Suede

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
classic or dud
search and destroy

i can't believe this one hasn't been done yet.

gareth, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I agree, Gareth - I've meant to do it myself. But forgive me for saying that C/D and S/D may not be the most interesting approach. Even people who hate the sound of Suede (and their number is legion) may well agree that they were 'significant'. So - I think there's a discussion to be had that's not particularly about how much we like / dislike them (and I'm sure your contribution will be grate).

the pinefox, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It's been done enough in other threads, though.

I would've liked their 2nd album lots if it weren't so damn over the top AND stupid. Brett Anderson should not trill. From what I've heard after that rekkid, he hasn't improved much. The music was quite agreeable, though (if a bit grandiose and grandiose).

David Raposa, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I heard Brett sing unaccompanied once, GAWD was it ever funny!!! Unlike Bernard Butler's solo 'songs', which are just so fucking stupid and boring that they retrospectively put me off the first two Suede albums, never mind the recent ones which are fucking stupid and boring but almost funny. "Wild Ones" and "Stay Together" are great though!

dave q, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

anyone here care to suggest that brett has ever written a good lyric?

Alan Trewartha, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Did "Still Life" rip off Ravel? I have the song sorta stuck in my head now, and I SWEAR there was an obvious classical music motif/movement they ripped off outright from some really obvious source.

David Raposa, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

If anyone dares suggest Brett can write a good lyric, I will laugh at them. Here's how you write a Suede song, throw the words "nuclear" and "shaking" and "machine" into every single verse, the more inexplicable the chorus the better.

That all being said, Suede are both classic and dud. Suede with Bernie were absolutely fantastic (despite godawful production), dogmanstar was one of my favorite albums for ages. Then Bernie left. Brett's voice has gotten continually worse (which would've happened with or without Bernie, just very convenient it happened when it did), and the song structures are not as good. They've become a parody of themselves. Though the dance mix of Everything Will Flow is fantastic.

Search: The first two albums, Stay Together EP

Destroy: Neil Codling.

Ally, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

What Ally said, 'cept I actually like the production on the first two records.

Andy, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I really liked "on the high wire, dressed in a leotard/there wobbles one hell of a retard." And "he writes the line wrote down my spine/It says 'oh do you believe in love there?' " always gave me a little shiver. So go ahead and laugh, Ally and Alan, I can take it. I'm with you on everything else you said, Ally.

Arthur, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm not really that familiar with them, just the really popular songs that get played at Britpop nights, like "Trash." One of those bands that rip off their predecessors (Bowie) so well that I can't help but enjoy them -- but wouldn't spend much money on them, either.

But they do a cover of Elvis Costello's "Shipbuilding" that I absolutely love, probably more so than the original. It's shorter, less subtle, and very glam, but great because of that .. check it out, if you're a Suede afficionado.

Chris, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

DESTROY ALL RECORDS BY SUEDE YOU EVER COME ACROSS

alex in mainhattan, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Destroy: Neil Codling.

Most unfair, he's left the band too. ;-) I always appreciated his Louche Bastard nature on stage.

Anyway, I'm hardly neutral in this, as I fired up the Suede fan mailing list six years back and have stuck with it ever since. They've definitely had their ups and downs, but I still like 'em -- still, the new album really does need to do better than the last. Right now I'm looking forward to the DVD video collection, and they just played in Portugal and apparently did a great job.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

You need the word "animal" too, Ally.

I think : Bernard-era - not very good at all. Bad production, bad Bowie impersonation from Anderson and as everyone agrees, mainly dire words. "To the Birds" (B-side of The Drowners) is ace though.

"Coming Up" - similar production, slightly worse songs, a few good hooks - overall the sound of wheels spinning.

"Head Music" - Their best. Inessential, but likeable.

As for Pinefox's question about significance - I'd say not, at least not in any definition of 'significance' that I recognize. They were/are a competent glam-rock band for the 90's who failed to transcend their all-too-obvious influences (Bowie/Steve Harley/Roxy).

