Jess - regarding yr blog post sunday March 21st on Crunk

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Perhaps this has been discussed here but I wouldn't know how to search for it (what are there, 200 threads on crunk now?) but for a huge period in the early-mid 90s, the hip-hop loverman became a big, big deal - the beginnings of it can be seen on GZA's first album (pre-liquid swords), Pete Rock and CL Smooth's albums (where CL Smooth epitimizes "control" and various other tracks from Gang Starr, Wu Tang ("you're all that I need, I'll be there for you"), Pharcyde, and even 2Pac ("Do For Love"...does that count?) etc.
I know this isn't a popular period for hip hop on ILM for reasons unfathomable to me(The popist approach to hip-hop? Not that I have a problem with that approach, its just as right as any other, but if it means one can't appreciate Pete Rock, it hurts me right here [gesturing to heart].)

djdee2005, Thursday, 1 April 2004 02:07 (twenty-one years ago)

http://othernessblue.blogspot.com/2004_03_21_othernessblue_archive.html#107992053193109508 is the link for those interested.

Also, I really like yr analysis of sexism and related problems w/in crunk. Although I think it might be wishful thinking to suggest that it's not "going anywhere" - that's patently ridiculous. Whether or not we like what they are saying - and I agree with you, it's horrible - you can't argue that it isn't doing things that have never been done and that it will undoubtedly influence other music.

djdee2005, Thursday, 1 April 2004 02:10 (twenty-one years ago)

And while we're talking about Technicolor - yes, I would like to see some stuff about Westchester (or is it West Chester?).

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Thursday, 1 April 2004 02:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm confused what you are asking, dee? Are you arguing that the mid-90s loverman ideal was a more "sexualized vision of rap" than Crunk? Or are you just curious why people on ILM don't rep more for Pete Rock?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 1 April 2004 02:36 (twenty-one years ago)

that's thuh post that got mah name on the blissblog! salute!

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 1 April 2004 02:37 (twenty-one years ago)

i just moved today and am about to collapse but two notes first:

1. any time i come up with some keerazy overarching theory on technicolor its generally full of all sorts of oversights, holes, big logical leaps (possibly [probably] total bullshit.) this is why it goes on technicolor in the first place. i'm just throwing stuff out.

BUT

i do think that - for whatever reason(s) - rap has gotten more sexual over the last couple years, in a few different ways. the loverman mc isn't new, no (superlover cee holla at me), but i do think there's been a weird explosion of them circa 2000-present (also the "love thug" etc. pac is clearly the progenitor of this; ja rule is like some sick lovechild born of "keep yr head up" and "i get around".)

2. crunk not "going anywhere" means i can't figure out how it could "evolve", without becoming something else entirely. (it's tunnel-vision is one of the most exciting things about it.) "yeah" is one way, but that's merely adding a new vocal style (and possibly changing venues...VH1 vs. 106 & park(.

2A. for all i slag it off, i do find this stuff impossibly thrilling at times.

okay i sleep now

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 1 April 2004 03:06 (twenty-one years ago)

on the crunk evolution tip i think further dancehall crossover is one obv thing -- the beenie man single sounds almost like its over a riddim derived from salt shaker.

also i really disagreed with the shouting at women in strip clubs deal coz its like sasha linked to on his blog that slate piece about all the gals dying to get on girls gone wild and he wrote "this is the question right now" and yeah -- why and what this means IS the question and on some overarching scale its v.v. ugly but like i've argued before its not per se a problem with say mystikal asking a girl to shake her ass and the girl shakin it enthusiastically. its more in the onesidedness, the deliniation of the roles, the strict terrain over which the give & take takes place. also food for thought -- the thulani davis article on disrespect in the voice which i found provocative though deeply wrong and also sometimes surface-level wrong too (since when is "shorty" just a synonym for "trick"!?)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 1 April 2004 03:14 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah me not being able to see how it could evolve is mostly due to my own lack of imagination at the moment, where as grime's various strands and half-formed ideas and tangents are out there for the world to see, so you can extrapolate various "futures" much more easily.

