― Whiskeytown Littlecock (ex machina), Friday, 30 July 2004 12:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Whiskeytown Littlecock (ex machina), Friday, 30 July 2004 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 30 July 2004 12:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Friday, 30 July 2004 12:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― dleone (dleone), Friday, 30 July 2004 12:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Whiskeytown Littlecock (ex machina), Friday, 30 July 2004 12:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Friday, 30 July 2004 12:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Friday, 30 July 2004 12:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Friday, 30 July 2004 12:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 30 July 2004 12:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 30 July 2004 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Friday, 30 July 2004 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― thorJESUHOY (Thor), Friday, 30 July 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― briania (briania), Friday, 30 July 2004 13:47 (twenty-one years ago)
It's unlikely that you would duplicate every track on the Best Of unless you really get into the artist and buy everything in their catalogue. Even then, the Best Of can serve a useful purpose because sometimes you might feel like listening to that particular collection of tracks rather than one of the regular albums.
For instance, I recently bought the Fall Best Of "50,000 Fall Fans Can't Be Wrong" even though I already had a few of their albums. But since the Fall have so many albums, and I knew I was never going to buy even half of them, and assuming it's reasonably well chosen, it's nice to have some of those tracks that I would never own by other means.
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 30 July 2004 13:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― rentboy (rentboy), Friday, 30 July 2004 13:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― JC-L (JC-L), Friday, 30 July 2004 13:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 30 July 2004 13:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Whiskeytown Littlecock (ex machina), Friday, 30 July 2004 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Friday, 30 July 2004 14:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 30 July 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Whiskeytown Littlecock (ex machina), Friday, 30 July 2004 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)
The best "best of" I can think of is the Emperor one which has pretty much every song I've ever liked by them plus a whole bunch of excellent and essential rarities on the back.
― dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 30 July 2004 14:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― caspar (caspar), Friday, 30 July 2004 14:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― flowersdie (flowersdie), Friday, 30 July 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Friday, 30 July 2004 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 30 July 2004 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)
EXTREME DUD: Hits compilations with a brand-new song or two, forcing completist fans to basically pay the price of an LP for a single new song. Well, that USED to be a problem, but in this age of filesharing and ipods, it seems kinda quaint.
One crucial point: If we're talking about best-ofs that consist entirely of singles that otherwise never appeared on any album (much more common in the UK than here in North America, or at least they used to be), then there's no reason why "serious music fans" shouldn't give them the same consideration as any other LP by the same performer, all things being equal. Unless said fans are snobs who consider anything as crassly commercial as a hit single unworthy of purchase.
― Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Friday, 30 July 2004 16:09 (twenty-one years ago)
Billy IdolCulture ClubJamesJoan JettHappy Mondays (oooooh shocka)etc
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Friday, 30 July 2004 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)
Any decent compilation by David Bowie would be a great album, and it would still be pointless to buy it as there is so much more out there. Same goes for The Beatles' "1" obviously. However, invest a single CD compilation by some 60s Motown act, you will have a truly great album and still more or less everything you need by said act. Same also goes for most 70s glam stars other than Bowie and possibly Bolan.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 30 July 2004 18:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 1 August 2004 15:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 1 August 2004 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 1 August 2004 16:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 1 August 2004 16:49 (twenty-one years ago)
Uhh, Sly and the Family Stone were "lesser artists"? In what universe? I mean you can't even buy a decent-sounding version of this lesser artist's somewhat good "There's a Riot Goin' On," but you can get a two-CD set that has most of it, but not all of it. So in this case, best-of is a dud. But for a lot of careers best-ofs are totally cool. However, I don't believe the Abba best of has "Suzy Hang-Around" on it, and that really gripes me.
― eddie hurt (ddduncan), Sunday, 1 August 2004 20:50 (twenty-one years ago)