Do you listen to and follow music to fill a void in your soul that you perhaps unconsciously believe can only be filled by material or externally derived pleasures?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I think I used to be a lot more guilty of this than I am now. Perhaps it will sound lame, or even new-agey for me to make this confession, but one day about 2 years ago, I suddenly realized that all the money and energy I was pouring into researching and buying all this ultimately disposable music was a method for me to distract myself from finding true purpose and meaning in my life. and although I'm still not entirely sure what that purpose is, I think I'm at least starting out the right track to finding it.

Anyway, the side story of this is that many of my friends feel that I am actively shunning music (not true), or that I have set my music-buying standards so high that I won't spend a lot of time and money searching out obscure shit just to find a few gems, something I used to do all the time (probably true). It's not that I don't care to find good new music, it's just that it doesn't really seem worth the effort because I now feel that there are other things that are much more important to me. I mean, I'm not going to be on my death bed wishing I had listened to the Fiery fucking Furnaces, right?

Anyway, I was wondering if anyone else has grappled with this issue in themselves, and thought about what it means to engage in this sort of cross between art appreciation and fanboydom while wars rage and horrible atrocities spread across the planet. it often seems sad and inexcusable that it's easier for me to get excited and passionate about some stupid CD than events that affect the wellbeing of the human race, and the world at large. and when i step back and read that, it seems horribly ludicrous, awful even.

does anyone have any reflections on these things? how do you justify the way you spend your time? does the commodification of music undermine its ultimate goals to the human spirit? do you see any hypocrisy in the amount of time you spend on music and your political beliefs? if you didn't have music, how would you spend your time? would you spend it better or worse? what is it you look for music to evoke in you that causes you to spend so much time on it? is your music ultimately a distraction, or a reason to live? these are the big meta-questions that plague me.

King Korn Karn, Monday, 25 October 2004 21:10 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm going out on a limb here but just discovering this about yourself is enough.

I know several people who are yet to come to the same conclusion.

At this stage of my life I'm decidedly more interested in making my own music rather than listening to someone elses.

papa november (papa november), Monday, 25 October 2004 22:04 (twenty-one years ago)

ANSWER ME OR I'LL KILL YOU

King Korn Karn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 01:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Umm, if it wasn't music, it'd be something else taking up your passion. So pretty good that it's music right? Still, I think I know whatcha mean. In short - music is a reason to live, but it can be a distraction. For me, I just gotta keep it in perspective, you know, without going nuts. That is, enjoy the obsession, but avoid letting it eat me up. Or something.

Piers (piers), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 01:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you listen to and follow (indie rock) to fill a void in your soul that you perhaps unconsciously believe can only be filled by material or externally derived pleasures?

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Seriously, I do buy less cd's than I used to, but it's not because I think music is silly or useless or less important than before. It's just because I feel more confident in my tastes and standards of what I want to listen to.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:32 (twenty-one years ago)

are you Nick Hornby?

Sympatico (shmuel), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Also my political beliefs might not be what they are without all the music I've listened to (and I don't mean politically-explicit music, either).

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd probably own more CDs than I do if I hadn't realized this. But I also just find myself trying to get more fulfillment out of fewer albums. Some people buy/download so much music that I can't see how they're really absorbing it all.

Ultimately I think one needs a greater purpose than just checking out and listening to tons of music, even if that purpose is just actually writing about the music or making your own. I actually found that element of "High Fidelity" to be right on -- the part about the main character needing to feel like he is "bringing something into the world" (paraphrasing) and not just a "professional appreciator".

Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:52 (twenty-one years ago)

so he Djs and puts out a dub of a RTX record, woo

Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:53 (twenty-one years ago)

BLONDE GF: "Good idea on the label release, Rob, but we just got a call from Drag City about that...something about them already releasing it, something about 'royal trucks' "

CUSAK: "should I sleep with Lisa Bonet again?"

BLONDE GF: "What?"

CUSAK: "Sorry, you're not supposed to be around when I monologue."

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:58 (twenty-one years ago)

For collectors, music is commodified. For enthusiasts, music is deified. Music and politics aren't at all separate. Arguing that music has played no serious role in world events would be pretty ridiculous. It's important to care about the world around you, but I don't think you have to sacrifice everything you love in order to do so. That would make life...suck...you know?

babyalive (babyalive), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 03:07 (twenty-one years ago)

(arguing that music hasn't, obviously)

babyalive (babyalive), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 03:08 (twenty-one years ago)

or wait, no. I CAN'T READ

babyalive (babyalive), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 03:09 (twenty-one years ago)

No.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 03:52 (twenty-one years ago)

By which I mean, for better or for worse, this has more or less become my 'true purpose in life', at least for now.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 04:06 (twenty-one years ago)

And also, music offers qualities that go beyond 'material pleasures'.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 04:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Yep.