if i really wanted to ponder the eternal question of why people want to debase themselves (with no money changing hands even), i could just walk down to frat row tonight.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 1 April 2004 03:19 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't hear that much "guys shouting at strippers." most of the time when lil jon talks to the bitches and all the real girls, he's just giving them the same instructions that he's given the niggas that aren't afraid to throw their sets up. he's being inclusive, because there are lots of bitches and real girls that aren't afraid to throw their sets up and if they are afraid to throw their sets up, they deserve to get the fuck out the club, too. on kings of crunk when he gets out of hand on bitch, chyna white is allowed to shout back at him and other than, get low and play no games, the most sexual tracks are the girlie ones near the end.

William Wiggins, Thursday, 1 April 2004 03:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm confused what you are asking, dee? Are you arguing that the mid-90s loverman ideal was a more "sexualized vision of rap" than Crunk? Or are you just curious why people on ILM don't rep more for Pete Rock?

I'm arguing that there WAS a positive, "in control" postive sexual male role model in early 90s hip-hop that she skipped as if old school had jumped to mannie fresh and then to crunk.
I'm saying that there are plenty of the kinds of sexual ideals she speaks of in early 90s hip-hop.

And also, I can definitely see Crunk going in a lot of directions - it IS going in a lot of directions! Compare David Banner's production to Lil Jon's - Completely unique, yet part of the same mvmnt.

djdee2005, Thursday, 1 April 2004 04:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmm I wonder if Jess's big essay *does* read differently if you assume the author is female...

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 1 April 2004 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Hahaha I was trying to figure out whose article was being talked about and then Tim posted.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 1 April 2004 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I sort of wish Jess was a girl. Then I would ask him to be my co-Twin Of Destiny.

As is he has to settle for being Matt Damon.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 1 April 2004 05:09 (twenty-one years ago)

To your Ben Affleck?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 1 April 2004 05:11 (twenty-one years ago)

To my Greg Kinnear apparently!

Can I trade this analogy in for a better one anytime soon?

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 1 April 2004 05:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Matt Damon is such a whore (Ben Affleck, Casey Affleck, Greg Kinnear, Jude Law. . . is the guy in movies where he doesn't have a "close" male bond.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 1 April 2004 05:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Franka Potente, too!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 1 April 2004 05:20 (twenty-one years ago)

i think one of the places jess was most OTM was about crunk more as a marketing gimmick than anything else -- like it galls me when ppl. throw in for example lil flip or whatever.

i mean there's lots of southern sounds at work but lil john seems like he's got a lock on the "crunk" thing right now -- banners' tracks sound distinct enough that even if they WERE crunk where the word's going they may not be. Bone Crusher on the other hand?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 1 April 2004 05:53 (twenty-one years ago)

wait GZA had an album before Liquid Swords? Or do you mean Prince "Oooh We Love You" Rakeem?

oops (Oops), Thursday, 1 April 2004 05:59 (twenty-one years ago)

he did, it's called Life of a Drug Dealer (and no, the song of that title from Liquid Swords is not on it).

hstencil, Thursday, 1 April 2004 06:03 (twenty-one years ago)

"Life of a Drug Dealer" is a song on it. The album is called Words From the Genius (and it's recorded under the name Genius, not GZA.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 1 April 2004 06:05 (twenty-one years ago)

oh right, shit. Well I haven't seen or heard it since 1997. If memory serves, it wasn't that hot anyway.

hstencil, Thursday, 1 April 2004 06:07 (twenty-one years ago)

No, it's supposed to be pretty average BUT apparently it's worth some money cuz amazon.com lists it at $70!?!?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 1 April 2004 06:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Duh! I even own a single ("Pass the Bone", which features Prince Rak..I mean RZA) from that album.

oops (Oops), Thursday, 1 April 2004 06:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Even when rap is at its most oiled up, loverman bravado overloaded there’s something queerly formal and abstract about it all.

