It's not a completely logical comparison, but not completely illogical. If you ignore Wolf Eyes more electronic ambient-y stuff, they are very simmilar.
One is an album and the other is a band so it's not cut and dry, but I think they have the same goals. Who did it better?
― David Allen (David Allen), Friday, 22 October 2004 02:44 (twenty-one years ago)
MMM is garbage - always has been. You know you're in trouble when the artist himself can't bear to make it through the whole album. Pointless, pretentious dreck.
Wolf Eyes are america's best band.
So, landslide, sez I.
― Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Friday, 22 October 2004 02:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian John50n (orion), Friday, 22 October 2004 03:06 (twenty-one years ago)
i can't really take sides here. it's like trance vs. possession.
― el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Friday, 22 October 2004 03:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 22 October 2004 04:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Friday, 22 October 2004 05:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 22 October 2004 05:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 22 October 2004 06:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Friday, 22 October 2004 06:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 22 October 2004 06:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Friday, 22 October 2004 07:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Friday, 22 October 2004 07:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Friday, 22 October 2004 15:37 (twenty-one years ago)