is anyone excited about andrew weatherall fabric mix?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
cos I know I am

click on the romboy/booka shade tune!!! vastness!!!

Barnaby (Barnaby), Monday, 4 October 2004 08:26 (twenty-one years ago)

oh my god that looks ace. pokerflat/landsky/booka shade/dj t etc=weatherall so on point.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 4 October 2004 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)

For sheezy!

B.A.R.M.S. (Barima), Monday, 4 October 2004 13:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah and it totally makes sense as a quasi follow-up to Hypercity. I was thinking today that the Get Physical mix is totally like a post-electro Hypercity

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 4 October 2004 13:26 (twenty-one years ago)

the steve bug remix on this is excellent post-schaffel disorienting madness. oh man and it's got "robot dance" on it. it's gonna be good one...

tricky disco (disco stu), Monday, 4 October 2004 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
Well?

adam... (nordicskilla), Saturday, 6 November 2004 22:42 (twenty-one years ago)

it's greatness
just finished grabbing this and it's so sexcellent

rentboy (rentboy), Saturday, 6 November 2004 23:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, get excited, this is magnificent. It's like he's taken a copy of that Get Physical mix back in time to 1989.

Mike (mratford), Sunday, 7 November 2004 02:08 (twenty-one years ago)

gimme gimme gimme micro-electro after midnight

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 7 November 2004 02:28 (twenty-one years ago)

EXTRA GOOD NEWS for UK ILXers:

HMV are doing a "buy one get one free" Fabric CD offer at the moment. And even though it only came it out yesterday, they've included Weatherall's Fabric 19 immediately in the offer. Well, they have in some London branches at least. So you can get this and another Fabric for £11.

zebedee (zebedee), Tuesday, 16 November 2004 11:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Heard that steve bug track on radio 1 the other night. Was surprised to say the least (it was the evening session show which is mostly indie-rock centred) f-ing stunning track! Is he worth investigating more? Bearing in mind I tend to buy more CD albums than 12"s

Checking out some more samples The Emporer Machine leapt THE HELL out at me as one of those 'oh god.. where have I heard that before??' tunes.

Finally tracked it down to the Sylvie Marks mix I downloaded the other week (not on her site any more sadly, this months is ok but not quite as insanely-twitchy-danceable)

The Richardo Villalobos track is odd, sounds just like late 80's/early 90's skate rock!

Probably will buy this ...

latetotheparty (latetotheparty), Saturday, 20 November 2004 00:27 (twenty-one years ago)

The Steve Bug album Sensual is good but not outstanding - impeccably produced and stylish but never really surprising.

It's kinda like to the Poker Flat sound what Scsi-9's Digital Russian is to the Force Tracks sound. Except Digital Russian is better.

When he's on he's on though. "A Night Like This"! "That's What I Like (Fuck A Duck Mix)"! His stuff usually sounds great in the middle of a mix.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 20 November 2004 00:55 (twenty-one years ago)

steve bug produced two really good compilation/mixes called "the minimal funk 1" and "the minimal funk 2". they're a bit dated now but still worth a spin, for background on what microhouse was before it was called microhouse and for some interesting historical connections.

#1 = http://www.discogs.com/release/145793
#2 = http://www.discogs.com/release/155151

minimal funk #3 is not really worth your time (ie it exceeds tim's "never really suprising" comment, it's actually really boring)

vahid (vahid), Saturday, 20 November 2004 00:59 (twenty-one years ago)

actually "really boring" is way too harsh, it just doesn't match the first two.

one good thing you can say about bug's selections is that they're less german-centric than most microhouse mixes, he casts his net pretty wide.

vahid (vahid), Saturday, 20 November 2004 01:01 (twenty-one years ago)

He's got a new mix out that looks quite good! But I've forgotten what it's called or what's on it.

Basically I like Steve most when he sounds Get Physical-worthy.

This conversation inspired me to put on that John Tejada Poker Flat Volume III mix again, I always forget how good it is. Tejada's "Flight to Tokyo"!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 20 November 2004 01:04 (twenty-one years ago)

BTW Vahid I picked up that Ian O'Brien Desert Scores album on Ferox. I've only listened a few times but it sounds like (straight) Black Dog meets Laurent Garnier!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 20 November 2004 01:06 (twenty-one years ago)

will probably pass on the yet more (2xCD's!) minimal/microhouse-ish thing for the time being though. Feeling a bit overdosed on it all right now. I could never be a dj, I think I'd find it really wearing.