Dr. C, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I love them. Even their b-sides collection is ace. "Head Music" is their worst tho, in my opinion. I hope there's a new one soon, and hope it's better than "Head Music".

Sean, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

A couple of observations. David their second album is great precisely because it's over the top, grandiose and stupid. If this is the sound of a band falling apart then more bands should do it. It's one of Elton John's favourites, which ordinarily would be enough to bury it in lava but I'm with Reg on this one.

The beautiful ones has the best lyrics of any song written in the 90's.

Billy Dods, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm back to say their debut may be one of my favorite albums ever. Love the third one, too.

Anyone heard Bernard's solo LP? It was so boring and bland I wanted to fling it in the garbage; traded it in for a couple bucks instead.

Sean, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

His solo LPs are terrible, why did he do that? He can't sing you know.

Ally, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

He actually carried off fairly well live, but that was an unplugged show and he wasn't straining very much. But yes, when I first heard him sing, I thought it was a bit of a reach...

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Hardcore Suede fans tend to = dud though, I know a few and they're embarassing.

DG, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I see, you hate me, DG. *cries*

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Not you, you silly Raggetty person. People who I know who sign their emails "The one and only trash pop slut", that kind of thing.

DG, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Suede were great. My 90s band. Since I missed Moz/Marr & Co in the 80s, Suede had to compensate... Awesome live, if you dig that kind of "You love us and We know it" performances. Meeting them was great. Brett chatted up my girlfriend, and I chatted up Brett. Those were lovely times. I really do believe it is one of the best examples of "love em or hate em" one can think of.
I never played "Head Music" in its entirety, note. But the singles up to and including "She's in fashion" are great. And cd1 of "Lullabies", obviously. And "Stay Together"... Is better than "Whatever"!

Simon, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Back in the day I was a downright slavering fanatic, which seems a bit sad in retrospect. Their first four or five singles were absolutely flawless, with nary a dud on them. Everything else up through and including Comiing Up has tended to be patchy, though there's still some good songs to be found.

That said, Head Music was the absolute end for me. It was painfully dull, and the lyrics were so beyond the pale it just seemed ludicrous to keep listening. I tried liking it (in fact I still sort of like Can't Get Enough), but in the end I've lost all affection for them.

Still, I'd probably get the dvd if it wasn't Region 2 encoding.

Nicole, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Suede, the Bauhaus of the 90s (the lyrics, the bowie-isms, the hysteria?, maybe better on the music side, but then Brett&co didn't record a standard like Bela Lugosi's Dead...

erik, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Insignificant. The fake-gay flip-side of Oasis. But as with Oasis capable of some great songs. I like 'Animal Nitrate', for that tagged- on wank-solo, 'Saturday Night' and 'Beautiful Ones'. Also liked: those hilarious Brett love-handles and Neil Codling was just a classic beautiful "me, I'm very bored" English boy.

Omar, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

significant. wow, i get to disagree with Omar! now, i typed a fairly long answer to this, which seems to have disappeared. so a truncated answer will suffice.

i agree with Ally that they became a parody, well rather a facsimile of themselves around Coming Up

i disagree with Ally saying this is a bad thing. For me Coming Up is the best album they did. it has an ease, an effortless, like the pressure to be grandiose a la DMS had been lifted. By The Sea, The Chemistry Between Us absoultely superb. Beautiful Ones and Trash great singles. i like the spangly shinyness of this album, which wasn't present on the earlier stuff. in this way i like to think of it as an anglo Hit To Death In The Future Head. Ilike the fact that Bernard had gone by this point. the adding of Codling - a good move. it is suede being themselves. a parody? yes, possibly. i want to say 'trite in a good way' here. i want to say Bretts singing is very good on this album.

to be honest, this is the only one i play regularly. but Dog Man Star very good too. in places. Wild Ones, New Generation, 2 of us in particular. daddys speeding too. it is grandiose, but i think they aimed high, and only partially succeeded. still, some great stuff on there though.

they seem to have escaped the 90s pretty much unscathed though. in comparison to their contemporaries anyway. but then, who are their contemporaries. surely we're not suggesting blur, supergrass and oasis are we? i do hope not. Pulp, yes maybe. but they have become too closely identified with Different Class. they are unable to escape that moment, it signifies a moment too closely. post DC they have been dirgeful.

i am interested in whether the pinefox is a Suede fan. this seems unlikely, but then his liking of oasis and non-love of nick drake was also surprising.

gareth, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

How were they significant, Gareth? They didn't change anything, for better or worse. They didn't do anything which hadn't been done (better) before. You might say they were very good, not that I agree, but significant? No.

