― everything, Tuesday, 5 October 2004 23:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 23:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 00:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 01:22 (twenty-one years ago)
A buddy of mine's whole argument against downloading is that kids don't appreciate the albums they get anymore. He remembers when he and I would return shopping carts in the rain to get the quarters, and bag groceries for money, just so we could walk to the amll and buy a 'tape.' Back then, you fucking LEARNED to love a record that you maybe didn't like initially. More at stake. Now it's - eh, I don't like this record, I'll delete it from my harddrive.
I see his point - but I love me some piracy, yaknowhutumsayin? The grass is always greener. i like life better now that I can get almost anything without leaving the house or spending more than $15 for a spool of CDRs. But then again, I paid dues, as most of you have. I know what it's like to spend lunch / rent money on music. I know what it's like to wait for months for a record only to have it suck when you finally get it.
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 01:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― gwb (cs appleby), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 01:52 (twenty-one years ago)
i have some sympathy for the arguement that people appreciate things less,but i think this is more than made up for by the amount of different things people get exposed to.
― robin (robin), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 01:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 02:02 (twenty-one years ago)
and there are some great advantages to technology like this. kids who are downloading now will have memories just like everyone else before them.
― seahorse genius (seahorse genius), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 02:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 02:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 02:39 (twenty-one years ago)
(hahah being an indolent/indulgent "music journalist" I got sent my copy four months ago but not a word to anyone...)
― Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 6 October 2004 07:11 (twenty-one years ago)
My SoulSeek wishlist proves you wrong!
― Diego Valladolid (dvalladt), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 07:35 (twenty-one years ago)
A new critical perception is emerging surely. Music is no longer just a tangible object which one can browse and physically hunt for. I think the main issues with the emerging methods of legal, and illegal, distribution concern disposability and the value one attaches to music.
I don't think i appreciate music as much as i used to when i had to save up and track it down, i now simply appreciate more of it.
― myke boomnoise (myke boomnoise), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 10:10 (twenty-one years ago)
still it's better now they have hmv and virgin.
― piscesboy, Wednesday, 6 October 2004 10:18 (twenty-one years ago)
i can't justify that at all: technology rocks, and seahorse genius is right: real music fans don't give a fuck how they get hold of stuff; they just want the sounds. only holier-than-thou music snobs get excited about their rare japanese 12" of "holiday 80", for instance; or the fact they got the last 7" of "new paths to helicon" in avalanche. (ahem.)
but ... personally i feel something has died. you don't need to find the record, the physical entity, that *particular copy*. you just click and 0001111000101100111 there you go. this saddens me deeply.
but, like i say, i know i'm wrong.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 19:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 20:01 (twenty-one years ago)