Piers (piers), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 04:08 (twenty-one years ago)

do you see any hypocrisy in the amount of time you spend on music and your political beliefs?

Hm, maybe but

if you didn't have music, how would you spend your time?

much worse, I'm fairly sure, if not criminally.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 04:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Ultimately I think one needs a greater purpose than just checking out and listening to tons of music, even if that purpose is just actually writing about the music or making your own.

good point. i think that's an important issue for me; that there must be some sort of dialogue between the media and myself. i feel like one of the big points for me in how i spend my time is that i want to grow as a person when i do things, and unless i have some sort of dialogue with my media, or create media by myself, it is ultimately somewhat useless to me in the long run.

furthermore, in regards to what someone else said, I understand that there's no hard separation between "life" and "music", and that they are clearly interconnected, yet I found that there was a point where I found that doing certain things like watching TV and obsessively listening to music kept me from engaging completely in the real world. Although these things might complement or enhance our lives, I eventually came to the conclusion that focusing on them as a major part of my daily life was doing an injustice to my limited time on this earth, and moreover was causing me to, in a way, de-evolve.

anyway, this epiphany planted itself in my brain one fine morning in early 2003, and my obsessiveness for music simply slipped away, almost overnight. i still listen to music, but i couldn't even tell you a good album i discovered in 2004, which when i hear myself saying, i find somewhat hard to believe, considering the way i used to be.

also, maybe what happened to me was that the highs stopped coming. music used to give me what I was looking for in my life in general-- those brief moments of sublime pleasure. maybe it could even be likened to an addiction, where music was the drug i used most often to produce feelings of pleasure. yet, as time progressed, the highs were never as high as they used to be, and i'd have to try harder and harder to get that previous high, which resulted in me searching for weirder, crazier, and more obscure music (to be slightly facetious about it). it was going through this consistently disappointing process of finding new music that i discovered that the music wasn't having the strong effects on me that it used to. from this, i concluded that i was misguidedly trying to achieve positive feelings by obsessively consuming music, and i had been pathetically reduced to searching for a high. i guess i felt in my heart that for real, lasting pleasure i'd have to go somewhere deeper than consuming all these mass produced products.

and although i still appreciate music, and certain albums still give me intense pleasure, i'm not convinced that it is beneficial for me to search out new albums to do this, and anyway i have definitely lost my zeal for it. compounding this is the fact that the commodification and celebrity culture of music has further discouraged me from walking that road again. interestingly, i've sort of rediscovered musical pleasure in folk music from around the world, which has a certain stripped down and spiritually purposeful 'soul' to it that i now feel is rarely observable in most commercially produced music. but even this is a very minor pleasure i take, and where music used to be my life, it is now only a subtle footnote. i mostly just enjoy the silence-- which of course, my friends who claim to listen to 8+ hours of music a day find disappointing and lame of me. they say that i'm just a malcontent now because i don't bother with it; they say my standards have gotten too high. i dunno, i guess i just prefer to call it a different set of priorities.

anyway i don't mean to criticize the music consuming habits of anyone here; these are only personal observations that i noticed in myself, and i just thought i'd throw them out there to see if anyone else had similar feelings.

King Korn Karn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 05:51 (twenty-one years ago)

i think that's an important issue for me; that there must be some sort of dialogue between the media and myself.

This is one of the most exciting things to me about "keeping up" with music (or any art form, really), aside from the sonic pleasures of any given record: the notion that your experiences with and ideas about that record are part of a larger discourse. Writing about music professionally is probably the most obvious way to engage in that discourse, but I find something thrilling about just having good conversations with other people about music. (And obviously ILM and the blogosphere serve as intermediary realms.)

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 06:08 (twenty-one years ago)

King Korn - how old were you in early 2003 when this epiphany occured?

This thread is very interesting.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 07:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe I'm just being cranky here, but I call bullshit.
Political beliefs? pfft.
Celebrity culture?
ULTIMATELY DISPOSABLE MUSIC!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Everything in life is ultimately disposable, KKK(ahem). I think you should join a zen monastary and fuck right off.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 07:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I think you should fuck right off this thread and leave it to people who actually want to discuss the issues raised properly.

In response to KKK's original question: yes. There used to be someone who filled that void in my life and then all of a sudden that person wasn't there any more.