Dr. C, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I find them well-nigh unbearable now. Dog Man Star is a record I honestly don't think I could ever physically sit through again, even for money. Honestly, there's fuck-all difference between them and Placebo. Isn't glamour and decadence meant to be intelligent and fierce and surprising? Brett Anderson seemed like he'd gone and bought a Decadence Kit from Boots. But like a lot of people I fell for it at the time - now I'm prouder of once being into Carter USM, frankly.

Tom, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

For me the magic has worn off and left a lot of rusty glitter. That much is true. No, they don't mean what they did. And so, no, the listening experience is not what it was. (I was never a Fan, wearing the togs, believing the hype, or anything - but I did respect the music, and close-up, live, they were sweatily astounding.)

But I did think them significant. I think they represented a union of 'indie world' and 'media hype' - of alternative and mainstream, more simply - which seems natural now but was genuinely strange then. They did on (retrospectively) a homely scale what Oasis then went and did on an absurd scale. In other words, I think they represent a major stage in The Reclassification Of 'Indie'.

I also think they had good material, and good musicianship. The first LP was a fine debut, but DMS beat it - it was a remarkable record, a masterpiece, within the Suede perspective. If you don't like that 'world' (lyrics, sound etc) then it's just an ugly folly, I daresay, but if you do (as to an extent I did when it came out) it felt like a very major achievement. Better, I'd still say, than Different Class, This Is Hardcore, The Great Escape, Be Here Now and a bunch of other Britpop behemoths. (But not necessarily better than, for instance, Parklife - another record I view as Significant.)

the pinefox, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Can we not just forget about this silly little band? Were they really influential? I can't imagine they were. Maybe in some narrow field of idiocy.

Nick, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

THE DROWNERS IS THE BEST SONG EVER, WHY HAS NO ONE MENTIONED THIS YET?

Ally, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Nick just doesn't want people to be reminded of the fact he looks like Neil Codling.

Nicole, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

That’s it, you had to get into their “perspective”, their “Suedeworld”.

I loved the flashness of Coming Up when it came along in the autumn of 96. You just had to admire Anderson’s survivalist instincts despite it being obvious they were never to be centre stage again. It had a cetain romance about it. They went for that deliberately cold, robotic, and mechanized sound with Head Music but what initially to me sounded brilliant soon wore away after a few weeks – it was the Suede LP that was stranded without context.

Saw them from speaker distance in the 100 club between their first 2 singles at the height of the hype and it was fantastic esp. after spending the summer at lank haired grunge gigs. I remember some of the radio interviews around the time of the DMS release. Brett seemed fucked out of it from the drugs but the album seemed like a strange but necessary anomaly in those last months of 1994 amongst the explosion of jungle, trip hop and Loaded culture. Anderson might have been an asshole but rather him than the whining and supercilious musoness of Butler.

Fave songs: The Chemistry Between Us, Wild Ones,

David Gunnip, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I actually own The Drowners.

But THEN I SAW SENSE

Nick, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

That was around the time Sense and Sensibility came out, wasn't it? Gotta love that Hugh Grant...

Nicole, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Pinefox: In other words, I think they represent a major stage in The Reclassification Of 'Indie'.

yes, i believe pinefox is correct here. although curiously i'm not sure whether they reaped the benefit of this or not (i suppose they sold a lot of records).

