Are today's Iron & Wine fans yesterday's Pavement fans?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
In other words, it seems the big indie acts are getting folksier, and is that because the cohort that used to buy Pavement records (or Dino Jr. or whatever: that generation) has mellowed? Am I right to suspect that the indie record buying community is aging? (Please forgive the shorthand and problematic term "indie." You know what I mean, right?) Or is there a whole new listening cluster that's come up since then, raised on maybe Palace Bros.?

Obviously what's going on must be some combination of these two developments and others, but I'm stuck on this idea of the class of '91 (say) growing hoarier, but still exerting market influence. I guess in a way I'm asking about dad rock.

Derek Krissoff (Derek), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:36 (twenty years ago)

i thought the majority of iron & wine's fans were florida emo kids who wanted to get a little more rootsy.

cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:38 (twenty years ago)

i was yesterday's pavement fan and i can't stand iron & wine.

frankE (frankE), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:39 (twenty years ago)

"Over on ILX, people have been throwing around the phrase "rural prog" a lot, and especially in
conjunction with Malkmus. I had heard Malkmus say, circa Terror Twilight, that he'd been going through
an Incredible String Band phase, but I wasn't aware that he was (and is) also really into Mellow Candle
-- kinda interesting, because within the same couple of months in early 2000 that I picked up the ISB's
The Hangman's Beautiful Daughter and Changing Horses, my friend Darren sent me a tape of
Mellow Candle's Swaddling Songs LP, which I've cherished ever since. So the Mellow Candle
reference reignited my curiosity re the ol' Malkster -- dude has good taste."

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:41 (twenty years ago)

"Pig Lib embraces the classic rock ensemble. If the form is familiar, however, the contents are not. A delectable
array of antecedents inform the music herein, from Irish prog-folk greats Mellow Candle to the jazz-inflected
musings of Kevin Ayers and Lol Coxhill to some of the more outré moments on Pavement's weirdest album,
Wowee Zowee."

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:42 (twenty years ago)

was too young to catch pavement in their prime, but i enjoy both bands.

tightweight, Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:43 (twenty years ago)

i have yet to give him a solid listen. i think i will be more inclined to hear sufjan stevens before iron and wine

Francisco Monar (fmonar), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:44 (twenty years ago)

Konzert-Bericht

Don't Call It A Comeback

Stephen Malkmus


Köln, Prime Club
06.02.2001
Vielleicht hat sich Stephen Malkmus an den
erschreckend langweiligen Auftritt Pavements vor
knapp zwei Jahren im Kölner Gloria erinnert und
meinte etwas gutmachen zu müssen, vielleicht ist
er jetzt einfach auch entspannter. Wie dem auch
sei, Steve und seine exzellente neue Band lieferten
im Prime Club im Jahre 1 nach Pavement eine
großartige Show ab.
Auch wenn er mit Bassistin Joanna Bolme, Drummer John
Moen und Multi-Instrumentalist Mike Clarke (der Mann
spielte alles von Steel-Drums über Gitarre bis hin zum
Keyboard) gerade einmal vier Auftritte absolviert hatte -
von ein paar Endings abgesehen - schien bereits blindes
Verständnis bzw. Vertrauen auf der Bühne zu herrschen.
Die entspannte Stimmung der Show passte ausgezeichnet
zu dem lockeren Feeling der neuen Platte, die natürlich
einen Großteil des Programms ausmachte und mit "Jenny
And The Ess-Dog" auch einen potentiellen Single-Knüller
enthält. Dazu hatte Steve im Interview bereits eine Reihe
Coverversionen versprochen, und die hätten obskurer
kaum sein können. Stücke von Mellow Candle, JK & Co
oder Fairport Convention haben die Jicks derzeit im Programm und dennoch
zeigten sie in Köln auch, dass sie trotz der unrockigen Platte gerne mal die
Verstärker auf "11" drehen. Dazu durften dann "Alien Boy" von den Wipers und
das als letzte Nummer heruntergerotzte "That's What Mama Said" von Coloured
Balls herhalten.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:49 (twenty years ago)

Doesn't "Range Life" have something to do with the shift toward rootsiness among the indie crowd? I know I was very surprised when I first heard that on "Crooked Rain" -- well before I'd reckoned with Palace or Uncle Tupelo. Every indie record these days has a slide guitar; not so in '94.

