TS: T. Rex vs. Todd Rundgren

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
70's pop phenomena with the initials TR that are both in my top 5 listened-to artists right now.

i say trex, but man. both are really great. im listening to a wizard a true star right now, and it is just the weirdest-poppiest thing ive ever heard. somebody compared sign o' the times to this a while ago, and i think the comparison is OTM. just these teeming worlds of weirdness; lots of juxtapositions, lots of weirdly personal stuff, lots of production quirks, both have amazing album covers, etc.

nonetheless, the slider and electric warrior are unstoppable, and i think ill listen to tanx next.

anyway, opinions?

peter smith (plsmith), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Marc Bolan at least had the good sense and taste to expire before ever releasing an album swaddled in a sleeve like this...

http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0001MXT14.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)

hahahahahaha - nah man, i love that album cover. in fact, that tips the scales a little, but not enough. still t-rex.

peter smith (plsmith), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Rundgren SHOULD be preferred (smarter, better singer, better songwriter, knob-twiddling genius), but I'm totally with T-Rex, for so many reasons. Self-conscious quirkiness < utterly BIZARRE unself-conscious uniqueness. Tall, toothy gawkiness < polymorphous elfin cuteness. Recording studio dr. frankenstein < TV studio monster.

briania (briania), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)

do you really think bolan was entirely un-self-conscious?

peter smith (plsmith), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)

y'know Todd kinda looks like the lead singer of the Liars, sorta.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

TS: TR's version of they were wrong... vs the liars' version of a wizard...?

peter smith (plsmith), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

hypothetically - dont go slsking.

peter smith (plsmith), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

ex-post...

I dunno, Bolan was apparently very much his own creation, but maybe he did a better job of APPEARING unself-conscious. He could definitely let the kooky lyrical non-sequitirs flow in a way that didn't betray much editing, not to mention his ability to lay back in a chunka-chunka glam-stomp groove. Todd is and was too clever by half for that stuff.

briania (briania), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)

i just dont know if i could agree that TR is smarter than bolan...

peter smith (plsmith), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Okay, picture "Marc Bolan Interactive" or imagine him producing Hall & Oates.

briania (briania), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 15:23 (twenty-one years ago)

recently went back and listened to pretty much all the t.rex stuff, the box, the orig LPs. very limited but as an updated eddie cochran, nice. don't think bolan was actually very smart but that's not really important.

todd has always been a bit of a cold fish. i find very little worthwhile after, like, '72. the black-and-white utopia album is marred by antiseptic, weird, trebly production, but i like the songs. but far more true musical value in todd and todd did make one great album, "something/anything." the t. rex albums are pretty inconsistent. so, as a rock star, bolan gets the nod, but in toto--you're comparing two fairly minor figures here i think--i say todd.

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)

minor?

peter smith (plsmith), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I take issue there, too. Big stars, hit records, slavish cults & mass audiences, fingerprints all over 70s rock music. And that was when rock was big, man.

briania (briania), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I've never listened to Rundgren but Bolan is worth worshipping

Sonny A. (Keiko), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)

As much as I love "Hello, It's Me," and "Open My Eyes," I'm going with T.Rex if only for "20th Century Boy".

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

It took me a while to work out where Rundgren's right leg is in the cover; until then it looked very creepy.

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)

todd rundgren gets points for "open my eyes" (my favoritest nuggets song of all) but i'll still have to go with the mighty bolan.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 22:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Tommy Bolin

dave q, Wednesday, 21 July 2004 23:24 (twenty-one years ago)

10 pin bowlin'

duane, Thursday, 22 July 2004 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, I think they're minor. fairly depthless music i'd say. the t. rex recordings are awfully one-dimensional. i mean listen to the way big star does "baby strange" on their "columbia " album and then to bolan's original. the big star version is so much more swingin', full and relaxed. marc bolan was totally cool and he tried very hard to be a star, and good for him. but elton john had more depth. i actually have some of the same problems with bowie--i've learned over the years to disregard all that futuristic, iggy stardust crap and just groove to his cool riffs and songs and enjoy him for the nice post-brit invasion performer he is. and i admire bowie for his ventures into his soul or funk or whatever that was in the late '70s. the diff is that bolan could've never done anything like "low" or "station to station" and that's fine. and same with todd--post philly-soul post-brit-invasion but in the end his later stuff has about the same content as hall and oates, and none of that is anything i feel i need to think about or engage with.

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Thursday, 22 July 2004 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Wow, eddie. I actually think Bolan was brilliant. Have you ever heard the early Tyrannosaurus Rex albums? His songs with John's Children?

And I don't get the "one-dimensional" thing. Were Eddie Cochran or the Ramones "one-dimensional?"

Tim Ellison, Thursday, 22 July 2004 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm with eddie on this one. i like plenty of t.rex songs, but over the course of an album, even at his/their best, he/they could be tough to take. which is to say even "electric warrior" has some glaringly awful songs, and there's not enough there in the performances to get you through it. or at least to get me through it.

todd had a pretty great run in the early '70s, but by the time he got around to banging on the drum all day ... well, "bang on the drum" was no "bang a gong."

fact checking cuz (fcc), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Eddie, do you hate sex?