I really don't get this line.

jesus nathalie (nathalie), Thursday, 1 April 2004 06:14 (twenty-one years ago)

haha my apologies to jess assuming he was a women (completely irrelevent to my argument incidently).
That Genius album is a fun listen. Not particularly GREAT per se, but enjoyable - esp. the single that pre-dated it, "Come Do Me". V. much like what the juice crew was dropping at that time.
Big Daddy Kane, incidently, was the original lovaman. "Smooth Operator" and shit.

djdee2005, Thursday, 1 April 2004 07:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Crunk is a pretty broad genre btw.

djdee2005, Thursday, 1 April 2004 07:01 (twenty-one years ago)

nah, I've met ugly girls that listen to it too

oops (Oops), Thursday, 1 April 2004 07:15 (twenty-one years ago)

ba-dum

djdee2005, Thursday, 1 April 2004 07:16 (twenty-one years ago)

[crash]

djdee2005, Thursday, 1 April 2004 07:16 (twenty-one years ago)

i'll be here all week, folks. don't forget to tip your waitress. etc etc.

oops (Oops), Thursday, 1 April 2004 07:22 (twenty-one years ago)

so dj who's crunk then? is t.i.? three six? ugk? eightball? drama? slip & slide? (one of the places where jess was most OFF the money -- i mean i can tell all these guys apart real easy and i think most ppl can) is Juve The Great crunk?

i mean if we're doing crunk :: oi then there's one whole clique, if we're doing crunk sonically there's another, etc. and in some ways the real question is one of projection -- where we expect the label will end up, if it will come to mean "southern" or end up meaning "lil john produced or" end up meaning particular sonics, maybe a particular bpm, or just a constellation of artists coming up together and sharing guest spots?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 1 April 2004 08:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Verry good questions you have posed and I don't think I could come up w/ a specific description...I just always "call it when i see it" so to speak. the first time I heard the term crunk was the "welcome to atlanta" music video (a classic, surely). I think the main difference between Crunk and grime would be how crunk doesn't describe a specific sound - or perhaps that Crunk is quite a bit further along in the evolution of its sound (has incorporated more influences, etc)? Grime seems relatively new in comparison.
Constellation of artists + specific aggressive musical aesthetic based on various southern groups, Miami Bass and its evolution thru Mannie Fresh? I donno I'm not as familiar w/ southern hip-hop as some, perhaps someone can help us out here.

djdee2005, Thursday, 1 April 2004 08:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Who are the major influences on David Banner and Lil Jon's sound, I mean....
Miami bass
mantronix
New York hip-hop (obv)
Scarface/Geto Boys
etc...?

djdee2005, Thursday, 1 April 2004 08:50 (twenty-one years ago)

NO LIMIT

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 1 April 2004 09:13 (twenty-one years ago)

(possible tangent: flow as sexy/feminine)(and how this changes w. crunk)

m., Thursday, 1 April 2004 10:01 (twenty-one years ago)

on the crunk evolution tip i think further dancehall crossover is one obv thing -- the beenie man single sounds almost like its over a riddim derived from salt shaker

tanya s has actually done one on the salt shaker rhythm: this was bound to happen. dizzee at fabric last night was spitting over the instrumental of get low, too. it's been said b4 but there's not much separating grime from crunk, except geography and a certain attitude

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Saturday, 10 April 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Money is probably the biggest difference between grimy n crunk.

Noone ever recognises Hypnotized Minds' influence on grime. They pretty much invented the get buck get wild tear da club up concept.

scg, Saturday, 10 April 2004 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)

(that should be Hypnotized Minds' influence on CRUNK not GRIME)

I think the dancehall crossover issue is more to do with the fact that the current biggest rap beats are by Lil Jon. I don't think crunk beats are anymore suited to bashment crossover than other big rap beats in the past couple of years.

scg, Saturday, 10 April 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)

in attitude, i'd say they are. but maybe that's just because i have a bit of inside perspective. i've had a couple of interesting conversations with elephant man and the member s of TOK regarding why the particularly like lil jon and why they're are/have working/worked with him. i'm looking forward to TOK-meets-ATL bashcrunk, personally. think it will be a winning combo: the stripped-bare grind of crunk rhythms and the maximalist flamboyance of TOK's ultramelodic take on dancehall...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Saturday, 10 April 2004 16:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Crunk = "crazy drunk" if anyone was wondering.

