TS: Microhouse - Clicky/Poppy vs. Smooth/Gliding

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Disclaimer: I don't know if this exercise requires taking one side over another as much as it's a long-pending differentiation that could well inform my (as well as, others') purchases.

I've been listening to this genre dubbed "microhouse" for a couple of years now and feel as though I still having difficulty pinning down a less all-encompassing definition of it, to wit: the Clicky/Poppy of Perlon and Akufen is directly related to the Smooth/Gliding of Kompakt and Superpitcher?

The latest examples of the two sounds that sound dissimilar to my ear yet rest in the cool shade of microhouse's umbrella is the Smooth/Gliding of Areal's latest mix/compilation Bis Neunzehn vs. the Clicky/Poppy of Daniel Bell's The Button-Down Mind Strikes Back.

In other words, in the realm of all things microhouse, I much prefer the Smooth/Gliding of Kompakt's Friends to the Clicky/Poppy of Perlon's Superlongevity. And though I've been loathe to participate in the propagation of subgenres in the past, qualifying the very different sounds of microhouse might just help me (and others) acquire more of what they like and less of what they don't.

Might it just boil down to the aesthetics of individual labels (e.g. glitchy: Perlon, smoothie: Kompakt, clubby: Poker Flat)?

Or is this a "movement" that requires anonymous subgenres and more time - until it matures into a more clearly defined sound?

nader (nader), Monday, 7 June 2004 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)

But there are lots of different sounds on those Kompakt cds. That's why I like them. If they all sounded the same I would only need one and wouldn't be so broke all the time.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 7 June 2004 15:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I prefer the clicky poppy stuff, but I would also contest whether kompakt is really microhouse in the way that Trapez, Perlon, Music Krause and others are.

___ (___), Monday, 7 June 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

i can go for both but as ___ said they are hardly the same thing. not a good answer but hey...

jed_ (jed), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Have we just agreed on something, jed? My god!

___ (___), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)

do we usually disagree??! i hadn't noticed, really!

jed_ (jed), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:14 (twenty-one years ago)

You say that Junior Boys are a viable artist....

Nah, not that often jed. Just Junior Boys and the fact they are better remixed.

___ (___), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:16 (twenty-one years ago)

im just a romantic, heh.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Junior Boys = Superpitcher + Super_Collider.

Dare, Monday, 7 June 2004 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Um, staying on point:

Kompakt's not really microuhouse? And all this time I...

nader (nader), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Meaning, they are super-duper.

Dare, Monday, 7 June 2004 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Or maybe I haven't heard enough Junior Boys to realize they indie's answer to microhouse.

nader (nader), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Junior Boys = Superpitcher + Super_Collider

now that is not right!

jed_ (jed), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Jed - he is right, and it is a bad combination of the two!

To thread - Microhouse is a spectrum within which people most oftenly sight kompakt (possibly through their key role in the distribution of most of the labels).

Kompakt, Playhouse and Klang all have completely different sounds to my ears. They get bundled into Micro, but I would more argue that Microhouse is truly the clicky stuff (hence the name?!). So for me Micro is early Trapez (has gone of the boil and Traum is too dreamy), Music Krause, maybe Dumb Unit.... it gets difficult.

Anyway - I could warble about this all day.

Yes, the labels have different aesthetics. None are like Kompakt. If you like the dreamier stuff, go near Traum next.

___ (___), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:27 (twenty-one years ago)

ok back to disagreeing then - there is no similarity, to my mind, between Super_Collider and The Junior Boys, i dont know how anyone could hear that!

jed_ (jed), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:34 (twenty-one years ago)

haha - no there isn't really jed. I'll allow you that. Junior Boys are electro-lite.

___ (___), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:36 (twenty-one years ago)

It was just shorthand for r&b + new wavey microhouse.

Dare, Monday, 7 June 2004 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)

superpitcher + scritti politti
------------------------ = Junir boys
Timbaland + Hall and Oates

jed_ (jed), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)

"I could warble about this all day"

Me too! Hence the thread...(sigh)

nader (nader), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)

hm

superpitcher + scritti politti / Timbaland + Hall and Oates = Junior boys

anyway - sorry about the derailment!

jed_ (jed), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, thanks guys (ahem, you know who you are). It's only the second or third time I've tried to pry the lid off this thing we call microhouse.

Re-boot!

Re-boot!

Run: C:\Muzik\Microhouse\Subgenres\ReDefinition\2004-06-07

nader (nader), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:53 (twenty-one years ago)

i take it 2 or three existing threads weren't enough for you then?

jed_ (jed), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, they were threads within threads.

nader (nader), Monday, 7 June 2004 16:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I like both kinds, I think.

But I see it more as shuffly-stompy vs. glidy-IDMy. Maybe.