Right now I'm not sure what I feel like buying at all! Have to scratch some kind of itch soon...

cheers for that though both of you :)

latetotheparty (latetotheparty), Saturday, 20 November 2004 02:11 (twenty-one years ago)

we have Desert Scores in work, in the sale, I'll check it out.

And all of you must hear "Chorgs" by John Tejada!

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 20 November 2004 10:56 (twenty-one years ago)

The Fabric mix is the goodness - that Alexkid track! Acid revivalism is on a certain level very cheesy, but it's also totally great.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 27 November 2004 04:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm a bit disappointed by this mix to be honest. Considering Weatherall's standing as a guru of all things eclectic and dirty and mashup I'd have liked to have seen a little less formula than this bunch of electro-lite microstuff. This mix could've been done by anyone really but Andrew's recent obsessions with microhouse and dance-punk just leave me cold. I guess it's more a personal dissatisfaction of current trends more than a critique of the man himself. I can't bring myself to hate him.

dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 27 November 2004 10:59 (twenty-one years ago)

the new steve bug mix is called bugnology. the mixing and track selection are both great and he does lots of looping and eq tricks, too. it's easily better than any of the fabrics released this year, but it is also very staged. i have some live steve bug sets that are some of my favorite mixes of all time though. he's one of my favorite djs...

and i kind of agree with dog latin. the weatherall mix, while technically great, is just missing something. it's very much like hypercity. maybe i need to hear it again. one thing i've noticed with weatherall is that his mixes are not headphone music.

it's tricky (disco stu), Saturday, 27 November 2004 13:38 (twenty-one years ago)

i've only been listening on headphones - how else should i listen?

The best DJ set I ever saw was TLS dj-ing dub and reggae in the dance tent at Reading. They somehow managed to blend all the dub together so perfectly and slipped in "Wilmot" towards the end. Had the whole place jumping!

dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 27 November 2004 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)

how else should i listen?

at a proper distance from quality speakers on a good sound system of course.

or in a car with a good stereo.

listening is completely subjective though so who knows. i notice that i prefer a lot of music with added room ambience. i also have a pretty great sound system...

it's tricky (disco stu), Saturday, 27 November 2004 15:07 (twenty-one years ago)

does that mean youve only ever listened to daft punks homework over haedphones? that wuold explain a lot. crosspost.

:| (....), Saturday, 27 November 2004 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

heheh, no I've listened to it in my room and on headphones. I do crank it up a lot though. Oh, and a friend of mine played "Teachers" during a DJ set and everyone stopped dancing.

dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 27 November 2004 15:36 (twenty-one years ago)

they were all busy taking notes!

:| (....), Saturday, 27 November 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)

"Losing My Edge" does it a lot lot better.

dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 27 November 2004 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes I know it came out about 7 years after, but still.

dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 27 November 2004 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I think I have the opposite reaction to Dog Latin because I love the current convergence of electro, house, micro etc. Like, there's been a dozen great mixes this year (Weatherall's, Mei Lwun's, the Get Physical mix, the Tiefschwarz mix, the Music for Freaks mix, Smagghe's two mixes, the Headman mix, the Optimo mix, the Ellen Allien mix etc.) which overlap eachother stylistically, but the entire area covered is so roomy, so accomodating of internal differentiation, that all of these sound pretty distinctive and individual to me. I can conceive of all of this getting tired eventually but right now it's terribly satisfying.

The DJ who played before Captain Comatose's live performance here in Melbourne the other night did a set which was like a best-of of all of these overlapping styles. He played the Mylo mix of "Chewing Gum", "2 After 909", DJ T's "Philly" (with an a cappella female rap over the top which worked surprisingly well), this awesome mix of the Freaks' "The Creeps" which I hadn't heard before (not the Steve Bug one) the Tiefschwarz mix of "Plastic Bags & Magazines" and all this other excellent stuff which i can't remember now. Anyway, the point is the whole time I was thinking "yes, this is what house should be right now, this expansive environment where killer electro riffs and acid bleeps and stuttering micro-beats and disco strings and pop vocals all mixed up as if it was the most natural thing in the world.

