I finally (?) bought Bryter Later the other day. I have one or two views on it. Veterans may find them clapped out. Never mind.
I am going to start by asking: why is the 'Introduction', which is cut from the same cloth as 'Hazey Jane I', followed by 'Hazey Jane II'?
My initial reaction was that it was a woeful misjudgment, not going straight into 'Hazey Jane I'. I have half a mind to assert that someone must have mixed up the numbers and programmed the LP wrong.
Perhaps this is not the place to talk about my historic inability to remember which is 'I' and which 'II', or about how dubious I am, really, about the practice of giving two songs virtually the same title.
― the pinefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 14:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sonny A. (Keiko), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)
And if it's such a great opener, why does it need to be preceded by ... by a... by an... 'Introduction'??
― the bellefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 14:41 (twenty-one years ago)
I think there's something really effective about the *really beautiful overture* *pause* => *jaunty pop number with outrageous horns* combination. It's...dramatic
― Sonny A. (Keiko), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― metalmickey, Friday, 23 April 2004 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)
I think I still think 'Hazey Jane I' would be better in that spot.
Perhaps I am wrong.
Why do they both have the same title anyway?
Except that one is called 'I' and the other is... 'II'. Or, the other way around.
― the bellefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)
I don't know why the numbering is that way around. Maybe he wrote Hazey Jane I first. To be honest, it immediately makes the pairing look more intriguing, to me. Maybe I fall for cheap tricks.
Introduction -> Hazey Jane I would have been too one note melancholic for me. One note melacholy is fine if it's across a whole album, but when you've got jauntiness to come, it would seem poor sequencing.
Presumably it's about the same woman, fictional or real. To go from sad -> upbeat would seem a little trite, unless you had been taken on a journey that led to such a change of mood. It's more natural the other way around.
If they were songs in a compilaton, the compilation would be fine.
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 15:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― the blissfox, Friday, 23 April 2004 15:40 (twenty-one years ago)
Hm.
'Natural'!
― the bellefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 15:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)
Wistfulness --> Wistfulness = Natural
(I think I have trumped you at last)
― the pinefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 15:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 15:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― the bellefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 15:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― the bluefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 15:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 15:57 (twenty-one years ago)
That was creative of you.
― the bellefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 15:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― the bluefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 16:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― the popfox, Friday, 23 April 2004 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― the bluefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)
We have done a lot better than our worst.
― the bluefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)
xxx
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Friday, 23 April 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― the bellefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 16:15 (twenty-one years ago)
Also, your cunning persona is leading me astray.
Great length?
xx
― the bellefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 16:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Paul Eater (eater), Friday, 23 April 2004 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)
That has not been ilx'd.
― the finefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 16:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 23 April 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)
That's from the real Alexis Petridis. I think it shows that, deep down, he's a nice chap.
What I'm going to do now is have a bit of a rummage around and see if I can find 'Way to Blue'. I'm sure it'll tkae me back to the day I bought it, in Irun, and went to sit by the church in Hondarribia to read the booklet really quietly. It was really mindblowing, because the booklet has ivy all over it and so does the church, and it was in full bloom, and the almost inaudible chirrup of ivy-dwelling insects was overwhelming, a bit like when you're seventeen and you get drunk and you have a snog.
No 'Introduction', Pinefox, but it is subtitled, 'An Introduction to Nick Drake'.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Friday, 23 April 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)
I agree about the ivy and stuff though.
I done wrong again.
― the bellefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)
xxxx
― the blissfox, Friday, 23 April 2004 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 23 April 2004 16:47 (twenty-one years ago)
Nick Drake - Best Ever Midlander?
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Friday, 23 April 2004 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 18:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Friday, 23 April 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 18:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sonny A. (Keiko), Friday, 23 April 2004 18:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― LC, Friday, 23 April 2004 19:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 23 April 2004 19:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Friday, 23 April 2004 21:05 (twenty-one years ago)
I used to agree about "Poor Boy" for a long time. It was just the one song on that album that bothered me a bit. But eventually I got over it, and now appreciate it's little nudge toward jazz.
― bimble (bimble), Saturday, 24 April 2004 05:36 (twenty-one years ago)
'Poor Boy' is rubbish, the worst thing on it by a distance. The other weaknesses of the LP, if such they are, remain to be explained.
― the bellefox, Saturday, 24 April 2004 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)
I was thinking the other day how Side 1 of Bryter Later reminds me of Astral Weeks in its playing and its flow.
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Saturday, 24 April 2004 20:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 24 April 2004 20:29 (twenty-one years ago)
I like this thread. Then again, I approve of knitting.
When I go to Marlborough, I think about Nick Drake. When I go to Ramsbury, I think about Nick Drake. When I go to Aldbourne, I think about Tag. And The Style Council.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Sunday, 25 April 2004 17:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 25 April 2004 23:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 25 April 2004 23:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 25 April 2004 23:24 (twenty-one years ago)
Nick Drake = Yogi Berra SHOCKER
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 16 May 2004 23:57 (twenty-one years ago)
Surprisisingly enough, I do.
