everett true interviewed...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
pretty brilliant answers from everett. neat background history of the indie revolutions of the early 80s in england. weird background on creation and the zine he did with alan mcgee. its actually a worthwhile read.

http://www.poptones.co.uk/interviews/qod_everett_true.htm

doomie x, Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:14 (twenty-one years ago)

do you really love the legend! singles? i don't hate them, but i don't think they're special either..

the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh dear lord... ;-)

Danger Whore (kate), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:18 (twenty-one years ago)

is he really as bitter as he comes across?

the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Argh, my computer just crashed halfway through reading the interview. grrr, argh.

Jim, I'd always been really scared of him because of his whole writing personna, but in person, I always found him quite sweet, even shy and quiet, and not particularly embittered. (In fact, he has that politician's ability to reply to the most bitter ranting with "you're a really funny person" type compliments.) But your mileage may vary.

Danger Whore (kate), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:28 (twenty-one years ago)

i can only go on his writing, but i also know that shows relatively little of someone's total personality

the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:29 (twenty-one years ago)

wtf?? i don't think the interview comes across as bitter at all?? everett is actually a very honest and very sweet guy. and yeah, i do love the legend singles. i mean, its just a very honest interview. i wouldnt have put it up on poptones if i felt that everett was even accidently stitching himself up.

doomie x, Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:41 (twenty-one years ago)

parts of it do, not all of it. i suppose i largely see more sadness than bitterness in some of what he said..

the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:46 (twenty-one years ago)

i think sometimes if you are going to be honest, there will be sadness as well as joy. that's just life.

doomie x, Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:47 (twenty-one years ago)

My impression is that he gives up on people if they do not come up to high expectations. That's a bad thing. But no bitterness there.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:51 (twenty-one years ago)

why not have high expectations of people? why be middling?

doomie x, Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:53 (twenty-one years ago)

high =! reasonable

the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:53 (twenty-one years ago)

i mean, there's nothing inherently wrong with having high expectations of people, but it means you often end up disappointed and alienated.

the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Jim kinda on the money there.

I don't know, maybe it's more the UK press syndrome of putting musicians on pedastals, only to knock them down, or maybe he invented/perpetuated that model.

Not a personal reflection on the guy, but still.

Danger Whore (kate), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:56 (twenty-one years ago)

and isnt that an universal? to be often disappointed and alienated from people? i don't see the shockingness of everett's interview, at all, i guess...

doomie x, Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:57 (twenty-one years ago)

i mean, saying: OH GOD HE WAS ALIENATED AND WAS DISAPPOINTED IN SOME PEOPLE - isn't that just a trueism? or does it make a difference because they were famous?

doomie x, Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:58 (twenty-one years ago)

and isnt that an universal? to be often disappointed and alienated from people?

No, not for everyone, Doomie. I'm not sure if this says more about him or about you.

Danger Whore (kate), Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:02 (twenty-one years ago)

oh please, kate.

all i have to do is a quick search of ilx to find you talking about how often you've been disappointed or alienated by people. let's just be honest, here.

doomie x, Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:03 (twenty-one years ago)

sorry, stepped away for a sec.

Um, no having high expectations is fine. It shouldn't mean you cut off from them if these things are not met. We're all fallible human beings here. I know that's not the entire story. It only makes a difference if they are famous, because these people have more people around them and more to be getting on with, than to suddenly think "hey, haven't seen 'phil' around recently..."

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:04 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm actually surprised he kept keeping his expectations so high for so long. if anyone's going to disappoint you, it's going to be some famous flake or another..

the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Possibly I relate to ET (and maybe even you) because I also suffer from that same cycle of overly high expectations and inevitable disappointments. But it's not universal, not by a long shot.

And I think one of the keys to a happy life and good friendships is *not* to have overly high expectations of people.

I'm not saying I don't suffer from it, I'm just saying that it's not productive, nor is it universal.

Danger Whore (kate), Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I did a 'random' on here once, and came up with an ev true thread about how he regretted ever championing/befriending CL because of her subsequent musical output. Now that read as pretty cold.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:07 (twenty-one years ago)

good interview doomie, tho its funny to find the poptones site now lauding what CTCL did, when their initial reaction to our publication was to write spiteful and damaging things on their news page.

