i say trex, but man. both are really great. im listening to a wizard a true star right now, and it is just the weirdest-poppiest thing ive ever heard. somebody compared sign o' the times to this a while ago, and i think the comparison is OTM. just these teeming worlds of weirdness; lots of juxtapositions, lots of weirdly personal stuff, lots of production quirks, both have amazing album covers, etc.
nonetheless, the slider and electric warrior are unstoppable, and i think ill listen to tanx next.
anyway, opinions?
― peter smith (plsmith), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0001MXT14.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― briania (briania), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)
I dunno, Bolan was apparently very much his own creation, but maybe he did a better job of APPEARING unself-conscious. He could definitely let the kooky lyrical non-sequitirs flow in a way that didn't betray much editing, not to mention his ability to lay back in a chunka-chunka glam-stomp groove. Todd is and was too clever by half for that stuff.
― briania (briania), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― briania (briania), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 15:23 (twenty-one years ago)
todd has always been a bit of a cold fish. i find very little worthwhile after, like, '72. the black-and-white utopia album is marred by antiseptic, weird, trebly production, but i like the songs. but far more true musical value in todd and todd did make one great album, "something/anything." the t. rex albums are pretty inconsistent. so, as a rock star, bolan gets the nod, but in toto--you're comparing two fairly minor figures here i think--i say todd.
― eddie hurt (ddduncan), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― briania (briania), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sonny A. (Keiko), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Wednesday, 21 July 2004 22:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― dave q, Wednesday, 21 July 2004 23:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― duane, Thursday, 22 July 2004 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― eddie hurt (ddduncan), Thursday, 22 July 2004 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)
And I don't get the "one-dimensional" thing. Were Eddie Cochran or the Ramones "one-dimensional?"
― Tim Ellison, Thursday, 22 July 2004 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)
todd had a pretty great run in the early '70s, but by the time he got around to banging on the drum all day ... well, "bang on the drum" was no "bang a gong."
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sonny A. (Keiko), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)
i think both acts have been hugely influential in pop music ever since their heyday. bolan's glittery sex-snarl basically came to define bowie's. how does hunky dory get to ziggy stardust (i agree that THAT one is somewhat overrated) without electric warrior? i dont think it does. and as far as the depth of the songs goes, ill take "main man" as one of the saddest, most evocative songs i can think of right now.
rundgren is a little tougher for me to be so effusive about, simply because i dont know his oeuvre as well as bolan's. but it just seems like 70/80's pop production is his domain. he worked with the ny dolls, he worked with xtc, he worked with patti smith, badfinger, sparks, and he put his weirdo-pop stamp on all of them. i cant imagine a record like prince's around the world in a day or sign o the times existing without TR, and i KNOW youre not calling prince minor.
if big star isnt minor, neither is t.rex or TR.
― peter smith (plsmith), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:53 (twenty-one years ago)
TR's latest is a pretty solid piece of work from a 56 year old guy.
― Rocco, Thursday, 22 July 2004 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)
i've always been on the fence about the ramones...i enjoy the idea of them more than the reality. but i like them far more now than i did a few years ago. kind of like my reaction to the cramps, whom i now really like after initially thinking of them as a one-dimensional joke...and my take on pop music is that if you can't appreciate a good one-dimensional joke then the joke's on you (sometimes sex is a one-dimensional joke but you go thru with the damned thing anyway, even if you're like me and you don't like it...)
and i would say that, in my opinion, big star is kind of another thing entirely and i wouldn't call them minor. neither todd nor bolan did anything with the depth of the third big star record. i'd say part of the appeal of the first BS albums is the surface quality of same, altho i'd argue there's a lot more to chew on on the best of those records than anything in the bolan or rundgren ouvre. i'm a fan of glam and power-pop and i'm aware that they're both genres that are somewhat shallow by definition.
and no, i wouldn't call prince minor. and again minor isn't necessarily pejorative. i love lots of minor r&b for ex. and i feel like if it enriches my life and satisfies my admittedly formalist bent, all to the good. prince kind of does, did, what a lot of glam/power-poppers/bubblegumers wanted to do, as on things like "peach" and "she's always in my hair," which is the kind of prince material i go for the most. there's something so reassuringly crass and populist, yet distanced, about the prince and that's what i think todd was going for on a lot of his stuff..."slut" and "piss aaron" for example, and bolan too. but they sorta fall short in there somewhere.
yeah, i like sex.
― eddie hurt (ddduncan), Thursday, 22 July 2004 20:23 (twenty-one years ago)
Again, though, have you heard Unicorn?
― Tim Ellison, Thursday, 22 July 2004 20:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― eddie hurt (ddduncan), Thursday, 22 July 2004 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim Ellison, Friday, 23 July 2004 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Friday, 23 July 2004 02:06 (twenty-one years ago)
Maybe I'm misreading into this, but the "even" makes me think that Electric Warrior is assumed to be his best. I was always under the impression that The Slider held that position (with fans of T Rex arguing that point endlessly, to be sure). I know I can't think of a weak song off of that one.
― dlp9001, Friday, 23 July 2004 02:18 (twenty-one years ago)
haven't heard that particular track, but i must say that big star have always struck me as the LEAST "swingin'" act i've ever heard. they're pleasant, but there's something downright soporific about them - i literally can't sit through more than half of radio city at a time without starting to nod off. i'll take "updated eddie cochran" over that any day.
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 23 July 2004 02:49 (twenty-one years ago)
(And the only two Tyrannosaurus Rex songs I ever heard, I didn't like. So I'll give 'em the benefit of doubt and say I'm unfamiliar with them.)
― Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Friday, 23 July 2004 03:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― billstevejim, Friday, 23 July 2004 12:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 22:04 (twenty years ago)