Search & Destroy: the Shoegazer Genre.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl good stuff swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl bad stuff swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl swirl.
So where should neophytes start looking?

Lord Custos, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Does Dead Can Dance/This Mortal Coil count as Shoegazer, or is that a completely a cockatrice of a different color?

Lord Custos, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

AARRRRRGGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGH!!!

This thread was laid down solely as bait for me and Ned. Someone else can provide the blue writing.

The 4AD stuff mentioned is in a genre of its own: 4AD. Some might say Etherial, rather than shoegazer. Then again, some shoegazer is 4AD (e.g. Lush) but not all shoegazer is 4AD.

Ugly Wife, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Shoegazer has been done folks!

Although best shoegazer releases this year Mira and The Emerald Down.

For shoegazer/ dream pop 2001 see Dreampop

DJ Martian, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This thread was laid down solely as bait for me and Ned

Except, as has been noted, it's happened already. Archives are your friend, Lord Custos. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Sorry.
Theres so much in the archives I didn't see it.
But still, if anyone would like to praise with great praise/piss on from a great height in MY version of the thread, thats perfectly cool too.

Lord Custos, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

the best of the genre are/were:

Slowdive
Ride
MBV
Catherine Wheel (Ferment & Chrome only)
Boo Radleys (EVerything's Alright Forever)
Swervedriver (early EPs only)
Loop
Moose
Telescopes
Pale Saints

There were lots of other bands that released maybe a couple EPs, or maybe one album, but this is a genre that for the most part, the good stuff was by the more well known acts, lesser known bands were pretty derivative (bleach, the belltower, drop nineteens are coming to me off the top of my head). I do have two EPs by a little known(?) UK band called the Suncharms that are quite good though. Also, in the linked shoegazer thread, a lot of the stuff mentioned is more what I would call space-rock (Flying Saucer Attack, Windy and Carl, etc.) - not exactly the real shoegazer sound, which (for me at least) means a more conventional pop-rock feel underlying all the swirliness. Sub-genres! Dreampop space pop space rock etc.

g, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I like Slowdive, the first 3 or 4 singles by ride, and the first few singles by chapterhouse. I always counted loop as "sub-hawkwind". Best stretching-it-a-bit nomination - The Sundial.

Norman Phay, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

claire records keeps the shoegazing flame aloft they just released two lovely records by con dolore and isobella, both take most of their cues from early slowdive and isobella sound much improved over their first record.

keith, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

yes, but what happened to ride? why did they turn into charlatan clones???

cybele, Friday, 16 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Shoegazery is very much alive in Toronto thank you very much. Spearheaded by Mean Red Spiders. A Northern Chorus from Hamilton have released an excellent album according to local sources but it hasnt hit NB yet.

If you wanna argue over whats shoegaze/dreampop/4AD you can try blisscent@yahoogroups.com which is pretty managable for a nearly 2000 person list.

Mr Noodles, Friday, 16 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I still wanna know what tiny little box does those bands from Constellation fall under?

Mr Noodles, Friday, 16 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

post-shoegaze?? alisons halo

gareth, Friday, 16 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Though they are proto-shoegaze, A.R.Kane are amazing. (Actually, all I've heard is '69,' but it's great enough for me to consider them classic.)

Clarke B., Friday, 16 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

That's right, Clarke, you are deficient in AR Kane love. D'yer need some music?

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

mean red spiders are dreadful. alison's halo fits in more with the burnt hair crowd, more drone than shoegaze, i think. i've got all the burnt hair singles, i wonder if i could sell them on ebay for much of a profit?

keith, Saturday, 17 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I wish to back up Clarke on A R Kane's "69". Wasn't it a kind of proto-shoegaze thing, like MBV? Whichever, it's a great weird rekord IMO.