ET *isn't* bitter, tho he is pretty aware of how the industry works, and detests that. but if he was bitter, he wouldn't have started CTCL, or continued with Plan B after that experience.

stevie (stevie), Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I actually think that interview nails exactly why I have time and respect for Everett True - because while I might not always agree with him about music, I love his attitude to music writing

"We viewed what we did as art... I really am NOT a fan of what some people call the ‘truth’ or objectivity, or history, or anything associated with journalism. I’m in the entertainment industry. The worst crime of all is to be boring."

And the great thing is, with Plan B I don't have to agree with him about music and can just appreciate the latter:

"The other reason I want it more democratic, editorially, is because I’m fully aware that there’s tons of great, exciting music out there that my own tastes don’t necessarily cover..."

Flyboy (Flyboy), Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:47 (twenty-one years ago)

good interview doomie, tho its funny to find the poptones site now lauding what CTCL did, when their initial reaction to our publication was to write spiteful and damaging things on their news page.

yeah, that was then this is now, stevie. i have alot of time for everett. and i hope some of the people who come to poptones.co.uk gets into everett's groove. that was my aim for that interview. but first i had to point out the reasons for why everett is historically relevant. i mean, think about it. the first creation release was the legend, it moves on to him supporting and more than likely making the alternative scene in america known, nirvana and courtney love, following on to the lost years and then a resurgence of everett again with ctcl and plan b. i mean, respect...

the funniest thing is that everett doesn't even see thta because he is so close to it.

doomie x, Thursday, 21 October 2004 10:04 (twenty-one years ago)

flyboy on point. and doomie. its a very good piece. ET is a fine interviewee...

stevie (stevie), Thursday, 21 October 2004 11:01 (twenty-one years ago)

What was thing on poptones site, a while ago, about?

Something like "ha ha ha ha shouldn't laugh really ha ha ha" etc?

Context?

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 21 October 2004 11:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I've written fan fiction about Mr. True.

Wasn't slash, though, unfortunately. ;-)

Kissing Time At The Pleasure Unit (kate), Thursday, 21 October 2004 11:34 (twenty-one years ago)

D'oh, spoiling my own joke. That was supposed to say written READ.

Kissing Time At The Pleasure Unit (kate), Thursday, 21 October 2004 11:35 (twenty-one years ago)

i liked what everett said about being in the entertainment industry, the rule about never being boring, and that hes not a journalist, but a critic and tastemaker so fuck objectivity.

DVD (dickvandyke), Thursday, 21 October 2004 12:14 (twenty-one years ago)

does anyone know what music writers everett himself liked before he became one?

DVD (dickvandyke), Thursday, 21 October 2004 12:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I remember ET posting here a bit in the dim & distant past. I wish he still did, actually.

I'll read the interview later on to-day.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 21 October 2004 12:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Reading that interview, he doesn't seem such a bad guy after all.

Reading his mag.. hmmm, it's still a lot of the same old same old.

PASSSION!!!! HYPERBOLE!!!! MEANINGLESSNESS!!!

I appreciate the focus on the counter-culture, but it's like nothing has been learnt about how not to alienate the reader since Melody Maker. Writers practicing writing, unable to keep their fascinating selves out of their thoughts and feelings. Meh.

latetotheparty (latetotheparty), Thursday, 21 October 2004 16:02 (twenty-one years ago)

(feelings about the music)

need edit feature...

latetotheparty (latetotheparty), Thursday, 21 October 2004 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)

i picked up his white stripes book and not only could he stop himself from inserting himself into the book over and over but he even inserted humongous quotes from stevie chick too taking about himself!

DVD (dickvandyke), Thursday, 21 October 2004 17:27 (twenty-one years ago)

But surely there's a place for putting yourself in the action? Classic technique of new journalism. Done badly, it can be self-indulgent and boring, but done well, you really get a sense of the music's power to move.
There is some meaningless overwriting in Plan B for sure, but the best pieces make me want to rush out to the record shop. Can't say I get that from reading dispassionate Q or broadsheet style reviews.
ET talking about himself can be irritating, but it can sometimes be very effective. Take his Ramones biog, where he occasionally inserts a short reminiscence about dancing around his kitchen listening to the Ramones. I've danced round the kitchen (and garden and living room and bedroom) to the Ramones myself, so he gets the sense of being a fan into a relatively straightforward, solidly researched biog.

