NME.COM

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
"NME.com is the most valuable tool we ever created. This magazine could not now come out without NME.com," says Robinson. "There are pages every week that are dedicated to the research done and the information given to us via the readership of NME.com. We get fantastic insights and it fits the brand strategy, which is about connecting with music fans. NME is much more than just this magazine."

From this article: http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/music/features/story.jsp?story=545027

I just don't understand how nme.com can be so popular, I visit it on the odd occasion, I used to go there quite a bit but have found it to be just as badly written as the Print NME, the news on there is usually to be found somewhere else on the net a good few hours beforehand, and their reviews section seems to be updated once every month or so.

actionjackson, Wednesday, 28 July 2004 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)

i used it as my main source for music news for quite a while (alongside dotmusic, now annoyingly defunct/part of yahoo/launch). frequented the chat room for 2 years or so and read reviews there after i stopped bothering to buy the mag. i wish they would still publish the official top 100 singles like they used to do. more video would also be good.

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Wednesday, 28 July 2004 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

i think they are afraid to update reviews as it may deter more people from buying the mag? also they used to publish film reviews but these just disappeared overnight - i take it NME no longer runs film reviews? is there even a TV column?

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Wednesday, 28 July 2004 15:12 (twenty-one years ago)

the only reason that it gets the web traffic:

A: NME brand awareness
B: It is one of the few UK music websites: that updates regularly with music news throughout the day. [even though most of the news is about useless artists]

[most of the UK music websites including: BBC 6 Music, PlayLouder and dotmusic are too lazy/ don't have the resources to break news, so they recycle it from the NME.com]

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 28 July 2004 15:22 (twenty-one years ago)

the chatroom and messageboard in there used to be great, around 5 years ago. But now I rarely visit the site at all (except for trying to find reviews that have appeared in the printed paper). And I think blogs have taken over as a decent news source.

jellybean (jellybean), Wednesday, 28 July 2004 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)

music blogosphere: http://blo.gs/3600/favorites.html

more diversity/ entertaining / informative/ knowledgeable / more updates than NME.com

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 28 July 2004 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)

woah, handy! if only it could include a few words from each page's new content

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Wednesday, 28 July 2004 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)

hey i had a real good idea. if there was a sort of search function for just music blogs, so if you heard a new tune or something, wanted to read more about it or whatever, then ytou could see what someone on a blog had to say about it, the attraction being that blog reviews are kinda more interesting than conventional press ones. for example. can this happen now?

ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 28 July 2004 15:57 (twenty-one years ago)

there is this:
The MP3Blogs Aggregator
http://www.mp3blogs.org/

but it only does MP3 blogs and updates each hour - no search function though.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 28 July 2004 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)

what I think Ambrose means is something like:

Daypop
http://www.daypop.com/

or

BlogPulse
http://www.blogpulse.com/

but just for music blogs.

a: this would require: a server / with appropriate bandwith
b: people with the programming skills to set up an information retrieval system

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 28 July 2004 16:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Technorati

has 3 million blogs in it's index
http://www.technorati.com/
unfortunately it's search capabilities are limited

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 28 July 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I started visiting nme.com about 2 years ago. Even had an email address and used the chatroom a fair bit.
Now the chatroom AND email service has gone. Theres less new news and as stated above reviews aren't updated very often.
It really is poor compared to what it used to be like.

Truly, Wednesday, 28 July 2004 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I visited the nme chatrooms in 1996 and I can confirm that they were crap then too.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 28 July 2004 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

eleven months pass...
Is it true that NME.com is going to be relaunched pretty soon? If so, what's happening to it?

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Monday, 25 July 2005 02:30 (twenty years ago)

Even more empthasis on ringtone adverts, pictures of Pete and DHTML scripts that don't work properly in Firefox.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Monday, 25 July 2005 09:30 (twenty years ago)

they've taken on nick southall as editor.

N_RQ, Monday, 25 July 2005 09:40 (twenty years ago)

robble @ blueski

Tumililingan (ex machina), Monday, 25 July 2005 11:14 (twenty years ago)

two years pass...

New look NME.COM, what’s going on?

Why have we done it?

Through years of adding new features and responding to new designs, NME.COM had become something of a monster. A monster that needed reigning in. All the feedback we were getting told us that it was getting more and more difficult to find exactly what you wanted - and no one likes to spend ages to find things.

Plus all the journalists working here were frustrated that the news stories and reviews couldn’t be found by search engines.

We had to get this right.

Why have we done only news, reviews and photos?

We were doing so well forging ahead with these sections and they were so much easier to get around that we couldn’t wait to get them out. We felt that the improvements we’d made to these sections outweighed the shock in moving from one look to another.

What are the changes?

Most of the main changes are ‘under the bonnet’. The code on the pages (I’m told) after much splendid boffinery is better structured and you may notice it’s a little faster.

Some of the things you’ll notice are:

1. Overall clarity has been improved – we’ve simplified the indexes and pages so they’re easier to get around

2. You can jump from one news story to another using the right hand list of latest news

3. We’ve increased the text size so it’s easier to read on a small screen or a mobile device

4. It’s easier to find news, reviews and media on your favourite bands from news or reviews stories

5. Easier main navigation – it lights up when you put your mouse on it, so you can be sure on what you’re about to click

6. A second level of navigation on news and reviews. So you can get straight to the sections (‘Blogs’, ‘Tour news’ or ‘Album reviews’ say) much quicker than before

7. We’ve made it easier to add comments to news stories and your own reviews - the best will appear below the articles

8. We’ve added a MyNME widget on these pages – this is so you can keep track of comments and reviews, add photos and videos, make friends and add tour dates

We think we’ve done OK, and we hope you like it. However we have some questions that you can help us with. Either e-mail me mynmeb✧✧✧@ipcme✧✧✧.c✧✧ with your answers or use the comment form below. We’ll be putting everything back into the next stage of the redesign.

1 Is the navigation bar easier, harder or the same to use? Why?

2 Is the second tier of navigation on news and reviews useful? How?

3 Is it easier or harder to find news stories and reviews you want to read? Why?

4 Is it easier or harder to read news stories and reviews? Why?

5 How often do you think you would add comments to news stories?

6 Would you comment on news/reviews only about artists you’re interested in, or would you like to have your say on major news stories, releases or tours?

7 How do you feel about the best of the comments being including in NME the magazine?

8 What things should we do to MyNME to improve it?

9 What things outside of news, reviews and photos could we do to improve it?

10 How jarring is the change from one look to another, is it too uneven?

http://www.nme.com/blog/index.php?blog=10&p=3067&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1

James Mitchell, Friday, 14 December 2007 09:38 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.