The Lyrics Of 'Shoplifting' by The Slits

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I was writing a blog post about that Pistol Pete Dead Prez remix that samples The Slits, and I wanted to quote the "ten quid for the lot, we paid fuck all" lyrics from 'Shoplifting'. I hit up Google for the whole verse, and found the most disturbing thing: every site that lists the lyrics to 'Shoplifting' gives the next lines as "Mr Paki won't lose much, and we'll have dinner tonight". As I remember it, whatever it is that Ari Up sings before "...won't lose much", it clearly isn't that (I remember it being something about "Babylon" instead). Bearing in mind I don't have my copy of Cut to hand...

i) Am I in severe denial of the fact that a band I like this much could have sung something like that? OR

ii) Were there ever two versions of the song, one with the offending lyric replaced? OR

iii) Is this one of those cases where one person transcribes lyrics wrongly, and every site on the web copies it off them ('cos I have seen this happen before)?

Flyboy (Flyboy), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 10:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I think option ii) is the answer

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 10:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Me too. I know I've only heard the Babylonish version.

strom (strom), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 11:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Isn't there an early version of "Shoplifting" on the Slits' Peel Sessions EP? They were a punk band then so offensiveness was a possibility.

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 11:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I have the slit's peel sessions ep, and I don't recall that lyric, I must confess. I'll have a listen to it tomorrow, and see if I can work out what it is saying.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 11:09 (twenty-one years ago)

just listened to the peel session version, and it sounds more like Mr. Buggy! probably is the lyric above though :(

zappi (joni), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 11:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Option ii) is the answer I'm afraid.

Fwiw 'though you need to bear in mind the historiocal context and appreciate that back in '77 / '78, very few people were as conscious of the offensiveness of "casual" racial tags and stereotypes as most people are today - and the term "paki shop" was in common parlance without any real intention to cause offence, to decribe corner shops since a significant number of these were owned / managed by asians.

I'm not saying it's right of course, but that's how it was.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks for the info. So was it changed because the band were unhappy with the original lyric (as a result of negative feedback or otherwise), or just as a kind of adlib? And does anyone know what the lyric on the version that appears on Cut actually says?

Flyboy (Flyboy), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Plus it was written by people who did not have English as their first language

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I think EVERYONE had wised up a lot by the time they recorded Cut.

Dadaismus has a point too i.e. English wasn't Ari's (or Palmolive's) first language - so presumably they just picked up the words and expressions they heard every day.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, the version on Cut says "Babylon yen won't lose much".

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:15 (twenty-one years ago)

What I find fascinating about this now I think about is that the change of just that line suddenly changes the idea of who they're robbing - not just in the sense of "no harm meant to you, individual shopkeeper, it's the capitalist system we're stealing from", but in the more concrete sense that (I assume) the racial epithet is meant to suggest a small, local shop, right? And "Babylon yen" evokes something else altogether: stealing from a coporation, so a supermarker chain, maybe...

Flyboy (Flyboy), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Plus, by that time, Ari had begun her long term quest to actually become a Black Jamaican woman

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)

".... the change of just that line suddenly changes the idea of who they're robbing - not just in the sense of "no harm meant to you, individual shopkeeper, it's the capitalist system we're stealing from", but in the more concrete sense that (I assume) the racial epithet is meant to suggest a small, local shop, right? And "Babylon yen" evokes something else altogether: stealing from a coporation, so a supermarker chain, maybe..."

I think it's fair to say The Slits had wised up in all sorts of ways between 1977 and 1979.

In fact I think we all had.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Flyboy what's your site?

p, Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:43 (twenty-one years ago)

The New Hip Hop Political Correctness Trend.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:45 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post: y'know, Fluxblog is responsible for half my hits...

Flyboy (Flyboy), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:47 (twenty-one years ago)

there's this theory in england/uk that 'paki...' is sort of oaky because its just an abbreviation of 'pakistani' in the same way that 'brit' is of 'british'. nice theory on paper, but it only pops up as an argument by the kind of people who use 'paki' strictly in the pejorative sense, and thus that renders it b-llocks.

i'm a bit irked+ that she says that cause i love the CUT version.

isnt it 'babylonian'' anyway not 'babylon yen' ?

piscesboy, Tuesday, 21 September 2004 13:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I remember reading about some Pakistani guy over here who has launched a clothing company called Paki and was trying to reclaim Paki as a word

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 13:42 (twenty-one years ago)

".... it only pops up as an argument by the kind of people who use 'paki' strictly in the pejorative sense, and thus that renders it b-llocks."

