Yesterday

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
by Paul Cartney: is often regarded as a significant song in the history of pop.

What do you think of it? Is it overrated; or underrated? How good, or not good, are the melody, the music and the arrangement? Oh, and Macca's performance on the record?

the pinefox, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Unsurprisingly I don't, on the whole, think it's overrated.

the pinefox, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think it's about even-rated. Considering it's exposure, that it's not openly slagged at all corners is a good sign, I guess.

dleone, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, it's generational. I think if you played "yesterday" back to back with the Pixies "Debaser" to someone around my age group, the choice would be obvious.

I think "Everybody's got something to hide except for me and my monkey" should be considered the greatest pop song ever.

Gage-o, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Much as love The Beatles when 'Yesterday' comes on I don't really pay attention. It's just too familiar. If I stop to think about it, the melody and arrangement are fantastic - the performance just right. I'll play the different versions of it tonight and come back to this.

Dr. C, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Thanks, doc - looking forward to your thoughts.

Gage-o: I don't think I understand your point, cos I don't know what your generation is.

I like 'Debaser', but cannot but think 'Yesterday' the greater work.

A thought on 'Yesterday': it's all there in the second line. If that instinctive melodic ascent doesn't do anything for you, you're not going to get much out of the rest of the song. If (like me) you are somewhat awed by it, the song may be important for you.

the pinefox, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I love it, and I seem to recall its lyric being one of the earliest to really haunt me. But I do think, in retrospect, that the strings are a bit OTT.

N., Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I agree, probably.

I'd like to know whether Edna W has poignant memories of hearing it in a broom cupboard in 1974, and feeling genetic race-memories of the Mersey tingle within her young blood.

the pinefox, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

the Pinefox likes indie-metal! Should I be as suprised as I am? Perhaps I am guilty of pigeonholing The Foxy One's tastes.

Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Is 'Debaser', or Trompe Le Monde for that matter, indie-metal? If so, then I do like some indie-metal.

the pinefox, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Hey PF, what makes the melody on line 2 'instinctive' as compared to most other melodies?

Also, the lyric to 'Yesterday' seems generic to the point of glibness to me. Perhaps a victim of its own success, it seems almost content- free. Maybe it's too perfect or something like that.

I don't like it very much.

Tim, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think what I mean is that the melody seems to me 'high-quality', but also 'effortless'. I admit that lots of bad melodies are 'effortless' too, and the worse for it.

I wouldn't defend the lyric for very long.

I am almost reassured that you don't like the song. We need to differ on these things.

the pinefox, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It's one of those suicide songs Terry Wogan used to play to get the day off to a bad start, like 'Alone Again, Naturally'. I'm sure it's brilliant, but I found it a bit too heavy when I was a nipper. Which is strange, because being dumped was unheard of then (Girls! Yuk!) but all was revealed recently when I read that Sir Paul had unconsciously written it about his mum, thus unconsciously scaring the wits out of all of us. Perhaps all songs are mum-motivated.

Peter Miller, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

One thing's for sure -- it's no "King of Wishful Thinking."

Andy K., Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

So 'instinctive' is value-neutral? Or the sub-group of 'effortless' which is also 'high-quality'? I'm not trying to be difficult, it's just that instinctive is the kind of word I find myself using and not really believing.

I only really mentioned not liking it because I thought it would reassure you. It reassures me, too.

Tim, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

better when called scrambled eggs

the competition for top second line STARTS HEAH!

mark s, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

McCartney was always tuneful, but here he's really at his apogee. It's georgeous, of course, pretty much a perfect composition. I don't ever listen to it, though.

Sean, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This is one of those songs that, because it's so ubiquitous (still the most covered, ever?), it's hard to write objectively about. Nor does any version of it demand to be played in the context in which I normally listen to records. My personal relationship with the Beatles' version is that I borrowed 1962-66 about 20 years ago, taped it, then largely forgot about it (the tape is now in storage). I can remember quite a few things about it even now. But if what follows is factually wrong, put that down to 20 years having passed...

First, in my mind the Beatles' version is quite low-fi, like a demo almost, the guitar & vocal muffled, the strings almost 'harsh' (hence the overbearing element someone mentioned?). But that still doesn't detract from the qenius of the arrangement. The moment when the strings first come in is magnificent (a beat earlier or later? fugeddabahdit). And that 'cello figure in the refrain - lovely.

The melody in the verses is very simple, which is one of its strengths. You imagine that anyone could have written it (patently not true of course). The lyric is a bit weak, especially the "I believe in Yesterday" line (pah! you could've come up with something a bit better than that, Paul!). But who cares about lyrics anyway.

As to Macca's singing, it has a naïve, unadorned quality to it which suits the subject very well ('I'm gobsmacked she left me!'). Also, when he does (first or second time round, can't remember) the "why she had to go/ I don't know/ she wouldn't say" bit, I seem to recall there are these minute pauses, delaying the next line slightly. This gets me every time I hear it.