Norman Phay, Saturday, 17 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

two months pass...
It's Emma here (ex-Lush). Just surfing around the Net and came across this site. If anyone is interested, I have a new band called Sing-Sing and we put an album out last year called 'The Joy of Sing-Sing'. If anyone wants to know more, please visit our website http://www.sing-sing.co.uk . We are playing a mini-tour in the US in March. Thank you and good night.

emma

Emma Anderson, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Hey, cool. Now let's see if Mark Gardener comes to talk about Animalhouse.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'd rather he didn't. But maybe Emma knows if Poptones is going down the gurgler or not. The Sing-Sing album is rather good, BTW. It's not shoegazer.

electric sound of jim, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Keith: the singles on Burnt Hair are worth sod all, except for maybe the Windy & Carl and Dual Group ep.

electric sound of jim, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

two years pass...
hello...!
wie geht's?

shoegaze 4ever ;-)

just*like*honey, Thursday, 21 October 2004 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)

i dont know if its ever acceptable to have an exclamation point after ellipses.
(/pedantic dick)

that said, yeah. some shoegazer stuff totally rules.

peter smith (plsmith), Thursday, 21 October 2004 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Search: Cocteau Twins (though always SO MUCH MORE than simply a "shoegazer" band), Lush, Ride, Chapterhouse, Pale Saints, Slowdive.

Destroy: Moose, Revolver

Curve were lumped in with the "shoegazers" initially....though I'd never call their music "dream pop". Blur were too, initially.

"Shoegazer" was, it should be noted, a term coined by the Brit music press, and it was intended as a pejorative.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 21 October 2004 17:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I suppose Kitchens of Distinction belong in there too (and they were amazing), but having seen them live, I assure you they spent no time looking at their shoes.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 21 October 2004 17:05 (twenty-one years ago)

why would anyone want to destroy Moose?
they were awesome in so many ways.
the first three EPs are flawless ("Do You Remember" is possibly one of the finest "shoegaze" anthems)

and their first and second albums (XYZ and Honey Bee)
are counted among my favorites ever, and boast some really terrific songwriting.

granted the last album was a bit of a letdown, but even so...

rentboy (rentboy), Thursday, 21 October 2004 17:50 (twenty-one years ago)

They didn't move me, rentboy, sorry.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 21 October 2004 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)

:(

i think i should make a Rough Guide to Moose once of these days. surely that'll win you over!

rentboy (rentboy), Thursday, 21 October 2004 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Andy Kellman is the go-to guy for Moose love.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 21 October 2004 17:53 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
Why are North American bands always left out?
Here are a few that came to my mind:

Lilys - The most underappreciate band of the genre. All Music Guides has two of their albums (In The Presense of Nothing / Eccsame The Photon Band) listed as the Top Shoegazing Albums of the Genre. Both albums are solid efforts from start to finish and worth a listen if you haven't heard them before.


The 27 Various - Most of their stuff is pretty forgettable and a lot of their music does not qualify as shoegazing. But they have one single, Turn On and On off the album Fine, that HAS to be one of the 20 best shoegazing singles ever.


Galaxy 500, Yo Lo Tengo - Two bands that may stretch the definition of shoegazing a little, but their is no question that both groups have an impressive body of work that falls somewhere on the shoegazing/space rock/dream pop map.


Sloan - Of course these guys are now a Power Pop/Garage Rock band, but I would argue that their 1st LP, Smeared, is as much shoegazing meets grunge as Curve.

The Veldt - Not as strong as some of the other bands listed above, but they put out some pretty decent dream pop/shoegazer albums in the early 90's.


The Rosemarys - A San Francisco band that I never see listed anywhere, but another group that put out listable shoegazer albums during the era's heyday.


Lenola - These guys are post-mortem, but they are very good and they sound more like Loveless than any other group I have heard this side of the millenium.

Marc Ferree, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)

The Veldt - Not as strong as some of the other bands listed above

! I heartily disagree, in that the Veldt clean the Lilys, Sloan's and YLT's clocks handily from where I sit.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Personal, minority, uninformed opinion:
Search: MBV
Destroy: Everything else

Ken L (Ken L), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Although, cockeyed optimist that I am, I'll probably read through this and the other thread(s) as well as click on the links and close the popups and buy some more stuff that I'll be mildly disappointed by.

Ken L (Ken L), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 21:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I still think that one album i have by All Natural Lemon & Lime Flavors is great even if it is highly derivative (stereolab/MBV). I was always too chicken to buy any of their other stuff though.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 21:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, Ken, Spencer in particular agrees with you on that point! He specifically likes MBV because they RAWK! where much other shoegaze as such does not. I'm more tolerant of everything else, perhaps, but then again I find stuff like Slowdive to be part of a separate if related continuum descending from New Order/Cure/Durutti/etc.

The All Natural discs are indeed all derivative and all good fun.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 21:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks, Ned.

