So, now that AMG has made itself COMPLETELY FUCKING USELESS, what is the best web alternative??

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I'm sure somebody dealt with this on that other thread last week, but I haven't had time to read it yet. So please let me know. Thanks. (And I know, I know, the All Music Guide was never especially reliable, factually much less critically {though I never understood why anybody would use it for the latter} in the first place. But at least it didn't take hours to load, and you could do in one click what takes five clicks now, and you didn't have to strain your eyes looking at the thing, and so on. Whatever moron thought up this new design should be shot, I swear.)

chuck, Monday, 19 July 2004 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)

i agree..i am a lzy fuck and when i want two cents of information i couldnt get elswhere i relied on their snappy shit..now i have to go thru customs to get my shoes back

dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Monday, 19 July 2004 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Man I don't know, I've been trying to think of one for a week and nothing's coming up. Plus, I noticed (during a search for some St Etienne import CDs on the new AMG) that they weren't listed on the main discography page as before. In fact, I'm still not sure where they are.

I like AMG for their criticism, even though it was all too clear they hand artists over to people who are predisposed to like them. I have to say, Heather Phares is a fine writer.


so, the answer is: Pitchfork!

Real answer: I have no idea.

Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 19 July 2004 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)

It crashes my computer now.

Hi Dan!

Hi Chuck!

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 19 July 2004 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, so now I just google stuff and hope for the best.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 19 July 2004 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Is it just a coincidence that Ned Raggett went on "vacation" just as AMG decided to be so "shitty". Hmmmm...Let's just blame Ned.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 19 July 2004 21:55 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost
do you use opera too? this is egregious

common_person (common_person), Monday, 19 July 2004 21:56 (twenty-one years ago)

It didn't make itself completely useless, it just made the internet an uglier place.


...You can use amazon.com for tracklist and release dates, can't you? And they post the AMG reviews sometimes.

Sonny A. (Keiko), Monday, 19 July 2004 22:00 (twenty-one years ago)

they seem to have fixed it although I still don't like the tabs and the read more shit. but it does work in mozilla now and it is fast. so I'll quit complaining

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 19 July 2004 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)

>>Is it just a coincidence that Ned Raggett went on "vacation" just as AMG decided to be so "shitty". Hmmmm...Let's just blame Ned.

Thea (Thea), Monday, 19 July 2004 22:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Let's try that again:

>>Is it just a coincidence that Ned Raggett went on "vacation" just as AMG decided to be so "shitty". Hmmmm...Let's just blame Ned.

Thea (Thea), Monday, 19 July 2004 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)

trouser press isn't 1/100 as complete, but if they have what you're looking for it's usually good.

Lukas (lukas), Monday, 19 July 2004 22:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Stupid computer. oh well

Thea (Thea), Monday, 19 July 2004 22:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Thea, if you use the left bracket (inverse of >) then the rest of your post will be FUXED

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 19 July 2004 22:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll second Amazon for the simple shit (tracklisting, release dates, reasonable amount of breadth, etc.).

Otherwise, I usually have no difficulties with just googling "(band name) discography".

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Monday, 19 July 2004 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, it did inspire me to get off my complacent ass and ditch Internet Explorer for Mozilla's block-rockin' Firefox as the default browser on my iMac. Holyshit, I should've done this months ago.

I guess AMG's partnership with Microsoft failed to consider that MS couldn't be arsed to develop an updated Mac version of IE. Idjits.

doug watson (solid air), Monday, 19 July 2004 22:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Gracias.

"Is it just a coincidence that Ned Raggett went on "vacation" just as AMG decided to be so "shitty". Hmmmm...Let's just blame Ned."