How I went about forlornly trying to refill that void is extensively documented.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Seriously though, I don't follow new music the way I did as a teenager either, but I don't feel the need to justify it with all this..............crap.
I don't understand how you reason that this "epiphany" makes you a better person or whatever is is you're trying to say. True purpose? Meaning in life? Dollars to donuts you're not EVER going to find these things until long after you're dead.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:07 (twenty-one years ago)

(I'm willing to discuss this properly Carlin, I'm trying to understand here...it would be another thing altogether if I had just made that first post and left.)

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:10 (twenty-one years ago)

You came on this thread to cause trouble, Dork, and you've been given the same treatment as everyone else who tries to come on a thread and cause trouble. Do you understand that?

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not trying to cause trouble, my first post was not entirely serious.
How is it unreasonable to ask for a little more elucidation here? KKK has rattled off ten long paragraphs that don't really say anything to me about how his life has really been made better by any of this. I have very strong doubts that it possibly could.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Why don't you try reading them, if indeed you're capable of doing so? Do your homework. We're not here to service indolent retards.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:20 (twenty-one years ago)

My inference of what KKK (unfortunate acronym) is saying is that YES, everything IS disposable (because we all die), but isn't it daft to waste ALL one's time on only ONE TYPE of disposable thing that might be more FUN and more MEANINGFUL and have a better impact on other people's lives thus leading you to enjoy your life more.

Sitting in a room on one's own "engaging" with music as a substitue for sitting in room with other people "engaging" with them. I gather Marcello used to (figuratively) sit in a room with a person AND some music and "engage" with both, thus getting the best of both worlds (apologies for any projection/assumption here, Marcello).

I am certainly feeling less and less as though being a "professional appreciator" is what I want, but I do still need som ekind of relationship/dialogue with music/culture.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I did read them, Mr. Carlin. I want more.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Missed a phrase in the first line after "ONE TYPE of disposable thing" = "when there are others which might be".

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:24 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost
Some of us wouldn't mind.
How cute is the indolent retard in question?

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:24 (twenty-one years ago)

anyway, to answer the question without answering it: maybe.
But I'm too tired to seriously think about this.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, Nick, don't currently have a person to sit in my front room and engage with.

Sitting in a room on one's own "engaging" with music as a substitute for sitting in a room with other people "engaging" with them

Yes that's pretty much my situation as it stands, though I would prefer to think of it as an alternative rather than a substitute.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:28 (twenty-one years ago)

ouch. Remind me to call the girl I'm seeing and cry hysterically tomorrow.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:30 (twenty-one years ago)

That's what I meant, Marcello - that you used to have a person to sit in the front room with but don't at the moment, hence the blog etcetera.

I'm wondering if maybe I've hit a peak point, a fruition, a goal that I was aiming for and that probably wont be surpassed again, and maybe I should just chill the fuck out about music now, enjoy what I like and keep "an interest", but spend time enjoying other things too.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I would agree with that, except in my case there aren't any "other things" to enjoy at the moment.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:51 (twenty-one years ago)

That sounds like my cue to grab a few hours of sleep and shuffle off to wait more tables.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:52 (twenty-one years ago)

The "at the moment" caveat is a positive, MC.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:54 (twenty-one years ago)

If KKK was using music as a substitute for relating to other human beings, that's one thing. For me, that's probably the only thing that really takes precedent over music and if that was the case, I'm happy for him. If not, I'd still like to know how this decision has made any real difference, and I'd especially like to know how one goes about "finding their true purpose", which as KKK himself said, sounds a bit lame and new agey. And is it really necessary to justify personal interests because you are not fully immersed in world events? I don't understand where he's coming from there either.
The zen monk/fuck right off thing was out of line. Even though it was intended to be facetious, I apologize if anyone took that seriously.

Let's not make this personal Marcello, hmm? I don't know you and you don't know me.
I'm not some random troll who just googled his way in here, I'm here everyday and you'll find I am perfectly reasonable if you can refrain from trying to insult me personally. I won't push the issue any further if you don't.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll refrain from trying to insult you personally if you refrain from coming on threads and trying to insult other posters personally IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I just took that comment back! Please sir, I'm trying to make amends here.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Besides I don't see how "I think you should join a zen monastery and fuck right off." could be construed as a personal comment or even serious! I mean "Dork"? "Indolent retard"? That's personal and you don't seem to want to drop it either. I'm trying to apologize for my rashness upthread, it's 3 AM here and I know I could have used a bit more tact.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:03 (twenty-one years ago)

BOY! 100 lines by lunchtime! "I must not try it."

