Now I'm experiencing their second album "Underneath The Colours" for the first time and wow, I can't believe this thing has hidden from me all this time! Sure I've seen it in record bins plenty of times, but just never got around to it. I took a listen to some of their earliest stuff and it sure sounds a lot like early XTC. Which is fine, I love XTC, particularly their early stuff, but it seems XTC will always be better at being XTC than INXS, so I'm sticking with Underneath The Colours for now.
Please weigh in, people. Pro or con.
― Bimble (bimble), Friday, 6 August 2004 03:27 (twenty-one years ago)
As far as favorite albums, I'd stick with Listen Like Thieves, m'self (though "Don't Change" on Shabooh Shabahh is flawless and "Burn For You" on The Swing is mighty ace too).
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 6 August 2004 03:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bimble (bimble), Friday, 6 August 2004 03:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Friday, 6 August 2004 04:31 (twenty-one years ago)
Search the 1981-1983 comp. INXSive. It's really good pre-Shabooh Shoobah stuff. I don't know if this is anywhere else, but it has "the unloved one" a remix of Loved One which is all instrumental synth-pop. That's the only straight synth tune I know of theirs and I wish they had done more like that. It's very, very cool. They also did a cool synth opening for their live shows around that time- I have a really good one from 1983.
I think #2 Underneath the colors, #4 The Swing, and #5 Listen Like Thieves also very good. (Dancing on the Jetty, on The Swing- is amazing.) About half of Kick decent. A few songs after that are OK but nothing sticks in my mind too much. Have to listen to the later ones more. Although, even the 1997 album was not bad. (Speaking as a person who only started listening to them last year.)
They are still touring with no Michael Hutchence, what are they doing and with who now?
― Queen Electric Butt Prober BZZT!! BZZZZZT!! (Queen Electric Butt Prober BZZ), Friday, 6 August 2004 05:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Queen Electric Butt Prober BZZT!! BZZZZZT!! (Queen Electric Butt Prober BZZ), Friday, 6 August 2004 05:36 (twenty-one years ago)
They're not actually touring with other people anymore, their longest-standing replacement vocalist quit in disgust at them having been unable to write any songs in his five years and only recording a footy ad. So they tried for the third time to get Suze DeMarchi to join, failed, and are instead doing a reality TV show to audition new singers. This fact has caused excitement here before.
― kit brash (kit brash), Friday, 6 August 2004 05:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 6 August 2004 06:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― mentalist (mentalist), Friday, 6 August 2004 07:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 6 August 2004 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 6 August 2004 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 6 August 2004 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 6 August 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)
Well, even without Michael Hutchence I still believe this band is capable of more greatness and i don't think it's such a tacky move to look for a new vocalist. How they're doing it, maybe. At least the reality show idea seems kind of original, since it's coming from an already great band, and not some TV suit's idea with a pre-fab band.
The reason I think they're still worthy is because of how tight a unit they were. It's the same 5 guys together since they started in 1977, right- Michael Hutchence was only 1/6th of the band and the rest had so many contributions to the music. He was charismatic and all, and nobody can replace him, but they wouldn't be the first giant aussie rock band to lose the main guy, and go on to achieve more greatness!
― Queen Electric Butt Prober BZZT!! BZZZZZT!! (Queen Electric Butt Prober BZZ), Friday, 6 August 2004 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)