the libertines' pete doherty covers blu cantrell's breathe (mp3 link)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.libertines.co.nr/

go to the downloads section. its not bad actually. fleshes the song out, makes it more melodic and more musical really, more tuneful. not just blu singing over a recycled dr. dre loop.

dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Thursday, 2 September 2004 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)

loop wasnt dre, was charles aznavour

david acid (gareth), Thursday, 2 September 2004 19:09 (twenty-one years ago)

when's that libertines cover of moldy peaches' "who's got the crack?" coming out? oh, probably never. it exists tho

duke tho, Thursday, 2 September 2004 19:29 (twenty-one years ago)

either way, the loop they used for the blu song was lifted from dr. dre's song. i think they even kept the screeching car crash effect from the dre track.

dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Thursday, 2 September 2004 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)

You are Barry Sheavils and I claim my five pounds.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 2 September 2004 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)

whats the story with the loop?
did dre just sample it from someone else?
who is charles aznavour?

robin (robin), Thursday, 2 September 2004 21:32 (twenty-one years ago)

He was like the Dre of his day.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 September 2004 21:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I know zilch about this band, other than that they apparently enjoy pharmaceuticals. That all said, I'm quite enjoying "Can't Stand Me Now".

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 2 September 2004 21:39 (twenty-one years ago)

fleshes the song out, makes it more melodic and more musical really, more tuneful.

not to be rude, but are you out of your mind? the original is tuneful, melodic, and joyous. the cover is pd mewling off-key over barebones guitar. are you joking?

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 2 September 2004 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)

tossed-off crap like this has to be one of the main reasons that nobody believes me when i say how good the new babyshambles single is.

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 2 September 2004 21:42 (twenty-one years ago)

where can one hear the BS single?

as for me joking or not, i think you have to be joking when you say the original by blu and sean freakin paul "is tuneful, melodic, and joyous." joyous?! where is the tune and melody? i can at least make one out in this acoustic barebones version.

dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Thursday, 2 September 2004 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)

the single can be heard quite often in my lounge. it's not online anywhere as far as i know.

i don't think our argument about pd vs bc/sp is going to go anywhere productive.

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 2 September 2004 22:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I was just hoping it was going to heat up!

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 September 2004 22:08 (twenty-one years ago)

shouldn't you be in bed?

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 2 September 2004 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)

I was staying up for the main attraction.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 September 2004 22:12 (twenty-one years ago)

(ps. that is the second time today a woman has said something completely innocuous to me and my first thought has been "Saucy!". I think I am ill.)

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 September 2004 22:13 (twenty-one years ago)

you're a shining star. don't ever change.

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 2 September 2004 22:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Ta. To be fair, the first one was "Will you have me?".

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 September 2004 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)

"Will you be mine?" I mean.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 September 2004 22:17 (twenty-one years ago)

she was probaby all hot and bothered after seeing your picture of gordon brown.

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 2 September 2004 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)

The concept of Gordon Brown as a sex beast disturbs.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 2 September 2004 22:40 (twenty-one years ago)

not as much as the mp3 does.

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 2 September 2004 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Gotta agree, this is shit

57 7th (calstars), Thursday, 2 September 2004 23:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Lauren OTM. Are you on Crack? "more musical really". Ugh. you deserve to de banned from ILM for that crap.

jed_ (jed), Friday, 3 September 2004 00:43 (twenty-one years ago)

This makes Travis covering Britney seem like Ella Fitzgerald interpreting Gershwin.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 3 September 2004 00:50 (twenty-one years ago)

not to be rude, but are you out of your mind? the original is tuneful, melodic, and joyous. the cover is pd mewling off-key over barebones guitar. are you joking?

lauren is so right!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 3 September 2004 00:53 (twenty-one years ago)

robin i'll put up the aznavour mp3 for you over the weekend. its from 1962, i think, hes a french crooner, dre sampled in, and then was used again for this. dre slowed it down somewhat though, the original is much jauntier. it sounds better slowed down. you can be the judge though

david acid (gareth), Friday, 3 September 2004 05:30 (twenty-one years ago)

crap or not, i never said it was brilliant but in no way is the original "tuneful, melodic" or - especially not - "joyous". its R&B at its worst and least imaginative: some girl singing over a hip hop loop with some random male sparring partner - in this case, not the standard rapper but a dancehall artist, thrown in for the prerequisite cameo role. and this isnt coming from some corny indie guy who hates R&B, im as far from an indie boy as can be.

dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Friday, 3 September 2004 09:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Come on, you all know the real reason Doherty recorded this is so he can milk the "all we do is make up and break up" bit AS IF THE ENTIRE FUCKING COUNTRY HASN'T GOT THE MESSAGE YET!