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:04 (twenty-one years ago)

if you refrain from coming on threads and trying to insult other posters personally IN THE FIRST PLACE

good advice, we should all do that. oh wait...

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't see how "I think you should join a zen monastery and fuck right off." could be construed as a personal comment or even serious

this is 'funny' if you've been paying attention

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:08 (twenty-one years ago)

All right, this is ridiculous. I don't feel the need to try to explain myself further. I have apologized, I have recanted that ridiculous first post as much as I possibly can without ILX having a delete function. A flip comment posted in jest does not usually incur such wrath around here. In all the time I've posted here it's never happened to me before.
If you're looking for a fight you will not find it with me. I can admit that I was wrong about the twattish comments made above.
My serious inquiries into KKK's posts stand, though.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:14 (twenty-one years ago)

yes he is looking for a fight. don't worry about it.

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Am not!

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:17 (twenty-one years ago)

YOU ARE THE DUMBEST FUCKER EVER!

YEA!

Thanks for reaffirming that for me! At least being dumb means I have better things to do with my time than flooding a bulletin board with crap.

hector (hector), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)

"cute girl at a party the other night, I guess that she's from Russia before she tells me her name is Natasha, so that's good, she actually pulls off wearing shoulder length gloves, she's insanely sharp. so what do I do? within thirty seconds I'm talking about how the invention of equal temprament choked off polyphonic chant just as it was about to get interesting. she says 'uhm sorry english is my second language could you repeat some of that' and I just look at her and say 'ANIMAL DESPAIR'

it didn't work too well as a pickup line, so back to my perotin CD "

You are just hanging out at the wrong bars.
Just try and look casual hanging out in the hallways of Cal Arts or another music school.
I know I dated a hottie that was a piano performance major that would have totally been up in your shit for that pick up line.

hector (hector), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 04:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks for reaffirming that for me! At least being dumb means I have better things to do with my time than flooding a bulletin board with crap.

-- hector (hector233...) (webmail), October 27th, 2004 1:14 AM. (hector) (later) (link)

139 older messages are hidden.

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 04:28 (twenty-one years ago)

You said "Animal despair"?

sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)

The thread-starting post was a good question. I'm sorry that the thread went the way it did. (sigh)

I guess there's no point adding my two cents at this juncture.

Shit.

Lefty, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)

woah shit, somehow i feel my post was responsible for this

sphere, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 05:27 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread is 1/3 interesting and 2/3s shite. The really intriguing thing is that the people responsible for the 2/3s shite (Jon, Aaron, others) have also posted some very interesting things too ("name one internally derived pleasure" being Jon's best point, for example).

I suspect I may be suffering from keeping-up-fatigue, meaning that these days when I get home from work I am generally confronted by at least one Jiffy bag with a CD in it (thank you, person at EMI who likes Stylus), but I don't want to put the CD player on. Sometimes I dread choosing something to listen to. Sometimes I dread having to listen to something new that's arrived on spec. A lot of stuff gets a cursory glance at the PR sheet and is discarded into a pile without listening ("sublime Finnish sound-art inspired by the Aurora Borealis" ; "politically-aware Swedish trip hop"). A lot of other stuff that I know I wont get to review gets filed in with my other CDs and stuff with the intention to get it out later and actually enjoy it (Pet Shop Boys DVD). Some stuff gets listened to, reviled and reviewed and sold on promptly so I can buy another Fred Perry (Dirty Vegas!).

I barely seem to have enough time to listen to music I already know I like and have a relationship/dialogue with, let alone try and engage with stuff enough to establish new dialogues. I don't think I ever wanted to be a "professional appreciator", I just wanted to understand better why I love the stuff I love, how I can find new stuff that gives me the same feeling, but at the same time I'm wary of turning into Hornby by the time I'm 30. But the semi-regular existential panic (or, perhaps, near-constant degree of existential awareness brought into being by years of semi-regular existential panic) I live my life within means, I hope, that this wont ever happen. Because no matter how much I'd like to stop, and only ever listen to Talk Talk and Orbital and whoever else again and never buy another CD (I said recently, when asked how many CDs I owned, that I had "nearly enough", and am almost constantly contemplating, lately, getting rid of the ones I suspect I'll never wish to listen to again), I don't think i could do that.

What I need, like anyone with anything, is some degree of balance.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 08:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I used to think music was all, but this thread has taught me the true point of life is petty bickering.

mei (mei), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 10:25 (twenty-one years ago)

(Yes, really! See war, religion, soap operas etc.)

mei (mei), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 10:26 (twenty-one years ago)

"...it's easier for me to get excited and passionate about some stupid CD than events that affect the wellbeing of the human race, and the world at large. and when i step back and read that, it seems horribly ludicrous, awful even."