True enough now, but not really the case in 1977.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 13:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Context is all yeah but I feel strange about this thread. I've never heard the Peel sessions but I've been lusting after them for ages- but now . . . ?
well, it's one line in one song, clearly delivered innocent of any rancour or spite or even low-comedy (in fact 'won't lose much' makes it sound almost affectionate). At worse you can say it's a lyric that's dated badly (something the rest of say 'Cut', definitely hasn't). But it'll be interesting to me when I finally get the Peel sessions to register my immediate reactions when hearing that line. I guess it'll be just another one of those little internal shudders that music sometimes tweaks within - the moments lyrics make you actually physically twitch in discomfort. (Sometimes, its the closest music gets to actual physical contact, s'like the clearest sign that there's a real life behind the music because it makes you feel queasy like only other people's opinions can.)
Homophobic lyrics in hip-hop still do it every time for me and sometimes listening to Eminem makes my stomach hurt . . ..

But you'd have to hate it if the Slits had tried to have that lyric erased somehow. It's honest (and perhaps more importantly) honestly naive, and of it's time.

Neil Kulkarni, Tuesday, 21 September 2004 16:27 (twenty-one years ago)

i was turned off 5 or 6 years ago when i heard that jurassic 5 song, where the dude says something like "yall aint nothin but some bitchass queers" or something. i mean, thank god i was turned off early, cause J5 roundly sucks. but ive felt this way about songs ive liked, too, and continued to like.

peter smith (plsmith), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 16:50 (twenty-one years ago)

in massachussetts they call liquor/beer stores "the packy", but I think it's short for package store.

autovac (autovac), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 18:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I've been listening to the Peel Sessions LP for about 15 years and have never deciphered half of the lyrics.

I suspect that Stewart is OTM in the 7th post above.

Kent Burt (lingereffect), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 04:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Ditto. The only bit I worked out of that song was

"DO A RUNNER! DO A RUNNER!"

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 05:55 (twenty-one years ago)

What does "Babylon yen" mean? Doesn't that kind of sound like it could be a racial term too?

sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 06:34 (twenty-one years ago)

It's a Jamaican patois term that can be used to refer specifically to the police or more generally to what hippies might have referred to as "The Man" / what young punks around the same time might have referred to as "The System".

Since Jamaicans are generally white and "The Man" (especially in this country back in those days) was almost exclusively white, I suppose it could be said to have some racial connotations under certain circumstances - but (particularly since Ari's white) not really in the way it was being used here I don't think.

If anything it's almost tempting to suggest that maybe this phrase was deliberately chosen to show solidarity in order to atone for the unintended racist element in the earlier version.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 07:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Possibly worth pointing out that The Slits manager when they recorded the original version was Don Letts (so presumably he can't have had too much problem with them using the word "paki") and the producer when they recorded Cut was Dennis Bovell (so maybe he did and suggested the alternative?).

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 07:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Ummmmm "Since Jamaicans are generally white...." should have been "Since Jamaicans are generally black...." of course.!

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Dr Freud to thread...

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 08:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Does he specialise in colour blindness?

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 08:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm suffering from a mild political correctness deficiency caused by an overactive bullshit detector gland, so it's not my fault.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 08:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmm, yes but where were you in 1977?

Dr Freud (mark grout), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 08:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Bunking off school to see The Damned.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 08:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, not all the time, obviously - but when I wasn't, I was thinking about it.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 08:49 (twenty-one years ago)

That's not my fault either.

After he'd finished bollocking me, the headmaster told me to go away and think about what I'd done.

So I did.

And I still thought it had been fantastic.

So I did it again....

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 08:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Umm, did the dammned play really early in the day gigs?

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 08:58 (twenty-one years ago)

No, just far away ones.

And the school I was at used to keep us in 'til really late.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 12:10 (twenty-one years ago)

I bunked off to see The Sex Pistols at Cleethorpes Winter Gardens.

Dr.C, Wednesday, 22 September 2004 12:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Which tour / who were supporting, Doc?

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 12:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Anarchy tour Dec 76. With The Clash and The Heartbreakers.

Dr.C, Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I had just turned 15!

Dr.C, Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:58 (twenty-one years ago)

This would have been after The Damned were thrown off the tour because they offered to play at some of the venues that had banned the 'Pistols then, right?

