Drum programming/sequencing software for PC?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Any suggestions?

danh (danh), Monday, 19 July 2004 14:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Reason, Reason, Reason, Reason, Reason.

You need nothing else.

Ma$onic Boom (kate), Monday, 19 July 2004 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Not just for drums, neither.

Ma$onic Boom (kate), Monday, 19 July 2004 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I've heard that Reason is extremely non-intuitive and difficult to use...not so, Kate?

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 19 July 2004 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)

?????

I've found it *utterly* intuitive to use. It looks JUST LIKE a drum machine and a a mixer and all the stuff that musicians use anyway. If you've ever used any kind of studio equipment at all, it's a breeze.

I suppose to someone coming from a programming background, as opposed to a recording/musicians's background, it might be confusing. But you can pick up the basics in an afternoon, make good music, and still only have scratched the surface of what it can do.

Ma$onic Boom (kate), Monday, 19 July 2004 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)

X-post

Standard answer-

Reason
or
Fruity Loops

Both have demo versions. Both have their fans and their haters. Get the demos for both and have a play.

They both work in very different ways - most notably that in Floops you have one bar on screen at a time and in Reason you have the whole song laid out before you. It's two different ways of looking at things - and I find that most people either find one or the other to their liking - cf. Kates answer

Words of warning - Floops got bought out by Cakewalk a while ago and has since had a million silly fluffy features added (although the recent addition of the Slicer allows you to do a few things that Reason could only do) and it's native sounds are incredibly dreadful. The quality of sounds you get with Reason straight out of the box are very, very good for what they are. However its native effects are woeful, its interface is arbitary and some basic things take a lot more work than I feel they should.

So, yeah, try both demos out first.

Gribowitz (Lynskey), Monday, 19 July 2004 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I just converted a Fruity Loops user to Reason last week. He said it was soooo much better than Floops. I don't know, I've never used Floops, but I didn't like the look of it from his copy.

Ma$onic Boom (kate), Monday, 19 July 2004 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)

It looks like shit, I'll give you that.

Somethings occured to me - Dahn, you're after drum programming. Are you looking add to existing instruments or are you going to be using the beats as a basis for what you're doing? If they're going to be additional then I'd go with Reason as you'll be able, as I've said, to see the whole track in more detail in one screen. If you're trying to "get a groove thang a-goin' awwwwnnn", making a beat from scratch as a basis for a track then go with Floops as it works with one bar at a time.

Gribowitz (Lynskey), Monday, 19 July 2004 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Okay, I'll certainly check out, Kate (for Mac I guess). I was a bit surprised the other day when my friend who has recorded multiple pro albums, is really good at Cubase, Vegas, etc. said he hates Reason because it's so hard to use.

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 19 July 2004 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Someone who uses a lot of *Cubase* finds Reason hard to use? I find that mystifying. I mean, it makes sense, cause they're quite different (I'm utterly mystified by the Cubase sequencer, I only ever use it as to record "live" instruments") but I just find Reason's sequencing so much easier. Then again, that could be cause I have a MIDI keyboard hooked up to it, and use it basically like a tape recorder, except for sequencing.

Ma$onic Boom (kate), Monday, 19 July 2004 15:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmmm, interesting. I haven't messed with the sequencer in Cubase, we're using it for the live instruments too, but I was hoping to make drum loops in another program and import them into Cubase.

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 19 July 2004 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Fruityloops is the best programme on the market for drums. 9th Wonder, Jammer, Skepta, Rapid, Musical Mob, and apparantly, Lemon D and Dillinja all use it. I only use FL 3 still, which came with every Roland drum machine manufactured and millions of other excellent quality drum samples. But for other stuff it's not great, i like the 3 osc synth function it has and the effects are alright. Still, for drums it's unbeaten.

scg, Monday, 19 July 2004 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Making drums in cubase is difficult, its worth getting another app to do it.

SCG - NEVER use the 3xOsc for bass - it suffers horrifically from phase problems. It's very badly made synth. You'll have your mastering engineer informing you that you've got to book him for another £500 quid session as that bass sound won't cut to vinyl.

Gribowitz (Lynskey), Monday, 19 July 2004 15:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Gribowitz, that was a helpful comment. Thanks. I'll probably give them both a try though.

danh (danh), Monday, 19 July 2004 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

The biggest problem witn Reason - as opposed to Fruity, Cubase, Tracktion etc - is that it is a closed system. You cannot use additional soft synths, drums and effects with it (what are called VSTs and VSTis). And there are a lot of these including a lot of good fee ones. This is worth bearing in mind.

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Monday, 19 July 2004 16:36 (twenty-one years ago)

You can export everything with reason though, plus you can use it as a VSTi with Cubase or any other program like that.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 19 July 2004 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)

ReWire, people!

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 19 July 2004 17:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Sigh, Cubase was once upon a time so nice.
Now that my copy is approaching ten years old maybe I should look into a new one. Is Performer still being made?

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 19 July 2004 18:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah Digi Performer is still going.

And a second on the "REWIRE dammit!" point

Gribowitz (Lynskey), Monday, 19 July 2004 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry. I just don't like rewiring for some reason (no pun). I know everyone else does but I stil forget.

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Monday, 19 July 2004 18:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Making drums in cubase is difficult, its worth getting another app to do it.

Same with the Cakewalk Pro Audio family, although the Sonar releases all support loops and shit ever since Cakewalk bought up Floops.