Actually, I am sticking to my now one-day-old theory espoused on another thread- based on a few listens to the self-titled Telescopes album- that The Notorious Byrd Brothers is, if not the first shoegazer album, a case of "anticipatory plagiarism." So I might add that to a Search Also list.

Ken L (Ken L), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, Ken, Spencer in particular agrees with you on that point!
Judging from the results of the 90's Poll (#1 = Loveless, #2-#100 = almost no other shoegaze) I'd say a large portion of ILM agrees with Ken on that point.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 22:08 (twenty-one years ago)

veldt rocks though

theyarelike, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 22:15 (twenty-one years ago)

funny this thread should get revidved, because i've only just finished making that Rough Guide to Moose comp. but it's wound up being two discs...

is it true they're putting something else out soon? i wasn't too impressed with high ball me, save for a few tracks (in particular the "reworking" of there's a place) but i've really grown to love the Polar (Polar Aim) records, especially the first one

rentboy (rentboy), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 22:15 (twenty-one years ago)

The Veldt highly, highly rocks.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I was just listening to them. 99 cents @ the pawn shoppe.

artdamages (artdamages), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 22:19 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd say a large portion of ILM agrees with Ken on that point.
Maybe I can use this newfound clout to spread the word about the OK-ness of Tom Petty. Probably not.

Ken L (Ken L), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 22:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I extremely regret the Veldt remark, because y'all missed the point of the bloody thread: North American bands are always sadly overlooked on shoegazing lists.

For better or worse, I always have and always will be partial to bands (Lilys, 27 Various, and Sloan) who obviously listened to way too much Big Star and/or Replacements during their formative years. It was an extremely biased personal opinion and I take it back. And BTW, I was the 1st person to MENTION the Veldt in over three years of posts on this board, so I deserve a little more credit than the person who went 3 years w/o ever giving the Veldt any props and then jumps in and slams me for liking the Lilys more!!!

These were the deeper questions I was trying to ask:

Why are the 2nd tier UK shoegazers like the Pale Saints, All Natural Lemon & Lime Flavors, Adorable, Chapterhouse, etc. etc. etc. always mentioned while all the US/Canadian bands I listed above are rarely, if ever included?

Why is a band with so many non-shoegazer moments like Swervedriver so readily accepted in the genre while Galaxy 500 & Yo Lo Tengo aren't? (God forbid I mention Billy Corgan's band)

Why are Jesus and the Mary Chain and the Cocteau Twins mentioned as the seminal influences of the movement and why is Sonic Youth's Sister and Daydream Nation left out?

Frankly I thinking trying to compartmentalize the whole dream pop/shoegazer/space rock movement is a little ridiculous. When I'm listening to Seefeel or Flying Saucer Attack I know I'm listening to something that a lot more relevent to the genre than when I'm listening to say 3 Doors Down or the Backstreet Boys.

BTW: 1st shoegazing album... VU's White Light/White Heat

Marc Ferree, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 14:36 (twenty-one years ago)

And BTW, I was the 1st person to MENTION the Veldt in over three years of posts on this board, so I deserve a little more credit than the person who went 3 years w/o ever giving the Veldt any props and then jumps in and slams me for liking the Lilys more!!!

Hey sunshine:

http://www.netcomuk.co.uk/~tewing/ned/n103.html

Written in 1999. And I've mentioned the Veldt on here PLENTY of times before, so no offense, but you're full of it. I'm always happy to welcome a fellow gaze fan -- and a fellow Veldt fan at that -- but you can stop trying to rewrite history.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)

All Natural Lemon & Lime Flavors *ARE* American.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Heh, I had missed that!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 15:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyway, on some other points in your message:

while all the US/Canadian bands I listed above are rarely, if ever included?

You could have easily mentioned Alison's Halo, Closedown or Sianspheric as well, among others. Some mention them and some don't -- there is no such thing as an official history of shoegaze, and what you see as '2nd tier' may not be the same to others (Chapterhouse were easily one of the best bands of their time, put on a great live show at that). Also, overwhelming press coverage at the time was specifically focused on the UK bands, so it's not exactly surprising that they still get the majority of attention even in retrospect.