djdee2005, Saturday, 10 April 2004 18:29 (twenty-one years ago)

From the blog linked to above:


"Crunk's Fear Factor

On the matter of music, I've not bought much lately at all. Put it down to poverty and the fact that I can't seem to find a few hours to go record shopping. However, of all the recent crunk discourse, I can't help thinking blissblog's idea that the entire genre can be distilled into two words, "beef and rump", the most astute.
Rump = the Ying Yang Twins' "Salt Shaker":
Face the wall shawty, put your hands on it
Bounce that ass up and down make a nigga want it
Roll that ass round and round like a motherfuckin' wheel
Shake that shit this ain't no motherfuckin' drill.
As technicolor says, crunk is aggressively masculine and, for all its libidinous preoccupations, utterly sexless and in crippling denial of any kind of feminine side. Just listen to the beats; there's no funk, no swing, no warmth. Like the sexual boasts they soundtrack, there's no shred of humanity whatsoever, just cold, digitised bump and grind. (Quick question: are there any women involved in this genre at all, has Lil Jon ever so much as worked with one, other than as a token guest? Answers by e-mail, please).
In this respect, though, crunk is like a lot of rap… a triumph of grotesquerie—so vulgar and squalid that it’s impossible to take it seriously. Anthony Miccio nailed it when he pithily encapsulated this music as “guys shouting at strippers”—and how pathetic is that? Paying women to get their kit off is hardly great proof of desirability and virility. Sure enough, Lil Jon & The Eastside Boyz’ “Get Low” is full of salivating sexist menace:
3,6,9 damn she fine
Hopin’ she can sock it to me one mo time
Get low, get low, get low, get low
To the window, to the wall (to the wall)
Till the sweat drop down my balls (my balls)
All these bitches crawl…
But it’s so extreme, it’s almost funny and if you don't buy that, then you have to agree that it's just as easy to see the dancers these men are bellowing at looking on with disdain, composing shopping lists in their heads as they disrobe, thinking about the electricity bill and muttering under their breath: “Yeah, okay you wanker, now gimme the money and fuck off…” as it is to view them as exploited and objectified.
It's also curiously deluded, like one of those drunk, sweaty, fat bastards who routinely hassle women in clubs, convinced they're God's gift when they're really the last person anyone in their right mind would want to wake up next to.
She leakin'
She soakin' wet.
Er, who the hell are the Ying Yang Twins trying to kid? The poor woman's probably bored stupid, spectacularly unmoved by the whole experience—far from being aroused, she's much more likely to be thinking what 24-carat arseholes they are and how she can't wait to get home to the telly.
Beef, meanwhile = "Throw It Up" by Lil Jon feat. Pastor Troy:
Nigga as soon as I enter
You know I'm making noise
Pastor Troy and The Eastside Boyz
AK bustin' I ride the whole clip
I cock that ho and let it motherfuckin' rip.
Now, this is where it gets really interesting. Listening to this song one morning on the way to work, I realised a few things about it. First of all that it's stunning, incredibly powerful and brutally effective, secondly that I'd be shit-scared to see it performed live. There really is no better incitement to mob violence out there, especially when Lil Jon breaks in:
Okay, okay hold the fuck up
Hold the fuck up/I'm looking round this bitch
I see a lot of niggas aint throwin up shit
What!?
Ya'll niggas must be scared to represent yo shit...
You scared
You must be scared nigga...
Scared!
These lines tap into the very basest male insecurities: feelings of hopelessness, powerlessness, impotence—exactly the anxieties extreme right-wing groups exploit to recruit their members. Yup, you guessed it, the third point is that there’s a definite paranoia and fascism at play in crunk, a continual, internalised undercurrent that its performers and you, the listener, are somehow under threat from a host of unnamed forces.
Here the repeated use of the word "scared" comes on less like an external playground taunt than a nagging, emasculating voice inside your own head. The subtext is simple—anger is all you have, take that away and you're nothing. BE A MAN... SHOW NO FEAR. It's screwface taken to the Nth degree.
Am I reaching here? Okay, there's no named enemy to focus this rage on, no racial/social/political scapegoating, no discernible ideology behind it, but does that really matter? Maybe it would be easier to understand and examine if there was, but the fury is its own end here. Rigteous or not, anger = power. Hell, there's even a thread of quasi-nationalism running through the narrative, a sense of thug pride and ghetto-nationhood—there's plenty of blood in crunk but there's also soil. Just check the intro:
We representing for everybody (everybody)
All the real niggas in America
Where you at or where the fuck you from
We represent for ya'll
WHO?
We represent for G-A (throw it up)
NAP town (throw it up)
Tennessee (throw it up)
St.Louis (throw it up)
J’ville (throw it up)
Mississippi (throw it up)
Alabama (throw it up)
V-A (throw it up)
Detroit (throw it up)
D-C (throw it up)
Dallas, Texas (throw it up)
The Carolinas (throw it up)
Houston niggas (throw it up)
Louisiana (throw it up)
The Bay niggas (throw it up)
Let's go!
This explicity puts crunk forward as music of the people, folk music, folkmusic, volksmusik. Go ahead, put the record on and listen carefully. From the get-go you can visualise Lil Jon and Pastor Troy standing in blunt-fogged, sweat-drenched bar room, spitting and frothing to the booze-fuelled masses below. The orchestral glissandi help set the scene for “a spot of the old ultraviolence” in much the same way Ludwig Van Beethoven's symphonies amped Alex and his droogs in Anthony Burgess' A Clockwork Orange, then as the beat kicks in a forest of fists shoots up, pumping the air in unison, the whole crowd baying like Pavlov's Doggs:
Bitch I aint scared
Bitch I aint scared
Bitch I aint scared
I aint scared motherfucker.
Hip-hop's very own beer-hall putsch."