Tom: Isn't glamour and decadence meant to be intelligent and fierce and surprising? Brett Anderson seemed like he'd gone and bought a Decadence Kit from Boots.

i'm not necessarily convinced of this. why should glamour/decadence be the above? i kind of like the fact that it was a bit faux in that respect. i think of the 'shtick' as being people from seaside towns looking towards metropolis as being exciting and glamourous, rather than glamourous itself. i think this removal, a slight distance if you will, lends it the english quality, as also seen in the obvious comparisons (tindersticks, the bowie of 'london boys', smiths) and also perhaps the less obvious (the sundays - although i'm not sure how i would articulate what i mean here), which for example the lumbering plod of oasis or blur could never hope to achieve.

the production (esp the drums) reminds me in a way of happy mondays (i think it is the big echoey drums, there is an 80s-ness about that)

The one and only trash pop slut, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Pinefox: In other words, I think they represent a major stage in The Reclassification Of 'Indie'.

yes, i believe pinefox is correct here. although curiously i'm not sure whether they reaped the benefit of this or not (i suppose they sold a lot of records).

Tom: Isn't glamour and decadence meant to be intelligent and fierce and surprising? Brett Anderson seemed like he'd gone and bought a Decadence Kit from Boots.

i'm not necessarily convinced of this. why should glamour/decadence be the above? i kind of like the fact that it was a bit faux in that respect. i think of the 'shtick' as being people from seaside towns looking towards metropolis as being exciting and glamourous, rather than glamourous itself. i think this removal, a slight distance if you will, lends it the english quality, as also seen in the obvious comparisons (tindersticks, the bowie of 'london boys', smiths) and also perhaps the less obvious (the sundays - although i'm not sure how i would articulate what i mean here), which for example the lumbering plod of oasis or blur could never hope to achieve.

the production (esp the drums) reminds me in a way of happy mondays (i think it is the big echoey drums, there is an 80s-ness about that)

the one and only trash pop slut, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Why, Gareth? Well because if it isn't then what's the difference between 'glamour' like wot Brett did and 'piling on the slap and getting off your face' like wot everyone in Ritzys nightclub does?

Tom, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

There are different types of glamour and different types of attitude; not all glamour can be Marilyn Monroe; some of it needs to be Patsy & Edina.

I mean, just think of it this way, Brett looked less Instant Decadance than the Manics did. I mean, talk about putting any old clap on and then pretending to be fabulous, lordy.

NICK YOU HAVE NO SENSE.

Ally, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I luv Gareth, if the real bloke who signs himself 'the one and only trash pop slut' saw that, he'd be SO pissed off.

DG, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"The Drowners" is my favorite single of the early 90s. Maybe favorite 90s single, period, I'll have to think about that.

A Homosexual Who's Had Several Bisexual Experiences, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

To the twelve-year old jamesmichaelward, Stay Together was one of the bestest things ever.

jamesmichaelward, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Stay Together was beautiful.

So what does everyone think of the McAlmont & Butler album then?

Ally, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I really liked it -- McAlmont is a great singer and performer. BB was a mentalist to think people would rather listen to his irritating weedy voice than McAlmont or Brett.

Nicole, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"McAlmont and Butler" is fantastic. How the hell did Bernard Butler get from that to....ugh...whatever he did afterwards?

Norman Phay, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

'Animal Nitrate' was their best song I thought. I want to know whether other people thought that was their best song.

maryann, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Of course it's amazing. Some days I prefer "Metal Mickey".

Sean, Friday, 2 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"What does it take to turn you on...?!" is one the best phrases in pop.

Simon, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But they do a cover of Elvis Costello's "Shipbuilding" that I absolutely love, probably more so than the original.
No way Chris. The one and only version of "Shipbuilding" is and will always be Robert Wyatt's. But nevertheless it is probably the best song Brett Anderson has ever sung. ;-)

alex in mainhattan, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Brett Anderson as shipbuilder = too great a leap of imagination

Nick, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

To me it sounds like he's singing about a lifestyle that he stopped living a long time ago.

you gotta roll with the pączki to get to what's real (snoball), Wednesday, 21 May 2025 17:50 (ten months ago)

What recent songs are you thinking of here, snoball?