Better yet, we could start a "How Much Do We Miss Ned" thread. But then, if it died with no posts it'd be sad for him. :-(

Thea (Thea), Monday, 19 July 2004 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Amazon is way less complete and more erratic and harder to decipher than AMG used to be (if you're trying to figure out record labels or personnel or what town a band is from, for instance, which I have to do every single day for my job); googling websites is totally hap-hazard, iffy, and time consuming (though i do that all the time regardless); as for trouser press and pitchfork, aren't they extremely limited genre-wise?? (and how good are they with, say, self-released records?) i dunno; maybe i'm wrong about that. CD-Now actually used to be ok, but that's long gone. With AMG now, I get an error message on every single page; all the pages freeze; the tabs never fucking work (and often lead to a completely different tab than the one I'm trying to get); i have to wade through scads of apparent random advertisting bullshit that has nothing to do with what i'm searching for; and that lavender color scheme and those miniscule typefaces just suck. the whole point of the place was that it was QUICK. What exactly wasn't working that convinced them to fuck with what they had? (And sorry, I don't understand people who say that the solution is to download a bunch of software crap I never needed in the first place; then again, I never understand when people say that.)

chuck, Monday, 19 July 2004 23:00 (twenty-one years ago)

allmusic used to be fantastic.

I've grown sceptical of things that say 'You'll love our new ' since Melbourne's wonderful revolutionary new trams turned out to be so incredibly shit.

That's the Way (uh huh uh huh) I Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 19 July 2004 23:04 (twenty-one years ago)

discogs is better anyway, no?

jed_ (jed), Monday, 19 July 2004 23:11 (twenty-one years ago)

(hey chuck I am almost done reading your accident book and decided to play a Babe Ruth track on my radio show today, thanks for the cheap entertainment)

discogs is pretty cool.

artdamages (artdamages), Monday, 19 July 2004 23:34 (twenty-one years ago)

And sorry, I don't understand people who say that the solution is to download a bunch of software crap I never needed in the first place; then again, I never understand when people say that.)

It's the standard of living in networked computing, a cover-yer-ass approach adopted as an industry fob to all problems. "We'll fix it in the next update." Of course, what you are not told is that the next update will be just as buggy, but in different and interesting ways. And that it will probably break things that aren't already broken on your PC.

So refusing to download more "stuff" is not an unreasonable strategy.

What exactly wasn't working that convinced them to fuck with what they had?

That's not the right question. Many times it's not a matter of what's not working but a matter of changing things just for the sake of the appearance of progress. It sounds stupid but it's true. You get people at companies like this and after awhile they're sitting around worrying about how to attack the attention of the media, or how to goose the image or furnish the impression that they are moving forward with !NEW! !IMPORTANT! !THINGS! And so a radical change is made just for the sake of this and it busts everything.

Essentially, I don't see an answer to what you're currently doing. The information is always going to be scattered piecemeal across the net. It is the nature of the sphere and it's not restricted just to pop music. It extends pretty much into all fields of endeavor. Information is scattered higgledy-piggledy across the network and
you have to rely on your wits -- or Google fu -- to find it.

That's computers, the essence of distributed "knowledge," "knowledge" having a very elastic definition.

Geoge Smith, Tuesday, 20 July 2004 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Chuck,

It's a limited solution, but MP3.com syndicates much of its current content from AMG, so it may have enough of what you regularly look for without the five-clicks-to-get-there issue. Unfortunately, AMG appears to have made the decision that it's worth alienating its most hardcore users in the name of being able to tout a fivefold increase in banner ad displays.

-- yer intern emeritus

Joseph McCombs, Tuesday, 20 July 2004 00:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Blah, mp3.com is now an alternative to allmusic? That's what the world's come to?

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 02:43 (twenty-one years ago)

A music equivalent of IMDb would be nice, with links to reviews around the net, etc. It's always been pretty straightforward to use. Did anyone ever attempt anything like this, or was AMG the closest thing? I suppose since music isn't quite as big business as movies, it wouldn't be all that feasible.

Jesse Lawson (eatandoph), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, man. That's been my dream for years.

I'd love to pull up an album, and see who produced it, who was the sidemen, etc. Click on the link on the side for trivia or alternate versions. It just seems that there's so many albums and artists. I know that there's a lot of movies, too, but still.