I have no idea.

"By around 2000, this new sound known variously as 'glitch', 'microhouse' or as we named it 'whorehouse' (after a track by Akufen called 'Whorehouse New Process') had reached critical mass"

Do people talk about glitch anymore?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 7 June 2004 17:01 (twenty-one years ago)

They were also subject to tangential conversations...but now I'm digressing.

HOWEVER: Traum is definitely one label I've overlooked for too long. Just ordered Tour de Traum from FE - hope it's as good as it sounds on BoomKat

nader (nader), Monday, 7 June 2004 17:01 (twenty-one years ago)

jed - now now, if you are going to say that post links to ALL the other threads!

I can't see what I did wrong - rather than asking us to go off on impromptu lines of shite about defining Microhouse genres, can you ask something a bit more easy to go with.

What is your problem with the finding of clicky-micro when you want swooshy micro? I always find it pretty obvious which of the two I'm going to get, and I will check the 12" before buying it to get an idea of the "is it cack" factor.

nader - It's a brinkmann mix of Traum. You can't really go wrong.

___ (___), Monday, 7 June 2004 17:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I didn't say anyone did anything "wrong" - I was teasing. We can still do that in these parts, no?

Secondly I don't have a "problem" outside of everything being ladeled into the same stew and called microhouse, that and a lack of turntables.

I'm more of mixed and/or compilation CD type of chap and finding samples thereof (to preview, as it were) aren't terribly easy to come by (not a big advocate/fan of file-sharing).

BoomKat, however, seems to do the best job of providing one with a fair indication (i.e. samples) of where a disc's headed.

nader (nader), Monday, 7 June 2004 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)

the thing about the digression though is that as a term Mircrohouse is almost too inclusive. if you are going to talk about superpitcher you are as well yoking The Junior Boys into the discussion as you are Farben (for example) since the JB's are closer to Superpitcher than they are to Farben.

Its pretty strange, also, the way someone like Brinkmann is almost always excluded from discussions of the genre (not that i am saying you were excuding him, im saying the opposite).

jed_ (jed), Monday, 7 June 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

apologies for garbledness and bad punctuation.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 7 June 2004 17:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree jed(!) - Brinkmann really fits into a lot of the asthetic of microhouse, and actually crosses a lot of the bridges between the different parts, yet he has only just been dragged into the fray (in all honesty) with the Traum CD. I find Brinkmann sits very comfortably alongside and between all forms of micro with great ease.

___ (___), Monday, 7 June 2004 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)

"...as a term Mircrohouse is almost too inclusive..."

_e_x_a_c_t_l_y_

And I think that's why I had consider(ed) an artist like Akufen "glitch" from the word go and yet with an artist like Herbert in the tangential mix I can also see the deconstruction/reconstruction aesthetic progress from "glitch with beats" to microhouse. It's just how the others, the Kompakts and Traums, fit into the model.

nader (nader), Monday, 7 June 2004 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)

um, likewise, apologies for garbledness and bad punctuation.

nader (nader), Monday, 7 June 2004 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

i agree ___ (!!) Brinkmann does Smooth /Gliding (SoulCentre) and clicky poppy (K_L_I_C_K to use the most extreme example).

jed_ (jed), Monday, 7 June 2004 18:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Is Brinkmann the tie that binds?

nader (nader), Monday, 7 June 2004 18:19 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah i haven't heard much about the glitch end of things (not glitch-y house and techno,but glitch as in clicks and cuts,etc) on ilm in a while now...
is there much mille plateaux style stuff coming out recently thats any good?

robin (robin), Monday, 7 June 2004 20:38 (twenty-one years ago)

there's a good cd in work at the moment called "the sound of click" or something, for a tenner, it's old though.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 7 June 2004 20:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Wasn't this clicky/poppy vs smooth/gliding breakdown Matos's?

Anyway I think this is tendential rather than a strict category breakdown, and there's multple axes upon which a spectrum could spin; trying to put everything in one camp or the other is exceedingly difficult. Traum is "micro" but doesn't really click and pop, plus it's tech-trancey enough to be smooth/gliding anyway. Areal aren't usually "clicky" but unless they've changed heaps they're certainly not smooth. Kompakt has run the gamut in every direction.

I'm more interested in how certain attributes to given tracks seem situational or tendential. When I first heard Scsi-9's "Just Married" in the middle of Sami Koivikko's 100 Minutes mix I was like 'what the fuck is this great tune?' thinking it would be Perlon or Areal - and then it turns out that it comes from Digital Russian which I'd always (maybe somewhat erroneously) always considered to be among the cleanest microhouse ever - in Koivikko's mix the track sounds wonderfully dirty and bottom heavy.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 05:05 (twenty-one years ago)

it sure was, Tim! I was beginning to wonder . . .