Derek Krissoff (Derek), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:54 (twenty years ago)

"range life" does not have a slide guitar (but "zurich is stained" off of slanted and enchanted (1992) does).

i've never heard iron and wine. i loved pavement in 94. i'm listening to about the same ratio of intense abrasive music and mellow downtempo music as i did back then.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:59 (twenty years ago)

I think Drag City has basically turned into an Adult Contemporary label.

Sean Witzman (trip maker), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:59 (twenty years ago)

im a huge iron and wine fan....never been a florida emo kid. always been a fan of folk music/alt country what not.

Velveteen Bingo (Chris V), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:06 (twenty years ago)

im also a pavement fan.

Velveteen Bingo (Chris V), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:07 (twenty years ago)

Right about the slide guitar. I didn't mean it literally though -- "Range Life" sounds sort of country and "Zurich is Stained" doesn't.

Part of what's going on here is that I'm in the demographic I'm talking about. Maybe everybody overestimates the importance of their own niche. But I do feel like if I walk down the street in, say, Park Slope, half the people I see will be Iron & Wine fans who used to listen to Pavement. Perhaps I'm projecting?

Derek Krissoff (Derek), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:10 (twenty years ago)

I don't know who Iron & Wine's fans are, but I suspect they're more nu-indie kids (probably because I saw the I&W guy play with the Shins frontman on an acoustic tour).

It's true that the past few years of Drag City releases haven't interested me as much as the stuff they used to put out, but I don't know if other '90s people are "growing along with the scene" in a way that I'm not, or if labels like DC are just appealing to a new group of "mellower" kids.

morris pavilion (samjeff), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:13 (twenty years ago)

I think the audience for things like Iron & Wine has definitely increased in the last 10 years, what with the rise of alt.country, general interest in bluegrass/folk -- but I'd hesitate to say that this niche has wholesale REPLACED the niche that Pavement falls into.

But this is a good question: Who is the new Pavement? In the sense of: Who is the band that defines what an indie-rock band is in 2004, with critical love and a somewhat large fanbase? My first inclination is Death Cab for Cutie.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:15 (twenty years ago)

I'd say Modest Mouse.

Sean Witzman (trip maker), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:16 (twenty years ago)

I think Drag City has basically turned into an Adult Contemporary label.

it's always kinda been one, and that's fine.

Iron & Wine are terrible, imo.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:17 (twenty years ago)

yeah, I don't think there is anything wrong with a turn to mellower music or Drag City's releases. But have you heard Suntanama?

Sean Witzman (trip maker), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:18 (twenty years ago)

I was a Pavement fan, have aged somewhat (and am almost a dad, as in 'dad-rock'), and now I mostly listen to free jazz.

mcd (mcd), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:18 (twenty years ago)

Pavement fans:

http://www4.ncsu.edu:8030/~kacollin/cockfight.jpg

Iron and Wine fans:

http://www.cem.va.gov/images/cwsoldr1.jpg

somewhat different, one group filled with happiness and joy, the other one grimly marching towards oblivion.

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:19 (twenty years ago)

Modest Mouse is an interesting case. I sense a semi-generational shift -- these guys came up with rap in a way that Pavement (and their typical fan) did not. So maybe they're the new indie rock darlings, but from my own experience I'd say the old Pave fans are more likely to go with I&W (or Sufjan, M. Ward, etc.) than Modest Mouse.

Have other cohorts aged? Or have most previous ones just stopped buying music in large numbers?

Derek Krissoff (Derek), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:20 (twenty years ago)

I thought about saying Modest Mouse, too -- except I thought I'd pick a band that's actually on an indie label.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:21 (twenty years ago)

SNAP

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:22 (twenty years ago)

OH YEAH!