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 04:50 (twenty-one years ago)

there are a lot more records than movies, i'd venture.

amateur!st (amateurist), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 04:54 (twenty-one years ago)

well, sure.

That's why I don't know how you could do it reasonably. That's a lot of server space.

Still. To be able to enter two people working together like you can now with the actors except with guitarists and producers? Man.

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 05:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I was looking at the new AMG a couple of days ago and a huge flash (I think) pop-up completely obscured the view, the only way I could get rid of it was yto click on the bloody thing then close it - I thought. A couple of minutes later I realised I'd somehow been transferred to MP3.com! WTF?

I mean, WHAT THE FUCK???

mei (mei), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 08:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I wonder if it's against license to buy AMG's data (costs a lot up front, but not so bad if you're a big corp) and make a new, better looking webpage?

caspar (caspar), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 11:43 (twenty-one years ago)

There is a company called Muze here in NYC that provides database info for Ebay sellers. I think you have to pay for the service though - but I guess you could run a lookup on Ebay for a specific title.

I pasted a sample from a current auction:

Description

Secaucus

Stock Photo

Item Specifics - Music: CDs

Artist:
The Wrens
Release Date:
Feb 27, 1996

Format:
CD
Record Label:
Grass Records

Genre:
Rock
UPC:
601501302121

Sub-Genre:
Punk
Album Type:
Full-Length CD

Condition:
Used


Portions of this page Copyright 1948 - 2004 Muze Inc. All rights reserved.
Additional information


Additional Information about Secaucus
Portions of this page Copyright 1948 - 2004 Muze Inc. All rights reserved.


Track listing

1. Yellow Number Three
2. Built In Girls
3. Surprise, Honeycomb
4. Rest Your Head
5. Won't Get Too Far
6. Joneses Rule Of Sport
7. Dance The Midwest
8. Still Complaining
9. Hats Off To Marriage, Baby
10. Jane Fakes A Hug
11. Counted On Sweetness
12. I've Made Enough Friends
13. Luxury
14. Indie 500
15. Safe & Comfortable
16. Destruction / Drawn
17. I Married Sonja
18. I'll Mind You
19. It's Not Getting Any Good


Details

Distributor:
BMG

Recording type:
Studio

Recording mode:
Stereo

SPAR Code:
n/a

Album notes

The Wrens include: Sett (vocals, bass).


Editorial reviews

...just on the punk side of the `Dazed And Confused' soundtrack, the Edgar Winter Group hovering around Girls Against Boys...
Option  (07/01/1996)

7 (out of 10) - ...uncrowned kings of Power Slop...blend the tightly-controlled dementia of the Pixies to the slippery clatter of Pavement and, more often than not, end up with the warped high-school innocence of Weezer...
NME  (03/09/1996)

...just on the punk side of the `Dazed And Confused' soundtrack, the Edgar Winter Group hovering around Girls Against Boys...NME (3/9/96, p.44) - 7 (out of 10) - ...uncrowned kings of Power Slop...blend the tightly-controlled dementia of the Pixies to the slippery clatter of Pavement and, more often than not, end up with the warped high-school innocence of Weezer...
Option  (07/01/1996)

erv (Abe Froman), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)

If you're using Firefox, this plugin may help make the site usable again.

retort pouch (retort pouch), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Is anybody else getting absolutely no response when they type a name into the little search window at the top of the screen? I can't get the site to search for things anymore at all. Maybe it's my browser (IE), but the fact remains that the site is now totally useless to me. It's just a front page, nothing more.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 14:39 (twenty-one years ago)

oh wow! i hated the javascript links so much!!!

I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 14:41 (twenty-one years ago)

they could have at least had the decency to make the javascript print an "a href" link rather than a stupid onclick js

I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I have a Mac machine. Since their re-design, the main page comes up as a Hockey-like splatter of text.

Not only is it literally impossible to read, btu if I click to any genres, my entire machine freezes!

I imagine this sort of thing can't be easy.