(Captain Comatose were amazing too, but that's another story)

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 28 November 2004 01:36 (twenty-one years ago)

this expansive environment where killer electro riffs and acid bleeps and stuttering micro-beats and disco strings

http://stat.discogs.com/R/2087-001.jpg

indulge me my rockism, please

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 28 November 2004 02:10 (twenty-one years ago)

sorry i didn't realize that was so huge

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 28 November 2004 02:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha ha Vahid I actually agree! But surely it's a good thing that, for the first time in my memory of dancing of clubs (which is about six years), so many house DJs, clubs etc. are looking past the limitations of post-Strictly Rhythm refinement and reaching back to the ideas of Chicago house?

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 28 November 2004 07:16 (twenty-one years ago)

the two freak tracks as intro is a master stroke

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 28 November 2004 19:13 (twenty-one years ago)

i love this mix. i'm a huge weatherall fan anyway, but this mix totally rocks. i ordered all the unofficial weatherall mixes from BiWire years ago but i still need plenty mixes from Mr.Weathers. anyone willing to swap Weatherall sets? i've got about 10 mixes not officially released. his mixing is usually hit or miss, often relying on short mixes but that just highlights the quality of his selections. I'm curious how he did the Fabric mix because it sounds better mixed than a lot of his other stuff. anyone know?

biznotic, Sunday, 28 November 2004 19:48 (twenty-one years ago)

i like the two freak tracks yes. i'm actually surprised i like these so much because they're really not what i normally like.

dog latin (dog latin), Sunday, 28 November 2004 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)

biznotic - i'd be eternally grateful if i could nix a mix from you although i don't have a whole lot to offer in return.

i prefer the radioactiveman mix on fabric to this one to be honest - a lot more pumpin!

dog latin (dog latin), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:12 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah this wasnt that bangin

still like it though, and the "mixing" that someone mentioned on another thread at track 6 and 7 - the steve bug "that kid" tune that jumops fronm schaffel to 4/4, and the dj t - time out (acid dub) arre both worth the price of admission. or the price of a cable modem

maybe i will take advatage of that hmv offer when i get near there and get fabric 17 and 19

ambrose (ambrose), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
So, this was reviewed on Stylusmagazine.com and I'm trying to figure out how what I thought was at the least very listenable and at the most really enjoyable ended up with a D+. I've listened to this a few times lately, is it really that bad? I don't think so.

mike h. (mike h.), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

The review confuses 'wont' with 'want' = it is worthless.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 16:32 (twenty years ago)

That's a crap review but what it says is true. If anything in it rings true is this:

It’s no fun

And it's true. There's nothing on this record that'll get your rocks off so I can leave it to the beards and jockey-spotters to pick to bits.

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)

if this = no fun
and stuff like soulwax = fun

i'll take no fun any day of the week
this was my number 2 mix of last year, only beat out by the truly amazing scratch perverts essential mix for radio one

rentboy (rentboy), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 19:21 (twenty years ago)

I just reread the review and it got worse the second time. The part he pulled from the press release about the album ("Joy Division-inspired" becomes "Joy Division influenced") is used to somehow fuel his rant against the "Atmosphere" cover -- wtf? He also never mentions how great the cover of Dexter is!

mike h. (mike h.), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 19:37 (twenty years ago)

"There's nothing on this record that'll get your rocks off"


bbbut this mix has steve bug "that kid" and dj t "timeout (acid dub)"!!!!!!

those two tunes are worth the price of entry alone!!!!

but there is something a little dry about the mix, i concede.

ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 20:45 (twenty years ago)

Compare it to Radioactive Man's Fabric mix and you'll see that it's most likely Tenniswood who's fronting the Swordsmen these days while Weatherall slowly but surely drives himself into the ground. Okay, that's harsh, but there's something so horribly Shoreditch about Andrew's output and influences these days.
From The Double Gone Chapel was a really obvious wishy-washy attempt to jump on the Disco-Punk bandwagon. Whatever happened to the Swordsmen doing for themselves? Tiny Reminders and Stay Down sounded so original compared to this Rapture-lite tat.
I'd been looking forward to a Weatherall mix for ages and was sorely disappointed by this. It's by all means a pretty decent disco/electro/microhouse/whatever mix but that's it - it's not a Weatherall classic.

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 20:59 (twenty years ago)

the digweed mix is going to be 10x better

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 6 January 2005 08:11 (twenty years ago)

That Digweed comp could indeed be great actually - the Solveig track is deathless, plus 16B, Richard Davis, Ralph Lawson and Mayer/Superpitcher all present and correct...