Stew S (stew s), Thursday, 21 October 2004 18:03 (twenty-one years ago)

well the bit with stevie chick in the WS book was spread across about 2-3 pages with quotes basically saying 'hey i was there first, i saw the WS first, i reviewed them first, im important, hey did i say i was there first?!' ;)

DVD (dickvandyke), Thursday, 21 October 2004 18:04 (twenty-one years ago)

hello philip, i believe that's you hiding behind the 'dickvandyke' email address.

i haven't actually had a chance to read ET's book yet, but if i kept saying i was there *first*, its because, as far as the UK is concerned, i *was*. and its something i've never tried to capitalise on, because luck was such a huge part of it (along with judgement), but at the time ET interviewed me, a number of people were claiming, erroneously, to have been the first, including someone high up on the chain of command at NME, who now tells people he was the first person to write about them.


why this even matters to me is, when i first heard Die Stihl, it was because a friend of mine who worked at a distribution company, with as much a passion for me for these weirdo bands who go nowhere and are ignored by the industry in favour of the mainstream product, knew i'd love it, and sent it to me with a sarcastic note attatched saying "this year 2 piece blues bands will be the new black" or something along those lines. i loved it to pieces, instantly - i mean, the album totally blew me away. i pitched to review it instantly, raving with enthusiasm about these new discoveries; the review got 'filed' next to a lot of other such discoveries, ie on the spike. the review didn't run. ah well, live and learn. i'm sure they know better. why, the white stripes couldn't possibly be as important as campag velocet. why would 'the kids' want to listen to the white stripes, when they could be grooving to starsailor? as ever, i knew nothing and wasn't to be trusted, so it was forgotten.

then, a couple of months later, i got to visit the SXSW festival in Texas, and cauught the white stripes playing there - i dragged my photographer steve gullick out of a tattoo parlour so he could catch this band i was crazy about. within seconds, he was onstage, taking photographs that NME still run from time to time. we got back from Texas, still raving about the show, and managed to convince the new live reviews editor to run live pix about this great new band we'd 'found' (again, how you can 'discover' a band who're on their second album is queer to me, but there you go).

a buzz started to gather about the band, after our pix and live review. they ran my album review, very belatedly. i was asked to write pieces about the Stripes' nascent back catalogue, and the Detroit scene, for the news section. when andy capper was too fucked up to review the 100 Club show, he asked me to write it instead. when the review was published, it got quoted in the broadsheets and read out verbatim on radio 4. this has certainly never happened to me since. a mouldering little cunt from the telegraph interviewed me and then maliciously misquoted me in light of the furore. the NME editorial staff member who would later claim credit for discovering the stripes even told me that he wished he could've written a review as good as that - which, considering he was in a position to comission me to write more and never did so, meant fuck all to me.

what means something to me, however, is that when the moment came i did the best i could, and good things came of it, for the band at least if not for me. this is not to say i have great taste or A&R vision at all - i just loved the band and wrote well about them. i've done the same for countless and perhaps more deserving bands, but no fucker's then got out and bought their records (cf the icarus line, who are the most exciting and impressive rock'n'roll band i've ever had the good luck to write about, and who struggle to sell anywhere the number of records they deserve to). most other chaps at NME were nestled next to the corporate trough, being told what to like by the record companies with the vested interests; the white stripes were nothing like that, just a band who i knew were great, and so therefore deserved my attention. it does my heart good to know that, 3 years on, the bands NME were fed - BRMC, the Vines, even the Strokes - have all stiffed, relatively, while the White Stripes, who i got while no one else was looking, are as strong as ever. i don't understand how that's not something to be proud of.

as i say, its immaterial. i never cashed in on the fact i was 'first' (though they had some press in the US, on the underground, looooong before i was on the scene, and John Peel and my friend Simon at Cargo, at the very least, were clued up in the UK way before me - which i've always gratefully acknowledged), and it certainly didn't help my career at NME any. like i said, one of my superiors now has it printed in other magazines that he contributes to that *he* discovered the white stripes, when in fact he was as much symptomatic of the ignorant and complacent attitude at NME, that would never have written about white stripes until they were wafted under their noses by a major label. but this was the one moment in my wasted and rotten career at NME where I was in the Right place at the Right time, and did not fail. i'm sorry if my pride in my work offends you.

stevie (stevie), Friday, 22 October 2004 08:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I always thought it a great pity that the band Worthington never became big. Mr Chick wrote such an ecstatic review of their last album in the NME five or six years that I ordered it via the band's website and it is the great lost American rock album of the last decade. If it had been REM it would have shifted about six million by now.

