Why in the name of all unholy fuck do people like Guided By Voices?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Okay, when I was a young and impressionable teen, I liked the song 'Teenage FBI'. I went out and bought 'Do The Collapse'. Never listened to it much, although that song 'Surgical Focus' is okay.

The other month, I was in a chain record store to buy the new Mission of Burma album, but it wasn't there. To satiate my need to buy something, I went around and hunted through the cheap bins, and I got:
Primal Scream's 'Evil Heat'
Generation X's 'Live in Paris'
Jesus and Mary Chain's 'Barbed Wire Kisses' (I only had it on tape before)
and Guided By Voices' 'Earthquake Glue', which I remembered was considered in most circles to be A Good Album, whereas 'Do The Collapse' was thought to be Not That Good An Album

I took it home, and about a week later got around to listening to it.
While I was, my flatmate walked in and asked "What is this faggotronic crap?".

I couldn't agree more. It was like a whiny emo band, but different. It just sucked so much, like a late Husker Du record re-interpreted by people who like elevator music.

And their fans are so rabid, yet can't really give me a reason as to why.

I like some fairly varied music styles, so what the fuck is going wrong.

Also if anyone wants it, you can have it for ten bucks, it's only been played slightly less than once.

Sasha (sgh), Thursday, 12 August 2004 01:51 (twenty-one years ago)

If you went and recorded something like Vampire on Titus and Propeller, people are going to let you coast through your 40s. Also see: Sonic Youth.

Joshua Houk (chascarrillo), Thursday, 12 August 2004 01:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Their last good album was Under the Bushes Under the Stars. Those ones you're talking about aren't that great. Judging them by them's not the way to go. They're good because they're songs are so short. They're catchy. I don't know.

steve hise, Thursday, 12 August 2004 01:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Sasha, I hate to break it to you, but you've been totally pre-empted.

Why in the name of all that is holy do people like Guided by Voices?

;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 August 2004 01:59 (twenty-one years ago)

everybody knows Do The Collapse is their worst record. well, i do anyway.

purple patch (electricsound), Thursday, 12 August 2004 02:13 (twenty-one years ago)

"Sasha, I hate to break it to you, but you've been totally pre-empted.
Why in the name of all that is holy do people like Guided by Voices?

;-)

-- Ned Raggett (ne...), August 12th, 2004. (tracklink)"

Yes Ned, but mine has a swear in it.

I've heard more than the two albums currently in my possession, and I think that it sucks too. Isn't 'Bee Thousand' meant to be their best? 'Cause I've heard it, and would be quite happy to never hear it again.

Sasha (sgh), Thursday, 12 August 2004 02:22 (twenty-one years ago)

they are horrible, reynolds once called pollard one more maggot crawling on the corpse of rock history or something like that and he's never been as otm

but i dont think anyone likes them anymore

ps: teenage fbi is good

artiste, Thursday, 12 August 2004 02:28 (twenty-one years ago)

actually maybe reynolds said that about tom petty. he says that about a lot of people

artiste, Thursday, 12 August 2004 02:30 (twenty-one years ago)

hmm actually teenage fbi is not good, it sounds like the rentals

artiste, Thursday, 12 August 2004 02:34 (twenty-one years ago)

oooh, Simon Reynolds called out a rock musician?? You're kidding!! What the fuck does Simon fucking Reynolds know about rock music? Not a good goddamn thing. Fuck that guy.

Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Thursday, 12 August 2004 02:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Except, well, you're sorta wrong. (Then again whether it was Petty or Pollard I have to agree with the sentiment.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 August 2004 03:00 (twenty-one years ago)

haha [@ broheems].

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 12 August 2004 03:05 (twenty-one years ago)

"faggotronic" ???? LAME

reo, Thursday, 12 August 2004 03:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Simon knows about as much as you, Ned, in terms of evaluating a musician's or a group's hard-won ability to go about the business of their craft in an interesting way. Which is very little. That's why you will NEVER see the likes of you engage in any formal analysis of jazz or blues or improv or small band rock music or anything that involves musicianly craft and parsing out the techne of the form. Hence, the love of gauzy back-to-the-womb narcoleptic meaninglessness.

Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Thursday, 12 August 2004 03:16 (twenty-one years ago)

people like guided by voices because they're, like, totally GAY. they're so fucking gay they're, like, FAGGOTRONIC, MANNNNNN. holy fucking shit batman, i put a swearword in. i like real man-music that has a whole fully engorged penis attached.

drew, Thursday, 12 August 2004 03:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Hence, the love of gauzy back-to-the-womb narcoleptic meaninglessness.

You make this sound like a bad thing!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 August 2004 03:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Their last good album was Under the Bushes Under the Stars.

Am I nutso? I think the last two (incl. Half Smiles) are their best. I absolutely loved Earthquake Glue. The only ones I've heard that actually had songs the entire way thru.

frankE (frankE), Thursday, 12 August 2004 03:21 (twenty-one years ago)

earthquake glue is indeed great. i remember listening over and over to "secret star" when it first came out. i've always luvved isolation drills, which some people feel is too glossy, but eh whatever.

drew, Thursday, 12 August 2004 03:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I like my share of gauzy back-to-the-womb music myself. Tons of it, in fact! I just have a real problem when a guy who has never evinced ANY kind of affinity for what's "going on" in rock music - real time interaction, rhythm/syncopation, formal play - is cited as some kind of important voice on the matter. Simon's got his thing - his scenous or whatever it's called, his "nuum". Fair enough - discuss your fucking scenes and do your amateur sociology and listen to your electronic music. But I don't give a fuck what you say about a rock band especially when you've never written WORD ONE about jazz or blues or soul or improv or ANY FORM that involves the techne of human beings interacting with instruments in their hands.

I know someone will just come along and put the scarlet R on me - but that ain't it at all. I'm not privileging those forms. I'm just saying, I frown upon the opinions of a guy who never evinces an ability to listen to them critically. In a way that interests me. That doesn't involve amateur sociology. And of course, big SR himself is the ultimate rockist. That's why he wrote a whole book about a subculture with an annotated discography.

Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Thursday, 12 August 2004 03:32 (twenty-one years ago)

c'mon how much parsing of the techne of the form is there in gbv really now?

besides sr used to listen to nothing but indie rock in the '80s, there's even a typically unreadable mm reynolds excerpt in the liner notes of one of my go-betweens cd's. i wouldn't trust him on bluegrass either but he has a pretty good grasp of indie

artiste, Thursday, 12 August 2004 03:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Isn't techne Greek for hand? What's that even mean? Is that a joke or jeez, bad moods late at night here.

FrankE, I'm starting to come around to the last one, but I still haven't been moved by any of the songs like "Underwater Explosions" or "Your Name Is Wild" or some of those others on Under the Bushes Under the Stars.

steve hise, Thursday, 12 August 2004 03:45 (twenty-one years ago)

i think he meant "technique."

diamond kinda sounds like me: "some people are too smart to review music" ... C Eddy (or peeps like him) vs. J Pareles (or peeps like him)

|a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Thursday, 12 August 2004 04:06 (twenty-one years ago)

i think he's much more qualified to speak on this issue, mind

|a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Thursday, 12 August 2004 04:09 (twenty-one years ago)

actually, broheems is talk about techne or (tech-ne): a new style of underground barber shop quartet mixed with gamelan ensemble. it's all the rage in sao paolo, berlin, tokyo and peoria. check it out on slsk, i'm "tech-ne-cali".

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 12 August 2004 04:20 (twenty-one years ago)

techne sounds like backne

purple patch (electricsound), Thursday, 12 August 2004 04:29 (twenty-one years ago)

for some reason I just had that word lodged in my head today. Nostalgia for my first year humanities sequence. I like the way it sounds. Better than "technique" as it doesn't quite impart the Malmsteen baggage. But unfortunately, it imparts the pseud baggage. It's a real toss-up, but I guess I'm opting for the road less-travelled. Anyhoo, yeah Amateurist I think we do share an affinity on this point. And right now I'm gonna fire up this Document Great Gospel Performers cd which just came in the mail; gonna rock me some Elder Lightfoot Solomon Michaux!!

Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Thursday, 12 August 2004 04:38 (twenty-one years ago)

(oh, and by the way, I don't care that much about GBV at all. I loved the run from Vampire through Alien Lanes - just LOVED IT, especially that legendary series of EPs; great lysergic campfire music - but I was a little lukewarm on Under the Bushes, and I've heard barely a note since then. But they killed it for a brief, glorious period in the mid-90s.)

Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Thursday, 12 August 2004 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Elder Lightfoot Solomon Michaux!! Whoa. I started a paper on the musical qualities of pentecostal sermons in college, but I never finished it. :-(

|a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Thursday, 12 August 2004 04:44 (twenty-one years ago)

i was trying to find common ground between musicological and rhetorical tools, but i just didn't know enough about either and ended up over my head. one day i sort of hope to return to this stuff though.

ok, carry on.

p.s. i like a lot of gbv stuff.

|a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Thursday, 12 August 2004 04:46 (twenty-one years ago)

oh man, Amateurist, Steve Cushing dedicated a whole hour to the guy on Blues Before Sunrise last week. I think he played basically every known recording. I had never heard of him before, but the music was just riveting. Michaux has this overly formal way of speaking that's really something to hear. "Pilgrims! I'm happy, pilgrims!!"

Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Thursday, 12 August 2004 04:49 (twenty-one years ago)

You should start a blog, man. I would read it. Of course, I still need to go catch up on the 65 unread Springsteen posts. I'm probably gonna go do that now...

Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Thursday, 12 August 2004 04:51 (twenty-one years ago)

you should get the rev. j.m. gates reissue that just came out. actually, it's not as exciting (not half as exciting) as ESM but still interesting. i wish i had a way to copy it for you.

|a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Thursday, 12 August 2004 04:51 (twenty-one years ago)

to continue in this vein, i was listening and re-listening to martin luther king's "after vietnam" speech last week and it occured to me that that is one of the most musical things i have ever heard.

|a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Thursday, 12 August 2004 04:52 (twenty-one years ago)

sascha wrote: Isn't 'Bee Thousand' meant to be their best? 'Cause I've heard it, and would be quite happy to never hear it again.

well, i can't say much about what that record sounds freshly to an ear in today's post-9/11 world, you know, cause everything's different now, but when it came out, it was fresher than hot nuts stickin to your fingers. sure, it was obviously a mix of rehash, but it was such a wonderful reheat. grandmas everwhere, even sammy hagars cross dressing as grandmas, approved like it was a fresh batch of pancakes. no one said, "oh but we had pancakes in the 70s! this is redundant bullshit!" it was good.

it was, "HOT FREAKS!"

but hey, i lost interest not so long after that, so...
m.

msp, Thursday, 12 August 2004 04:54 (twenty-one years ago)

See my point?

All I've got from the fans is ranting and raving about my language in the title post, or that it sounded good *then*.

If I can explain to people why I like the Fall, then y'all should be able to do a whole lot better.

Sasha (sgh), Thursday, 12 August 2004 05:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll try this. A lot of their songs between 1992 and 1996 sounded like outtakes from some great 60s band you haven't heard yet, and somehow they managed to do it fresh without it being a nostalgia trip. If you're into the Fall, that probably sounds like shit, but if you're into the Kinks or the Zombies say, it's a better deal.