How good were The Heartbreakers? I never got to see them.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

The Damned were off the tour a few weeks before IIRC. The Buzzcocks stepped in for a couple of dates at the Electric Circus, but I couldn't go, even though my eldest sister did. The fact that she saw Devoto-era Buzzcocks and I didn't still rankles! I can't remember much about The Heartbreakers. They were alright, but seemed a bit out of place.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 14:32 (twenty-one years ago)

"The fact that she saw Devoto-era Buzzcocks and I didn't still rankles!"

I can understand that!

Weren't The Clash on the tour too?

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, I said The Clash!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 14:35 (twenty-one years ago)

D'OH! So you did! I was too busy rankling because you'd seen The Heartbreakers - I'm sure you'll understand!

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 14:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Guess who drummed for The Clash.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 14:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm listening to Buzzcocks 'Times Up' right now. Utterly fantastic! Apparently 'Lester Sands' is on the latest Buzzcocks album!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)

"Guess who drummed for The Clash."

You're not going to impress me by saying Terry Chimes.

"Apparently 'Lester Sands' is on the latest Buzzcocks album!"

It is and it's a great version; and there's also an equally great version of "'Til The Stars In His Eyes Are Dead" (retitled simply "Stars") from the Buzzkunst album Pete Shelley made with Howie in 2002 - in fact I reckon it could be the best album Buzzcocks have made since A Different Kind Of Tension!

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

**You're not going to impress me by saying Terry Chimes.**

One Rob Harper actually! Chimes quit before the tour. I think he came back again and then quit again. Then Topper joined.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 15:04 (twenty-one years ago)

[rankles silently]

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Still rankling Stew?

[= thin excuse for another day of punk reminiscence]

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 23 September 2004 07:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Uptown Top-Rankling

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 23 September 2004 07:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Unless or until someone finally comes up with something better, no excuses should ever be needed for another day of punk reminiscence.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 23 September 2004 07:46 (twenty-one years ago)

My uncle skipped off school and MET the Damned. They (Vanian & Sensible I think) were waiting for a joke shop to open so Vanian could buy his face paint and my uncle got them to sign his ticket from the show the previous night and they ended up going to play pool in some cafe nearby. I think my uncle was about 15 at the time (1978? not sure).

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 23 September 2004 10:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Stew.

You should see the half-ton of punk singles in that alleyway secondhand vinyl/CD shop (Harris Arcade).

you should.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 23 September 2004 12:44 (twenty-one years ago)

B-b-but that would mean going into Reading in.... daylight!

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 23 September 2004 13:03 (twenty-one years ago)

The clocks go back soon enough. It'll be dark by five in October.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 23 September 2004 13:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Is that in Smelly Alley?

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 23 September 2004 13:44 (twenty-one years ago)

No. Across the road from M&S.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 23 September 2004 13:46 (twenty-one years ago)

If I have to try to sneak a load more old punk singles into the house it would need to be under cover of darkness anyway!

To be honest 'though there aren't very many old punk singles I'm remotely interested in finding now - a few odd things by the Depressions, Desperate Bicycles, Snivelling Shits, Suburban Studs, Trash.... - and nothing I wouldn't be just as happy if not happier to have on CD if someone were to see fit to release it.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 23 September 2004 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

"My uncle skipped off school and MET the Damned...."

I remember the first time I met The Damned properly and had a proper conversation with them; when me and my mate interviewed them for our 'zine in December 1979.

I was 16 and so excited about meeting them that I'm surprised my trousers didn't spontaneously combust.

Captain Sensible told me about how he'd managed to blag his way to meet Gary Glitter when he was 16 - and I was thrilled because Gary Glitter had been my hero too a few years earlier.

I then asked him when he'd decided to stop trying to be like Gary Glitter or Jimi Hendrix and become Captain Sensible and he thanked me and told me that was the most intelligent question he'd been asked for a long time and I thought my head was going to explode.

Then he told me that I had bad breath and needed to clean my teeth more often and I didn't care and included that bit when I wrote up the interview too.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 23 September 2004 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, punk singles I have just 'sneaked into the house'

New York Dolls "Jet Boy" Mercury, £3
Lurkers "Aint got a clue" w/ gold vinyl "Chaos Bros" £5

The Depressions rings a bell, funnily enough. Were they on Barn records? if so, they have at least three different.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 28 September 2004 12:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Just checked. Yep.

Stewart, check it out man.

(p.s. if there had been any desp bikes etc, there wouldn't be now iygm)

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 29 September 2004 06:07 (twenty-one years ago)

(if you get me)

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 29 September 2004 12:41 (twenty-one years ago)

four months pass...
As a post script to the (original) discussion on this thread, the just-released Live At The Gibus Club contains two versions of "Shoplifting", in both of which the word "paki" has been carefully excised....

