without being pretentious or needless complex, and it also has a way of sticking in your head. Granted, it’s on a stoned sort of tip, and it’s probably not as social as Sterling would like it to be or as structured/polished as others would need, but I enjoy it.

And he’s also hella prolific – which I realize doesn’t count for that much, but when you release or produce like six albums in a years time (Blue Note, Trojan thing, Wildchild, Jaylib, Dudley Perkins, Madvillain) then its great if you’re a fan and doesn’t require so high of a batting average. And I will say this about the Trojan thing: it wasn’t anything special, but I’m glad that he released it and I have listened to it a few times (although more for just the songs than what Madlib does with them).

Sterling, I somehow doubt that Madlib even wrote “Shades of Tomorrow.” If you listen to every other song he's done, it just doesn’t sound like him, and if he did it was just as a homage to Sun Ra – who I guess was the prototype for indie emcees.

s>c>, Friday, 26 March 2004 20:49 (twenty-two years ago)

just wanted to toss in a bratty seconding of chuck's frequent comment that "head-nodding" is about the least exciting description of a beat around.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 26 March 2004 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)

"Shades of Tomorrow" is actually a poem by Sun Ra.

djdee2005, Friday, 26 March 2004 21:10 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, head-nodding is pretty vague. i should've cross-checked my post with the "words sterling and chuck don't approve of" list.

s>c>, Friday, 26 March 2004 21:25 (twenty-two years ago)

s>c>, thank you for fleshing out my thoughts. it's times like those that i realize i'm more a fan than a writer (which i'm not at all)

JaXoN (JasonD), Friday, 26 March 2004 22:14 (twenty-two years ago)

one year passes...
uh-huh.

@@, Wednesday, 6 April 2005 03:12 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.