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:23 (twenty years ago)

No, seriously, I did think that, though.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:23 (twenty years ago)

A few years ago, it looked like the Dismemberment Plan could've turned into the new Pavement. (Okay, I swiped this theory from Ryan Pitchfork while we were drinking on my porch.)

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:24 (twenty years ago)

It kinda grosses me out to think about there being some kind of connection between Pavement (the best of all early 90s indie bands) and Iron & Wine (a band very typical of today's borecore emo crap).

Pavement was a pop band, and a pretty joyous one at that, most of the time. There could never be a substantial similarity between Pavement and ANY borecore emo group because those kind of bands are totally un-pop and anti-fun.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:25 (twenty years ago)

Iron and Wine is really just the new Sparklehorse I think

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:26 (twenty years ago)

"borecore"!! Matthew, I kiss you!

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:26 (twenty years ago)

The common thread between Pavement and I & W is good sing-along melodies.

Derek Krissoff (Derek), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:27 (twenty years ago)

I do like Iron & Wine a bit -- I think "Bird Stealing Bread" and "Naked As We Came" are amazingly sad and beautiful songs -- but I don't think I've EVER been able to sit down and listen to either full-length all the way through. I get totally restless.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:28 (twenty years ago)

today's pavement = animal collective (revolving lineups starting out atmospheric and willfully obscure and began embracing more pop music with a few releases).

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:28 (twenty years ago)

Who is the new Pavement?

The Fiery Furnaces. No question about it.

Jaymc, to paraphrase a friend of mine, it's amazing how fast 'borecore' has become the most scathing thing that I could say about anything. As far as I'm concerned, the primary conflict in art right now is one of borecore vs. joycore, and in the indie world, the borecore people are winning.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:29 (twenty years ago)

good sing-along melodies

Yeah, Beam is tuneful, sure, but Derek, you've got to admit, it's the difference between singing along while jumping on a bed versus singing along while drinking whiskey by yourself on a porch swing.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:29 (twenty years ago)

The Animal Collective's aesthetic is so un-Pavement, though. They aren't pop enough, and that's crucial.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:31 (twenty years ago)

As far as I'm concerned, the primary conflict in art right now is one of borecore vs. joycore, and in the indie world, the borecore people are winning.

I like this idea. I've seen you use "joycore" on Fluxblog, but I wasn't aware it had a mortal enemy! But actually, it's something I've been noticing, too, especially among friends of mine as we get older.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:31 (twenty years ago)

what are some borecore bands?

I think there have been some great "joycore" releases lately, if we're talking in the indie world as it usually is defined. (All this talk about Belle and Sebastian lately makes me realize how I used to regard them as borecore, but "DCW" made me do a complete 180 on them)

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:32 (twenty years ago)

Too bad Matador's old "Chat With Pavement" page has been defunct for years; we could ask it who the new Pavement is.

morris pavilion (samjeff), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:32 (twenty years ago)

Re: Tunefulness in Beam & Pavement. From Wowee Zowee (or better, Strings of Nashville) on the best Pavement was the whiskey-drinking variety. That's why I see this transition playing out in Pave's work.

Derek Krissoff (Derek), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:32 (twenty years ago)

actually the most boring band I can think of now is the Postal Service, which will hopefully remain a Temple of the Dog-ish one off.

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:32 (twenty years ago)

The Animal Collective is more like the new Sun City Girls, maybe.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:33 (twenty years ago)

yeah, but the first 3 or 4 pavement releases weren't very poppy at all either.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:33 (twenty years ago)

how many years have you been listening to the sun city girls?

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:34 (twenty years ago)

Gear! OTM re: Belle & Sebastian going from borecore to joycore.

Gear! not OTM re: Postal Service being boring.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:34 (twenty years ago)

I KILL YOU

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:35 (twenty years ago)

with joy and love, friend

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:35 (twenty years ago)

Iron & Wine is more like the Silver Jews, don't you think?

I don't really think of borecore as being like a genre or anything - it's just a way of thinking or an aesthetic which informs all kinds of art and writing. Most emo strikes me as being inherantly borecore, because it revels in depression and impotence, and its fanbase seems to actively distrust fun and happiness and deny pleasure. Whenever I talk about joycore these days, it's almost always defined in my mind as being "not borecore."