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 6 January 2005 11:17 (twenty years ago)

so horribly Shoreditch about Andrew's output and influences these days.

that's such kneejerk bollocks! barely any of the tracks on Fabric 19 are that style of electro and the outro to the mix is weird post-punk type stuff, as a mix it's not comparable to any of the other electro mixes which I assume are horribly Shoreditch. And even if they were, what on earth has that got to do with the music?

And also, make up your mind, you say Fabric 19 is "no fun" and "horribly Shoreditch" and also for "beards and jockeyspotters"

That sounds like a fairly 3 different criticisms of pretty much any possible sense in which this mix could be good.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 6 January 2005 12:28 (twenty years ago)

the "dryness" on Fabric 19 is nothing new, Weatherall doesn't put massive tunes on his mixes, it's always going to be underground, but if you've no interest in anything new then in this case the big tracks might suddenly appear dry.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 6 January 2005 12:30 (twenty years ago)

and that review is a load of rubbish, "nothing much of interest happens until track 5" is the point at which you know that the writer isn't worth taking seriously.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 6 January 2005 13:02 (twenty years ago)

dog latin - weatheralls 9 oclock drop compilation preceeded the disco post punk bandwagon by a good 6-8 months...


I see the fabric as weatherall havig a bit of a "hmmm what shall i play next" vibe rather than a work out on paper and practise for ages mix.

he probably turned on the decks, and knocked it out.

then again his one for the social comp is deep house...

you say you were looking forward to the mix for ages and so was i but the fact that it doesnt sound like it should in your head is more youre views on the Wev' and not his musical taste

but what do i know about anything.

danny boy (danny boy), Thursday, 6 January 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)

And also, make up your mind, you say Fabric 19 is "no fun" and "horribly Shoreditch" and also for "beards and jockeyspotters"

That sounds like a fairly 3 different criticisms of pretty much any possible sense in which this mix could be good.

Err... What? I love arguing with you Ronan but I'm making the same point with all of these. I'm not asking Andrew to play the bloody Vengaboys or anything but I can't help thinking that this mix is rather soulless. It seems very much style-over-content trying to play the very trendiest of trends until it just sounds nerdy and cleansed of any vigour or energy.

Seriously, I'm not bashing it and I do like puting it on occasionally. It's just, as I said upthread, that this mix could've ben done by any old house DJ whereas I've seen Weatherall do some amazing sets in the past. Admittedly there's a personal agenda here too because I have a general aversion to mid-tempo house music as well as the Disco-Punk sound (which fucks me off - yes I said it) and am more up for the dub/idm/electro/techno side of the Swordsmen's work.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 6 January 2005 15:32 (twenty years ago)

That review was very rubbish even though I kinda get what the guy is saying. I keep waiting for the mix to get warmed up but it barely manages a good stretch let alone a gentle jog.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 6 January 2005 15:38 (twenty years ago)

Well to me calling something "horribly shoreditch" and "nerdy" at the same time is a total contradiction.

Also I don't consider the last 3 or 4 tracks "the disco punk sound", or if they are they're a fairly specific spin on it.

I dunno, I don't really accept "style over content" as a valid criticism of anything.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 6 January 2005 21:29 (twenty years ago)

Strange, I deluded myself in thinking this was totally amazing. :)

Omar (Omar), Thursday, 6 January 2005 21:38 (twenty years ago)

you clearly spend too much time doing your hair/beard to even realise what you have playing

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 6 January 2005 22:05 (twenty years ago)

I'm just a no fun kinda guy. This imaginary beard is bothering me though.

Omar (Omar), Thursday, 6 January 2005 22:11 (twenty years ago)

those things are a nuisance, mine has a huge piece of chewing gum in it

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 6 January 2005 22:16 (twenty years ago)

joking aside, I am growing to really like this mix, oddly this thread was revived in the week when I finally gave it a proper daily play, and I love it. Listening to it the whole way through yesterday I was fairly blown away, it's very diverse and the "outro" beginning at the Kerrier District remix is just magic.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 6 January 2005 22:18 (twenty years ago)

has anyone listened to the digweed mix yet? it's next up on my stack, and as tim points out the tracklist looks good, but gracious it's digweed! had to review a set by him a couple of years ago; i've never seen a more hands-off mixing style than his. still, i'm intrigued.

martin turenne, Thursday, 6 January 2005 22:23 (twenty years ago)

i hope the digweed one is good. i loved his first GU mix, but after he started bedrock (and proghouse got so boring that i couldn't tell tracks apart anymore) i kinda gave up on him.