Ian G, Tuesday, 20 July 2004 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)

get the free software /GNU people to generate a band-web-site or set of writing web site, using google-like web-bots with the ranking system, then set up an editorial commitee.

obv. critcs' sites might qualify too.

george gosset (gegoss), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

its fucking awful.

why the tabs? and why does my computer freeze everytime i use the tabs. and i hate flash for a functional website. and its confusing. bah.

doomie x, Tuesday, 20 July 2004 15:10 (twenty-one years ago)

"...get the free software /GNU people to generate a band-web-site or set of writing web site..."

So refusing to download more "stuff" is not an unreasonable strategy.

Yeah, get the ten CD install of Free Bltfzpk 5.4x. Don't forget the Excrement 01.1 action web accelerator add-ons, people. And you'll need the CrummyFree compiler, although that usually comes with Bltfzpk.

Support is excellent.

Harry Klam, Tuesday, 20 July 2004 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

something like Wikipedia would be cool

I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

why does my computer freeze everytime i use the tabs.

It's the Excrement action web accelerator add-on. There are still a few showstoppers in it.

Joe Bltfzpk, Tuesday, 20 July 2004 15:26 (twenty-one years ago)

>Yeah, get the ten CD install of Free Bltfzpk 5.4x. Don't forget the Excrement 01.1 action web accelerator add-ons, people. And you'll need the CrummyFree compiler, although that usually comes with Bltfzpk. Support is excellent.<

Thanks! I knew there had to be an easy answer to this predicament.

chuck, Tuesday, 20 July 2004 15:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Harry,
don't be so bitchy about the GNU-folk.

They could optimise a 'bot and a web front end for that sort of data collection, but maybe there should be outside-committee non-GNU site design. And yet it's more their free spirited attitude that is valuable.

anyway, the Linux _servers_ would do this work. You'd still get the page easily in IE and Mozilla. Nothing to install browser side (cf: AMG's new site -- i presume it doesn't install anything except a cooky, but whatever AMG's doing between clients and servers it sure takes an exceptional time).

george gosset (gegoss), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 15:29 (twenty-one years ago)

haha chuck

- fuck computers and shit

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)

PEOPLE STILL USE COMPUSERVE?

I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 15:35 (twenty-one years ago)

PEOPLE STILL USE COMPUSERVE?

The computer virus that thought it was human asks a question.

Happenings ten years time ago:

www.soci.niu.edu/~crypt/other/vcl.htm

They could optimise a 'bot and a web front end for that sort of data collection, but maybe there should be outside-committee non-GNU site design.

"Oot-greet." -- Carbuncle, "Don Martin Steps Out."

Harry Klam, Tuesday, 20 July 2004 17:50 (twenty-one years ago)

none of the links work anymore. i followed a link from artistdirect into some massive gobblegookshit. it fucking blows.

doomie x, Tuesday, 20 July 2004 18:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Itr is, it's fair to say, FUCKING HIDEOUS.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 18:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I wonder what the chances are that a steep traffic dropoff will compel them to undo some of their "improvements."

morris pavilion (samjeff), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 19:19 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.discogs.com

It's pretty much only for electronic stuff but VERY complete and pretty accurate. THey are working on Hip-Hop as well.

DigitalDjigit, Wednesday, 21 July 2004 03:16 (twenty-one years ago)

tho the cost of used LPs varies more...

martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 22 July 2004 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I've been to a few places that sold used LPs and they were really expensive, but it was all indie/collector type stuff. How much would it cost if I just want Jackson 5 or K-Tel type compilation LPs?

artdamages (artdamages), Thursday, 22 July 2004 21:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm guilty of this, too, but over-reliance on Allmusic among journalists kind of scares me. It seems to me it magnifies rather than cuts through some of the "telephone game" aspects of internet research.

I just now used it to check something about the Time, and the only thing factually accurate about the summary was the spelling of their names.

Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 22 July 2004 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I never much used AMG to check bios; the text parts were usually kinda worthless. I used it to check band members' names, birthdates, deatdates, cities of origin, record labels, years of issue, relatively concrete stuff like that. (Though AMG often got *those* facts wrong, to be honest - especially record labels, where their US vs UK label problem made them completely inconsistent.)