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 3 September 2004 09:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Lauren is so otm. This is almost as awful as the Vines doing "Ms Jackson".

The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 3 September 2004 09:29 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post - haha! well yeah, thats true (about milking it). noone is hearing this though, apart from haters on ILM and their rabid maniacal fans.

dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Friday, 3 September 2004 09:32 (twenty-one years ago)

i am not remotely interested in hearing this

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 3 September 2004 09:35 (twenty-one years ago)

rockers remaking R&B songs seems to get worse reactions from ILMers than it would on say, www.okayplayer.com. how strange. its like musical political correctness.

dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Friday, 3 September 2004 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)

it's a cheap lazy gimmick that lost it's novelty appeal at least 2 years ago

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 3 September 2004 09:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I am trying to think of the first example. Does Tom Jones and 'Kiss' count?

Alba (Alba), Friday, 3 September 2004 09:40 (twenty-one years ago)

theyre not ALL done as a tongue in cheek gimmick though. why do people automatically insist its a gimmick or done for laughs? is it so far sighted to think that the vines or pete doherty might just like these songs? i mean, beck did hot in herre and crazy in love, and im pretty sure he likes them in earnest.

no, kiss does not count. we might as well go even further if THAT counts and say the stones doing irma thomas' time is on my side counts in that case.

dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Friday, 3 September 2004 09:41 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm sure they do like them, it doesn't mean they have to murder them. when has it ever been the case that they improved on the original?

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 3 September 2004 09:42 (twenty-one years ago)

who says they have to improve? theyre not trying to out do them. if they were, they would probably/possibly be more faithful to the originals. theyre just doing different versions. nothing wrong with that in my book. theyre not brilliant, no, but theyre not *all* that awful.

the opposite to this ridiculous automated PC outrage on rockers doing hip hop or R&B songs is like idiots who think joss stone did fell in love with a girl better than the white stripes, when all she did was a wimpy vaguely funky neo soul retread of it.

dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Friday, 3 September 2004 09:46 (twenty-one years ago)

i did like Elbow's 'Independent Woman (Part One)' tho, most amusing

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 3 September 2004 09:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't really like Eels, but saw them at Reading 3 years ago and they did a pretty good 'Get UR Freak On' that obv. wasn't for laughs.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 3 September 2004 09:58 (twenty-one years ago)

don't forget afghan whigs, though there was nothing ironic about their soul covers beyond a sense of dramatic irony...

stevie (stevie), Friday, 3 September 2004 10:09 (twenty-one years ago)

i dont much like rockers doing hip hop covers, but R&B or soul covers i dont mind. i dont want to hear non-rappers rapping, really.

i know prince has been doing i like the way you move, im hoping hes only been doing the sung parts in the chorus. he should really be doing hey ya though!

dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Friday, 3 September 2004 10:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Who in their right mind thinks Joss Stone's White Stripes cover was any good?

Tom Jones doing Kiss doesn't count as Tom Jones is considerably more kitch than Prince.

All these pale in comparison to the horror that is Jamie Cullum's Frontin'.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 3 September 2004 10:24 (twenty-one years ago)

lots of people think the joss stone cover was good. whether its anything to do with her cover or not, but jack white started playing a slower version of the song at gigs in the last year or so.

dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Friday, 3 September 2004 10:27 (twenty-one years ago)

no, kiss does not count. we might as well go even further if THAT counts and say the stones doing irma thomas' time is on my side counts in that case.

Yes, but the difference is that the Stones loved R&B and their sound grew out of it. There was nothing remotely 'here's a crazy novelty cover departure' about it.

I quite like that Joss Stone cover!

