― jess, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― ...Motel Hell..., Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tom, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― dave q, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sterling Clover, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
In hip hop I'd imagine different types of harshness.. sometimes it's more viscerally felt as a grating force (El-p/AlecEmpire on HBMS as an extreme example), but sometimes its more implicit, lurking around in relentlessly gritty samples (the foreboding nature of the quintessential RZA beat). What exactly is the culprit for the coldness that bugs you, jess? (waiting for the radio examples.....)
― Honda, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
One possible response to it all (and as Sterling says artistically the response seems to be business-as-usual) is to turn away from it and suggest alternatives. Another is to reflect it, render yourself an aesthetic accessory-after-the-fact in the way that politicians (theirs and ours) have made us all political/emotional accessories a.t.f. (either by assuming we're sympathetic proxy-victims, or more simply by designating us as legitimate targets).
So that'd be my 'excuse'.
the radio (only one of our hiphop stations will come in and i brought no cd's with me today) is playing nothing but ultra-sucrose r&b today as a way to thwart me. the one fabolos track i've heard is actually a good example. as is a chunk of the timbaland record.
Other thought: Jess, how does this all square with liking Cannibal Ox (who strike me as generally much colder than anything in the gangsta world)?
Other other thought: I love The Blueprint to death, but it more than anything else strikes me as sounding anachronistic, ill-reflecting our current social position however you choose to look at it. Out of interest, who was Reynolds criticising?
― Tim, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― daria gray, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Josh, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Am I the only person on these boards who just doesn't get what is supposed to be so great about "The Blueprint"? I mean, exactly like his previous 46 albums, I've got money/women/am better than Nas/Mobb Deep/grew up in the projects/sample Gilles Peterson's record collection. So what?
― Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tom, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― jess, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Also: "inventiveness and density of the production" - Jess, why do you think you readily identify this in Cannibal Ox and yet not in gangsta rap? I thought it was a well-established cliche that gangsta rap's saving grace for a lot of people is the inventiveness and density of the production.
― Tim, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
the reason i love can ox probably comes down to my essential "indie"- ness on all fronts. however, i really do dislike most undie rap, and this is one of the most *sonically inventive* undie (or period) hiphop records i've ever heard... it might be (and i am loathe for this to be true) that it's all gone a little too futurist for me, and it's my own problem... but at the same time, another problem i have with a lotta modern gangsta is that it's rather monogroove. the late period co. flow of "simple" and "dpa" and the can ox record are dripping from end to end...maybe i was wrong earlier and can ox actually = the associates of sulk? but it's not just the layered density, but the multiple...movements(?)...it's a bad word, but the radio songs (perhaps out of necessity) seem much more linear to me. (comparing, perhaps, "to shape the future" with "weird energy"?)
i've argued before that actually PRE-timbaland most hiphop tracks were perfect circles, with the apex probably being the rza in terms of mono-loop. so i'm doubling back all over myself, as per usual.
btw, points to any tracks which might disabuse me of these notions are welcome...
ahem.
Back to the topic at hand, I heard some of what jess was talking about yesterday on Bubba Sparxxx' "Ugly". The beats were actually further from trad hip-hop than Get Ur Freak On. The beats are piled at the end of the bar, instead of near the front with another set on the 2.5, then an extended pause before it closes (which is my lose description of the normal rap beat). Anyway, consequently, it felt absolutely undanceable, and made no visceral connection with my groove thang. I wonder if some of the coldness you hear comes from the increasing "headphone" quality of some pop-rap. The new P. Diddy single, Fabolous, Bubba, &c. are all hard to imagine blowing up in a club. And on the other end, the increasing house influence may also have sort of a familiarity-shock effect.
Increasingly, we're living in the era foretold by Bombs Over Baghdad where production is matched as much to flow as to funk, which seems absolutely the opposite of techno paring itself down for the dancefloor.
― Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Honda, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I do see the monogroove thing you mean - there's an air of decay within Can Ox stuff that gives it that sense of constantly disintegrating, moving between different radioactive groove half-lives or something. As you note though, monogroove = a staple of hip hop generally. Although maybe it's the shiny perfection of modern hip hop that makes it sound much more rigidly defined than say RZA, who is in truth far more repetitive but in a vaguely ramshackle way.
I personally find something really impressive about the locked groove approach; moment of truth came when reading Sterling's sound-by-sound dissection of Nivea's "Don't Mess With The Radio", which really captures the subtle undercurrent of an almost arty minimalism at work.
One big exception that comes to mind since we're talking about the Trackmasters elsewhere is their remix of Usher's "You Remind Me" with Method Man and Blu Cantrell. Firstly, the groove is an awesome crunk-riddled thing that is undeniably "warm". Secondly, the combination of the different performers with new twists on the melody gives the track a very distinct multifaceted appearance, both musically and emotively (Method Man's section is sly and sexy; Blu's is quite sad). Thirdly, the entire thing has a really naturalist live swing to it that makes me think the next stage in digital sophistication is a partial rejection of the overtly digital sound and the appropriation of a live "hands-on" feel that actually slightly mirrors the move from electro to sample-based hip hop (see also: Toya's "I Do (Part 2)", Bubba's "Bubba Talk" and "Lovely", Mystikal's "Bouncin' Back", Ja Rule's "Livin' It Up").
― Tim, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
The Blueprint = triumphant, luxuriant, not quite as compulsive, still v.good. I can't imagine myself preferring it to Life and Times in a couple of years, though. In fact I'm not sure whether I prefer it *now*.
Cover imagery of "The Great Depression" = awesome. Shame there's nothing close to "Party Up" or "What's My Name" on there.
― Robin Carmody, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― daria gray, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sterling Clover, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
spot on. nelly sounds very comfortable, instantly recognizible, and vaguely unthreatening. yr laughing with him, as opposed to at him or him at you (which is how i feel for a lot of gangsta's...ludacris, etc.)
― jess, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tim, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
(this is probably an interesting thread to revive for other reasons too)
― m. (mitchlnw), Sunday, 25 April 2004 13:20 (twenty-one years ago)