>How much would it cost if I just want Jackson 5 or K-Tel type compilation LPs? <

$1.00, if you go to the right place. And if it's much more than that, you should go somewhere else.

chuck, Thursday, 22 July 2004 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I desperately need to purchase a record player then.

artdamages (artdamages), Thursday, 22 July 2004 21:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I used it to check band members' names, birthdates, deatdates, cities of origin, record labels, years of issue, relatively concrete stuff like that. (Though AMG often got *those* facts wrong,

AMG fucks that sort of shit up all the time.

martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 22 July 2004 21:45 (twenty-one years ago)

hunting through used store bins is way more fun and informative and full of surprises, and way less antiseptic, than downloading them on some damn machine at home.

Sorry to continue this off topic convo but...

I agree that it is more fun. But I will also say that there is no way in hell that i would own (ie. i bought) Big & Rich or Montgomery Gentry without having downloaded them and heard them for a month or more before said purchase. On the other end of the spectrum, there is a hell of a lot of feces (actual feces!) that I *would* have bought that sucked cuz I didn't get a chance to download and judge in advance.

frankE (frankE), Thursday, 22 July 2004 22:17 (twenty-one years ago)

does anyone how what IMDB's business model is? and where they get their data? they have fairly reliable information on some incredibly obscure stuff, like hungarian silent films of the teens that have been missing for 80 years. i remember in the early days, you couldn't even find some of the more well-known films by, say, stan brakhage. but now it's pretty close to exhaustive. i hope they never move to a "pay" model.

amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 22 July 2004 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)

amazon owns them.

frankE (frankE), Thursday, 22 July 2004 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)

which, i suppose, begs the question as to why they don't start the same for music.

frankE (frankE), Thursday, 22 July 2004 23:47 (twenty-one years ago)

And you can pay to use other features of IMDb same way Allmusic is.

David Allen (David Allen), Friday, 23 July 2004 05:58 (twenty-one years ago)

two months pass...
after all the huffing / puffing, how many of you now find yourself back at amg about as much as before?

frankE (frankE), Thursday, 14 October 2004 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I go back, but only as a last resort (which means I end up there about once a day). I've found it's become easier just to google information than navigate the AMG site.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 14 October 2004 15:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I've gotten used to navigating the new system, but I no longer find it fun to just scroll around and play with. Too many separate windows and "click for mores." I miss the big pages with all the info on them.

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 14 October 2004 15:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm probably there as much as ever - but I don't get as much out of my time there as I used to.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 14 October 2004 15:54 (twenty-one years ago)

It loads a lot faster now, but I agree with Anthony that you have to do a lot more clicking than you used to.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 14 October 2004 15:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I only go there if I absolutely have to, and I don't enjoy it like I used to. Just look up what I came for (which takes 3 times as long as it did before) then get out - no more random band searching, clicking around, etc.

morris pavilion (samjeff), Thursday, 14 October 2004 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)

it's definitely working better from a loading/technical standpoint...not crashing my browser anymore, but I guess yeah I'm still not crazy about having to click all the tabs for everything....

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 14 October 2004 16:28 (twenty-one years ago)

But y'all still love me, right? ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 14 October 2004 16:32 (twenty-one years ago)

More than ever. The rare times I check nu-AMG, I'm always hoping for Raggett byline. I'm usually disappointed.

W i l l (common_person), Thursday, 14 October 2004 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Aw. Well I'll be talking about the new Pig Destroyer and the new Staubgold comp soon, among other things. Maybe the Cristina reissues too!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 14 October 2004 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe the Cristina reissues too!