rentboy (rentboy), Thursday, 6 January 2005 22:27 (twenty years ago)

and by "starting bedrock" i mean the label, not the night or the "artist"

rentboy (rentboy), Thursday, 6 January 2005 22:28 (twenty years ago)

Poor Digweed - Sasha seems to get a lot more grudging respect than him doesn't he? I think it's the right time for him to re-emerge as something credible - neo-trance and neo-prog are all the rage! And when you look at the artists I mention upthread they're all people who could easily have been on a Northern Exposure comp had they been around at the time (in fact 16B was on Northern Exposure 2 wasn't he, what with that there lovely shivery remix of Gus Gus's "Believe"). From what I've heard Digweed has been a lot more monochromatic since going solo, but

"Admittedly there's a personal agenda here too because I have a general aversion to mid-tempo house music as well as the Disco-Punk sound (which fucks me off - yes I said it) and am more up for the dub/idm/electro/techno side of the Swordsmen's work. "

I take it you disliked Hypercity and the Live @ The Social mixes too then doglatin?

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 6 January 2005 23:22 (twenty years ago)

Actually now what I'd like is for Vahid to make a short summation of his 'position' on all of this (or dance music in general even). I have a vague sense of what it is, but it's based more on vague implications from random statements in combative threads than on anything solid.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 6 January 2005 23:24 (twenty years ago)

Thing about Digweed is, he'll never play good stuff if you see him outside of Fabric, I reckon.

I think though to be honest he's such a "big name" he could get away with playing those sort of sets to his audiences around Europe, I mean, the time I saw him last, about 2 years ago, he was so so so so boring that people were chatting and talking or alternatively stretching themselves out having taken many many pills.

I was quite high and it was far and away the most boring thing I've ever seen, but almost comically boring, we actually spent the night talking and drinking and messing with people around the club.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 6 January 2005 23:26 (twenty years ago)

what I was trying to say is, the stuff Digweed played at the last big gig I saw him at was so boring and the crowd seemed so ambivalent that I don't see how he couldn't start playing the stuff off that list: I can't imagine those who are his loyal followers still, at this stage, being especially picky, unless he's playing a show in some Global Underground country.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 6 January 2005 23:28 (twenty years ago)

Ha ha Ronan I bit of my last post was cut off where I was saying that the whole bedrock/global underground vibe struck me as inherently creativity-killing, so maybe he needs a forum like Fabric now!

I guess though there will always be people for whom Tilt is like the highest pinnacle dance music has ascended to.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 6 January 2005 23:44 (twenty years ago)

tim, please expand on how GU/Bedrock vibe was inherently creativity-killing, because if a single/album/mix sucks, i'd say the artist's to blame, especially when the artist in question also happens to the label's pinup star and/or owner. all of which explains why i'm still wary of digweed's fabric 20 mix.

martin turenne, Friday, 7 January 2005 00:03 (twenty years ago)

I think GU/Bedrock and related stuff had overly defined a list of criteria for how the music played was supposed to sound, a pleasingly kinetic combination of elements from house, techno, prog, trance and (in the last six years or so) a smattering of breaks. It was a policed vision of perfection that is kinda equivalent to post-97 drum & bass. I don't dislike this stuff at all but I do feel as though it was hard to ever be surprised by a lot of it. What could I learn from all of Digweed's mix-cds that I hadn't already learned from Sasha's Xpander EP? This is an inevitable development in most dance music genres but what always amazed me was the sheer volume of output relative to the aesthetic range covered (the same is true for d&b I guess, it's just that the prog shifted more units).

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 7 January 2005 00:26 (twenty years ago)

I realise that not all GU mixes plowed this furrow, but Digweed/Warren etc always felt like the center of their aesthetic.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 7 January 2005 00:26 (twenty years ago)

Actually now what I'd like is for Vahid to make a short summation of his 'position' on all of this (or dance music in general even)

well, tim, how it is that i'm basically a house/techno populist in the way that most post-reynolds critics are d&b populists.

the funny thing is that i get accused of being a "house music rockist" when of course, nobody ever gets called a "junglist rockist" for suggesting that early suburban base tracks are better than the new product.