The lyrics / themes were precisely what struck me on the more recent albums. Especially The Blue Hour and Night Thoughts. How Brett captured very well a set of middle-aged concerns and middle-aged fears. That he used to write about the seamy underbelly of urban life and the twisted young people he met there. Now he writes about the seamy underbelly of middle england and the twisted older people he meets there. That particular streak of frustration and resentment that leads to those displays of purple-faced road rage in the Waitrose car park that constitute British politics at the moment. I was quite struck by the way his lyrics had matured.

But maybe you are thinking of different songs than I am?

Etherwave, Thursday, 22 May 2025 08:29 (ten months ago)

two weeks pass...

And while we wait, I had some stories to tell:

https://www.buzzsprout.com/2438248/episodes/17292299-definitely-not-the-london-suede-with-ned-raggett

Ned Raggett, Friday, 6 June 2025 15:17 (ten months ago)

new track, Trance State released today, 6 Music will be playing it at 8pm, meanwhile the premiere will be on Radio 2 at 7.30 pm

.@jowhiley will premiere Suede's new single 'Trance State' on @BBCRadio2 tomorrow evening, Wednesday 11th June. Tune in from 7:30pm BST or catch up on @BBCSounds.

- SuedeHQ pic.twitter.com/uzb0lN34rV

— Suede HQ (@suedeHQ) June 10, 2025

djmartian, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 18:15 (nine months ago)

Suede - Trance State

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KRJbg2KJBQ

djmartian, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 19:02 (nine months ago)

New Suede!

Bee OK, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 20:29 (nine months ago)

I like this one a lot more than Disintegrate. Getting Europe Is Our Playground vibes from the synths. It's giving me hope that this will be the weird, deep, dark Suede album I've been looking forward to.

Etherwave, Friday, 13 June 2025 13:20 (nine months ago)

That's pretty standard-issue but still pretty great. Mat going for the half-Hook is pretty ballsy. Had to google mirtazapine, at first I thought he was saying marzipan.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 13 June 2025 13:51 (nine months ago)

It can be both!

Ned Raggett, Friday, 13 June 2025 15:04 (nine months ago)

one month passes...

So we have a new song/video...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCNdb5zlQLE

Plus a new radio session with a cover that initially raised my eyebrows...but the more I thought about it, the more I realized the title IS a very Suede phrase.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QId9oWt8nj0

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2025 19:32 (eight months ago)

one month passes...

And of course the new album rules.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 5 September 2025 13:11 (seven months ago)

Fantastic album. Just an absolute blast throughout.

They are ridiculous.

kitchen person, Friday, 5 September 2025 14:01 (seven months ago)

Please tour the US again, please.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 5 September 2025 14:03 (seven months ago)

"she still leads me on" is one of my very fav rock songs of the decade. looking forward to hearing the new one

gestures broadly at...everything (voodoo chili), Friday, 5 September 2025 14:09 (seven months ago)

Please tour the US again, please.

Deeply unlikely; my understanding is the 2022 tour was a financial loss. The cult that's here loves them, but. They're making bank literally everywhere else. (No joke, seen some of the crowd footage for them worldwide? China? Chile? More? They honestly don't need us.)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 5 September 2025 14:16 (seven months ago)

Haven’t liked an album since Coming Up. Wonder if I will like this.

piscesx, Friday, 5 September 2025 14:37 (seven months ago)

frankly shocked by how good this is.

J Edgar Noothgrush (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Friday, 5 September 2025 16:12 (seven months ago)

On the first listen, I'm not really connecting to it except for Trance State. But that often happens on first listens of new Suede.

The past 2 albums they really have been locking into the short, sharp, post-punk guitars. Right when I was really loving the more keyboard-driven orchestral sounds of The Blue Hour and Night Thoughts. Maybe I need to let go of the expectation that they'll go back to that style. And try to appreciate what they're doing now. (Just as I type that, June Rain came on, which is more of the big, orchestral keyboard-driven Suede I love again, so there's hope!)