Why is a band with so many non-shoegazer moments like Swervedriver so readily accepted in the genre while Galaxy 500 & Yo Lo Tengo aren't? (God forbid I mention Billy Corgan's band)

Galaxie 500, if I may note -- and as for them, this review of mine specifically mentions shoegaze as a contemporary parallel, while there are a number of interviews with UK groups at the time where G500 were named as an inspiration/influence. YLT's own shoegaze connections via such things as the tour opening for MBV and their resultant albums have also been mentioned more than once in press stories and general comments over the moons. The Pumpkins connection is obvious. And that Swervedriver play 'non' shoegaze is important only if you think there's some sort of fixed template to rank the music by -- never has been, never will be.

Why are Jesus and the Mary Chain and the Cocteau Twins mentioned as the seminal influences of the movement and why is Sonic Youth's Sister and Daydream Nation left out?

Hardly. Sonic Youth got mentioned and namedropped A LOT by the end of the eighties/start of the nineties crowd.

Frankly I thinking trying to compartmentalize the whole dream pop/shoegazer/space rock movement is a little ridiculous.

Quite.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 15:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Rewrite history
I see you take your board way to seriously. I apologize for not reading everything you EVER wrote before I posted something...

I came across this lovely thread when I did a search on Sundial, Shoegazing because Sundial by itself brought information, on well, sundials. I'm sorry for creating such a ruckus. After this, I will go back to my fantasy football league board and complain about the Rams not throwing the ball to Torry Holt around the end zone this season.

But for the record, I did not see the word shoegaze mentioned in that review you so kindly linked me to (although granted there were comparison to other bands in the genre) and considering that your list of albums included L7 and Dirty O' Bastard, I am assuming your album list wasn't not strictly limited to artists who had an affinity for mixing their fuzz and delay pedals with minor chords.

Nor did I see any of the bands listed in this shoegazing thread. The other thread only mentioned listed the Lilys with mostly negative information. I was feeling froggy and thought for posterity that I’d add some cool bands that I thought were missing. For future reference, you might want to put a disclaimer at the top of the page ranking all shoegazing bands in order so that no one accidentally comes in here and offends you.


and what you see as '2nd tier' may not be the same to others
Wasn't it already settled that MBV was the only 1st tier band….


Chapterhouse were easily one of the best bands of their time, put on a great live show at that
I'm glad you like them; I think their albums drag in a lot of places. I was a minor during their early 90’s so I can’t speak for their live show.

Personal opinions are just that, personal. I will always a softer spot in my heart for Going Blank Again than Loveless because it was the album that wouldn't put me to sleep behind the wheel when I was too stoned to drive home. Also, my original copy was on a cassette that seemed to be distorted in just the right places. My theory is that it got that way from of all the times I fast-forwarded through Making Judy Smile and rewound back to 0x4. Unfortunately my CD copy doesn’t sound nearly as good. All of these personal feelings wouldn’t make me go out in public and argue that Ride was more seminal than MBV.


I think at this point you are arguing just to show off how much obscure rock-n-roll knowledge you have. If you’d stop to read what I said instead of being so busy cutting and pasting my posts, you’d realize that I was making the exact same point. Maybe I'd be less offended by what you say if your name didn't remind me of Ted Nugent =-)


YLT, Sonic Youth, G500, Pumpkins
I wasn't trying to come off like I invented the idea; I just think they are too often excluded from Web Sites I find on shoegazing, e.g. All Music Guide's section on the Shoegazing genre. Speaking of AMG, WTF did they move the band’s discography off the 1st page?


Quite.
Thank you for agreeing with one thing I said, it takes away some of the sting from not knowing All Natural was a US band.

If I Crawl Across The Floor Then Id Be Closer To The Door, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)

PS Tom Petty Rocks!

If I Crawl Across The Floor Then Id Be Closer To The Door, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 19:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, Ken, Spencer in particular agrees with you on that point! He specifically likes MBV because they RAWK! where much other shoegaze as such does not.

Actually, I like some traditional "shoegaze", things like the first couple Slowdive EPs, but I tire of it quickly after that. There's actually something that bothers me about some it, like they're not really trying and it's all going nowhere - it's like a heartless beauty. I don't necessarily need RAWK, but there's got to be a bit of propulsion.

Also Ned, I'm curious about your Slowdive descending from New Order comment as it bothers me somewhat. Are you talking about "Elegia" or something. Otherwise, I don't see it.

I think the reason North American bands don't get much attention is because the genre was "dead" before they even got started. Fair or not, there's something really uncool about being a North American shoegazer.