also where i draw the line is in suggesting that whole scenes/genres are inherently populist or cognoscenti-oriented. i think you can do that at the label level probably but the idea that detroit techno doesn't have its own fanbase that's as trend-unconscious as the progressive trance massive is just silly (or maybe some people need to hang out in different record stores and online forums)

i feel like every genre has its functional product (UR, 20:20 vision records, dj hype and doc scott) and its cognoscenti product (intuit-solar records, kompakt, roni size) and that really transcendent zone of overlap where the really really good shit happens (carl craig or urban tribe, classic, reinforced).

when it comes down to it, given a choice, i'd rather listen to purely functional and anonymous music, like subliminal or defected comps than whatever i perceive to be (stealing from fashion terminology) "directional" music. i guess that's why i was so excited by the blackstrobe mix - it doesn't seem at all like "blackstrobe's mission statement of purpose and intent" until somewhere in the 2nd hour and even then it's much more functional than usual (i'm crediting arnaud rebotini as the secret weapon).

the problem i guess is that where you draw these lines is going to be entirely subjective. to my ears most kompakt sounds very very dry and while i can see the ways in which it's interesting to think about and write about and blog about for me it's not such interesting listening. i have to struggle to come up with things to say about west coast house and detroit techno (whooshy noises! hazy synths! steady beats!) but i can listen to it for hours and hours and hours.

my feeling with weatherall is that his best work is going to be the emissions output phase where he was working with people like muzique tropique at the same time as much more underground producers. my favorite mix of his is the deep house one from the social, followed by his essential mix from the same year, the rest of all hovers in the same space far far below those two pinnacles.

the new mix sounds rather dry, yes, but i guess what is bugging me more is that #1) it seems like a forced attempt to make a statement re: the intersection of post-electroclash and microhouse, which is what killed my interest in bpitch control and #2) the attention seems misplaced, just based on the song snippets on the website i can't see how anyone would think weatherall's sounds better.

ok does that answer your question tim??

vahid (vahid), Friday, 7 January 2005 01:53 (twenty years ago)

also i've gotta say that i mistrust any dance music that doesn't have a lifestyle behind it. you can say whatever you want about it but i have a pretty good sense who the listeners of neo-d&b are (at least where i live). i have my own lifestyle and the dance music i self-identify with (the stompier end of deep and french house, detroit techno, disco) reflects it.

i'm not sort of hazy as to what the lifestyle of people who are really really into steve bug and ricardo villalobos is but i have a sense they all own ipods or something.

mind, i have the same general suspicion of people who are really into trance, there may be a hardcore fanbase with a lifestyle attached but it's also clearly the dance music of choice for the 12-cd crew so i guess the music is going to reflect that by pandering to a pretty low common denom (see also TRIP HOP in it's late decadent zero 7 / morcheeba oriented stage)

also the hardcore fanbase seems to be largely composed of overtanned australians (sorry tim) in tanktops making faces under strobelites and lasers, so there's more points deducted.

vahid (vahid), Friday, 7 January 2005 02:07 (twenty years ago)

and what really rankles with weatherall is just this sense that time's caught up with him and that he's backpedaling.

his early sabres material is amazing, and really there's always been a big postpunk influence, at least the industrial end that took in 23 skiddoo and human league and cabaret voltaire.

the late sabres material and early emissions = totally sui generis.

the late emissions deep house phase and the early 2LS on warp were also ahead of the curve as far as exhibiting strong "micro" tendencies in the music, also you've all got to admit that mixing postpunk and deep house is going to be a lot more naturally interesting than doing electro covers of joy division tracks (see also: maurice fulton's work as "boof" and "stress" vs the horribly overrated "mu" [uber-noisy "dance" music you can SKRONK to! YUCK!]).

so to see weatherall sudden reversing course as electroclash got real trendy and swing back to a vein he'd thoroughly mined out in the mid and late 90s is a bit disturbing. at the very least he could be doing ragga-electro like radioactive man and tim wright.

also can i be the first to say that the get physical label reminds me uncomfortably of the DMX krew? even down to the slightly creepy racial politix of the whole affair?? (mind you, i am equally if not more guilty of the same by repping bunker (dudes from the netherlands calling themselves "raheem hershel"??) and um, the dirt crew's "cleaning up the ghetto ep")

vahid (vahid), Friday, 7 January 2005 02:25 (twenty years ago)

vahid just summed up what I was trying to say re: weatherall in that last post. It's like an old master trying to get down with da kids all of a sudden and it doesn't work.