I've got a couple issues w/ this entry myself but lets get a discussion going on it first.

djdee2005, Saturday, 10 April 2004 18:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I think my main disagreement would be the assertion made here:

utterly sexless and in crippling denial of any kind of feminine side. Just listen to the beats; there's no funk, no swing, no warmth. Like the sexual boasts they soundtrack, there's no shred of humanity whatsoever, just cold, digitised bump and grind.

djdee2005, Saturday, 10 April 2004 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)

what are the other issues?

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Saturday, 10 April 2004 18:48 (twenty-one years ago)

The argument about the sound of crunk being cold and having no humanity seems filtered through the writers perspective - that is my primary disagreement.
I would also disagree that there is no subtext to the rage contained w/in this music - first off, David Banner's album is pretty political, as are many other lesser known crunk-artists.
But even w/ the example given in that post - i think that the subtext is the existence of being black in the south. Yes, the music doesn't explicitely state any sort of political rage, but i think the subtext of living a poor minority in the south is an underlying theme to all of this music - the emphasis on SUVs and TVs in Banner's "Crank it Up" isn't so much about driving yr SUV and watching yr TV as it is about the ABILITY to purchase those things.

djdee2005, Saturday, 10 April 2004 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)

simon reynolds took the thing jess wrote and went a little further and now this guy has taken the already stretched out idea and tried to bend it even further and stopped making sense. he doesn't seem to have heard that much of the music.

why are english people always imagining that rappers are fascists?

WW, Saturday, 10 April 2004 22:56 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, it seems the valid points here are reiterations of things already said by jess and simon r (and without their interrogative bent). i don't think it's a badly written piece or that all the conclusions it comes to are disposable (except i wish we could finally do away with the 'sounds that come of out electronic machines = cold' equation - even if the author wasn't being quite that reductive) but the nazi parallels are pretty cheap and obvious.

maybe everyone here'll roll their eyes, but i think we're still due a smart conversation about content in rap (or why content in rap is the kind of thing i think we need to have smart conversation about etc)(insert sound of meta-barfing here)

m., Saturday, 10 April 2004 23:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha oh jeez:

Sure enough, Lil Jon & The Eastside Boyz’ “Get Low” is full of salivating sexist menace:
3,6,9 damn she fine
Hopin’ she can sock it to me one mo time
Get low, get low, get low, get low
To the window, to the wall (to the wall)
Till the sweat drop down my balls (my balls)
All these bitches crawl...