Alba (Alba), Friday, 3 September 2004 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)

(I mean yeah, of course Tom Jones loved R&B too, but something relatively modern and well... from Prince was definitely a wacky ploy by the Art of Noise after his years in the Vegas wilderness)

Alba (Alba), Friday, 3 September 2004 10:32 (twenty-one years ago)

i hate that kiss remake tom jones did with TAON. a lot. they made kiss into a complete farce. yeah, it was kinda daring of him to do a prince song, as prince was still ruling pop back then, but it sucked,

dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Friday, 3 September 2004 10:38 (twenty-one years ago)

i never got the 'here's a crazy novelty cover departure' feel from time is on my side, or the vines cover of ms jackson for that matter, but that was all I got from tom jones' kiss. The original wasn’t exactly a deadly serious song anyway but even so.

dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Friday, 3 September 2004 10:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I haven't heard the Vines do 'Ms Jackson', but when indie bands aren't doing it for wacky reasons, they're usually sounding like they're doing it to 'reveal that there's a real song underneath, that works with proper instruments' kind of thing. Which I find equally annoying.


i never got the 'here's a crazy novelty cover departure' feel from time is on my side,

Well no - that was my point. Who would?

Alba (Alba), Friday, 3 September 2004 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)

how do people feel about Tom Jones 'Reload' album? sometimes i think the cover of 'Burning Down The House' is better because it's more polished and less annoying/frustrating than the original, but this could be some crazy talkin'

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 3 September 2004 10:46 (twenty-one years ago)

soul and R&B arent quite the same thing, definitely not these days.

splooge (thesplooge), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)

my bad. split hairs where it's convenient for you, then.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:24 (twenty-one years ago)

so youve listened to albums from tweet, blu cantrell, craig david, etc and think they sound just like ones from erykah badu, dangelo, and frank mccomb? id hardly call that splitting hairs. id call that generalising if you think its all the same.

ive spent thousands on rock records too, but i still consider myself more of a soul/R&B/hip hop fan at heart. i'd imagine its more or less the opposite for most ILMers. its not like the number of posts on soul or R&B are competing with those on indie or rock is it?

splooge (thesplooge), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:26 (twenty-one years ago)

jesus christ let it go man.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I have no idea where you are getting those assumptions from, splooge. I have 862 tracks labelled R&B on my iTunes (I use it as a crappy catch-all term for soul, funk and R&B from all eras) and zooming the scroll bar halfway down to get a median year shows 1971, which suggests I'm more into old stuff than new, but I don't want modern R&B artists throwing out new technology or reverting to old songwriting idioms either.

I have only ever heard the Libertines once, as far as I am aware and I thought they were pretty dull and recycled, but maybe you're right and I secretly loved it.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)

what exactly is "Breathe" watering down?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:31 (twenty-one years ago)

this thread is feisty, but, not yet aggressive. i am sure, in time, it will become so, it is merely, frothy, at the moment. this is good, it is heartening to watch.

which david acid question do you refer to R.I.M.A?

i shall put the charles aznavour track online somewhere, later tonite, and then i shall email robin, so that he can download it.

i have never heard this band, do people think i would like them. i have many records by many artists, but it is late, i don't think i will list them today

david acid (gareth), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)

id call that generalising if you think its all the same.

you accused people of not being "soul/r&b" fans. i said that i collect soul records. how did i generalise or twist around what you said?

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)

also, rock records do all sound very similar, dont they, as do soul and rnb records? i, at least, can certainly tell a rock or a soul record when i hear one, often within the first 5 seconds

david acid (gareth), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:36 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, it is a crappy general term, alba. its like me saying keane and the white stripes all make rock with no differentiation between the two.

you can call it all R&B if you want, if that just means anything sung by mainly black people over the years, but if you think theres no difference between an artist like frank mccomb and what craig david do, then hey, each to their own. i dont know why this is so hard to stomach, if you read any 'black music' mag in either the states or UK, its the norm.

splooge (thesplooge), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Roul and sock.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)

i repeat: i said i have lots of soul records because you mentioned soul (coupled with r&b). of course i don't think tweet and erykah badu are equivalent.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)

is this the great "so what's that supposed to be about baby?" song? I love the way sean paul sounds so indignant that blu is having the temerity to call him out, almost surprised and yet still with the lazily nonchalant delivery.

cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)

lauren, you said i was merely splitting hairs when i said soul and R&B werent the same these days.