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 7 January 2005 02:53 (twenty years ago)

Ronan, I'd really like to meet up and go clubbing with ya when I come to Dublin man - even if we do disagree on a whole lot of subjects I'd really like to see things from your side and go to one of your clubs. Mail me if you're up for it.

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 7 January 2005 02:55 (twenty years ago)

i guess the other thing about weatherall is how his music doesn't really work "in a vacuum" for me. for me the interesting thing about his emission deep house was how he stressed (as in "subjected to stress") the normal conception of deep house by using really menacing (and yet banal and poparty) uber-military sleeve art and track titles like "glide by shooting". meanwhile the music sort of worked off and bounced off ideas on another level that i'm still trying to unpack. similarly the sabres tracks worked in the gap between icy IDM, british dub and big beat (itself sort of a fusion genre, i guses).

weatherall for me was always a fusion artist - which i guess explains reynolds antipathy, right? - and i don't see the new mix and work so much a fusion as it is weatherall plopping himself down right smack in the middle of someone else's scene (true, it's a scene he helped birth (years and years ago) but it's still a holding manuever, i think)

vahid (vahid), Friday, 7 January 2005 03:10 (twenty years ago)

You're right there. I remember hearing an interview with the Swordsmen basically saying they were like a sponge of influences that had their own sound. So for instance they could sit around all week listening to Latin music all week and then making a track that, whilst not being at all Latin or even Latin influenced, you'd still be able to hear that vibe shining through on the track. That's why I was so disappointed that they made such a straight-ahead post-punk album and why I agree with Vahid that it's Weatherall simply going through the motions of with this mix.

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 7 January 2005 03:17 (twenty years ago)

I'd have liked to have seen Weatherall do more of a "legacy" style mix - he's got so many influences, he's done so much stuff he could've done a wicked seamless mix of vintage dub, electro, post punk, microhouse, idm etc. Instead he plumped for a mix which is going to sound dated as soon as the zeitgeist finds a new style to embrace.

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 7 January 2005 03:27 (twenty years ago)

dudes from the netherlands calling themselves "raheem hershel"??

Could be an ironic joke yet there are plenty of black/muslim dudes here (though probably none of them are into bunker style electro.)

I see the Vahid/Dog Latin pov, although in the end I don't get it. Fabric 19 for me gives me a vision of how clubbing could be made fun again (probably then a personal struggle to which the mix give a solution). Of course it helps that I never went to the Church of Joy Division so I don't mind him dropping that coverversion. Also, as ever, I never care if things sound dated. Seems to go for that Weatherall, the big Author who strives for timeless art vibe.

Omar (Omar), Friday, 7 January 2005 09:18 (twenty years ago)

Fabric 19 is not actually jumping on anyone elses bandwagon, it's a fairly unique spin on any of the styles involved, the electrohouse is not like the usual electrohouse, the postpunk the same.


also can i be the first to say that the get physical label reminds me uncomfortably of the DMX krew? even down to the slightly creepy racial politix of the whole affair?? (mind you, i am equally if not more guilty of the same by repping bunker (dudes from the netherlands calling themselves "raheem hershel"??) and um, the dirt crew's "cleaning up the ghetto ep")

If you mean Chelonis R Jones he's from Los Angeles.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 7 January 2005 09:38 (twenty years ago)

v.interesting stuff from vahid.

Ronan - stop being so grumpy and make friends.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 7 January 2005 10:14 (twenty years ago)

I'm not asking Andrew to play the bloody Vengaboys or anything

That, dear chap, is *precisely* what I'm waiting for!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Friday, 7 January 2005 10:15 (twenty years ago)

I bet you his mix would be amazing though....

danny boy (danny boy), Friday, 7 January 2005 11:27 (twenty years ago)

I'm going to have to batter Alba, one of these days.

I still think this mix is not really electroclash or even electrohouse on anyone elses terms, it's very much Weatherall's own take. The two opening tracks are more EBM style than most of the current stuff you hear. Ambrose otm about the amazing segue into "Time Out" (Acid Dub) aswell.

Also as far as I know, lots of Dutch people probably are called things like "Raheem Hershel", can someone confirm the likelihood of this?

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 7 January 2005 12:20 (twenty years ago)

everytiome ive seen andy weatehrall dj, since 1997 about, he has been pretty amazing. but the recent TLS stuff on warp was lame. in fact, i dont really like any of the TLS stuff really, apart from tiny remiders, which sounded amazing when i was walking around moscow. I think hes a better dj than producer. this mix is decent, although i wish he had left his remix of dexter off it.

ambrose (ambrose), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:00 (twenty years ago)

"well, tim, how it is that i'm basically a house/techno populist in the way that most post-reynolds critics are d&b populists...