Change "balls" to "brow" and "bitches" to "ladies" and this could be the chorus to one of those lost late '60s funk-soul tracks on some Stones Throw comp! "salivating sexist menace"... oog.

Nate in ST.P (natedetritus), Sunday, 11 April 2004 00:01 (twenty-one years ago)

"Nazi Crunk Fuck Off"

Nate in ST.P (natedetritus), Sunday, 11 April 2004 00:02 (twenty-one years ago)

um, hello

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 11 April 2004 02:25 (twenty-one years ago)

It feels weird masturbating to Rudy Huxtable.

Broheems (diamond), Sunday, 11 April 2004 02:28 (twenty-one years ago)

must try harder

I updated by the way!

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 11 April 2004 02:28 (twenty-one years ago)

does masturbating to that new kanye video count?

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 11 April 2004 02:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I do have to say that that Nelly video from the remix album is one of the most outrageous things I've ever seen.

Broheems (diamond), Sunday, 11 April 2004 02:35 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah tip drill is almost too offensive to masturbate to. it gets easier once you see it a few times. then, the biggest problem is the cut-ins by that comedian guy.

WW, Sunday, 11 April 2004 02:39 (twenty-one years ago)

we brits are a nation of virgins of course - in any case i'm going to bed if i can get lose the thought of jess working in a strip club. for some reason he's been doing a fan dance with that bloody teddy bear in my head ever since i made that post and it's really quite bothersome!

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Sunday, 11 April 2004 03:44 (twenty-one years ago)

actually, the thought of an american robin carmody is infinitely more disturbing, if i'm to be brutally honest

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Sunday, 11 April 2004 03:53 (twenty-one years ago)

sieg heil y'all, er now did i not get the memo where we all don't mention dave is eastside boy? luv, p

prima fassy (mwah), Monday, 12 April 2004 09:56 (twenty-one years ago)

can we have a lock thread joke by a moderator now plz.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 12 April 2004 10:03 (twenty-one years ago)

i wish i could stir up this much shit intentionally. sadly i only ever seem to do it by accident.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Monday, 12 April 2004 11:42 (twenty-one years ago)

IT IS NOT CALLED "GRIMY"
-- @d@ml (nordicskill...), April 11th, 2004.

Haha don't try it blud, I was repping Ruff Sqad while you were still posting to Fushitsusha threads!!!

scg, Monday, 12 April 2004 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha ha my cred will make your face look weird!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 03:59 (twenty-one years ago)

im not sure who is saying rappers are fascist or whatever, but there is a militaristic/quasi-fascist sound at work, sonically/aesthetically (this by no means implies in any other way). the liljon/usher track has a total hitler youth feel, not in content of course, but in aesthetic. its also my favourite single of the year so far

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 10:04 (twenty-one years ago)

although, relating back to the post in question, where jess says he's not sure where it can go from here (though i don't necessarily think things have to go anywhere from anywhere), surely ushers track is at least one way that it can become something else, should you so wish it (ie ushers softening of lil jon, yet it still sounding harsh)

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 10:09 (twenty-one years ago)

what about yeah's aesthetic gives it a hitler youth feel!?

ww, Tuesday, 13 April 2004 17:57 (twenty-one years ago)

difficult to actually capture in words i think, but i'd say the brassy bombastic quasi-militaristic staccato stabs, the relentlessness. like, well, perhaps not with this track because of ushers presence, but with the other lil jon tracks, the way you could imagine it being played by us soldiers doing training exercises

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 19:01 (twenty-one years ago)

devil's advocate here, but surely usher is the coldly detached glammy authority symbol tru fascism would demand? (this was all more entertaining with 'santana town' btw)

prima fassy (mwah), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 20:03 (twenty-one years ago)

random moosey myrmidons do not fascists make

prima fassy (mwah), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 20:05 (twenty-one years ago)

could an english person make a rough guide to fascist rap, please?

ww, Tuesday, 13 April 2004 20:22 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe i will do one in the next couple of days. it might be interesting to compare english versions of said, with canadian ones, i think a rural take might be interesting perhaps?

