And you will know...trail of dead

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Hey now

― 57 7th (calstars), Thursday, 23 September 2004 21:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Yancey's review is hysterical

― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 23 September 2004 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)

where is it? this album is hysterical.

― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 23 September 2004 23:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, the album is pretty horrible.

― Kevin H (Kevin H), Thursday, 23 September 2004 23:08 (twenty-one years ago)

"Horrible" seems a little strong. Pretentious, over-symphonised, weak in places, yes, but hardly "horrible". I quite like "Rest Will Follow".

― Simon H., Thursday, 23 September 2004 23:42 (twenty-one years ago)

is this on soulseek?
i really like the last one

― i can't remember my name, Friday, 24 September 2004 00:01 (twenty-one years ago)

it's horrible.. cringworthy!

― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 24 September 2004 00:03 (twenty-one years ago)

it's horrible.. CRINGEWORTHY.

― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 24 September 2004 00:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree that the album is cringworthy, but clearly not CRINGEWORTHY!

― The TAO that can be Posted is not the TAO! (The Tao that can be Posted is), Friday, 24 September 2004 00:33 (twenty-one years ago)

as in worthy of much crings. yummy yummy crings.

― The TAO that can be Posted is not the TAO! (The Tao that can be Posted is), Friday, 24 September 2004 00:34 (twenty-one years ago)

When's it due for release? I'm surprised to hear it's disappointing! Yet strangely, not.

― piers (piers), Friday, 24 September 2004 01:18 (twenty-one years ago)

i like the album title.

― reo, Friday, 24 September 2004 05:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Why? Did they move to Jupiter or something? Otherwise it's just "Standard Portentous Indie Title #2445" isn't it?

― Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 24 September 2004 05:41 (twenty-one years ago)

yacey's review is on here

― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 24 September 2004 05:58 (twenty-one years ago)

yancey's. sorry.

― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 24 September 2004 05:59 (twenty-one years ago)

IAN ASTBURY WE LOVE YOU

― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 24 September 2004 05:59 (twenty-one years ago)

corpulent internet backlash

― harshaw (jube), Friday, 24 September 2004 06:16 (twenty-one years ago)

i like this album because i heard some songs at coachella and they were raw and bleeding and alive.

― harshaw (jube), Friday, 24 September 2004 06:20 (twenty-one years ago)

i like the album title.

Them boys know their European boybands of yore.

http://www.chez.com/ecole/aurelie/wa4.jpg

― DJ Mencap0))), Friday, 24 September 2004 08:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Still bombastic, but in my opinion with 3 or 4 really good tracks, especially the one with the bridge on track 3(?) that goes: 'Looking back to '91, things we should have said and done.'

― 57 7th (calstars), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:39 (twenty-one years ago)

'Horrible' is a little strong, but to me it is surprisingly bad. The melody on the title track (the one with the kids laughing in the background) reminds me a lot of Piebald, but maybe that just has to do with the lead guy (Conrad?)'s voice.

― Kevin H (Kevin H), Friday, 24 September 2004 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Damn...I really like Source Tags alot lot lot....I hope I'll like it better than this stuff is leading me to believe...

― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 24 September 2004 23:50 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm listening to "It Was There That I Saw You" and it is only making me that much more disappointed. Kinda forgot what an awesome opening track that is.

― jsk baby (jsk baby), Saturday, 25 September 2004 04:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Are there even one or two good songs?

― billstevejim, Saturday, 25 September 2004 04:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Will You Smile Again, which is track #2, is probably the most similar to what they've done in the past, and it's pretty decent. Although the middle section drags on a little bit, it's good overall.

― Kevin H (Kevin H), Saturday, 25 September 2004 05:12 (twenty-one years ago)

haven't heard it, but i'm not too surprised by the feedback on this -- the band has sounded pretty ridiculous in the interviews i've read since Source Tags came out. they come across as wishful artistes or something. i really liked the previous album and EP though.

― ryan kuo (ryan kuo), Saturday, 25 September 2004 05:18 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...

Will You Smile Again is the only track worth listening to. I guess these guys spent themselves on Source Tags.

― Shaun (shaun), Friday, 29 October 2004 21:00 (twenty-one years ago)

two months pass...

I never really liked them in the past, but several people I know have commented on how different this one is and I might like it if I'd give it a chance.

So I did.

Hearing it once seems like enough to satisfy my obligation.

― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Saturday, 1 January 2005 12:23 (twenty years ago)

this album is definitely NOT what they should be doing right now.
after ST&C's+elaines' tomb, they seemed poised to bust out something major, uber epic...
alas, this may be what they had in mind as an 'uber epic'.
and THAT is just sad.

we'll see. i hear live they still kick in teeth.

― eedd, Sunday, 2 January 2005 23:39 (twenty years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.

And you will know...trail of dead - Worlds Apart (2004)