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:37 (twenty years ago)

I sense a semi-generational shift -- these guys came up with rap in a way that Pavement (and their typical fan) did not.

THIS IS MADNESS.

Also Matthew, I'm sorry, but your joycore vs. boycore is a false dichotomy of Momusian proportions. Many of the bands you used to champion back in the day (but now only mention on your blog in order to parody) could be considered serious borecore by your own defnitions, possibly even progenitors of it (I'm looking at you, PEARL JAM and SMASHING PUMPKINS), and they weren't even significantly on indies! And if "borecore is winning," as you say, how do you explain the popularity of your blog?

The Animal Collective is more like the new Sun City Girls, maybe.

and no, I think gygax!'s Pavement comparison is more apt. The SCG seek to deconstruct pop (or maybe recontextualize it in a non-Western setting) in a way that AC don't, to my knowledge (admittedly I haven't heard their pop songs).

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:37 (twenty years ago)

I don't mind the emo attitude so much but the expression of it too often falls on the flat wall of guitar sound and the bland vox.

the latter is why I don't like Postal Service, btw...

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:39 (twenty years ago)

http://image.allmusic.com/00/amg/cov200/drd000/d020/d020651my10.jpg
less porch whiskey and more weed plz

artdamages (artdamages), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 10:25 (twenty years ago)

the kids are more depressed today angle is wild and silly. as charltonlido suggested on the other thread its more likely gravitating to small community, intimacy, organic personal holding handsness rejection of metropolitan saturation bigcity grind. which isnt to say its entirely sincere with everyone involved, like the bleed out my pain thing, to an extent its playing with tropes maybe. it's for fun. perhaps paddling around in boredom is a suspension of pain, pain/action/life

antifolk/jewelled antler cdrs vs dipset/dsouth mixtapes... whatev

prima_fassy (mwah), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 10:58 (twenty years ago)

generally calling out nihilism at this and that is lazy idiotic. what cos u started spelling pop with a capital p? please.

prima fassy (mwah), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 11:01 (twenty years ago)

Hey I own a banjo and mandolin too. F the haterz!

Velveteen Bingo (Chris V), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 11:04 (twenty years ago)

A lot of people are drawn to depresso folk because it has that whole 'authenticity' vibe, both in terms of history and that it ian't part of the mainstream these days. Acoustic guitars are pretty accessable instruments. Kids today seem to be more depressed, selfabsorbed, and fucked up than ever before, so they are a perfect audience for People Singing About Their Pain. Some folks go for aggressive, physical metal, some folks go for nihilistic hip hop, the indie kids of today prefer open mic night style pain ballads.

Most of the new folk stuff coming out these days is not depressing at all (with maybe the exception of Iron & Wine, but maybe it just depressed me because it was so bad). Listening to Six Organs or PG Six or any number of great folk bands (new being relative since both of those dudes have been doing things for a while now) doesn't conjure up depression in me as a listener at all.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 13:11 (twenty years ago)

Spin magazine did a feature on Devendra shortly after Arthur magazine released a compilation CD that he curated.

And thus the assimilation of Thee New Folk America began...

The Untouchable Sound, Wednesday, 23 June 2004 13:29 (twenty years ago)

Does Byron Coley still have influence, I wonder? Sunburned Hand, Six Organs, PG Six, Banhart play in his backyard like every day -> he writes for the Wire + Spin -> the Wire had that Sunburned Hand spread. Thurston Moore must be jizzing himself that the indie kids finally like something Coley-approved again. And I'm sure he loves the Hold Steady. Somebody start publishing Forced Exposure all over again, it's time to reissue David Crosby's If Only I Could Remember My Name...