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 20:27 (twenty-one years ago)

possibly because it is by such far removal as being from england or, rural canada for example, that it is possible to suggest things which might, on initial viewing, seem increduluos to some.

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)

i am thinking of doing an essay of militaristic tropes in hip-hop and R&B when i get the time, quite simply to annoy uppity americans and for no other reason than that. however, gareth is right. i can't vouch, but i don't think anyone's saying that the actual political motives are fascistic, just the aesthetic. it's a *feeling* not a concrete statement of fact and for once, if thinking along these wholly *aesthetic* lines, i agree with fassy re usher. it's a good point, put well. the prob with crunk-fascism i that for the most part it's not that presentable. not that the piece above mentioned national socialism or hitler *at all*, it simply alluded, created imagery, as the writer believes the track in question does, hitler, mussolini et al knew that if you're going to present a pretty rank ideology, you need to wrap it up in a smart box. usher's quite pretty, so maybe he's that man! the militarism is totally borne up by the fact that lil jon likes to wear fatigues and camo!!! for the record, i love lil jon and think he's been making the most exciting music of the past few years.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 21:37 (twenty-one years ago)

"*some of* most exciting music of the past few years", that should have said. btw anyone who would say david banner, lil jon and bonecrusher are actually aligned with the BNP or the aryan nation would be an absolute spastic, for obvious reasons.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)

i can't make the leap, extending crunk from micro-nationalism to outright fascism.

wouldn't it make more sense to compare lil jon to hank shocklee?? as in, this isn't fascism w/o a target, it's black nationalism without a target??

certainly the crunk sound is more jump-up than anything in the charts since PE.

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 21:44 (twenty-one years ago)

btw - ea$t$ide's lyrical analysis was totally dead-on. PE worked with that fear too, though.

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 21:45 (twenty-one years ago)

they liked combats, too

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 21:47 (twenty-one years ago)

well, everyone like camo.

but TI is wearing a t-shirt with an apache helicopter on it in the rubberband man video. and most US soldiers are from near the poverty line. though repping your friends and neighbors != repping millitarism.

i mean, i think the camo stuff is sort of separate from what's going on with the lyrics/presentation. they could be waving their fists at the camera dressed like kanye west and it'd still have the same effect.

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm dicking around - wearing camos does not a nazi make otherwise i'd have been one for a few years back in the 90s!

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 21:57 (twenty-one years ago)

go forbid carmody sees that post...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 22:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I always thought European techno sounded rather fascistic. Certainly more so than Crunk, which seems a lot more concerned w/ grittiness.

djdee2005, Tuesday, 13 April 2004 22:11 (twenty-one years ago)

well, it's interesting that crunk's intrumentals use quite a lot of the same sounds as bleep & bass and even certain strands of gabba. was talking to a friend by email the other day who happens to be probably the mover's #1 fan and he said the same thing before i even got the chance. weird as all i'd been listening to that weekend was lil jon and the frontal sickness ep... or maybe not weird at all, maybe they go together naturally...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)

i have been heavily indulging myself in mentioning gabba and bleep every time i write about crunk. my editors are probably getting annoyed.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 23:05 (twenty-one years ago)

america just loves heavily detuned, quasi-miasmic bass frequencies...it's why post-techstep dnb continues to do so well here. or, hell, nu-metal for that matter.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 23:07 (twenty-one years ago)

"rubber band man, wild as the TALIBAN"

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 23:08 (twenty-one years ago)

i think shocklee is a red herring in this, because, while pe/s1ws might have employed ambiguously totalitarian imagery, the bom squad sound surely cannot fall into the same category, too busy for a start, i think a much less cluttered sound is the key here, which is why lil jons much more orderly and focussed sound is much more in keeping with totalitarian sonic aesthetic, the focus of sound on repeated central motifs...