splooge (thesplooge), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)

For god's sake - this is an iTunes tag. I'm not saying I can't tell the difference between Irma Thomas and R.Kelly. Are you wilfully ignoring the point of my post? It was nothing to do with genre labels. I was saying I did care about soul/R&B (your term) and that despite my having more old stuff than new, I didn't agree with dick.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)

(if you think I'm abusing the term 'R&B', you should see the stuff I have categorised under 'Rock' on iTunes)

Alba (Alba), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)

this post is making people rather angry, isnt it? maybe i misread what you wrote alba, i thought you meant that you just regarded it all as R&B. to me though, R&B means stuff like nicole wray, ashanti, christina milian, etc. i thought people didnt see any difference between that and the dangelos, badus, donnies of this world.

splooge (thesplooge), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Well you're clearly just thinking what you like regardless, so right ahead.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I hate threads getting bad-tempered on ILM, but when people try to pull the "I'm a real fan of x genre and I assume that those I disagree with can't be" card it really puts my back up.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

lauren, you said i was merely splitting hairs when i said soul and R&B werent the same these days.

i'm sure i was being overly sensitive, but i assumed the fact that you said "soul/r&b" then turned around and said "aha! but the two aren't at all alike!" was some sort of trap.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

you go right ahead and think what you like too alba, as youre already doing.

"I hate threads getting bad-tempered on ILM, but when people try to pull the "I'm a real fan of x genre and I assume that those I disagree with can't be" card it really puts my back up."

im not saying i know it all, or anything like that, but i think maney people, esp. those crazy about music as i assume most on this site are, often have more passion for one particular music above all others. or maybe its just me.

and what if i do know more about the music we're discussing (or attempting to discuss at least - everyone just seems to be exploding in fits of rage instead), so what? im sure theres plenty of people that know more about other genres or styles more than me.

im not saying my opinion is definitive, im just saying what i thought about the blu song and that i think its shit. whats the big deal? cant believe a bit of criticism of blu cantrell is getting people in such a tizz. who knew she had such militant fans?

splooge (thesplooge), Friday, 3 September 2004 17:59 (twenty-one years ago)

this is better:)

david acid (gareth), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)

i could go into why i think its shit, but ill probably just get pompously or angrily shot down so ill probably not bother.

splooge (thesplooge), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:06 (twenty-one years ago)

although for the same reasons alba thinks the libs are shit and recycled, i think blu and her ilk are hopelessly predictable and unoriginal.

splooge (thesplooge), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:07 (twenty-one years ago)

in what way?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)

That was the worst cover I've ever heard.

The original is lovely though.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:11 (twenty-one years ago)

you have to be aware of how many modern-urban-music-is-shit/why-can't -they-just-play-instruments-and-write-nice-songs-with-a-melody trollish posts that appear. a lot of what dvd was saying upthread probably pushed those buttons.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I think "Breathe" is far from predictable, really, exactly because of the duet thing I mentioned earlier: as in, it's a confrontation, the two sides actually engage with each other, as opposed to your average R&B colaboration where the guest verse is often throwaway or only very vaguely connected to the song; it stands out because of that. Also, the contrast established between Blu's powerhouse style and Sean's sly, laid-back delivery make for quite a unique contrast. And Aznavour ain't exactly the most popular sampling source in the world.

It kind of reminds me of Otis & Carla Thomas, thematically.

(tons of xposts)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:18 (twenty-one years ago)

well, its just that ive heard that type of thing so many times before, thats all. i mean, its an R&B singer re-using a hip hop beat (please dont tell me dr dre sampled it, duh, i know, but they just resampled dre's version) already made popular and familar to most listeners, which is boring in itself cos weve heard it already. then, its sung in that post-mary j style of hip hop singing, so its quick riffing all the way. its just a beat, its not much of a song. four bar 'beats' are best suited for hip hop in my humble opinion, not for R&B. theres a male rapper (in this case a dancehall DJ) brought in to give it some flavour of the month currency. at that time sean paul was everywhere on everyone songs, so he was stuck on the blu song cos he was popular, not for the good of the track.

as far as the its boy against girl duetting, thats been done to death too. the ja rule and ashanti songs, the janet and busta songs, etc etc. maybe i just listen to too much of this stuff!