In short it's a very very good song indeed, brilliantly arranged, well-performed.

And it's the Beatles song pre-Sgt Pepper I hate the most. Seriously. Totally overrated.

Jeff W, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Original second line = "oh baby how I love your legs". But perhaps you knew this. Given the talk above, perhaps it should be "oh mamma how I love your legs"

N., Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

(still the most covered, ever?)

I'm sure always read that 'Light My Fire' was the most covered ever. 'Yesterday''s record was 'most played on radio ever'

N., Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This may have been one of my misrembered facts, given this thread. Look at this weirdness for currently most covered (non-recorded) songs in Britain. 'Dance The Night Away' by The Mavericks???

N., Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

maybe i'm dadrockin' again but familiarity and endless covers have blunted the effect but if Guided By Voices or Belle & Sebastien or any of the new indie pop melodicists came up with something half as effortlessly moving, my head would Linda Blair.

fritz, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm trying to remember the first time I heard "Yesterday", and of course I can't. But my family weren't great Beatles or radio fans so I'm not sure where I can have heard it. As far as I know I've never enjoyed it - it's too straightforward, perhaps? too melodic? the equivalent to the 'love song' of what an unadorned three-chord boogie is to 'rock'? But on the other hand it's not mediocre or forgettable - it's there, I don't not enjoy it.

(Of course there are Belle And Sebastian songs that have moved me more than "Yesterday", because I'm me and they're them and it's it - the stripping away of context you talk about Fritz is impossible. How else am I to judge?)

Tom, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

And I thought this would be another Pinefox thread about "old pop" as a concept!

I'm indifferent to this thread's *actual* subject, probably through overexposure.

Robin Carmody, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This song I learned to sing long before I remember hearing it, ~ 5th grade choir. Like other songs from choir class ("The Rose," "59th Street Bridge Song," "Annie's Song") I can't stand it. Just sang it too many times and our choir sounded like shit (totally off key.) My least favorite Beatles song, I'm sure.

Mark, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

True, indeed. Even hearing it for the first time at the time it came out, it would be heard in the context of being "the Beatles' new super-fantastic love song destined to be a classic, folks" not just a random song on the radio.

Still, as impossible as it may be, I do think it is useful in evaluating something so familiar to at least try to imagine as if hearing it for the first time - or in a different context (eg as if hearing it on a B&S record).

fritz, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

(hey grammar police, in my above post should it be "try to imagine" or "try and imagine"?)

fritz, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"Yesterday" is an important song, but it can't be divorced from the slightly patronising discourse that surrounded the Beatles in the 1960s. M.O.R. singers loved to cover "Yesterday" because they could appear to be up-to-date without having to venture into the cacophonous world of rock 'n' roll. Also, the violin on the track must have pleased those musicologists who could only admit to liking the Beatles after having proved that the band's compositions were similar to classical music. The Beatles must have had some awareness of the unfortunate way in which the song might be received, because they refused to release it as a U.K. single at the time.

Perhaps the lyrics to the song are a bit weak if you analyse them on their own, but I think that the tenderness of "Yesterday" comes from the perfect match between words and melody. "Yesterday" belongs to a special group of songs that McCartney wrote between 1964 and 1966, which are distinguished by a gentle, reflective quality. "Things We Said Today" is the first of these and "For No One" is the best. In all of these songs the delicacy of the form is matched by the intelligence and sincerity of the lyrics.

After 1966, McCartney descended into glibness and pastiche. His later Beatle songs which attempt to be sincere ("Let It Be", "The Long and Winding Road") are overblown and empty. "Yesterday" and its ilk have a quiet modesty to them.

Mark Dixon, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"ooh baby how i love your eggs!"

I hate "yesterday" because the version I remember best is a busker's shrill subway rendition which frightened everyone down to the other end of the platform. So Macca's performance has been (temporarily?) blotted from my brain, though I'm sure he acquits himself well in the singing dept.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Mark D is bang on the money about the quality of McCartney's songwriting at this period, but I think "Yesterday" is one of the lesser examples. "For No One" is a masterpiece, certainly.

Oh, and Pinefox - "Macca" in 1965, never! That's an affectation of the later years. Quick guide:

"Eleanor Rigby", "Yesterday" = "Paul" "We All Stand Together", "Pipes Of Peace" = "Macca" "My Brave Face", "Young Boy" = "McCartney"

Robin Carmody, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"qenius" = my new favorite word

Clarke B., Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It's brilliant despite the arrangement. Sort of similarly to Mark, I first heard it when the melody was transcribed in the Hal Leonard intro to guitar book.

Gage-o, I have no idea what you're trying to say. I'm quite sure that the number of people in any generation who have even heard "Debaser" is a minority. I do think "Yesterday" would win statistically with any demographic. If that's the obvious choice you meant, I agree.

A brief study of hair metal ultimately resulted in my thorough embrace of the cock-rock canon which in turn led to an embrace of the whole concepts of classic rock and canonization in general. I've been listening to Bach too. In the next few months, expect me to rave about the Rolling Stones and Pink Floyd.

sundar subramanian, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The Beatles' "Yesterday" vs MOP's "Ante Up": FITE.