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 06:40 (twenty-one years ago)

and I think the reason that Friends is my all-time fave is that it's BOTH clicky/poppy and smooth/gliding. the pops glide and the sweep has some popping in it.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 06:41 (twenty-one years ago)

i can go for both but as ___ said they are hardly the same thing but they go so well together that they are the same family.

am i alone in thinking that brinkmann is actually a pretty awful producer. yes, he has done some stunning tracks but considering the amount of music he produces, his batting average is low, low, low.

as for trapez - riley seems to have lost the plot! he'll be putting out a peace division 12" next! and that limited label is SO annoying. what is the point? there are a few great tracks but i NEVER end up playing them out as it is imossible to remember which track is on which 12". i've never been too into traum but i think philippe cam is an unsung genius and that dominik eulberg 12" is my favourite stoopid record of the month.

stirmonster, Tuesday, 8 June 2004 07:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Agree on pretty much all you say, stirmonster! Brinkmann I have a few things by which I think are great, but a lot of the other things I have heard are terrible. And there is SO much that he has released. It is almost as though he has dropped the quality control filter across the board. At the same time, he does seem to hit on a great sound every now-and-then that covers all parts of the spectrum.

Trapez has gone pretty awful since the mid-twenties (Caulfield, Rahn and Dialogue were the last good ones) and has shown no sign of coming back - I still listen to them, but the expectation of buying them is no more. As you say, there are a few gems on the limited edition ones, but it is nightmarish to remember where the hell the one you want is unless you come up with some method to label the sleeves (I haven't!), and even the limited ones are pretty hit-and-miss.

I have only dipped into Traum through the Interkontinental comps, and picking a few bits here and there (I seem to remember that there was a good 12" earlier this year - name escapes me) but I wouldn't trust is as a label on sight, I will often peruse what they have out.

At the end of the day, all the labels are like this. The unoquivocal kompakt love on here is misguided to my mind, though it is a great label.

___ (___), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 08:05 (twenty-one years ago)

which brings up an interesting point which should perhaps be another thread?

are there any of these labels that folk here buy (rather than leech of soulseek) religously without hearing the releases first? personally, i buy every perlon and playhouse release unheard as i am that confident i will like them. i've only been let down by them once or twice. also, i kind of agree with ___ on the kompakt love on ilm. don't get me wrong, i do love most kompakt releases but i don't think they are all as great as one might think if you'd never heard them and only read about them here.

stirmonster, Tuesday, 8 June 2004 08:45 (twenty-one years ago)

OTMFM

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 08:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Perlon and dumb-unit are the two for me I would say, and maybe Playhouse. I may possibly even brave it with Musik Krause, though probably not - that is more Robag Wruhme than the label.

I had high hopes for Cadenza after release number one, but was let down on the second release!

___ (___), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 09:05 (twenty-one years ago)

i kind of liked the second cadenza but the third was a bit disappointing. sort of like 'V' by dimbiman but even more reduced. too reduced! still, i think it takes about six to ten releases to decide if a label is going to be classic or not so let's see what luciano can pull out of the bag. if it's anything like the material from his recent live set then i think we are in for some super 12s..

dumb-unit has passed me by somehow. i shall investigate forthwith.

i just got robag's lp. so far so good.

stirmonster, Tuesday, 8 June 2004 09:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Dumb Unit is Jeremy Caulfield's label, and he puts out stuff by himself, and quite a bit of Jake Fairley stuff. I have the last few they have put out and would easy go with buying them, but I really like Caulfield.

As you say on Cadenza, it takes quite a while. Dumb Unit is on about release 9, but I would seriously run with it myself. I shall get some to you.

___ (___), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 09:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I failed to credit Matos for this thread's inspiration - colour me: badd.

I felt Matos' delineation was exactly spot on (clicky/poppy vs. smooth/gliding) and thought it warranted its own discussion/expansion.

Thank you, Matos.

nader (nader), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

i've never been too into traum but i think philippe cam is an unsung genius
This needs to be said more often.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry to be all ignorant and annoying again, but how does something like the Superpitcher remix of Quark's I Walk fit into this clicky/poppy - smooth/gliding dichotomy?

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)

smooth gliding with a schaffel underside, N. There ain't no clickin going on in that one.

___ (___), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 15:10 (twenty-one years ago)

That's the thing. I think this dichotomy totally underplays the glam schaffel element. I wouldn't really call that track smooth and gliding at all.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 15:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe what we are looking at is the triangulation mapping of microhouse, then. We need the Schaffel element at one end, smooth at another, and clicky at the other.

So - will this triangle be equilateral?