That said, have you heard "Ageless Beauty" by Stars? Is it even shoegaze? Because that's what I really like.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 19:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Yup, I have them all. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

So if, you know, you need a CDR burn...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Is that where you rub a CD-R back and forth across someone's arm until it leaves a heat rash?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 22:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll start with you.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 22:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Speaking of harmful CD-R's, have you ever caught a whiff from a spindle just after opening it for the first time? It's definitely industrial strength brain-cell killer.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 22:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Mmmm, fumes.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 22:47 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't see any direct line between new order and slowdive, but if you put galaxie 500 in between them it makes a lot more sense. personally i see G500 as more of a psych band than a shoegaze band, but really there's equal lashings of both (which is exactly what i love)

the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 22:59 (twenty-one years ago)

The New Order comment partially comes up because Slowdive were such freaks for them -- I think it might be something more in the bass, though used much differently than Mr. Hook did.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 23:00 (twenty-one years ago)

of course. when there's that much swirly guitar, there's so much more reliance on the bass to provide a melodic grounding..

the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 23:01 (twenty-one years ago)

S: Video clip for Ride's 'Drive Blind'. They spend the whole time looking at their shoes!

Sasha (sgh), Thursday, 2 December 2004 02:52 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
So is this the first 'classic' shoegaze anthology as such? I think it might be. Tracks:

* Ride - Like A Daydream
* Chapterhouse - Pearl
* Swervedriver - Son Of Mustang Ford
* Slowdive - When The Sun Hits
* Lush - Sweetness And Light
* Catherine Wheel - Black Metallic
* Cranes - Tomorrow's Tears
* Telescopes - Everso
* Blind Mr Jones - Over My Head
* Pale Saints - You Tear The World In Two
* Ultra Vivid Scene - Mercy Seat
* Curve - Horror Head
* Revolver - Heaven Sent An Angel
* Moose - Suzanne
* Bleach - Shotgun
* Spiritualized - Anyway That You Want Me

I understand MBV didn't want to be part of this, which I consider wise. Still, Cranes instead of the Boo Radleys? (And I'm a huge Cranes fan.)

Anyway, listening to it now as a copy arrived courtesy of Ian W., who wrote the liner notes. It'll be nice to hear the Blind Mr. Jones track, as I never got that single and is as a result the one song on here I don't already have. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:36 (nineteen years ago)

cant argue with most of it. somehow spiritualized dont seem quite *part* of that, (less shoegaze than 'mbv' anyway). i wouldn't have had boo radleys on it either. i would have had drop nineteens on it though...

-- (688), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:58 (nineteen years ago)

am i wrong in thinking smashing pumpkins were shoegazey? and sugar?

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Saturday, 29 July 2006 17:01 (nineteen years ago)

swervedriver is sooo bad. blech!

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Saturday, 29 July 2006 17:02 (nineteen years ago)

SPs parallel at many points, yes. Sugar less so, if only because Bob Mould already had his own way, though he is an admitted MBV freak and many songs reflect that. Swervedriver were great and foo on you.

EARLY Boos should have been on there, surely. It's not like the band would deny it! Agreed on Spz, Drop Nineteens would have been nice. (I should note that the liner notes agree on the fairly amorphous 'what is/isn't shoegaze' thing to start with, so it's not like they weren't aware of it going in.)

Though not listed as such, the version of "The Mercy Seat" is the 12" version, which I have no problem with, but the original album version sounds a lot meaner and has that amazing slow burn solo (or at least has it more clearly in the mix).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 29 July 2006 17:05 (nineteen years ago)

And "Horror Head" appears to be the remixed single take but it's been too long since I heard both back to back so I'll have to compare/contrast.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 29 July 2006 17:06 (nineteen years ago)

i only have mezcal head but it was pretty yuck. "Come" off Beaster gotta make it there. perhaps it is mbv rehash/they've done it better -don't know mbv. but this song is like the standard for euphoria stretching out inside a box. its cheesy too.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Saturday, 29 July 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)

don't know mbv

Ah, see, you might want to look into that.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 29 July 2006 17:28 (nineteen years ago)

Based on the few lovesliescrushing mp3s I've heard, I'd definitely say "search"... I wish I could find their album! (and before you ask, I hve been too much of a lazy buggerto search on the Internet Tubes.)

unnamedroffler (xave), Saturday, 29 July 2006 17:32 (nineteen years ago)

Have any bands ever tried to sound like "Isn't Anything"? With glide guitar but loud drums, a sense of space and audible vocals?

unnamedroffler (xave), Saturday, 29 July 2006 17:33 (nineteen years ago)

nope, never : )

Brad Laner (Brad Laner), Saturday, 29 July 2006 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

well, if you're coming in too, then lets have smashing orange as well...