Sonny A. (Keiko), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)

i mean, making music that some people think is depthless or boring is fairly different than being minor...

i think both acts have been hugely influential in pop music ever since their heyday. bolan's glittery sex-snarl basically came to define bowie's. how does hunky dory get to ziggy stardust (i agree that THAT one is somewhat overrated) without electric warrior? i dont think it does. and as far as the depth of the songs goes, ill take "main man" as one of the saddest, most evocative songs i can think of right now.

rundgren is a little tougher for me to be so effusive about, simply because i dont know his oeuvre as well as bolan's. but it just seems like 70/80's pop production is his domain. he worked with the ny dolls, he worked with xtc, he worked with patti smith, badfinger, sparks, and he put his weirdo-pop stamp on all of them. i cant imagine a record like prince's around the world in a day or sign o the times existing without TR, and i KNOW youre not calling prince minor.

if big star isnt minor, neither is t.rex or TR.

peter smith (plsmith), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

and i mean, i love me some fuckin' big star, dont get me wrong.

peter smith (plsmith), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I think Todd Rundgren is fucking awesome. I could easily pick out 20 or 30 numbers by him that make me happy every time I hear them. T-rex are OK, I guess. A coupla numbers, and I don't feel the need to hear any for a while. The early Tyrannosaurus rex stuff is pretty horrible to my ears, and I have a hard time getting through more than a coupla minutes of any of it. His singing voice really grates on me. the T-rex number on "glastonbury fayre" joins the version of the grateful dead's dark star as the only bit of that album I couldn't get thru. Bolan was pretty fucking hot, I must admit, and Todd, ergh, no perhaps not, still Todd is the MIGHTY VICTOR here for me, easily.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:53 (twenty-one years ago)

If Bolan were still living and had been making music up through today, what are the chances your opinions might be different on this Q?

TR's latest is a pretty solid piece of work from a 56 year old guy.

Rocco, Thursday, 22 July 2004 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

hmm...i wonder why my comments on two pop acts elicit the interesting question, do i like sex? i like sex and sex is a good part of what bolan was about, and i am not agin it. i enjoy marc bolan a lot and hear it as a lot of great raw material. i love his acoustic version of "buick mackane" a lot, and i think he had his heart in the right place...as evidenced on the box-set piece on which he and roy wood talk about music and bolan tries to learn how to play the move's "fire brigade." i mean i listened to bolan a lot last winter and got a great appreciation for what he'd done. and as i say, if i had to choose i'd go with bolan because he really was a pop star, far more than todd.

i've always been on the fence about the ramones...i enjoy the idea of them more than the reality. but i like them far more now than i did a few years ago. kind of like my reaction to the cramps, whom i now really like after initially thinking of them as a one-dimensional joke...and my take on pop music is that if you can't appreciate a good one-dimensional joke then the joke's on you (sometimes sex is a one-dimensional joke but you go thru with the damned thing anyway, even if you're like me and you don't like it...)

and i would say that, in my opinion, big star is kind of another thing entirely and i wouldn't call them minor. neither todd nor bolan did anything with the depth of the third big star record. i'd say part of the appeal of the first BS albums is the surface quality of same, altho i'd argue there's a lot more to chew on on the best of those records than anything in the bolan or rundgren ouvre. i'm a fan of glam and power-pop and i'm aware that they're both genres that are somewhat shallow by definition.

and no, i wouldn't call prince minor. and again minor isn't necessarily pejorative. i love lots of minor r&b for ex. and i feel like if it enriches my life and satisfies my admittedly formalist bent, all to the good. prince kind of does, did, what a lot of glam/power-poppers/bubblegumers wanted to do, as on things like "peach" and "she's always in my hair," which is the kind of prince material i go for the most. there's something so reassuringly crass and populist, yet distanced, about the prince and that's what i think todd was going for on a lot of his stuff..."slut" and "piss aaron" for example, and bolan too. but they sorta fall short in there somewhere.

yeah, i like sex.

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Thursday, 22 July 2004 20:23 (twenty-one years ago)

"Neither todd nor bolan did anything with the depth of the third big star record."

Again, though, have you heard Unicorn?

Tim Ellison, Thursday, 22 July 2004 20:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I confess I am not familiar with the Tyrann. Rex stuff. So "Unicorn" is worth hearing?

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Thursday, 22 July 2004 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I love all of those first four albums. Unicorn is the best of them (Beard of Stars is close).

Tim Ellison, Friday, 23 July 2004 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe I missed it, but am I the ONLY one who loves both?

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Friday, 23 July 2004 02:06 (twenty-one years ago)

which is to say even "electric warrior" has some glaringly awful songs

Maybe I'm misreading into this, but the "even" makes me think that Electric Warrior is assumed to be his best. I was always under the impression that The Slider held that position (with fans of T Rex arguing that point endlessly, to be sure). I know I can't think of a weak song off of that one.

dlp9001, Friday, 23 July 2004 02:18 (twenty-one years ago)

i mean listen to the way big star does "baby strange" on their "columbia " album and then to bolan's original. the big star version is so much more swingin', full and relaxed

haven't heard that particular track, but i must say that big star have always struck me as the LEAST "swingin'" act i've ever heard. they're pleasant, but there's something downright soporific about them - i literally can't sit through more than half of radio city at a time without starting to nod off. i'll take "updated eddie cochran" over that any day.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 23 July 2004 02:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Todd Rundgren w/Nazz > T. Rex > Todd Rundgren Solo > Todd Rundgren w/Utopia.

(And the only two Tyrannosaurus Rex songs I ever heard, I didn't like. So I'll give 'em the benefit of doubt and say I'm unfamiliar with them.)

Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Friday, 23 July 2004 03:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Too tough to decide. I supposed just for Nazz, I'll have to go with Todd.

billstevejim, Friday, 23 July 2004 12:44 (twenty-one years ago)

seven months pass...
marc

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 22:04 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.