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 22 October 2004 08:32 (twenty-one years ago)

correction: "five or six years ago"

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 22 October 2004 08:33 (twenty-one years ago)

oooh, marcello... i still play tht album. so austere, such heroic dignity. must dig that one out again...

i truly thought exactly zero people would love white stripes - led zep meets GBV seemed like a flavour only i would appreciate. but i was *convinced* Mike Ladd would become a superstar.

stevie (stevie), Friday, 22 October 2004 08:42 (twenty-one years ago)

You mean people actually take Everett True seriously these days?

What did you do in the war, Dadaismus? (Dada), Friday, 22 October 2004 08:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Why? (stevie)

I kept hearing three acts mentioned a lot. Strokes. Moldy Peaches. White Stripes.

So I downloaded a track each and was blown away by all.

Then another by each, and continued until I either got a bad track (i.e. not a good one) or a dud (i.e. fake/spoiler).

Moldy peaches, total one track (I tried three times, all others were rub. The good one being Steak for Chicken)
Strokes, fine stuff
White Stripes, all great!

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 22 October 2004 08:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Moldy Peaches were TERRIBLE!!!!!!!!!

What did you do in the war, Dadaismus? (Dada), Friday, 22 October 2004 08:52 (twenty-one years ago)

But nowhere near as TERRIBLE!!!!!!!!! as, for instance, Roy North performing "All Along The Watchtower" on the late, unlamented Granada TV kids' pop show of the mid-'70s, Get It Together.

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 22 October 2004 08:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Now you're just messin' with our minds Marcello

What did you do in the war, Dadaismus? (Dada), Friday, 22 October 2004 08:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Mouldy Peaches were better than the Strokes and the White Stripes put together! (OK, that's not saying a lot, but still.)

Kissing Time At The Pleasure Unit (kate), Friday, 22 October 2004 09:00 (twenty-one years ago)

everett's still a great writer, and he still has an idiosyncratic taste that i'll always trust further than the chorus of dull writers desperately rethreading the press release into a 'will this do?' downpager.

i have some affection for that first Moldy Peaches album. the 'smoking crack' 'downloading porn' stuff seemed really childish and transparent, when it was obvious, by danya's 'nothing came out', that they were, in fact, pretty impressive wannabe K Records-esque schmindie types with a deceptive NY-Cool by proxy. i rarely play that record now though...

mark, i guess i just didn't think my tastes were even remotely in synch with our readers', a feeling my editors certainly encouraged. when i got sent the strokes single early, before NME began covering them, i also thought it'd be a gulty pleasure for me - cool garage-y pop with a Lou Reed cool and a Richard Hell-esque sense of romance - that no one else in the world could love. i was in two minds about comissioning a feature on them at first (i was editing the music section of sleazenation at the time), but the writer who ended up doing the piece was so enthralled and thrilled by ver strokes that her enthusiasm swayed me.

stevie (stevie), Friday, 22 October 2004 09:00 (twenty-one years ago)

i still think Tricky Woo's 'sometimes i cry' album was a better pure rock'n'roll record in the 'raw power' vein than anything NYC or Detroit produced during the 21st Century, though i reviewed *that* amazing record in NME and no-one (besides Swells, who thrilled to it when i played it in the office) else seemed to agree.

stevie (stevie), Friday, 22 October 2004 09:01 (twenty-one years ago)

..well, maybe that's it. "NY Cool" makes me want to be sick. It honestly does.

I dug the Mouldy Peaches album out again recently, and it still held up. Childish and silly or not, it's still demented and great, like yeah, even though you know Pixie Sticks or Hot Rockz or whatever are bad for you and full of sugar and will make you hyper, and you can't eat too much of them or you'll get ill, but every now and then it's UTTERLY REFRESHING AND GRATE!!!

Kissing Time At The Pleasure Unit (kate), Friday, 22 October 2004 09:02 (twenty-one years ago)

well, hey, respect for doing the first NME review of the WS! hopefully the upcoming DVD is as good as all the live bootlegs i've got.

DVD (dickvandyke), Friday, 22 October 2004 10:12 (twenty-one years ago)

it really is... alongside the Peel sessions, its the best live artefact, and could go some way to convincing the White Stripes skeptic in yr life...

stevie (stevie), Friday, 22 October 2004 10:19 (twenty-one years ago)

well im already converted so i cant wait.... fuck the sceptics, if they havent come around by now, they dont deserve to!