steve hise, Thursday, 12 August 2004 05:21 (twenty-one years ago)

you sit down with a guided by voices album, and it sounds like shit, except for every seventh song or so, which is about one and a half minutes of heartstopping, tears-in-your-eyes joy, seemingly out of nowhere. you keep on listening to the album, filling in the blanks around the perfect tracks, and all of the songs which formerly sounded like shit slowly reveal their hooks, as nonsense phrases become personally meaningful, evocative, somehow more than the ridiculous sum of their parts. you go out and buy another of their five hundred albums in hopes of getting that first buzz again. this goes on until you realize that you are pathetic and you love a band that everybody agrees is past their prime and not okay to like anymore. you don't give a shit.

drew, Thursday, 12 August 2004 05:27 (twenty-one years ago)

whatever. wah wah wah.

i mean, we're talking totally nonsensical lyrics by a freakin school teacher with an afro from dayton no less! we're talkin rem/who hybrid action. lo-fi sparklies. kung fu kicks on stage. perfect pop songs all in different shades creating a mix tape, yet of one band's pantheon, from the heights of winky spiritful elation to the lusty rock beer belly sprawl gutter shiv. i am a scientist. tractor rape chain. kicker of elves. hot freaks! the MOTHERFUCKin The Goldheart Mountaintop Queen Directory!

"what does it all mean?", asks 18 year old msp.

it did sound good then. it sounds fuckin great now. that's the point noodle. programming at an earlier date. cha-ching.

how can i detach from those moments and tell you why i like something now when it's so clouded from the monster bliss of all those past bits?

i guess i'll have to call up the MOTHERFUCKin The Goldheart Mountaintop Queen Directory!

got the number for that?

"do a whole lot better"... sheesh and grumble. sheesh and grumble.
m.

msp, Thursday, 12 August 2004 05:30 (twenty-one years ago)

er apologies... i'm obviously riding the "lusty rock beer belly sprawl gutter shiv" right about now...

woot!
m.

msp, Thursday, 12 August 2004 05:32 (twenty-one years ago)

i loved me some bee thousand, alien lanes, and maybe some under the bushes, but i don't really recall the latter well enough to say. i have little of interest to add on the band at this time, except that i'd need to return to those records to say more (and i'm guessing they'd still give me some thrill).

i don't really see what "the techne of human beings interacting with instruments in their hands" has much to do with anything, though. i mean, simon does talk about techne, if by techne we mean craft - read him on the 303. and as far as GBV goes, they were usually so drunk (on stage anyway) that what they did with their instruments was pretty thoroughly modulated by chance. and on record, their recordings are so lo-fi that the machinery itself, in all its limitations, becomes an integral part of the techne -- the machinery swallows half the effect of instruments-in-hands anyway. in its four-tracker's authenticity, it becomes artificial all over again; it is almost literally electronic music, in that half of the "music" comes from the machinery.

but what do i care. like i said, loved the records. my tops is probably "motor away," followed by "my valuable hunting knife."

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Thursday, 12 August 2004 05:45 (twenty-one years ago)

By the way, why does "a musician's or a group's hard-won ability to go about the business of their craft in an interesting way" only apply to instruments invented before the 1950s, as you seem to suggest?

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Thursday, 12 August 2004 05:47 (twenty-one years ago)

oh, hey, Philip - glad to see you on this thread! No not at all, re: my opinion pre-1950 (that's why I raised that 'scarlet R' flag!) Yeah, I love what you wrote in your first post - the technology swallowing the technique. Very much true, with this band perhaps more than any other (GBV a poor choice for me to go off on the rant, then!) Yeah, I think I should just come clean with some basic biographical details: I live next to a jazz club and I see some outstanding young musicians come through every week, playing to - quite frankly - paltry crowds. It's just horribly depressing. I don't know how to make the case for these kids - especially on ILM - without coming across as *priviliging* the use of "real live instruments." Because, again, I certainly don't myself! But when I read Reynolds quoted on the "corpse of rock history", as above, I don't feel like he's talking about Jimi Hendrix and the White Stripes as much as he's talking about the whole notion of, like, people learning how to actually play an instrument, and play it well. Extending beyond rock into, say, these young kids just fucking tearing on ass on the rich history of african-american song from "Footsteps" to "Giant Steps". Now, that may sound "old" and "stodgy" and whatnot to a guy like Simon Reynolds, especially when - hey! - there are new white label 12"s coming in the mail. I dunno.