Otis Wheeler (Otis Wheeler), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 13:39 (twenty years ago)

dude Otis, check out Arthur sometimes, Byron writes a review column for it that definitely covers this stuff.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 13:40 (twenty years ago)

it's a joint column between byron and thurston even.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:00 (twenty years ago)

I doubt Thurston writes much of any of it. The writing style's all Coley.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:05 (twenty years ago)

why does any band have to be the "new so-and-so"? why acn't we let artists develop on their own and become their own entity?

timj, Thursday, 24 June 2004 00:33 (twenty years ago)

seriously, I really don't understand this cyclical way of thinking about music. It's kind of wierd and pervasive but really has nothing to do with what's going on. It seems like a lazy way of making sense of things.

danh (danh), Thursday, 24 June 2004 02:45 (twenty years ago)

to paraphrase the funk "When mattybeebs swoops in, wow, it just goes off to a whole new world, doesn't it?"

i can't believe i read this entire fucking thread.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Thursday, 24 June 2004 03:34 (twenty years ago)

i have a couple thoughts about the whole "iron & wine are the new pavement," but its super late and i cant think straight with this migraine. so ill chip in with this:

iron & wine are playing the khyber in philly tonight. the show is sold out. on the second floor of the khyber, the dj lounge, is a night devoted to spinning nothing but built to spill, beat happening and dub narcotic sound system. it is insanely packed.

make of this as you may....

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 24 June 2004 03:41 (twenty years ago)

This thread is obviously dead, dead. But I do want to clarify that it was never my intention to label Iron and Wine the "new Pavement." What interests me here is the idea of communities of listeners, and how they change over time. It's a matter of audience, not artist, to me at least.

Derek Krissoff (Derek), Thursday, 24 June 2004 12:24 (twenty years ago)

I thought it was a good question, but I really don't think Iron & Wine's fans were around when Pavement was at its peak. I think this is a new generation of indie rock fans.

Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 24 June 2004 12:33 (twenty years ago)

I listened to the newest iron & wine cd one time, and maybe I'm just an immature late-20-something, but it made me uncomfortable. it was too "adult". some songs more "adult" than others. I have no desire to listen to it again. maybe I will just to see if I'm missing stuff. I was playing cards the first time.

in college, I listened to the palace brothers cd's all the time, and found special joy in lou barlow home recordings, too. both of which could be considered, I don't know, maybe somewhat borecore? but not "adult" like iron & wine. the absurd is an important ingredient.

katnyc, Thursday, 24 June 2004 13:05 (twenty years ago)

"are todays iron and wine fans yesterdays pavement fans"

Velveteen Bingo (Chris V), Thursday, 24 June 2004 13:13 (twenty years ago)

oops wrong thread

Velveteen Bingo (Chris V), Thursday, 24 June 2004 13:16 (twenty years ago)

Mark given how wrong you are on Pavement's fanbase how can you say you know anything about Iron & Wine's fanbase? The first time I heard Iron & Wine it was because a dude older than myself was playing the record (which might support the thesis at the beginning of the thread - except this dude thought it sucked).

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 24 June 2004 13:32 (twenty years ago)

I didn't realize that one must master knowledge of the Pavement fanbase before speculating about the nature of the Iron & Wine fanbase.

Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 24 June 2004 13:42 (twenty years ago)

dude knowing about both kind of is the point of the thread, don'tchathink?

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 24 June 2004 14:05 (twenty years ago)

Derek said: But I do want to clarify that it was never my intention to label Iron and Wine the "new Pavement."

You initial question was asking if today's I&W fans are yesterday's Pavement fans. Perhaps not directly, that does imply one band is an older trend and the other is the newer one.

It's not surprising to see people interpret it as such, especially in a society where things need to be hypercommercialized to make them appear desirable. "The new ____" has always been an intrinisic part of rock and youth culture.

But i'm going to put aside the semantics argument for a moment to refocus on your question and try to remark on a couple of interesting comments from this thread.

Paraphrasing Mark, he stated "Many I&W fans were not around at the time of Pavement," meaning that this is a whole new generational thing. I slightly disagree. I might be basing my own opinion on what I see in Philadelphia, but many people in the crowd at last nights aforementioned I&W show were between the ages of 25 - 35. These are people who could have [and did] see Pavement when they were still around. And if they didnt, they were keenly aware of the group.