Tim, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

'I think Yesterday was about the death of my mother - "why she had to go I don't know, she wouldn't say" - but it was only 20 years later when somebody made that suggestion, that I went, Yeah.'

Paul McCartney in Mo-Jo, December 2001.

You see, I didn't make it up.

Peter Miller, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

(hey grammar police, in my above post should it be "try to imagine" or "try and imagine"?)

'Try to'.

N., Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Wasn't "Yesterday" originally called "Scrambled Eggs"? I guess this means that the lyrics are not really important. There is something very classical (like in classical music) about this. A slow solemn song. The tune is extremely sad and McCartney's singing adds to this. Definitely one of the strongest songs of the fab four.

alex in mainhattan, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i'm with the "it's part of life so hard to appreciate" party. it's a song we sang at school for fuxake. if we had a thread on "Morning has Broken" (Cat stevens?) i'd have the same problem. i remember when i realised that "Morning" hadn't been around forever (like all those ancient school hymns) cos the bloke wot wrote it was still alive.

Alan Trewartha, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Wasn't "Yesterday" originally called "Scrambled Eggs"? I guess this means that the lyrics are not really important.

The fact that McCartney chose to change the title and lyrics suggests, on the contrary, that they are.

Tom, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Alex - do keep up.

btw - this doesn't reflect on the importance of the lyrics in any way. He just called it 'Scrambled Eggs' because it scanned - a way to sort out the phrasing before he wrote a real lyric. Better than just going 'la di da'.

N., Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I love the Beatles, but "Yesterday" is a song I avoid. I agree that there are some great things about the melody, but the song drags for me. The strings bother me (but I don't especially like string sections in general).

Also, as someone else noted above, this song gets trotted out in serious music circles as an example that, see, there is some good rock music out there, but it really has very little to do with rock and roll. I agree that "For No One" is better overall.

DeRayMi, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

In the beginning Paul sang 'Scrambled eggs, Oh you've got such lovely legs'. This is quite funny (almnost dada) and is totally inadequate for the tune. Some background of the song here. Point taken, Tom. The lyrics are nevertheless quite vague and a little vacuous. It would be funny to hear that scrambled eggs version.

What I wanted to say before is that if you can change the lyrics of a song so much then they do not mean a lot anymore. The song did not start from the lyrics which means for me that they are secondary to the song. Paul sang the scrambled eggs version for about four weeks!

Interesting that Paul immediately thought that the tune had already existed before. It was so damn classic that the composer thought it was not his. A universal tune.

alex in mainhattan, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Best use of "Yesterday" in science fiction - Tim Powers' "The Anubis Gates". Protagonist travels back in time to 18th century, lives then for some years undisturbed until he realises that the folk-melody someone on a street is humming is actually "Yesterday". I can't remember what happens next but it's a great shivery time-travel moment.

Relative importance of lyrics and music = relative importance of arms and legs, discussion wise.

Tom, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I haven't much to add to what Jeff W and Mark H have to say about Yesterday. It just *right*, but somehow I find it easy to lose attention when it's playing. It feels small and modest alongside Ticket to Ride, Help or even something like The Night Before. I've always loved Help (the album) - the quantum leap in sound from the first 4 albums is part of it, as may be its status as a 'minor work'. I like minor works by BIG artists.

As an aside, I've never really noticed before how "I've Just Seen A Face" sounds like a Simon and Garfunkel song. Spookily so. Yet it was written in early 1965, whilst S+G didn't really sound like *that* for another year or so. Coincidence? Or perhaps S+G and The Beatles were both listening to the same sources. But who?

Going further off-topic, but what the hell, isn't Ticket To Ride stupendous? That opening blast of sound, that guitar line, that hump- backed rhythm, those lyrics ("I*think* I'm gonna be sad, I *think* it's today yeah"). How much better this is than "I *know* I'm gonna be sad...". Lennon holds a tight line between self-pity and bullish arrogance("she oughta think twice, she oughta do right by me"). It's the best Beatles single. No. The best Beatles SONG.

Dr. C, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I meant IT'S just right...

Dr. C, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Doc: I agree with A GREAT DEAL of what you've just said. S&G, yes, absolutely; 'TTR', yes, absolutely...

the pinefox, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dr C is OTM re. "Ticket To Ride".

Now, anyone agree with me that Scritti Politti's "She's A Woman" is the best ever Beatles cover, no questions asked?

Robin Carmody, Friday, 14 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh but well yeah of course "For No One" is better.

sundar subramanian, Saturday, 15 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

three years pass...
I actually don't think I've ever heard a cover version of Yesterday. Are there any good ones? I think the original could definitely be improved upon.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 15 August 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
Marianne Faithfull's version is the best, by some way

the big UK hit version at the time was by Matt Monro, but it's shite

robin carmody (robin carmody), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:16 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.