It's a view I'm kind of forced to surmise, considering the thrust of his usual commentary. I don't see too much rock OR jazz OR country OR improv or blues or whatever. There's no doubting that he has done immeasurable work in terms of documenting a sadly underrepresented form of music (hey, the city of Chicago is finally recognizing the music's rich history this very month!) I just really can't really countenance him sneering down his nose at a genre he's basically abandoned. Perhaps Guided by Voices DO suck, maybe they don't (and as I say, I absolutely loved them for that brief burst of mid-90s lysergic energy), but I am just saying: I don't care to hear about it from a guy who basically turned his back on the form. At base, he just doesn't strike me as a well-rounded critic. Just a kind of subculture journalist, I guess. I don't know. If we have to pick British critics, give me Marcello Carlin any day of the week. Not a guy who owns the latest white label 12, just a guy who can write swimmingly great prose about a wide swath of music, and can recognize a decent musician when he hears one.

Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Thursday, 12 August 2004 06:27 (twenty-one years ago)

i love this band with all my heart. i even have a soft spot for all the totally sucky post-alien lanes stuff. really excited for the bee thousand box set..

fizzcaraldo (Justin M), Thursday, 12 August 2004 06:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I prefer Guided By Voices to Simon Reynolds

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 12 August 2004 08:53 (twenty-one years ago)

i think the beauty of bob pollard and guided by voices is that here is someone who has managed to channel this incredible music the heard in his head for years and record most of it, with apparent disregard of genres, scenes, recording techniques etc. I mean gbv was literally something that was going on in someone's basement for almost ten years before anyone gave a shit but if you go back to the albums on 'Box' you'll find some classic fully-formed gbv stuff. he actually didn't care that much about getting out and was surprised when it did. the lo-fi thing often gets bandied about but Bob has always said they did these crappy recordings because of necessity, they just didn't have any other means to record it, and when they moved on into a more hi-fi phase it was all about progressing and trying out something new, rather than trying to sell out. Latter-day gbv, particularly live, is quite a different beast but Bob's artistic vision is still at the core of it, channelling this incredible music he keeps hearing. you shouldn't just look at GBV albums proper, and yes, EQG is probably not the best place to start, but at the incredible run of recordings on his Fading Captain label. All the RP solo albums are worth checking out (some people rate them higher than the recent GBV albums), as well as the ongoing Circus Devils project which is Bob and the Tobias brothers doing some 'Lynchian' noise horror music. All i'm saying there are many facets to Bob and his many contributors' output and it takes time and commitment to really get through. I've never really experienced anything quite like it though.

thomas, Thursday, 12 August 2004 09:10 (twenty-one years ago)

this thread is embarassing.

jess, Thursday, 12 August 2004 10:43 (twenty-one years ago)

you embarrass all too easily, apparently.

purple patch (electricsound), Thursday, 12 August 2004 10:50 (twenty-one years ago)

well there's nothing like psudeo-intellectual "you will never experience true happiness because you don't understand the human grit of the real blooze like me" cock-punching to get me there.

jess, Thursday, 12 August 2004 11:10 (twenty-one years ago)

i think i must have blanked over that bit

purple patch (electricsound), Thursday, 12 August 2004 11:11 (twenty-one years ago)

msp, steve hise, thomas, fitzcarraldo and dadaismus OTM.

If I can explain to people why I like the Fall, then y'all should be able to do a whole lot better.

I don't know if i can explain why i love GBV. Part of it - certainly from Propeller thru Alien Lanes, and on the Box material too, though to a lesser extent - is that sense that there's some alternate pop universe where these songs were as big as 'hey jude', as 'hey mr tambourine man', as 'i want you to want me', and GBV albums are like some C S Lewis wardrobe that lets you peek in there and hear these faux-nuggets. But that's too simplistic, as Bob's no mere parodist, a la Neil innes - its a more passionate, personal thing, and his frame of reference and influence is broader than many credit.