I'm hoping it will click with repeated listens. One of the songs really reminded me of Kae Tempest's Diagnoses, which is a good sign.

Etherwave, Friday, 5 September 2025 16:20 (seven months ago)

Seems alright. Totally bewildered by the 5 star reviews of this and Autofiction though

PaulTMA, Friday, 5 September 2025 17:33 (seven months ago)

I absolutely love Autofiction and have high hopes for this new one, based on the feedback here (mostly Ned and Joan Crawford tbh).

better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 5 September 2025 17:47 (seven months ago)

I thought Autofiction was their worst record so far. Not my cup of tea at all.

Despite low expectations, I was really into the singles Disintegrate and Trance State, but then the Europeans one was ruined by a truly awful chorus.

I would be surprised if this were any better or worse overall than Autofiction, but I'm only hearing good things about it, and the singles are supposed to be among the weaker tracks, so let's find out!

Will probably buy it over the weekend. I have loved this band for a long time but I've been finding things to grumble about with them for just as long (I was describing My Insatiable One as overrated back in 1992), so will report back.

Eyeball Kicks, Friday, 5 September 2025 18:21 (seven months ago)

this album completely knocked me over this morning. still feeling the effects at the end of the day. it's so complete, such a journey - it works in a way nothing has in a long while -- and I'm a big fan of Coming Up. but this really has a cohesion that's rare for me

J Edgar Noothgrush (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Friday, 5 September 2025 23:35 (seven months ago)

gotta give this a listen. bummed I missed the 2022 tour. I saw them on their first US tour (with the Cranberries!) and they were so amazing.

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Sunday, 7 September 2025 21:28 (seven months ago)

Album's pretty great! It's definitely got some Furs/Bunnymen vibes, but it's also really muscular, which requires a bit of endurance. Just one track after the next, bam bam bam, like punches to the face (in the best way).

This band is so good. Back in the UK are they still considered top tier? Because what a gift to have this band not just back in action but still in such strong form.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 7 September 2025 22:44 (seven months ago)

I guess it depends on how top tier is defined these days but in terms of veteran bands they've had the red carpet rolled out for them for sure at this point -- tons of major features and high profile gigs and etc. Oasis and Coldplay may suck the air out of the room on the arena level, say, but they're not *not* there in the conversation from what I can sense.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 7 September 2025 23:05 (seven months ago)

Ned, I didn’t know you lived in the UK!

Etherwave, Monday, 8 September 2025 06:03 (seven months ago)

I'm not sure what 'top tier' means in this context. In terms of selling tickets? In terms of critical appeal?

They're not the kind of band that would sell out a week at Wembley. But they can take over the entire Southbank Centre for a week and sell that out. (I think Suede have always been quite smart in playing venues slightly too small for them, which increases demand and makes gigs feel more exciting.) And 'Southbank centre' is a good measure of the quality of critical appreciation they get. They have definitely attained a 'national treasure' status. They get features in broadsheets with good arts coverage. But not necessarily omnipresent tabloid wallpapering.

I'm still undecided about the album. Another set of listens had me wondering 'have Suede changed or have my tastes just changed?' So I went back and listened to The Blue Hour, and I was immediately sucked back in and immersively overwhelmed and 'oh yes yes favourite band, alltime!' So this is definitely not a 'Suede suck now ugh' complaint, but more 'what is this longterm fan missing, that everyone is raving about on this album?'

Maybe it's that 'muscularity' of the guitars that is failing to connect. It's very 'back to basics' and a lot of twin-guitars only arrangements. When what really got me about The Blue Hour and Night Thoughts was the maturity and range of the orchestral arrangements and the spoken word soundart bits. Where this album is really just pulling back to be a 2-guitars postpunk rock band. All that angularity.

Etherwave, Monday, 8 September 2025 09:00 (seven months ago)

Yeah, which seems to be by design, of course. Also, Brett's lower range (less yelp, more bark) maybe lends itself well to these kind of raw guitar arrangements?