___ (___), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 15:19 (twenty-one years ago)

I feel like Kompakt's discography is more varied than some of the other main microhouse labels. You might feel more comfortable buying the other labels' offerings unheard becaue you have a good idea of what it's going to sound and feel like before you hear it. Kompakt keeps you guessing a little more, which is good and bad depending on your perspective.

Clarke B. (Clarke B.), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)

i think it's a scalene triangle. the schaffel vector is the shortest but just because of there are relatively few schaffel releases (or are there?).

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 18:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm all about the schaffel.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 19:56 (twenty-one years ago)

you're all about the kit-kat schaffel

jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 00:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Re: schaffel - this is my point! There's so many different ways you could divide this stuff - cold versus warm, disco versus techno, clean versus messy, pop versus tracky, goth versus light-hearted, and each of those oppositions (and correspondingly any given label!) will run roughshod over the other. The fact that schaffel tracks can fall on either side of any of these given equations (eg. contra Superpitcher, Wighnomy Bros shuffle is all clicky/poppy) is a case in point. Indeed it's relevant that there's no label - to my knowledge at least - which *specialises* in Schaffel as such; it's like it exists at a ninety degrees to every consciously articulated position within the style (which maybe means the triangle model works).

Matos's original opposition was formulated to explain his personal preference, but it's a bit of a mug's game to try and form an objective scheme, at least one with objective qualitative distinctions.

Kompakt is notorious because, especially with its mixes, it tends to cover all these bases (albeit some more than others); it stands in for the internal contradictions inherent within this genre in a way that Perlon, say, doesn't. Also (at least until the great dance distribution meltdown!) it was by far the easiest label to find CDs by (I think it's Playhouse now).

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 03:37 (twenty-one years ago)

One entry found for mug's game.

Main Entry: mug's game
Pronunciation: 'm&gz-
Function: noun
: a profitless or futile activity

nader (nader), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 11:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Tim - I think this is the difficulty that we can get with on the chat about Microhouse on here. I think some of us judge a label by its twelves as they come out, and the form therefrom. Others will go for the CDs and the mixes.

As one of the former, rather than the latter, it can give a different opinion (especially on the quality). I mean - when kompakt put out a compilation, it strangely seems to have the better stuff they have put out on it...

___ (___), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 12:02 (twenty-one years ago)

mug's game : Sisyphean :: "You Don't Need A Weather Man" : "Run Into Flowers" (Jackson Mix)

nader (nader), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 12:05 (twenty-one years ago)

well, the fact is it's rare for a label to manage to fill a comp with mostly their own records, and for it to be good.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 12:08 (twenty-one years ago)

They release a Total virtually every twenty 12"s. That - guess by experience - is about 50 tunes. Early on it was way more, as they did 6 track EPs.

How many tracks are on a Total? 10 or so? Plus a few new specials?

___ (___), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 12:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Shades of gray/grey: I'm not so much after (at all, really) a hard-and-fast objective scheme, but one with roughly objective qualitative distinctions because microhouses different disciplines (and their disciples), I feel, warrant (and might like) them.

However, Tim, I've read several of your microuhouse-related blog entries and must agree (it's solidarity, brotha!) that the all-encompassing borders of what fits within the general(ized) microhouse scheme certainly allows for sustained interest and is unquestionably part of its charm.

If all of microhouse sounded similar it would amount to one subgenre of, for argument's sake and in the very high-level hierarchical sense, house, and lack the musical space for innovation and invention we continue to hear from one label to the another.

nader (nader), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 12:26 (twenty-one years ago)

New Playhouse/Klang/Ongaku website:

http://www.ongaku.de

Gus (Gutta_Funk), Thursday, 10 June 2004 09:15 (twenty-one years ago)

at last! now, if only perlon would get theirs up. it has been 'under construction' for about 4 years.

stirmonster, Thursday, 10 June 2004 09:53 (twenty-one years ago)

didn't it used to have a animation of someone into 'schranz' - germany's equivalent to the gatecrasher kids.

nick.K (nick.K), Thursday, 10 June 2004 10:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Think that was the klang site (Perlon was just mad with all the letters)

___ (___), Thursday, 10 June 2004 10:02 (twenty-one years ago)

yay! my night is in the playhouse links section. way to go ata!

stirmonster, Thursday, 10 June 2004 10:04 (twenty-one years ago)

So, like yesterday, I label-searched "Perlon" at Forced Exposure and, thanks to keyword highlighting, discovered it's right in the middle of their compilation series, i.e. suPERLONgevity.

Yep. That's my disco discovery o' the week.

nader (nader), Thursday, 10 June 2004 12:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Or, as it appeared at FE: superlongevity.

I know, I know. A little slow on the uptake.

nader (nader), Thursday, 10 June 2004 12:55 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.