-- (688), Saturday, 29 July 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)

talking of which...

http://www.theskydrops.com/tour.htm

anyone heard?

-- (688), Saturday, 29 July 2006 18:29 (nineteen years ago)

xxxpost - make that "intelligible" before a pedant seizes upon the misuse of "audible"

unnamedroffler (xave), Saturday, 29 July 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)

nope, never : )

:-D

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 29 July 2006 18:56 (nineteen years ago)

aww come on guys... I thought I was being pretty specific, although I did use some fairly wankerish terms to refer to the sound of the tremolo barred chords with rests in between them... if the answer to my question's so obvious, go ahead and tell me! I genuinely don't think I've ever heard anything that sounded like that record other than mbv's other pre-loveless stuff.

unnamedroffler (xave), Saturday, 29 July 2006 19:19 (nineteen years ago)

Hey now, I don't think anyone's ignoring you or anything, it's just that not everyone who could answer has posted yet! Patience! (You might enjoy early Swirlies.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 29 July 2006 19:48 (nineteen years ago)

heh... I assumed it was a piss-take...

unnamedroffler (xave), Saturday, 29 July 2006 20:32 (nineteen years ago)

So is this the first 'classic' shoegaze anthology as such? I think it might be.

Well, Mobile did FEEDBACK TO THE FUTURE in 2003. Stylus even reviewed it! Some overlap on the track listing as well. Ned, did you really miss this one?

doug watson (solid air), Sunday, 30 July 2006 00:54 (nineteen years ago)

xxpost... I'm listening to some early swirlies right now... thanks!

NAPSTER 0F PORN (xave), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 02:41 (nineteen years ago)

Ned, did you really miss this one?

Uh, yes?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 03:46 (nineteen years ago)

I'm giddy with glee that Swervedriver have shown up on a shoegazing comp. That must mean someone sees them as shoegazing. I don't actually see them that way myself, but they were always getting lumped in with that, so I feel that a comp like this kind of "tells it like it was". I really thought they were great, especially the first singles and album.

Strangely enough I actually pulled out a Blind Mr. Jones EP (first one, I believe - it has "Over My Head" on it) just about a week ago after not hearing it since it came out. I remember quite liking it at the time it came out but now I just think "ugh, what a second rate Slowdive".

Rabbits are actually good football players (Bimble...), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 04:29 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...
So friend Stripey (who goes by that name for good reason) was scrounging around last night on YouTube:

----

...you just pitch the word "shoegazing" into the search engine and voila!
Something like 3,000 entries pop up. yikes! I'll be up all night!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgvKPkFa27M
(used to listen to this one obsessively while drivng between UCI and NBPL. And one day there were all these wildflowers on the hillseide. I jumped out of the car and frolicked in them..Ah, memories ...)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igMhJvP23M8
(And, here's someone else frolicking in the wildflowers!!! -- read the comments section on this one too, they're fun)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8L4s00Fa2Hg
(they always were the kings of quirk. This video just confirms that. Wow, I'd forgotten how pure his voice is. Lovely!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Df_JW6DBnE
(oh, neat video. I don't think I've ever seen this one before. It does some interesting things with the usual shoegaze cliches)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtMqdHJtOro
(one of their better videos)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GB8nCE2EoIw
(I know you've seen this a million times, but have fun reading the comments beneath it while it's playing)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJwcvxTEsxI
(This is an amusing video. I wonder how many of them caught colds after it was filmed though!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9Su7bpEZKo
("give up the gardening?" -- hmmm -- I wonder what they mean by that...)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYyqcVXfHRw
(never heard of them, but this is a neat song -- interesting accent too -- I wonder where they're from. Austria? Germany?)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_XmH6C_3Zg
(my adoration of this band has diminished over the years, but this ep still kicks ass. Great drumming! Everyone compares them to Coldplay -- why? Is it because both have singers who can't sing? (sorry Mark ...)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOrQVwC5v5I
(no, I am not trying to be Ian McCulloch, Im not Im not!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J-h01u4k9o
(this song still sounds great! the video is rather yummy too. Saint Andrew and his expensive teeth. Love the halo.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtvJRMRQAps
(Japanese shoegaze. This song has some interesting MBV sounds, though the video is nothing special)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE3ngnTSLMA
(I always thought that Joanna and I were on the same wavelength clothes-wise. Just about everything I've seen her wear could have easily come from my wardrobe, and vice versa. We both had the stripey mock-turtleneck thing going.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0ymingO1kk
(hey, look! it's Shaun Ryder! Oh, no wait ... )