splooge (thesplooge), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:20 (twenty-one years ago)

and they didnt sample aznavour directly, they heard it from the dre song, and looped it from there! its common second-hand pracice!

splooge (thesplooge), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:21 (twenty-one years ago)

i dont think modern urban music is shit, but i do think a lot of R&B isnt that great. if you think of it all (hip hop, R&B, soul, broken beat, garage, etc etc) as just 'urban' music, all under that one banner, then maybe yeah, you will think its all shit.

splooge (thesplooge), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:24 (twenty-one years ago)

at that time sean paul was everywhere on everyone songs, so he was stuck on the blu song cos he was popular, not for the good of the track.

maybe so, but he completely nails it. whatever the motivation may have been, the vocals work so well together that intention becomes completely irrelevent.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:26 (twenty-one years ago)

breathe - blue cantrell feat. sean paul

this would be single of the week if it wasn't for lumidee. i really love this song, i've been singing it all summer. i heard somewhere that blu sings a snaky melody, which i totally agree with. and sean paul's "stop actin crazy" bits are joyful and very fun to sing along with. i like how they grind in the video and look up at the sky. blu's lyrics are vague and sad, like she's skirting around how bad she feels about the bad, crazy boy she's hooked up with.

- spizzazzz

cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:27 (twenty-one years ago)

i guess we agree to disagree. i can live without hearing another supposedly-cred-enhancing-rapper-guests-on-R&B-singer song as long as i live. i never thought id hear anyone say sean paul nailed it on that song though! i cant help thinking people are giving the song more credit than it deserves. i will have to download it again and see.

i like sean pauls own songs though.

splooge (thesplooge), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:29 (twenty-one years ago)

but the dynamics between Busta and Janet or Ja Rule and Ashanti are light years away from the one between Blu and Sean Paul (light years away from each other, too.) Busta and Ja are way too gruff to play it like Sean, and Janet and Ashanti way too girly to play it like Blu, for one, and there isn't such a sense of there being a "straight man" in their acts. I don't think boy against girl duetting can be "done to death" - it's a deathless approach, because it'll always be relevant.

also:

theres a male rapper (in this case a dancehall DJ) brought in to give it some flavour of the month currency. at that time sean paul was everywhere on everyone songs, so he was stuck on the blu song cos he was popular, not for the good of the track.

why does intent matter to you?

xpost who CARES where they got it from, it's still an unusual sample! I mean, sheesh, if two songs having the same backing track bothers you, how do you deal with Dancehall?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:31 (twenty-one years ago)

listening to sean paul is often one long "why do you humans cry?" moment (looking at him is even more disturbing!) even when he's got the infectious hook.

- spizzazzz

cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Joss Stone's "Fell In Love With A Boy" = much much much better than it should be by any right (i despise her last two singles); singing in lower register really suits ms Stone, and she turns what would've otherwise been a plodding Roots jam she turns into
a hella sexy soul-rock thing... nothing "wimpy" about it to these ears

The Shite Stripes' "Fell In Love With A Boy" = annoying racket, just like their other "songs"

Dick, I REALLY resent being called an idiot just because i prefer one to the other.

Mind Taker, Friday, 3 September 2004 18:32 (twenty-one years ago)

i really do think that sp did an amazing job with his bit, swaggering and loud and cajoling. i'm not an enormous fan of his, either, and at the time i remember thinking that people should stop sticking him into songs for the hell of it. i've been listening to the song all morning, and it still sounds fantastic - especially in comparison to pd's take on it. if you're looking for a reason why this thread turned into the blu cantrell appreciation society, i think it stems from her being set against something that sounds a lo-fi cookie monster.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:38 (twenty-one years ago)

a lo fi cookie monster? dyou mean ja rule?! ;)

"but the dynamics between Busta and Janet or Ja Rule and Ashanti are light years away from the one between Blu and Sean Paul (light years away from each other, too.) Busta and Ja are way too gruff to play it like Sean, and Janet and Ashanti way too girly to play it like Blu, for one, and there isn't such a sense of there being a "straight man" in their acts. I don't think boy against girl duetting can be "done to death" - it's a deathless approach, because it'll always be relevant."

i can deal with male artist. vs female duets, i love them, im just tired of rapper vs. singer ones. and busta was very toned down when he did his janet and erykah badu duets so that doesnt wash here. ja started singing in his duets and wasnt exactly rapping hardcore in his duets either so thats kind of a moot point. i really dont think sean was playing a straight man, as such, because blu wasnt exactly pulling the punchlines out. i really dont know what dynamics youre talking about either really, listen to the duets between busta and badu - that really has chemistry and a dynamic.