DVD (dickvandyke), Friday, 22 October 2004 10:22 (twenty-one years ago)

does Everett mention in the book that he didn't even like the Stripes till I burnt him a CDR of their out of print seven inches and the Peel sessions?

'handsprings' is the best white stripes song ever.

stevie (stevie), Friday, 22 October 2004 10:25 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe, but lets shake hands is just monumental. i have a special place in my heart for the first WS album, maybe above all the others. on the same sort of note, i have a cd of all the early dirtbombs singles, and i dont think they can top the brutality and fuckedupedness of those early 45s. i have that free pinball cd comp thing that handsprings is on btw and the dirtbombs track on there is fantastic!

DVD (dickvandyke), Friday, 22 October 2004 10:29 (twenty-one years ago)

im not sure if he mentioned that you burnt him a CDR of their stuff, no, cant remember.

DVD (dickvandyke), Friday, 22 October 2004 10:50 (twenty-one years ago)

eh, its not important.

to get this thread back on an ET theme, he's the best editor i've worked with, ever, bar none. has a way of encouraging you, while getting to the core of what's wrong with a piece, that's masterful.

stevie (stevie), Friday, 22 October 2004 10:57 (twenty-one years ago)

i didnt know editors could encourage.

DVD (dickvandyke), Friday, 22 October 2004 10:59 (twenty-one years ago)

He really is good at the encouraging. That is great.

Kissing Time At The Pleasure Unit (kate), Friday, 22 October 2004 11:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Love, love, love... I really *am* going to write "Sleeping With Plan B" this weekend. ;-)

Kissing Time At The Pleasure Unit (kate), Friday, 22 October 2004 11:01 (twenty-one years ago)

i wish (even though he'd hate it) that he'd edit for a 'big' magazine again. he's a very fine, shrewd editor, and that's often missed because his writing style is what most people concentrate to praise/condemn him.
kate, do you write for Plan B? i'd like to read that.

stevie (stevie), Friday, 22 October 2004 11:30 (twenty-one years ago)

They won't let me write for Plan B. :-P

"Sleeping With Plan B" is going to be Plan B fan fiction... ;-)

Kissing Time At The Pleasure Unit (kate), Friday, 22 October 2004 11:33 (twenty-one years ago)

(that is a joke, BTW, before anyone gets any funny ideas...)

((The bit about "not being allowed" to write, not the bit about writing the fan fiction. I am *so* working on Plan B fan fiction.))

Kissing Time At The Pleasure Unit (kate), Friday, 22 October 2004 11:37 (twenty-one years ago)

i didnt know editors could encourage.

Of course they can! (My personal favorite example, nothing against Mr. True, is M. Matos.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 22 October 2004 11:48 (twenty-one years ago)

However, if Plan B would give me a Fan Fiction column, I would reconsider...

(OK I ended up sleeping with a good percentage of the bands I reviewed for CTCL anyway, but still. This would be fictional. Of course.)

Kissing Time At The Pleasure Unit (kate), Friday, 22 October 2004 11:52 (twenty-one years ago)

i want to write for plan b now. i want to be encouraged! it sounds great. would make a change from grumpy editors who dont even bother subbing stuff properly.

DVD (dickvandyke), Friday, 22 October 2004 11:54 (twenty-one years ago)

i didnt know editors could encourage.
Of course they can! (My personal favorite example, nothing against Mr. True, is M. Matos.)

I AM STILL IN THE ROOM, RAGGETT!

stevie (stevie), Friday, 22 October 2004 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I LOVE YOU.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 22 October 2004 13:10 (twenty-one years ago)

I would love to write more for Plan B but I keep getting the sense I am surplus to requirements, which is kinda frustrating.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 22 October 2004 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Oi! I ran yr column for near on the entire run of CTCL. Surely, that must tell you summat, right? I LOVE YA, NED. Simply put, as ever, we're swamped with contribs and ideas and have very little space to put either, sadly. You should drop our new albums dude a line - daniel@planbmag.com - and remind him that yr name's on the list and you ARE coming in. See? We've got Slobodan back for the new issue, as well.