― the bellefox, Monday, 28 June 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― the dreamfox, Wednesday, 16 March 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)
It all seemed to me a lot less effective than Bryter Later, which seems to me more forceful but also more peaceful; stronger in its dreaming.
Yet I was more dubious about that 2nd LP earlier on, as this thread shows, I dare say; so could I change my mind about 5LL?
― the bellefox, Thursday, 18 August 2005 22:19 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 18 August 2005 22:30 (twenty years ago)
― the bellefox, Monday, 13 February 2006 18:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Mitya (mitya), Monday, 13 February 2006 18:26 (nineteen years ago)
― sean gramophone (Sean M), Monday, 13 February 2006 18:54 (nineteen years ago)
― the bellefox, Monday, 13 February 2006 19:22 (nineteen years ago)
Not that I am a huge Robert Johnson fan nor nuffink, and not that not being like Robert Johnson is necessarily a bad thing. Just that my expectations were raised.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 14 February 2006 10:39 (nineteen years ago)
Musically, I guess the comparison is based on starkness.
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Tuesday, 14 February 2006 15:48 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 14 February 2006 15:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Tuesday, 14 February 2006 15:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 14 February 2006 15:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Tuesday, 14 February 2006 16:00 (nineteen years ago)
― NickB (NickB), Tuesday, 14 February 2006 16:14 (nineteen years ago)
*gets down on knees*
― sleeve (sleeve), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 01:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 15 February 2006 02:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 10:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 11:05 (nineteen years ago)
Good one!
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 12:54 (nineteen years ago)
spent a portion of this evening rediscovering a portion of his back catalogue -- time well spent
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 00:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 00:29 (nineteen years ago)
I don't get the crossroads joke. Is it like this one: 'Trinidad and Tobago? No, she went of her own accord'?
― the bellefox, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 14:43 (nineteen years ago)
― darren (darren), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 15:19 (nineteen years ago)
That name does not look quite real to me.
― the bellefox, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 16:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 23 February 2006 08:10 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 23 February 2006 08:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 23 February 2006 11:03 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 23 February 2006 11:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 23 February 2006 11:33 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 23 February 2006 13:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 February 2006 14:03 (nineteen years ago)
I never tire of those Nick Drake albums.
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Thursday, 23 February 2006 16:38 (nineteen years ago)
I am a bit puzzled by the PM sleeve, by the way - every opy I have found seems to feature a cardboard sleeve with a mildly ageing N.D. on it. On the back of that is a picture of a psychedelic sort of sleeve. Is that what is on the inside?
I am trying to remember what Steady Mike's PM CD is like - I think it might be pink. That is surely how it should be.
― the bellefox, Wednesday, 3 May 2006 14:43 (nineteen years ago)
PM = Pink Moon
N.D. = Nick Drake
http://www.dustygroove.com/images/products/d/drake_nick~_pinkmoon1_101b.jpg
― Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 14:47 (nineteen years ago)
Also: how come it is no longer possible to post on ILE, but I can still post here? It seems unfair.
― the bellefox, Wednesday, 3 May 2006 14:48 (nineteen years ago)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B000025XKM.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
i believe ILE is currently registered users only
― Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 14:49 (nineteen years ago)
re. ilx, I still don't see why that has happened since last night.
― the bellefox, Wednesday, 3 May 2006 14:57 (nineteen years ago)
Briefly, it's because the boards are being plagued with unwanted advertisements and it's taking an unsustainable amount of the moderators' time hunting these ads down and deleting them.
I'm afraid I don't have anything to add on the Drake issue.
― Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 15:05 (nineteen years ago)
― NickB (NickB), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 15:11 (nineteen years ago)
― NickB (NickB), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 15:14 (nineteen years ago)
btw i am quite surprised that you haven't got it yet. and i'd be curious to know which other cds could be in front of pm on your wishlist. maybe not. i can't imagine any.
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 15:19 (nineteen years ago)
"seven-ohs" = 1970s?
It is odd to think that though the 1970s are maybe still cool to some people, that kind of art is still not.
I have looked again at the old cover and I'm afraid I don't think I like it.
OK, then, maybe I will buy it!
TH, thanks for the link.
― the bellefox, Wednesday, 3 May 2006 15:23 (nineteen years ago)
― dr x o'skeleton, Wednesday, 3 May 2006 15:23 (nineteen years ago)
she's back again in my mind
― the pinefox, Monday, 20 April 2009 10:25 (sixteen years ago)
Hazey Jane II is one of my all time favourite songs. I love the ridiculously long verse phrasing.
― the next grozart, Monday, 20 April 2009 11:37 (sixteen years ago)