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 05:41 (twenty-one years ago)

use of music in fascism might rely on bombast, but it relys on stringency also (well, actually, it relys on romanticism more than both, but thats a separate facet)

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 05:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Crunk doesn't exactly rely on romantacism! If anything its more anarchic.

I agree that this whole analogy worked a lot better w/ Santana's Town.

djdee2005, Wednesday, 14 April 2004 06:15 (twenty-one years ago)

And if anything, yr description, gareth, makes mainstream euro-techno sound a lot more "fascist" to me than crunk!

djdee2005, Wednesday, 14 April 2004 06:16 (twenty-one years ago)

shocklee really doesn't work here at all. every track on it takes a nation of millions was teeming, saturated, overloaded. with lil jon in particular it's a much more stripped back, stark aesthetic - everything in its place, marshalled. that's what gives crunk its totalitarian feel. gareth's pinned this down perfectly.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 08:54 (twenty-one years ago)

no, only the authority symbol is to be stark. but crunk is slack and smeared, i can't hear what you want to hear, and shocklee's is better because of the straining fervid mobmania panic. organized noise remember? fascists don't need everything in its place, they want everything in a place. kay i'm done with this jejune little conceit now, ta ra

prima fassy (mwah), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 09:25 (twenty-one years ago)

aesthetically (this by no means implies in any other way)

also this is the cheapest of get outs

prima fassy (mwah), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 09:29 (twenty-one years ago)

fassy how the hell can we be saying essentially the same thing, but still you make it sound like we're in opposition? in any case, it's not important. jejeune = a lovely word, but not one i'd use here.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 09:30 (twenty-one years ago)

gareth you cheap hussy, you...

*falls over handbag on the way out*

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 09:32 (twenty-one years ago)

i didnt mean crunk relied on romanticism,

i meant art in fascism relies on romanticism as much as it does stringent bombast (but that in crunks case, only the stringent bombast applies, hence my suggestion that romanticism is a separate facet, applicable to fascist art, but not crunk)

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 09:32 (twenty-one years ago)

will 'effete' do?

prima fassy (mwah), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 09:34 (twenty-one years ago)

nah, but "crackpot", "ill-considered", "idiot" would be perfectly understandable

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 09:35 (twenty-one years ago)

also this is the cheapest of get outs

this is certainly possible, although are you applying this to art that might use certain imagery, but shy away from implications? (ie, use it only as signifier?). if so, i'd say only if there was intentionality to some degree

or are you applying this to my reading of the subject? in which case it might tie in to the above anyway, as in this take is from the reader rather than the artist, again bringing the issue of intentionality to the fore (as WW gets at quite succintly with his european jibes, perhaps it is something a european audience might be more primed to pick up?)

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 09:39 (twenty-one years ago)

thirteen years pass...

Change "balls" to "brow" and "bitches" to "ladies" and this could be the chorus to one of those lost late '60s funk-soul tracks on some Stones Throw comp! "salivating sexist menace"... oog.
isn't that like saying change the word "cunt" to "cheese sandwich" and then calling someone a cunt is rather like ordering a cheese sandwich? an utterly facile argument

― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Saturday, April 10, 2004 8:17 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

well, both of 'em are pretty delicious
― Nate in ST.P (natedetritus), Saturday, April 10, 2004 8:23 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 30 August 2017 05:21 (seven years ago)

this sort of thing is interesting to read, because you can't find the same style of criticism anywhere else, at least not not about weird london rap or cat power, but it's frustrating because it's all written by english people that think rappers are nazis and have never desired a woman sexually. we need an american robin carmody who has masturbated to chingy videos.

― WW, Sunday, April 11, 2004 2:22 AM (thirteen years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Mr. Snrub, Wednesday, 30 August 2017 09:38 (seven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.