"xpost who CARES where they got it from, it's still an unusual sample! I mean, sheesh, if two songs having the same backing track bothers you, how do you deal with Dancehall?'

whats good for the goose...... dancehall has its own laws and rules which are what its musical culture is made from. R&B has, or had, its own too. id rather they dont all turn into each other.

splooge (thesplooge), Friday, 3 September 2004 20:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't believe it's too far to say that if someone is a fan more than someone else of a certain genre, they may know more about that genre than someone else. For instance, I've found Martin Clark's views on UK garage and grims highly invaluable on this site, and don't think you can dispute that he is more of a fan of said artists, and thus, more of an authority on them.

nelson_george (NelsonGeorge!), Friday, 3 September 2004 21:01 (twenty-one years ago)

splooge, Blu is the straight man, not Sean Paul!! And while Busta and Ja Rule might not have been 'ardcore in these duets, their voices are still in a naturally gruff tone, and the recordings do bank on that beauty & the beast dynamic (Ja and Ashanti much more so than Janet and Busta, granted.) "Breathe" doesn't use that, it's just a very very different song.

dancehall has its own laws and rules which are what its musical culture is made from. R&B has, or had, its own too. id rather they dont all turn into each other.

You're fighting a losing battle there, though.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 3 September 2004 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)

We're getting away from the Pete Doherty hate a bit here. Let us focus our efforts. ;-)

A lot of this discussion is interesting to me because, on the duet tip, it covers a slew of songs I mostly don't know, from a time when I was so heartily sick of The Cult of the Now that I wanted everything and anything remotely musical, popular or not, to go up in flames or something close to it. I'm actually looking forward to hearing some of these suckers at my own pace and in a different context.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 3 September 2004 23:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Theres so much more going on in Breathe though - the dynamics, the "chemistry" as mentioned above, great sonwriting - Its sonically fascinating too: Those constant high pitched tones could have some straight from ventolin and yet at times they seem almost imperceptible. They are always there though. It's incredibly Multi layered. dvd saying docherty makes the song "more musical" is laughable.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 4 September 2004 00:39 (twenty-one years ago)

argh, i cant take this post anymore!

the sight of people in the throes of blu cantrell appreciation (and a totally average song at that, i can think of a million other examples that do what people say this song does and ones that do it better) is doing my head in! from this thread alone, im not convinced of ILM's taste in R&B but no more blu love please! (unless its for her brief centrefold career)

splooge (thesplooge), Saturday, 4 September 2004 08:37 (twenty-one years ago)

in order:

blu
charles
dre
pete

david acid (gareth), Saturday, 4 September 2004 12:38 (twenty-one years ago)

g. you forgot "all of humanity" between dre and pete

jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 4 September 2004 13:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Even the Dashboard Confessional dude?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 4 September 2004 15:41 (twenty-one years ago)

two weeks pass...
reading this thread after listening to blu's last album again and discovering that breathe is still pretty crap in my humble opinion, i still dont get what the fuss was about the idea that fans of a certain genre might know more about it or are going to be more passionate about it than generalists or people coming from a pop/rock background. its kinda like someone who only knows the stones or beatles getting all enraged because someone is saying they *might just* not know that much about rock as they think they do.

i read mainstream media reviews of soul or r&b all the time from people who are obviously mainly rock and pop fans, but feel they have just as much knowledge/passion/interest in soul and R&B artists as specialists in the field so end up writing lazy or ignorant comments. (granted, sometimes it can foster interesting outside perspectives).

splooge (thesplooge), Friday, 24 September 2004 00:16 (twenty years ago)

i don't think that was my argument. i just think the cover is crap!

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 24 September 2004 01:05 (twenty years ago)

I heart Lauren. I heart Lauren soooo much!

Danger Whore (kate), Friday, 24 September 2004 08:02 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.