Maybe not

Andy K (Andy K), Thursday, 14 October 2004 16:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Ah, ya punk, I knew it was too good to be true when I saw the reviews had been unclaimed. But you don't even like that music! *retreats hastily*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 14 October 2004 16:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I still use it as much as ever, and even more than when they had all those insane javascript links. They really need to do away with that flash navigation thingy. It definitely causes longer load times (and the usual flash loading stutter) and doesn't seem to contribute to the experience (and more importantly their business).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 14 October 2004 16:48 (twenty-one years ago)

>I only go there if I absolutely have to, and I don't enjoy it like I used to. Just look up what I came for (which takes 3 times as long as it did before) then get out - no more random band searching, clicking around, etc. <

Exactly what I was going to say. I go there way, way, less than I used to. (Though more than I did the week they changed, I guess.
The site has improved slightly since, but it is still not a fraction as useful as it used to be, back before all the idiot changes.)

chuck, Thursday, 14 October 2004 16:50 (twenty-one years ago)

i go there way less too

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 14 October 2004 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I go there sometimes, and it is a bit more reliable now, but much quicker to go via bn.com, the Barnes & Noble site that shares most if not all of the AMG base, including what *I* think of as advanced9enough).Plus you get sound samples of a lot of it, and bn usually hooks you up with all related albums (that an artist has appeared on; they don't try to steer you from the Stooges to the Hollies like AMG might). There are exceptions, like if you put in Magnetic Fields, bn won't also list Future Bible Heroes, Gothic Archies, etc. But all of those are in there if you do a search for each, and they have led to me to alot of stuff I never would have known was related. Also, if you do an Advanced Search on Google, and put AMG in the Domain Name box, you can break through AMG's Advanced Search barrier, or at least it worked this summer; even when the *basic* search thing on AMG was useless, this worked. Somebody mentioned Muze. In the CD store where I worked, we had a Muze computer. They sent a new disc every month, updated; really it was as useful as a website, without the freezes. Although they later offered soudsamples via the web (I think Best Buy's Rhapsody [tied in with Real Networks] service offers downloads too, don't they?)Good to Muze is offering a deal to Ebay (Merchants only?), but the only way to access 'em for free is to go the store (ones owned by Trans World Entertainment, like Coconuts, FYE, Camelot, Planet Music,I think). Anybody wondering about vinyl, you can still find bargains at eBay, but I've found amazing rarites (incl. a lot never on CD) at Salvation Army stores etc. for a quarter (also helps to live in a town where a lot of military are always being transferred, *finally* parting with vinyl ballast in yardsales!). See the Rolling Vinyl Thread.

Don, Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)

ned,

i'm waiting for you to split off with www.allraggett.com

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:40 (twenty-one years ago)

I went there today for the first time in awhile to get some info on Marvin Gaye live albums and was just frustrated by all the slowness, connection problems, and clicking. I didn't look at half the albums I was interested because of it.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)

What Morris said, and what Chuck quoted, perfectly sums it up for me. Still use it when I need to fact-check something, but all "exploring" has gone out the window. Main problem now is the lingering slowness, though the extra clicks continue to annoy. Life is too short.

Roy Williams Highlight (diamond), Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Give me time, Matt.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)

The StaubGold sampler is dire! Overall effect: subnormal temp (which can be bad as low-grade fever), despite a few good tracks (despite ven Faust vs. Dalek!) Pig Destroyer had me unreasonably depressed on Rolling Metal cos it's good parts are good (pretty short though. Jeez, Cristina was indeed The One Who Got Away; sympathy for yr ministry.

Don, Thursday, 14 October 2004 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)

all music guide *bookmark deleted*

fuck them. really, totally utterly fuck them.

That hurt, godammit. No way in hell am i going back with whatever pages I might *also* have loaded at the current time, with all the associated cookies, flash bits whatever just to see if it maybe doesn't crash within 30 seconds anymore and lose my whole browsing session.

