whenever i've seen this, or some variant thereof, it can usually be read as "beloved indie band writes song with catchy hook!!", and there's the (usually rockist) implication that the charts aren't working 'as they should'. but when have you genuinely felt this about a piece of music? i'm thinking both of great stuff that wallowed in the bottom regions of the charts in relative obscurity (eg. the 'kish kash' singles?) and songs completely off the clearchannel radar. perhaps more entertaining spin on the thread topic would be "what is it about the world that your favourite music isn't what it loves best?"
― m. (mitchlnw), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Red Panda Sanskrit (ex machina), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Monday, 9 August 2004 12:31 (twenty-one years ago)
Actually, now I usually think of this applying to acts like Mouse on Mars and Felix da Housecat. Obviously "pop"-centric music that for whatever reason has little to no chance of ever being heard by people who only listen to top 40 radio. You could say the same thing about Superpitcher, Erlend Oye, Phoenix - even Kraftwerk.
And I think as a statement, the "in a perfect world" can have validity beyond just complaining why your fave bands aren't popular; in a "perfect" world, I really do think the people who decide whatever gets played would take more chances on unknown/commercially unproven bands simply because they happen to be interested in the music.
― dleone (dleone), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Patrick (Patrick), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:34 (twenty-one years ago)
In contrast, some of the structures of Cathy Dennis or Xenomania compositions are equally labyrinthine in their own way - but they always have an identifiable centre, "a hook you can hold onto while you enjoy the trip." And they are therefore more precisely "pop."
― Marcello Carlin, Monday, 9 August 2004 12:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:40 (twenty-one years ago)
Likewise hip hop between "Rapper's Delight" and "Walk This Way" (unless you count "West End Girls" and semi-rap like "Double Dutch Bus" and "Rapture" and "I Feel For You").
― Patrick (Patrick), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Patrick (Patrick), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:45 (twenty-one years ago)
When was Jimmy Cliff's last hit??
― hobart paving (hobart paving), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:45 (twenty-one years ago)
x-post
― dleone (dleone), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Patrick (Patrick), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:48 (twenty-one years ago)
(from a certain light you could even view "O Superman" as the first House record to make the charts; it just needed a drumbeat underneath it!)
― Marcello Carlin, Monday, 9 August 2004 12:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mr. Snrub, Monday, 9 August 2004 12:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― mc aka lbs, Monday, 9 August 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 9 August 2004 14:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― zebedee (zebedee), Monday, 9 August 2004 14:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Monday, 9 August 2004 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)
'You're In A Bad Way' is made for this thread. Out and out P!O!P! and surely made for the top of the charts. Or not.
― hobart paving (hobart paving), Monday, 9 August 2004 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 9 August 2004 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Monday, 9 August 2004 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)
Didn't 'Only Love Can Break Your Heart'
― derrick (derrick), Monday, 9 August 2004 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 9 August 2004 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― daavid (daavid), Monday, 9 August 2004 22:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 9 August 2004 22:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Monday, 9 August 2004 23:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Monday, 9 August 2004 23:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― frankE (frankE), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 01:52 (twenty-one years ago)
I heard "Short Skirts" on the radio this morning
― C0L1N B3CK3TT (Colin Beckett), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 04:25 (twenty-one years ago)
i agree that too often this phrase is applied to apples in stereo-type bands that advertise a kind of condescending version of Pop in neon letters but don't actually do the work of making a really fucking dig-deep song.
the prob. with this phrase in general is that it abstracts the charts into some sort of "the greatest of all time" banality, when the reality of the charts is much messier and more interesting. in other words if they actually took the next step and asked "*why* isn't this record on the charts?" they might discover some interesting things...some of which might not be too flattering to the music they're gushing over.
― |a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 04:31 (twenty-one years ago)
Generally speaking the songs that get hyped up on ILX are ones which fit the phrase well - the sense that there's a collective excitement around it which already mimics some of the chart's qualities, whether or not the song in reality has such a chance of making it to the top. "I Luv U" for example.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― djdee2005, Tuesday, 10 August 2004 04:51 (twenty-one years ago)
Yeah, the replayability. I know what you mean; when i downloaded 'I Can't Go For That (No Can Do)', I listened to it 6, maybe 7 times in a row. 'Action' does that for me. Actually, 'Necessito', from the Some Girls album that Juliana Hatfield put out last year does too. I actually heard it first on the CBC and freaked out over how perfect it was.
Anthony, yes on 'False Alarm', though the song doesn't ever live up to the glory of the intro, once the band comes in. The chorus always misses the mark, but it's a very-nearly-perfect song. It didn't even get released as a single, iirc, which is ridiculous.
― derrick (derrick), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 06:24 (twenty-one years ago)
Some contextualisation which might help to explain why "You're In A Bad Way" only made #12 in Feb '93: number one at the time was "No Limit" by 2 Unlimited, and the two new entries which charted ahead of SE were Annie Lennox's double A-side "Love Song For A Vampire/Little Bird" (#3) and Rolf Harris' "Stairway To Heaven" (#9; peaked at #7).
― Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 10 August 2004 06:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Salvador Saca (Mr. Xolotl), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)
Steely Dan never had a no. 1 either. Rikki Don't Lose That Number made it to #3, Do It Again to #6, Reeling In The Years to #11, etc. etc.
― derrick (derrick), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 08:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 10 August 2004 08:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 08:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 10 August 2004 09:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― derrick (derrick), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 09:30 (twenty-one years ago)