PS: My favourite editor I ever worked with was Har Mar Superstar..although I guess this is only retrospectively as he wasn't actually Har Mar back then. And indeed never had any contact with me, nor me with him. So I guess that fails as an ex-editor shout out all round.

PPS: OK, then. Steve Sutherland at Melody Maker. The arguments we had - over pretty much fucking EVERYTHING - were perculiarly invigorating. Seriously.

PPPS: OK, then. Allan Jones at Melody Maker. I'd phone him up from the States and go, "Allan, I've missed my plane, sorry."
"That's fine, ET. You doing alright, apart from that? When's the next one then?"
"Er, not for another week..."
"OK then. See you in a week."
(This is a true conversation.)

Jerry (Jerry), Friday, 22 October 2004 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)

That's not my email address, incidentally.
Shows how long it is since I've been here.

Jerry (Jerry), Friday, 22 October 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)

EVERETT I AM STILL IN THE ROOM! DID I NOT JUST OFFER TO KISS YOU???

stevie (stevie), Friday, 22 October 2004 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Oi! I ran yr column for near on the entire run of CTCL. Surely, that must tell you summat, right? I LOVE YA, NED.

Aw. I certainly don't complain on that front at all! :-) I AM glad you have a new albums person, though...and really all I just would ask is that somebody write me back from time to time! I didn't even get confirmation when I sent in some album reviews last time. :-( I will contact this new personage, though.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 22 October 2004 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)

(As for my other editor here, so, Mastodon, Apollo Heights...?)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 22 October 2004 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)

You know, I offered to write fan fiction about him, and he totally blanked me, but hey!

Man, that Everett True, just not as good as he used to be, is he? I'm so disappointed in my idols... sigh... mutter... mutter...

("I'M RIGHT HEEERRRRE!!!")

Kissing Time At The Pleasure Unit (kate), Friday, 22 October 2004 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Kate and Stevie...whoa man.

I LOVE EVERYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jerry (Jerry), Friday, 22 October 2004 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Apollo Heights - the minute we can shoot them, definitely. maybe we could even run an illustration, if they're really not coming over here and we're not over there soon.

this issue coming soon suffers only in that it is a Nedless Horse Of The Apocalypse.

stevie (stevie), Friday, 22 October 2004 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Er, wait, do you need a review or essay on anything posthaste or something? It can be done, of course!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 22 October 2004 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

You know what?

Bless you all!

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 22 October 2004 15:15 (twenty-one years ago)

oooh, no, it'll gave to wait for #5...

stevie (stevie), Friday, 22 October 2004 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Wah! (Etc.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 22 October 2004 15:22 (twenty-one years ago)

two years pass...

Not Found

The requested document was not found on this server.
Web Server at poptones.co.uk

;_;

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:40 (eighteen years ago)

RIP

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:40 (eighteen years ago)

Be grateful for small mercies (xp)

Tom D., Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

Was that *really* an xpost?

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

Somebody die?

Tom D., Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

aspie rubes strike again

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)

*high-fives dom*

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)

"They were - maybe because they were the first generation who were told in school and by their parents not to trust grownups (mainly to avoid sex crimes committed against them) - also one of the most ageist generations ever, and preferred to follow their own sports, have their own "slang" to a larger extent than anyone before them"

Tom D., Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)

I hate the way half his reviews start with "I remember the first time I heard this band..."

max r, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)

I am *so* working on Plan B fan fiction

DJ Mencap, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)

Shame he died before he got the chance to creep overhear the Pipettes.

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)

i hear he met courtney love.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)

YSI?

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:57 (eighteen years ago)

one year passes...

http://gawker.com/5356730/twitter+crazed-courtney-love-wants-dave-grohl-ass+raped-by-everett-true

history mayne, Thursday, 10 September 2009 22:25 (sixteen years ago)

too funny

Highly trained BBQ chef (rockapads), Thursday, 10 September 2009 22:32 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2009/sep/10/courtney-love-guitar-hero

history mayne, Friday, 11 September 2009 09:47 (sixteen years ago)

http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/09/courntey.jpg

velko, Friday, 11 September 2009 09:59 (sixteen years ago)

eight years pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3rx9LpEAD8

Kibbutzki (Jaap Schip), Sunday, 24 December 2017 00:01 (eight years ago)

Thread category: "ILX was a very different place back then" thread 2

Mark G, Sunday, 24 December 2017 00:22 (eight years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.