ANyway the professor through out his Big Theory (you know, overarching direction of the class for the semester etc.) today since it was the first day of class. He talks about how the "big" ppl in jazz (Ellington etc.) weren't the most important figures to black America during that time - Bessie Smith etc. were. Which I'm down with - he's doing a bottom-up populist revision of the way history has been told in the past, etc.
But then he fails at his own reasoning when it comes to hip-hop. The first three weeks we'll be focusing on Gil Scott Heron, who he seems to see as the forerunner of hip-hop, and adds to this the doomsday theory of current h-h, that is money and capitalism came in and changed to to reflect glamor etc. (a la Ellington + P.Diddy) rather than reality (Bessie Smith + whoever...NWA I guess).
So my take on it would be more that GSH really wasn't a part of the populist history of h-h (or h-h as a whole really) and that hip-hop was about partying etc. rather than the political conscience of Gil Scott Heron.
Yeah....so is this just a case of oldster not "getting" the younger generation? Should I confront him on his theory or just subvert the class slowly? Haha I kid.
It'll actually be an interesting class I think.
― djdee2005, Thursday, 2 September 2004 00:15 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 2 September 2004 00:20 (twenty years ago)
Visions of that "Storytelling" flick are dancing in my head.
― maria b (maria b), Thursday, 2 September 2004 02:10 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 2 September 2004 03:37 (twenty years ago)
― djdee2005, Thursday, 2 September 2004 03:42 (twenty years ago)
I think you're probably right, by the way -- for as much as Gil Scott-Heron, the Last Poets, etc., can claim to be forerunners to hip-hop, I'm not sure that they were at the forefront of the minds of rappers making shit up over breakbeats on the street.
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 2 September 2004 03:44 (twenty years ago)
― Begs2Differ (Begs2Differ), Thursday, 2 September 2004 03:47 (twenty years ago)
― Begs2Differ (Begs2Differ), Thursday, 2 September 2004 03:48 (twenty years ago)
I'm just waiting for the debates to get started...I feel like I'll be alone defending teh bling blingerz.
― djdee2005, Thursday, 2 September 2004 03:51 (twenty years ago)
I'm in this bizarro-world where bourgeoise marxists tell me the evils of corporate music.
Help.
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 23 September 2004 01:18 (twenty years ago)
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Thursday, 23 September 2004 01:24 (twenty years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 23 September 2004 01:37 (twenty years ago)
― shookout (shookout), Thursday, 23 September 2004 01:54 (twenty years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 23 September 2004 01:57 (twenty years ago)
― The TAO that can be Posted is not the TAO! (The Tao that can be Posted is), Thursday, 23 September 2004 02:26 (twenty years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 23 September 2004 02:35 (twenty years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Thursday, 23 September 2004 03:28 (twenty years ago)
Oh my. What was their evidence, if any?
― Symplistic (shmuel), Thursday, 23 September 2004 04:02 (twenty years ago)
Kill me.
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 23 September 2004 04:16 (twenty years ago)
― gaz (gaz), Thursday, 23 September 2004 04:25 (twenty years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 23 September 2004 04:49 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 23 September 2004 05:13 (twenty years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 23 September 2004 05:17 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 23 September 2004 05:18 (twenty years ago)
god in applying to grad school i'm about to wade into oceans of this sort of bullshit. deep breath...
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 23 September 2004 05:57 (twenty years ago)
he's quite gay.... -- djdee2005
Well, all right, then: Does he know what a hoo-hoo-dilly is?
(I gotta say, this thread is most entertaining!)
― Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Thursday, 23 September 2004 07:37 (twenty years ago)
― David Allen (David Allen), Thursday, 23 September 2004 08:10 (twenty years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 23 September 2004 15:29 (twenty years ago)
― Dave M. (rotten03), Thursday, 23 September 2004 15:33 (twenty years ago)
― Dave M. (rotten03), Thursday, 23 September 2004 15:34 (twenty years ago)
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:17 (twenty years ago)
You're going to need to learn how to pick your battles. Save your energy for defences of 50 Cent and Jay-Z.
― Symplistic (shmuel), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:35 (twenty years ago)
I'd like to see you make that argument because it isn't true! (If you'd said The Neptunes or Timbaland I would agree.)
― Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:37 (twenty years ago)
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:38 (twenty years ago)
― Symplistic (shmuel), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:39 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:40 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:41 (twenty years ago)
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:42 (twenty years ago)
Incidently, I DO like the Roots.
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:42 (twenty years ago)
This teacher's world seems a lot more interesting than his theories. Please let us know more about the comical adventures of these academic Don Quixotes.
― Marco Damiani (Marco D.), Friday, 24 September 2004 08:46 (twenty years ago)
― robin (robin), Sunday, 26 September 2004 01:57 (twenty years ago)
robin is quite right, too many teachers of pop culture approach it purely from a pseudo-Marxist "if the people like something, it must be good" approach and then fuck that up by applying their own ridiculously dated ideas about the differences between meaningful and non-meaningful discourse. I blame the 60s.
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Sunday, 26 September 2004 08:44 (twenty years ago)
Last week we talked about slam poetry. We watched that documentary on it (I think its called "Slam!") and we observed that (his ideas, not mine) the white guy was the one who wanted to make slam poetry more entertaining, and the group of mostly black slam poets (Saul Williams' group) was more self-consciously artistic. I got the feeling we were supposed to infer that hip-hop becomes "less black" and less authentic when commercialized (apparently "Commercialized" = "entertaining"). I didn't like it because he essentially set up this idea of altruistic art as being counter to entertainment. Why are they supposedly contradictory? No idea.
This week we discussed hip-hop lyrics. We read the book of lyrics that was released this year. We were assigned the "gangsta" section. One of the girls read the first verse of "Whoa" by Black Rob, and the class came in for the "whoa" parts.
I am not even fucking kidding.
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 7 October 2004 04:29 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 7 October 2004 04:36 (twenty years ago)