They are also, bigger fans of I&W than any 19 year old i've met. [i work for a university and my workstudy kids are all pretty "with it" when it comes to music.] Actually, my kids have only "kinda heard about Pavement," so there's the generational gap. The only college kids I know who are familiar with both bands, work in college radio or harbor that same unhealthy obession with music that I did when I was their age.

Perhaps its more that quest for something "new" or "different" from whatever's being hyped in music circles -- a reaction to the post-punk blitz thats been crammed down fan's throats the last couple years than it is as a reaction to canonized indie rock bands like Pavement, Built to Spill, etc.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 24 June 2004 14:09 (twenty years ago)

dude knowing about both kind of is the point of the thread, don'tchathink?
-- hstencil

Not really...if you can prove that today's Iron & Wine fans did not grow up with Pavement then you can answer the question without knowing what happened to the Pavement fans.

Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 24 June 2004 14:12 (twenty years ago)

how do you prove knowledge of something without, uh, having knowledge of something, Mark?

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 24 June 2004 14:15 (twenty years ago)

Secret Knowledge of Meta-Knowledge.

And it gets labeled "New" because it's (nearly) all been done before in one form or another.

The Untouchable Sound, Thursday, 24 June 2004 15:44 (twenty years ago)

Maria's comment about the DJ spinning C. Johnson/D. Martsch is interesting to me because I actually sense a greater affinity between Iron & Wine and Built to Spill than I do I&W and Pavement. Not sure why. Maybe it's the beards.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 24 June 2004 15:53 (twenty years ago)

beards + shorts, methinks.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 24 June 2004 16:08 (twenty years ago)

Doug Martsch is the most poorly dressed man in rock history. He wore sweatpants and bulky white tennis shoes the last time i saw him live.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 24 June 2004 16:17 (twenty years ago)

what's that blowin' in the wind? (are yesterday's replacements fans the older brothers of yesterday's pavement fans and do they make fun of their nephew's Iron & Wine albums?)


PAUL WESTERBERG RELEASES FOLKER, HIS FIFTH SOLO ALBUM!

Ex-Replacements frontman, PAUL WESTERBERG is one of the most notorious
figures and best lyricists in rock. Bringing us his greatest new material
since the critically acclaimed Stereo/Mono release, PAUL WESTERBERG will
continue said reputation with FOLKER, out on Vagrant this September.

Yes, he recorded and produced the entire record in his Minneapolis basement
studio. Yes, he plays every single instrument on the record. No, you should
not bother having any expectations 'cause we're sure they'll be blown.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 24 June 2004 16:21 (twenty years ago)

"Maria's comment about the DJ spinning C. Johnson/D. Martsch is interesting to me because I actually sense a greater affinity between Iron & Wine and Built to Spill than I do I&W and Pavement."

but really it's all just indie-rock. the names of the fans and the bands may change, but the song remains the same.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 24 June 2004 16:23 (twenty years ago)

maybe there's just a certain eternal appeal to young folks of any era of sad, folky type songs....and I&W is just an extension of Simon&Garfunkel, Neil Young, James Taylor, etc etc....

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 24 June 2004 16:27 (twenty years ago)

James Taylor et al, yes -- and Elliott Smith. Thinking more about I&W's antecendents, Smith really seems like the obvious one, and chronologically he comes between (good) Pavement and I&W.

Derek Krissoff (Derek), Thursday, 24 June 2004 16:41 (twenty years ago)

who are extensions of Pete Seeger, etc.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 24 June 2004 16:42 (twenty years ago)

im drinking whiskey.

Velveteen Bingo (Chris V), Thursday, 24 June 2004 16:43 (twenty years ago)

Also Maria OTM re: the typical age of an Iron & Wine fan, based on my experience in New York and Athens anyway.