If you already use some multitracker that supports VST or directX instruments, and you don't want to drop the bank for Reason or really just want something for drums/beats only, I cannot recommend Native Instruments Battery enough.

martin m. (mushrush), Monday, 19 July 2004 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)

When the new version of Live comes out it's going to have everything

Dan I. (Dan I.), Monday, 19 July 2004 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)

That's what they said about Windows.

martin m. (mushrush), Monday, 19 July 2004 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Does Battery do grid sequencing and stuff or is it just for drum sounds?

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 19 July 2004 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Battery is designed for drums or beats or whatever, and that's the way the interface is set up. (It's an odd interface, but one that makes a lot of sense for drums.) However, it's a sampler, so technically you can use it with non-drum sounds if you wanted to.

martin m. (mushrush), Monday, 19 July 2004 21:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I was mostly asking because of how the interface looks in the screen shots (very non-linear?).

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 19 July 2004 22:01 (twenty-one years ago)

paul/gribowitz: if the 3xosc is crap is there something else you would recommend for bass? for anything? i tried crystal but it was a serious memory hogg.

g--ff (gcannon), Monday, 19 July 2004 22:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmmm . . . I HAVE used the 3xosc on commercially put out stuff - it's fine - just really, really double check if its out of phase with itself. If it is then putting it right is a time consuming nightmare. If you want to hear the 3xOsc on something then its on the last track on my EP that you can buy here:-

http://www.simbioticstore.com/valentine/index.html?c=viewalbums&ssid=0

Hehe.

The King Of The Castle is Novation's BassStation - top notch sound quality, does all you want it to do. Pricey though.

Korg have just brought out a top of the range set of softsynths which look good - although they're processor hogs like no other.

Really, its a tough call - if you want pristine quality with high levels of control then it costs. For a cheap way around it in Floops - get a sample of a decent sound in there and impose whatever controls you want over the top using plugins - filters, low-end ramps etc. - to get what you want.

Gribowitz (Lynskey), Monday, 19 July 2004 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Grobwitz ... could you explain about the 3-osc bass a bit more. I don't know how much I use it, but I suspect it's the basis of some presets I use.

Is the phase problem that the volume of the base changes dramatically? Could you disupt this by flanging or phasing the base sound with an effect?

phil jones (interstar), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 15:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Bazzoid can get some big/nasty/whatever bass for very little cash..

http://www.maxxclaster.com/programs.html

Otherwise do a search for this subject in the forums and database at:

http://www.kvr-vst.com/

which is the best music plug-ins site.

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 15:59 (twenty-one years ago)

The MS-20 sim on that new Korg collection is pretty fucking good! (I used to have a real MS20, and it sounds pretty much like I remember) but Why the fucking soft wavestation should be such a processor hog, I have no idea. It's not that complicated a synth, surely?

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 21:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyone here use Logic? How's that for drums? I need software and considered Logic but I def. need good drum programming features and don't know jack about it in that regard...

AaronHz (AaronHz), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 21:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I know I know. After a bit of benchmarking and such I've discovered that it's the visual part of it that really screws things for the Korg MS-20. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

Why the Wavestation kills things so much I'll never know. It should be well below the complexity of some things I do with equivalent synths.

The 3xOsc - The 3 oscillators do not work well together - especially when using it to create long, pure sine-y bass sounds. Here's how its done - a pure sine wave doesn't cut through enough to be effective, so the standard practice is to introduce another oscillator thats squared or tried or whatever and then filter the sound down so it retains the purity of the sine but has some of the properties of the harsher waveform. The 3xOsc is good for doing this as you can have sines on 2 different octaves plus your fattening, harsher waveshape. However it invariably leads to phase problems at the export stage - it'll sound fine as you play but will sound very different when you export. Ok, this is down to the export functions of Floops (which are notoriously awful - for God's sake use the higher quality export modes, the default is woeful) rather than the 3xOsc itself, but obviously it's an issue.

Let's clarify - on higher octaves it's fine, it's when you use it as a pure or semi-pure bass sound that it becomes a headache. I might be spreading paranoia hear, but just try solo'ing then exporting the 3xOsc tracks and playing them back and just see if what you're hearing on playback is actually what you're getting on export.

Gribowitz (Lynskey), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 21:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Logic - It's one of those blank-canvas programs, it's equivalent to Cubase. The main plus about it is that it's native effects are streets ahead of other similar packages in range and quality.

I've used Logic heavily only once for a MIDI-based project with a lot of racks of soundbanks and the like. I found it easy to dive into - except for the setup of the external midi stuff. Apprently though it's the easiest piece of software to set all that gubbins up with but I still had problems. I've since countered this by making any setup I use as simple as possible and making everything as software based as possible.

To be honest the deciding factor with Logic these days is that if you're using a Mac then go with it, if you're on Windows then don't. It's not made for Windows anymore.

Gribowitz (Lynskey), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 21:46 (twenty-one years ago)

The main plus about it is that it's native effects are streets ahead of other similar packages in range and quality.

That's one of the things that made it attractive to me. Does this include drum sounds? I am on mac, so....

AaronHz (AaronHz), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Not in and of itself, but they ain't that hard to come by. Just go Sample Fishing in your record collection or get some off the net.

If you want to shell out for Sample CD's then Best Service and Zero-G are the ones you want. V. Good quality.

Gribowitz (Lynskey), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 21:59 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.