And yeah, top tier as in ticket sales and appeal, yeah. It's hard for me to tell where they stand. because they seem to pick venues strategically. Where does a band like James play these days?

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 September 2025 13:41 (seven months ago)

Not too sure about the new album yet (my expectations are getting a bit like when the Manics do a new album), but I'm now seeing them in February - finally - so it'll have the time it needs to sink in.

It's at the Bristol Beacon, incidentally, and tickets didn't sell out immediately. Unlike Pulp/Blur/Wasis their stock with people my age is relatively low. I don't really know anyone under, say, 40 who cares about them too much, besides myself.

you can see me from westbury white horse, Monday, 8 September 2025 13:49 (seven months ago)

Ned, I didn’t know you lived in the UK!

Roffle. Hardly, I’m in SF. But I’m pretty plugged in to The State Of Suede As Such by default at this point.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 8 September 2025 14:19 (seven months ago)

So this is definitely not a 'Suede suck now ugh' complaint, but more 'what is this longterm fan missing, that everyone is raving about on this album?'

I think this is exactly where I'm at, although I was enjoying Antidepressants a bit more today. I really enjoyed Bloodsports, Night Thoughts and The Blue Hour, although all of them had their imperfections. I was quite surprised to see Autofiction get so much love, I feel it is perfectly OK but has too much of this kind of lumpen neo-Suede rocker stuff like '15 Again' and 'That Boy On The Stage - or 'Like Kids' from a couple of albums back. Or the Brian Molko-tier stuff like "will you be my personality disorder" (good riff, though). The new album definitely feels like a more melodic (and superior) take on Autofiction, but the idea that they are gold-level Suede has flown completely over my head. And it's a bit of a shame to be left out. :(

PaulTMA, Monday, 8 September 2025 20:06 (seven months ago)

Brett's lower range (less yelp, more bark) maybe lends itself well to these kind of raw guitar arrangements?

this is a big part of it for me -- he's leaning into how he sounds now. I honestly have had plenty of the old Brett -- his mature voice on this really connects with me, I like the melodies, i like how propulsive the record is overall

J Edgar Noothgrush (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Monday, 8 September 2025 21:21 (seven months ago)

Where does a band like James play these days?

This year’s US tour is generally in 1200-1800 cap rooms. Suede’s co-headline with the Manics varied from 1000-2800, from a quick look.

Nancy Makes Posts (sic), Monday, 8 September 2025 21:38 (seven months ago)

I meant back in the UK.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 September 2025 21:58 (seven months ago)

New album rules.

I'm also seeing them in Bristol in February lol xps

groovypanda, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 07:26 (six months ago)

I feel it is perfectly OK but has too much of this kind of lumpen neo-Suede rocker stuff like '15 Again' and 'That Boy On The Stage - or 'Like Kids' from a couple of albums back. Or the Brian Molko-tier stuff like "will you be my personality disorder" (good riff, though). The new album definitely feels like a more melodic (and superior) take on Autofiction, but the idea that they are gold-level Suede has flown completely over my head. And it's a bit of a shame to be left out. :(

Yeah this really sums it up for me. But it's also why I prefer Dog Man Star to Coming Up. I like their Scott Walker meets Crass material more than the short, sharp, post-punk blasts.

I liked the second half of Autofiction more than the first - Drive Myself Home and the the run from It's Always The Quiet Ones to Turn Off Your Brain And Yell. And I think to make a more compact, focused, melodic album, the left off the bits of Suede that I am most attracted to, which is the meandering, weird Suede.

Etherwave, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 07:52 (six months ago)

I meant back in the UK.

ah! well, you can probably look it up next time you have five minutes on a bus.

Nancy Makes Posts (sic), Tuesday, 9 September 2025 08:27 (six months ago)

True, I'm just not familiar enough with venue capacities there, so if, say, Suede were indeed strategically playing venue slightly too small for them, there's no way for me to know that.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 13:15 (six months ago)

I don’t know the capacity of every venue in the UK, I just Google ‘[venue.name] capacity -ai’ and it tells me!

