http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/_/id/6558540/thekillers?pageid=rs.Home&pageregion=single1&rnd=1097768551279
Some highlights:
In the past decade, Wal-Mart has quietly emerged as the nation's biggest record store. Wal-Mart now sells an estimated one out of every five major-label albums. It has so much power, industry insiders say, that what it chooses to stock can basically determine what becomes a hit.
[...]
Wal-Mart is tired of losing money on cheap CDs. It wants to keep selling them for less than $10 -- $9.72, to be exact -- but it wants the record industry to lower the prices at which it purchases them. Last winter, Wal-Mart asked the industry to supply it with choice albums [...] at favorable prices. According to music-industry sources, Wal-Mart executives hinted that they could reduce Wal-Mart's CD stock and replace it with more lucrative DVDs and video games.
Wal-Mart is like no traditional record seller. Unlike a typical Tower store, which stocks 60,000 titles, an average Wal-Mart carries about 5,000 CDs. That leaves little room on the shelf for developing artists or independent labels.
Getting Wal-Mart excited about carrying a record is at the top of every label's to-do list, but it's harder than it sounds. There is an immense cultural chasm between slick industry executives and Severson's team of three music buyers at Wal-Mart headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas. Only one of the three had ever worked in music retailing -- until that person moved to a new division in August and was replaced by someone who previously bought Wal-Mart's salty snacks.
Major labels insist that the low prices mass retailers such as Wal-Mart and Best Buy demand are impossible for them to achieve. But Best Buy senior vice president Gary Arnold counters, "The record industry needs to refine their business models, because the consumer is the ultimate arbitrator. And the consumer feels music isn't properly priced." Labels point to roster cuts and layoffs as evidence that they can't sell CDs cheaper.
― frankE (frankE), Thursday, 14 October 2004 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― still bevens (bscrubbins), Thursday, 14 October 2004 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)
kidding.
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 14 October 2004 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickn (nickn), Thursday, 14 October 2004 16:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Thursday, 14 October 2004 16:47 (twenty-one years ago)
i have no particular love for walmart, and as far as i know i've never shopped in one, or even been in one. but why condemn them for asking record companies to lower their list prices, which is what music fans like us have been begging them to do for years?
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)
they aren't asking them to lower list prices. they are demanding that they give them a better deal when they buy massive quantities. your local shop will still pay out the ass for the twenty-five copies they buy.
― frankE (frankE), Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)
(i'm assuming walmart isn't demanding that the labels keep the prices higher for its competitors, for which walmart would be completely condemnable. that would be interfering with the market. but as i read it, walmart is just trying to get a good deal for itself, which is what businesses are supposed to do.)
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:33 (twenty-one years ago)
A really fascinating read on WalMart is here. The story details how concessions to WalMart led to the bankruptcy of Vlasic Pickles.
― frankE (frankE), Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― mcd (mcd), Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)
and so the major labels will now come to see what happens when you rely on one retailer for 20% of your sales...
― frankE (frankE), Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― You've Got to Pick Up Every Stitch (tracerhand), Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:59 (twenty-one years ago)
b-b-b-but the Stork!!!
http://www.toymuseum.com/inside/c2/3237067.gif
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 14 October 2004 18:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 14 October 2004 18:24 (twenty-one years ago)
Musicians Friend and some of the other big chain online music retailers have set things up so that they are the only Gibson guitar dealers that can post pictures, price and stock on their site. Your local guitar shop Gibson dealers can still sell them online, but you have to email them to get pictures and stock availability, it can't be posted active on their site.
― earlnash, Thursday, 14 October 2004 19:04 (twenty-one years ago)