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KdHLc9gi54
(and of course the keepers of the flame ....)
---

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 October 2006 11:48 (nineteen years ago)

you've never heard of malory? oh no!!

electric sound of jim [and why not] (electricsound), Thursday, 12 October 2006 12:00 (nineteen years ago)

(they are fantastic)

electric sound of jim [and why not] (electricsound), Thursday, 12 October 2006 12:00 (nineteen years ago)

That Malory track is excellent.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 12 October 2006 12:43 (nineteen years ago)

*cough* If you would read more closely, Jim, I am posting this from a *friend* who hasn't heard of Malory. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 October 2006 12:57 (nineteen years ago)

Actually, most of the linked clips are excellent. I never dug Curve much, or the catharine wheel, and I can take or leave adorable, but the rest of it still sounds pretty fine to me. That Pale Saints track is mighty. This was the last uk rock "movement" thing that I really got behind, everything since has been something of a dissapointment compared to this.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 12 October 2006 13:00 (nineteen years ago)

just literally in the past half-hour have bought the first chapterhouse album, listening to it right this minute. are they generally regarded as shoegazing legends, or also-rans?

(this is pretty awesome stuff, incidentally)

You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:25 (nineteen years ago)

Chapterhouse kinda fall down in between. Personally I think they were total monsters live, something the albums don't always show. The Spacemen 3/Loop obsession in their work certainly helped more than hurt.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:32 (nineteen years ago)

They strike me so far as being a slightly murkier Ride. They don't really have the dynamical sharpness (or songcraft) of that band, but that's no real slight on them; their aims aren't quite the same as Ride's, who seemed to me to be aiming at some sort of perfect noise-pop groove, whereas as you say this stuff is more similar to the Spacemen 3-style pulse and drone.

I haven't heard any Loop. Are they recommended? How do they fit into the late-80's psych-rock canon?

You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:40 (nineteen years ago)

I haven't heard any Loop. Are they recommended?

Very. Check the archive threads, and especially the Peel Sessions comp Wolf Flow.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:42 (nineteen years ago)

Shall do so.

I still haven't found a record shop that sells any Catherine Wheel. Haven't their albums been reissued yet?

You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:49 (nineteen years ago)

(those videos in full if, like me, you don't like clicking on random links

Ride: Sennen
Slowdive: Shine
Pale Saints: Throwing Back The Apple
Lush: Deluxe
Catherine Wheel: Crank
My Bloody Valentine: Only Shallow
Curve: Missing Link
Lush: Superblast
Malory: Sleeper
Ride: Unfamiliar
Adorable: Sunshine Smile
Chapterhouse: Pearl
Hartfield: Reason
Telescopes: Everso
Spiritualized: Any Way That You Want Me
Autolux: Blanket
)

spz video screams '1989 computer graphics'.

one more:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5o8oBKWjTK4
Pale Saints: Kinky Love

very early slowdive (ha ha):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWxgx8lp2b8

Koogy Yonderboy (koogs), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:14 (nineteen years ago)

God, I wish YouTube worked on this 'puter.

Three In A Bed Socks Romp (kate), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:28 (nineteen years ago)

that spiritualized one totally rips off Wild Thing in the chorus...however pretty it is on its own terms I can't quite get over that blatant thievery.

You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:30 (nineteen years ago)

Uuhhh... you know it's a cover, right? Of a song by the band the *WROTE* Wild Thing?

Three In A Bed Socks Romp (kate), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:06 (nineteen years ago)

haha

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:08 (nineteen years ago)

I am glad someone else said it before I did.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:33 (nineteen years ago)

redface.jpg

You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Thursday, 12 October 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.