I've used mp3.com a bit, but it's hardly any sort of replacement for what I liked about amg - the all-on-one-page 'related artists' info, the ability to see which album was generally rated the best 'first buy' etc (mp3.com seems to show everything as *****)

I HOPE THEY GO BUST.

p.s. fuck them

i POST on ilm (i lurk on ilm), Thursday, 14 October 2004 21:02 (twenty-one years ago)

i use 'em now only as a last resort when i have no other choice. i hate all the tabs, yeah, but mostly i hate how completely fucking slow it is. sometimes it's just completely fucking non-responsive. you type in a band name, if you're lucky you get the page with all the possible matches, then you click on the appropriate match and half the time nothing happens. nothing at all. you click again, still nothing. you click seven times in a row out of frustration, still nothing. then, if the stars are aligned right and you've said all your prayers, maybe just maybe it will finally open up.

at least that's how it is for me. this happens to me a good 35 percent of the time. and i'm using a current version of IE on a new PC, with a T-1 connection. so somehow i don't think the problem's on my end.

i could say more about how fucked up the whole tab system is -- not just that it exists, but the way they've coded it -- but then i might explode.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Thursday, 14 October 2004 21:09 (twenty-one years ago)

The StaubGold sampler is dire!

Different strokes, m'friend. I'm addicted to glaze.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 14 October 2004 21:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyway, y'all with complaints have sent them feedback about that, yes?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 14 October 2004 21:11 (twenty-one years ago)

fwiw, I certainly did.

and a polite and composed complaint it was too.

grrr.

i ... on ilm (i lurk on ilm), Thursday, 14 October 2004 21:48 (twenty-one years ago)

5{I would see how many connections it would take to get from, say, Wire to N'Sync (six, if you do it correctly!), but now I can't have that fun anymore. It took me five minutes yesterday to open the page for the Gun Club's Miami album.

Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 14 October 2004 22:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I just opened the full page for that album in less than a minute. (Running Mac 10.3.5, Safari 1.2.3, DSL line, if that helps.) I'm not saying this to be a shill (they'd have to pay me more, for a start!), merely noting that everyone's experiences with the speed of the database will likely differ.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 14 October 2004 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)

why didn't they allow boolean in the search box for fucks sakes? how tedious is it to not be able to search for band & song at the same time.

bulbs (bulbs), Thursday, 14 October 2004 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Raggett, I want your computer!

(why u break heart all time?)

Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 14 October 2004 23:17 (twenty-one years ago)

the sad thing is that old amg back in the day used to be kind of slow too, which was always my biggest beef with the site. i always hoped if they gave it a makeover they would speed up page-loads some. sadly post-remake it's practically unusable at least on my (old-ass) computer, going there is the lastest of last resorts

artiste (artiste), Thursday, 14 October 2004 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Raggett, I want your computer!

Tell it to my face. Next Tuesday, at the Di FAP for _The Apple_ and _Xanadu_ at the New Beverly Cinema. Which you are attending. No exceptions.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 14 October 2004 23:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I bought a copy of the first two Guru Guru albums on a single CD - it turned out to be some East European bootleg edition with liner notes by Ned Raggett - taken from AMG reviews, I'm guessing.

Pangolino (ricki spaghetti), Thursday, 14 October 2004 23:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Hahah. True, that's where they would be from. I keep running across AMG reviews from me via Russian bootleg websites, I've noticed.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 14 October 2004 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
On a similair note, try this:

http://www.zvuki.ru/

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Thursday, 25 November 2004 18:57 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
Holy fucking shit, Chewy! That's a great alternative to AMG! Thanks!

heh.

King Kobra (King Kobra), Thursday, 20 January 2005 00:55 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.zvuki.ru/logo167x70/6/pic.gif

:)

latetotheparty (latetotheparty), Thursday, 20 January 2005 15:22 (twenty-one years ago)

It does seem like most of it was ripped straight from AMG!

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Thursday, 20 January 2005 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

eight months pass...
I am registered with amg as a woman who was born in 1962, currently living in a zip code that corresponds to Knoxville, Tennessee, which set of digits is either incidentally coincident with an identical postal code in the island republic of Vanuatu or has has been suddenly annexed by it. My name is Garnet Anderson and I'm in the entertainment industry, making $0-30,000 a year.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 06:23 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.