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 09:50 (twenty years ago)

Is it bleeped? Or is some 'authentic '77 punk noise' strategically gaffa taped on top?

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 11:36 (twenty years ago)

The first couple of times I thought there a bit of feedback had been strategically grafted over the top which ceased to be remotely convincing when it happened twice in exactly the same place. The third time I wondered if there was the "k-ching" of an old-fashioned cash register mixed in there. The last time it was definitely a "k-ching".

I've yet to ascertain whether it really was different every time or just my ears playing tricks on me.

Absolutely FANTASTIC album btw - definitely the best live Slits recording I've heard yet.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 12:01 (twenty years ago)

speaking of which...

Tour Dates!

"The Slits With Ari Up"
Still fronted by Ariane Forster, the Slits were revolutionary on the punk scene in the 70s, evolving their sound to encompass dub and reggae before splitting up in the early 80s. Expect a reggae-layered set which still remains full of punkish attitude.

http://www.ents24.com/web/artist/75994/The_Slits_With_Ari_Up.html

itchy bits, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 19:32 (twenty years ago)

Unfortunately, as you'd probably expect, "The Slits With Ari Up" actually translates as "Ari Up without any of the other Slits".

I'd advise a little caution - but here's at least some idea of what you might be letting yourself in for.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:03 (twenty years ago)

so did we actually conclude whether pakistani's find 'paki' offensive? aussie, brit and scot aren't offensive terms, why would paki be any different?

chris andrews (fraew), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)

uh because of its history as pejorative term?

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:48 (twenty years ago)

But how long is that history?

I don't think the issue here is really whether people from Pakistan find the term offensive today, but whether they found it offensive in 1977.

I'm not in any position to speak for the Pakistani community; but I think I can speak for the majority of the indiginous population - and I'm not at all convinced that it was considered to be a term of abuse or particularly offensive by the majority of white people who who have casually used the term in 1977.

The fact that it did seem to be in general use as a word to describe almost anyone of Asian extraction (rather than just people with actual roots in Pakistan) did of course create an additional - but entirely separate - potential for causing some level of offence; in a manner similar to that which may be caused by e.g. misidentifying people from Portugal as being Spanish, people from New Zealand as being Australian, or people from Canada as being American; but that is a separate matter.

Nevertheless, it is vital to understand the context - and even if the use of the term does appear to be horribly insensitive and unenlightened from our current standpoint, it must be understood that (compared with today) those were horribly insensitive and unenlightened times and the casual use of racial tags was not only endemic but, far more importantly, was also probably the very least of the worries that faced members of many racial minorities in the UK at that time.

If an old friend came running up to you in the street and addressed you as ".... you old bastard", I imagine you'd probably be delighted.

If a complete stranger came up and did likewise then I suspect your reaction would be rather different.

If you were at the annual convention of the "People who were Conceived Out Of Wedlock Society" however, that reaction might be different again.

So calm those jerking knees for a moment and consider this: I suspect that most people today (not those directly involved in the education or child care professions perhaps, but most ordinary people) will casually use the word "kids" to describe children.

If any of us ever bother to actually stop to think about it, we're probably vaguely aware that it is a mildly pejorative term and we probably shouldn't really be using it - but it's only a word, there's no intention to offend anyone, and it's not as if it's actually hurting anyone, is it, right?

In 25 years, a new generation will look on you as being little better than a child molestor for having used that word.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 10:08 (twenty years ago)

Why is kid a pejorative term?

jim (jim5et), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 10:25 (twenty years ago)

It equates human children with the offspring of goats and it's certainly considered pejorative within the education and child care professions.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 10:32 (twenty years ago)

what about calling children "ducklings"? is that okay?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 20:02 (twenty years ago)

this is far too PC for my liking...

chris andrews (fraew), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 20:14 (twenty years ago)

"what about calling children "ducklings"? is that okay?"

It is at present afaik - but who's to say whether it will be considered so in a quarter of a century's time?

My dear old Cockney grandma, gawd bless 'er soul, used to habitually call me (and probably all her other grandchildren too, for all I know) her li'l "Cock Sparrer".

I believe the "Cock" bit was an abbreviation of "Cockney", rather than a reference to my pre-pubescent male genitalia; although if the old girl was still about today I imagine Social Services would probably put my name on the "At Risk" register, just to be on the safe side.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 24 February 2005 09:41 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.