But a lot of it has to do with just loving that sound - and at the peak of their lo-fi era, say, Alien Lanes, that sound wasn't remotely unlistenable, and it certainly didn't obscure their music prowess, or charming lack thereof. what you get is a war,th to the tone of the instruments, and especially to bob's vocals - they never sounded the same after he quit recording them on four-track.

as it is, he's kept writing amazing songs and shitty songs and sticking them together, though the songs on later GBV albums are, to my mind, less amazing and less shitty, which is why i've preferred the solo stuff of late. 'speak kindly of your volunteer fire department' is perhaps his best solo, or 'not in my airforce' - two very odd, very delectable prog-pop records (that is, progressive in structure and experimentalism, an overweening musical proficiency is still not part of the scheme), the anthemic songs eeriely familiar, like you knew them already, the weirder pieces less pungent, more beguiling.

sure, the 'legend' of GBV - the drunk schoolteacher who just so happens to write perfect pop songs about folklore and weirdness, inspired by the most terrestrial things - road signs, pizza places, etc - is a big part of why people get into GBV - its a great story. But its the quality of the music that keeps people listening and buying.

and Do The Collapse and Earthquake Glue are *not* prime GBV, IMHO. They're strong records, but in the canon they can't compete with UTBUTS, Alien Lanes, Propellor/Vampire On Titus's, etc, best moments. and you need to spend a bit of time with their albums, filtering through. often the track i love first play ended up being my least favourite. i like that, records that you grow into, they've always been my favourite. if yr gonna reject Bee Thousand on first listening, well, i think that's really fucking dumb, but its your loss, boss - the Kings Of Leon albums are just over *there*. I'd suggest you don't give up on 'em entirely until you've heard Alien Lanes, where the lo-fi thing is just perfect, and the songs - Game Of Pricks, As We Go Up We Go Down, King & Caroline, etc etc etc - are perhaps bob's strongest, but it sounds like you're really settling into hating GBV, so why don't you see how that suits you??

and also - there've been so many threads on I Love Music about the moonie-like obsession of GBV fans. maybe its time we did one on people who start GBV hate threads and then expect everyone to applaud 'em for kicking an easy target.

stevie (stevie), Thursday, 12 August 2004 11:45 (twenty-one years ago)

the lo-fi thing often gets bandied about but Bob has always said they did these crappy recordings because of necessity, they just didn't have any other means to record it

i don't think that's completely true. early albums like sandbox were recorded in proper studios -- not high-end new york studios but studios nonetheless -- and while they don't exactly sound great, they're not all hissy and inaudible either. pollard has made it pretty clear that he decided to stop using a studio for his next several albums because he thought the studio sound sucked and he could do better at home. which he pretty much did for awhile, hissiness and inaudibility notwithstanding.

when he started going to big studios a few years later, the problem wasn't that he was selling out. the problem was (a) that his songs had started to suck, and (b) that he was really bad at using high-end studios. i don't know whether to blame bob, his producers or what, but i can't listen to do the collapse or isolation drills all the way through because they hurt my ears. everything since then has just been blah, though i kinda liked an mp3 i heard of the upcoming album, so i don't doubt that the man still has a song or two somewhere up his sleeve.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Thursday, 12 August 2004 11:46 (twenty-one years ago)

i do like the sound Todd Tobias gets for him, though. Todd's the best 'producer' Bob's had, the recent Fiction Man solo LP is proof of that.

stevie (stevie), Thursday, 12 August 2004 11:51 (twenty-one years ago)

isolation drills i'd say has pretty solid production and is a much stronger record than DtC, it's a bit samey but the songs are heavier, punchier and have more emotional depth, check 'brides have hit glass', 'skills like this', 'twilight campfighter' etc..