My observation that they’re playing venues slightly too small for them comes from a) how quickly they sell out b) how crowded it feels at the gigs and c) the fact that they copped to doing this previously on tours where they were trying to build hype

Etherwave, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 13:20 (six months ago)

I don't disbelieve you at all, I just meant that if I saw Suede was playing a (I dunno) 3000 person venue in the UK, I wouldn't know if that was too small for them or the right fit. For comparison, James is playing Brooklyn Steel tomorrow. That venue is 1800, which seems about right for James in America. But would 1800 be too small for James in the UK? No idea.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 13:24 (six months ago)

James recently played near me in Cardiff Castle (with Shed Seven supporting lol)

Capacity is about 9K/10K but no idea if it sold out

For comparison The National, Pet Shop Boys, Fontaine's DC, Sting, The Human League, Primal Scream and Elbow have also all played there in the last year or two

groovypanda, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 16:08 (six months ago)

i'm just repeating the "ooh there are occasional post-punk textures on this thing" observation, but it is nice for a suede album to remind me of the chameleons and comsat angels

ivy., Tuesday, 9 September 2025 16:14 (six months ago)

Ha, yeah, someone in one of the fan groups posted the cover of Strange Times as a reference the other day, rightly.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 16:18 (six months ago)

yeah, otm, it's really in that wheelhouse.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 16:18 (six months ago)

The album is starting to click for me, with repeated listens. Headphones really helped. Listening to what the guitars are actually doing. Hearing the fine grain of the 'post-punk textures' - there's a lot more going on in the guitar department than just thrashing and angularity

There's a lot of chorus on the guitars as well as just distortion which comes through nicely on headphones

Etherwave, Thursday, 11 September 2025 14:15 (six months ago)

"Disintegrate" kind of reminds me (the music not vox obv) of later period Rush, like I could hear it on Clockwork Angels or something

Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 11 September 2025 15:33 (six months ago)

I've u-turned hard on this album now and love it. For a phone-shot video, this is absolutely incredible. Captures Suede at their live best
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY2ksIuZEhM

PaulTMA, Saturday, 13 September 2025 22:53 (six months ago)

Ugh, people who stand down the front and film the whole gig on their phones are a PLAGUE and should be taken out back and shot (and also are completely contrary to Suede's entire message which is 'put down your phone and live in the moment')

BUT LAST NIGHT WAS ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE. Old men at the top of their game! The lights went down and this faint ominous thudding started, got louder and louder, really menacing sounding in a kind of We Are The Pigs way. Until the band came out and it morphed into Disintegrate - which is absolutely apocalyptic live! Those moments where the thrash of the music stops and Brett gets the entire hall to sing 'come down and disintegrate with me!' - their lyrics often look meaningless when written down, but the way he sings them and gets 1000s of people to chant along is something really powerful.

Good mixture of new material, Ver Hitz!!! and some real deep cuts. (Crackhead! Killing of a Flash Boy! This Time) I will never not sing along to Trash or Metal Mickey.

They really need to get Brett a cordless mic for the moments when he decides to go walkabout. It's fun that he still does it, and those moments of personal connection feel so meaningful. (he is still very, very cute when he smiles that little boy smile.) But I was right in the 4th row and that cable gets really really dangerous when it starts snaking around through the seats.

It's cheeky tho, that they've nicked the Crass logo for their new T-shirt design. I kept doing double takes seeing extremely un-Crass looking people wearing what looked like Crass T-shirts. (I know Brett is a huge fan, but there's not much of an overlap in the fanbase.)

Etherwave, Sunday, 14 September 2025 08:08 (six months ago)

The Fash had mostly dispersed by the time I got to the SBC apartment from a few straggling drunks dressed up like football louts

But it still felt weirdly Suede in an odd way, picking your way through a litter of broken England flags to get to the gig

Etherwave, Sunday, 14 September 2025 08:22 (six months ago)

Extraordinary again tonight.

Piedie Gimbel, Sunday, 14 September 2025 23:17 (six months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.