Derek Krissoff (Derek), Thursday, 24 June 2004 16:45 (twenty years ago)

i am a pavement fan of olde, and i like iron and wine. i also like the fiery furnaces, bright eyes, beyonce, avril levigne, the postal service... a lot of artists mentioned here. i must say i roll my eyes a bit at people who find joy only in music that hits you over the head with sunshine and rainbows.

shut up, Thursday, 24 June 2004 17:42 (twenty years ago)

matt: Doug Martsch is the most poorly dressed man in rock history. He wore sweatpants and bulky white tennis shoes the last time i saw him live.

what, like we're better dressers than him?

have you looked in the mirror recently? [collectively speaking, of course]

when i went to the radio station today i looked horrible. if i was 16 again, my parents would definately not let me out of the house [and i grew up in a very strict household]: ripped, repatched and cuffed jeans; a bright blue "baltimore" t-shirt that i "borrowed" from an old boyfriend years ago; old and gross converse low-tops and a big white belt. if i was standing in a rock club, i probably would have looked pretty fucking cool but this was lily-pulitzer-white princeton nj.

i dont want to turn this into I Love Fashion but part of the indie rock aesthetic is looking like a homeless person. do i need to sit you down and force you to listen to "ex-con" by smog on infinite repeat until you get the point?

i played it once today, i can play it again, young man. :)

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Friday, 25 June 2004 03:53 (twenty years ago)

are today's yesterday fans iron & wine's pavement fans?

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 25 June 2004 14:22 (twenty years ago)

matt: Doug Martsch is the most poorly dressed man in rock history. He wore sweatpants and bulky white tennis shoes the last time i saw him live.

what, like we're better dressers than him?

have you looked in the mirror recently? [collectively speaking, of course]

when i went to the radio station today i looked horrible. if i was 16 again, my parents would definately not let me out of the house [and i grew up in a very strict household]: ripped, repatched and cuffed jeans; a bright blue "baltimore" t-shirt that i "borrowed" from an old boyfriend years ago; old and gross converse low-tops and a big white belt. if i was standing in a rock club, i probably would have looked pretty fucking cool but this was lily-pulitzer-white princeton nj.

i dont want to turn this into I Love Fashion but part of the indie rock aesthetic is looking like a homeless person. do i need to sit you down and force you to listen to "ex-con" by smog on infinite repeat until you get the point?

i played it once today, i can play it again, young man. :)

Hey, that was a little jibe out of love for Doug....I'm a huge Built to Spill fan, and I find his apparent total lack of vanity endearing!

I dress okay, I think. (haha I think key words here)

but still, SWEATPANTS, that's a whole new level...

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 25 June 2004 14:29 (twenty years ago)

Bill Callahan does not dress like a homeless person.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 14:30 (twenty years ago)

two years pass...
otm.

s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 17 September 2006 14:10 (eighteen years ago)

are today's hot pockets fans yesterday's twinkies fans?

timmy tannin (pompous), Sunday, 17 September 2006 15:21 (eighteen years ago)

Last time I saw Smog he was dressed really well, actually. I mean he definitely made an odd shirt choice (funny patterned button-down) but made it work.

Anyway, I don't see any necessary correlation between yesterday's Pavement and today's Iron and Wine fans. I know plenty of Pavement fans who don't like I&W and some who do as well. Not to mention I know people who have always had pretty dull taste in music but seem to see Iron & Wine as something to listen to as their taste "matures."

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Sunday, 17 September 2006 16:18 (eighteen years ago)

Discussing Bill Callahan's threadz >>>>>>> ILM Pavement musings of 2004.

Jamesy (SuzyCreemcheese), Sunday, 17 September 2006 17:12 (eighteen years ago)

http://static.flickr.com/38/97243692_babd02bfc5.jpg

Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Sunday, 17 September 2006 17:14 (eighteen years ago)

^^^^1994 with a young Chan Marshall^^^^

Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Sunday, 17 September 2006 17:15 (eighteen years ago)

if i hear that iron and wine cover of such great heights again i'm going to kill everybody

electric sound of jim [and why not] (electricsound), Sunday, 17 September 2006 22:30 (eighteen years ago)

Is that the one they play in the M&Ms commercial? I didn't realize that was I&W.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Sunday, 17 September 2006 22:38 (eighteen years ago)

seven months pass...
ts: joycore vs. borecore

deej, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 00:52 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.