But it's true, there's something about Bob that only comes in its own when he's messing around with sounds, lyrics, melodies, sitting on his porch or in someone's basement. i think he used these lo-fi recording techniques to get closer to the sounds he heard in his head, they actually sounded better to him and it was a lot easier and cheaper to do it like that, but he was also curious about where he could take these songs if he would record them 'properly' (whatever that means). these days he's working in small studios, mainly with Todd Tobias, i guess it's some middle ground, and i think he's quite happy with the results...

thomas, Thursday, 12 August 2004 12:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Is my neighborhood record store the only place in the world where you can buy The Best of Guided By Voices?

Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 12 August 2004 13:20 (twenty-one years ago)

"you will never experience true happiness because you don't understand the human grit of the real blooze like me"

strange that you would write this just before and after some much more sober defenses of the band.

|a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Thursday, 12 August 2004 13:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I haven't really liked a GBV album since Bee Thousand, but I haven't really listened to one that closely, either. To be honest, every time I've seen them live recently they've played a lot of great, half-familiar songs that it turns out I already own (on one of their records). In a lot of ways I think GBV have suffered the curse of any wildly prolific act, be it Prince or the Fall or whomever, prone to bouts of hit or miss activity: the most recent good stuff is never that far behind the most recent bad stuff, which really suffers in comparison, even over the span of a single sprawling record.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Thursday, 12 August 2004 14:12 (twenty-one years ago)

actually teenage fbi is pretty good, when i put it on last night i hadn't listened to gbv in a long time and i was just kind of taken aback by how flimsy and annoying pollard's voice is. it's good, i like it better than i am a scientist or motor away or whatever.

artiste, Thursday, 12 August 2004 15:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey Monetize, I really think you've got Simon wrong - in recent years he's really moved away from the white-label fetishizing culture to the extent that I don't think he gives a fuck about most of these "famous for 15 people" artists. Check out his Blissed Out book on rock circa 1987, and it might change your mind. Plus his forthocming book is all about postpunk, so again, that'll be... rock. I mean, what he does with it is up to you to judge - but I do feel like maybe you've got a lopsided view of his work.

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Thursday, 12 August 2004 16:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Sure they've got loads of shit songs that you gotta skip but their 'best of' is as good as anyones. Classic.

The Velvet Overlord (The Velvet Overlord), Friday, 13 August 2004 01:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Bob's got it back. This new album is the best thing I've heard him do since Waved Out. There is hope again.

Knee Jerky, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:42 (twenty-one years ago)

If its as good as Isolation Drills I might surrender and check it out.

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)

"there is hope again"???!!!? yeah good thing they're breaking up.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 19:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Definitely the best since Isolation Drills, maybe even since Bushes/Stars.

Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I will kill you all if you're wrong. I'm really not into giving Mr. Pollard more of my ca$h money.

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)

I just sold a hysterical amount of GBV EPs back to the local store today, good riddance

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)

oh wait, I'm doing that next time. Today I sold back D-F. nevermind.

GBV stuff I'm keeping:
Bee Thousand
Alien Lanes
Under The Bushes, Under The Stars
Isolation Drills

everything else is getting tossed now that I cherrypicked my fave stuff onto CD-Rs.

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Not every song is great, and there's a resigned sensibility informing the whole affair emphasized by the back photo of a lake at dusk. But if you're into them, the first four songs are worth it; there's a snap and a hookiness that's been missing for years. Not a bad way to bow out, and it's got me interested in Fiction Man.

Knee Jerky, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)

jazz/blues/improv/rock makes me think "jamband".

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:32 (twenty-one years ago)

the last song on the new one is GRATE. and tobin plays on it, so it's got that echoes myron two-string outro solo on it.

drew, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 21:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Alien Lanes is good to get drunk and sing along with. It's amazing how much rock music fails this simple test.

Lukas (lukas), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 23:32 (twenty-one years ago)

"i speak in monotone / leave my fucking life alone!" indeedy!

stevie (stevie), Wednesday, 25 August 2004 00:22 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.