When it comes down to it, given a choice, i'd rather listen to purely functional and anonymous music, like subliminal or defected comps than whatever i perceive to be (stealing from fashion terminology) "directional" music."

See Vahid I'm not sure if this works analogy works exactly because, while maybe not "directionalist" in the fashionalist sense, early d&b was also not exactly functionalist "product" in the same way that Defected/Subliminal is (and I don't mean to imply anything negative by the term "product"). There's a timeless stability to Defected/Subliminal's vision of house which, while it certainly follows trends ("Shiny Disco Balls" etc.), has a sort of aesthetic reliability to in the sense that it works within pre-conceived notions of how house should sound. Early d&b, even the functionalist end, almost always had a "will this work?" ambiguity to it.

But anyway, I'm not really wanting to argue for the lack of worth of Subliminal or whatever (who, as I've said elsewhere, I really liked though I think they've dropped off of late). What interests me is that I feel like our definitions of "populist" are different. Or at least they feel like they must be insofar as most of this electro-house I would consider to be very populist. I mean you look at current Ministry of Sound comps and it's all "Rocker" and "Drop The Pressure" and "Midas Touch" and so on, just as it would have been French House at some points and trance at others (in fact somewhat oddly "Midas Touch" has as high a rate of car stereo rotation as any dance song I can think of since Modjo's "Lady" - in that sense it's probably bigger than "Drop The Pressure" or "Rocker"). This is very much the music of the masses at the moment - people who think it's just inner-city art-phags and/or bloggers deeply underestimate the extent to which metrosexuality (as a fashion statement if not a lifestyle choice) has taken hold. Of course I'm extrapolating from Melbourne's dance scene when I say this.

When I think of "purely anonymous and functional music" I think of one-bar-loop tech-house and deep-house (and ha ha neo-d&b). This stuff doesn't strike me as populist at all but really rather gatekeeperish (neo-d&b a slight exception because its tempo and sheer grunt allows for a trace of leftover rave mentality) - it's music about which nothing can be said precisely because it only makes sense to DJs, as DJ tools; it's qualities can only be articulated in terms of the snare sounds and synthesisers and EQ levels and so on. I realise that this is probably not the same music you were referring to; my point is that it's not necessarily easy to break this down into a good/bad binary.

Your argument that Kompakt and so on lends itself to blogspeak strikes me as right but I always thought this was because of its pop and populist attributes rather than its cognoscenti appeal. I mean I can't speak for every blooger who writes about Kompakt, but I can't really countenance coming from the perspective of being, say, pro-Kompakt and anti-Shakedown.

If being pro-Kompakt and pro-Shakedown and not entirely pro, say, Funk D'Void (though that Coccoon mix is mostly quite decent) is a sign of the dreaded iPod owner (ie. the middle class urbane dillettante who's not part of a dance scene), well, yeah, guilty as charged.

"also the hardcore fanbase seems to be largely composed of overtanned australians (sorry tim) in tanktops making faces under strobelites and lasers, so there's more points deducted. "

Well I'm not tanned at all and I don't wear a tanktop so I won't take it personally.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
what is weatherall playing right now?

i heard something about rockabilly? does that just mean gun club / birthday party / etc?

anybody seen 2006 set lists or charts for weatherall anywhere??

the art ensemble of chicago house (vahid), Monday, 18 September 2006 19:41 (nineteen years ago)

i got round to postpunk about 2 years too late, lol! still not keen on this mix nor the last swordsmen album. sorry vahid, i can't help you. weatherall's been pretty quiet recently.

wogan lenin (dog latin), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 08:56 (nineteen years ago)

nine years pass...

http://images.junostatic.com/full/CS1952055-02A-BIG.jpg

a few years old, but this still hits the spot.

i buy very few commercially available mix cds these days, but this one i had to, and damn, i have not regretted it.

its truly wonderful.

mark e, Thursday, 17 December 2015 21:08 (ten years ago)

Weatherall has two new things coming in 2016. The Woodleigh project sounds great. Scott Fraser debuted a track on his radio show last week. I'm seriously contemplating a trip to Carcossonne for his festival in 2016.

brotherlovesdub, Thursday, 17 December 2015 21:39 (ten years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.