on closer inspection it turns out to be an advert for sodding H&M!
am i right to feel sickened to the very core of my being by this? it's WIRE. they're holy. how was this allowed to happen? are the band happy? it's almost as bad as when someone (hello wilson) let barclays bloody bank use "atmosphere".
or am i over-reacting? have adverts become an acceptable medium for music in this market economy?
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 24 October 2004 12:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 24 October 2004 12:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 24 October 2004 12:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sasha (sgh), Monday, 25 October 2004 00:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 25 October 2004 00:41 (twenty-one years ago)
Elastica perchance?
― Ben Dot (1977), Monday, 25 October 2004 20:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Monday, 25 October 2004 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 25 October 2004 20:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian John50n (orion), Monday, 25 October 2004 20:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― John Cei Douglas (John Cei Douglas), Monday, 25 October 2004 21:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― chuck, Monday, 25 October 2004 21:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 25 October 2004 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Monday, 25 October 2004 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Monday, 25 October 2004 21:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian Moraine (Eastern Mantra), Monday, 25 October 2004 21:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sasha (sgh), Monday, 25 October 2004 23:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 25 October 2004 23:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Thea (Thea), Monday, 25 October 2004 23:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:26 (twenty-one years ago)
i mean - and if anyone knows this for sure, please enlighten me - i assume the original writers/the people on the publishing credits have to give their consent before their song is used on an ad?
still. somehow the notion of it being a cover makes me feel better.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 07:05 (twenty-one years ago)
Leave the dreary kneejerk anti-capitalist posturing to D*ss*ns*s please.
― Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― salim (salim), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:48 (twenty-one years ago)
(caveat: I haven't seen them in person, but you get the idea...)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― What did you do in the war, Dadaismus? (Dada), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:41 (twenty-one years ago)
eh? i'm, er, asking a question. that's what ILM is for. isn't it?
and there ain't no posturing about my anti-capitalism, matey. i've got my AK-47 ready and a big wall at which to line people up (ugh, too many prepositions there) when my revolution comes. you're welcome to take your place :)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 10:39 (twenty-one years ago)
i have. lewis certainly ain't starving. colin is a bit gaunt, mind ... but that's probably only because lewis eats all his pies.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 10:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 11:37 (twenty-one years ago)
"The song selection process is pretty organic," says NigelCox-Hagan, senior vice president for creative group andconsumer marketing at VH1 in New York.
― W i l l (common_person), Tuesday, 2 November 2004 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 2 November 2004 22:32 (twenty-one years ago)