But music is more interesting than 'the wellbeing of the human race', much of which seems to want to kill each other for money, oil, law or some stupid fucking God their forebears wished into existence to give their empty lives some point.

I'm not syaing people aren't important, but at some point you have to grow up and realise there are more important things than saving the world.

mei (mei), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)

The topic of this thread has been buzzing on my head for the last couple of months... Myself, as a music consumer (as in BUYING music as well as listening to it), I gather more than I can listen to, because of my never-ending urge to listen to new stuff or to complete that artist's discography. Well, I've been thinking: if I really LOVE music, why buying and listening only to new records all the time instead of really enjoying the ones that "clicked" in the middle of all that shopping frenzy.

And the conclusion I came to is this: if I'm not shopping for used CD's or going to some CD fair or listening to anything on my 2ft.high "to listen" pile, or writing crap on a music forum somewhere, I don't know what to do! I try, but I can't find the same thrill in other things. I recently started doing some music photography and the casual review once in a while, but even so, it's hardly unrelated. It seems music has really got me addicted, in a way that I can't think about anything else.

I think it's time for me to get a girlfriend.
Quickly.

JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 11:54 (twenty-one years ago)

KKK

I have experienced the same sentiments you are now expressing. For me, though, it wasn't music. It was something else. Later, like yourself, I tried to fill my void with an obsessive music hobby, which I still do today. I believe other people have tried to say (although in different words), that nothing will fill that void. Everything you place into it will be a temporary solution that will ultimately make no difference.

I believe that one of the only things that is truly universal "human nature" is the void. It's timeless as well and be witnessed in the oldest literature still available, and the subsequent failing search to satisfy the void. No matter, like teenagers, people have a tendency to think it is a phenomonen unique to themselves, their time, or their society.

It reminds me of this commercial I saw on TV once for some Church. It has some guy standing there saying, "Do you feel like something is missing in your life? You can't figure out what, but you can feel it? YOU NEED JESUS PRAISE ALLAH, etc." Although I'm sure that somehow convincing myself that I believe in Christian theology wouldn't be any more effective than music, it almost makes me want to try.

Welcome to being a semi-nihilistic. The first step is realizing that you're trying to fill a void in yourself with something that isn't working. The next step is accepting the fact that nothing will.

Mickey, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 12:57 (twenty-one years ago)

FUCK THE VOID

JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 13:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Shit, I've reached the denial phase.

JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 13:06 (twenty-one years ago)

And it's whispered that soon, if we all call the tune, then the piper will lead us to reason.

toothy philanthropist, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I cannot tell you how much happier and better-adjusted I feel now that I've rediscovered music as a pleasurable hobby rather than as a social tool. I was never really an adept a music scenester, even though I aspired to travel in those circles. Now that the pressure's off, I can seek out the new music I truly enjoy while not feeling guilty about just listening to old stuff for weeks.

mike a, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I believe that one of the only things that is truly universal "human nature" is the void. It's timeless as well and be witnessed in the oldest literature still available, and the subsequent failing search to satisfy the void. No matter, like teenagers, people have a tendency to think it is a phenomonen unique to themselves, their time, or their society.

That's a very interesting and astute point, Mickey. Perhaps it is this very thing that makes us do what we do. In fact, I'm almost sure it is. I think that filling this void is what all these musicians we love are trying to do with their music, all the scientists who push themselves and their technologies, all the activists, politicians, movie stars, writers, and everyday people like ourselves who find something to try and fill it... In fact, you might even say that the people who become famous and drive themselves to do great things are the ones who, ironically, are more cognizant of their void and feel more like they have to validate themselves somehow. In this sense, the void might be in some way equated with self-loathing, a sobering way of viewing the course of humanity throughout the ages.

Of course, the question is whether the void can ever be filled by anything. Like I said before, that void sometimes-- ever so fleetingly-- seems filled in my heart. I used to experience that feeling especially in music. I'd get lost in the words and melodies of music, and it would haunt and enchant my heart, but at some point, this feeling starting to wane. Yet, hundreds upon hundreds of albums kept coming out week after week-- so many, in fact, that I, like the other people who mentioned this point, panicked, and (wrongly) put the emphasis on getting the albums rather than listening to them closely, engaging in them, forming a dialogue, and growing with them. This was a process that never registered with me until I started questioning why I was losing interest in music despite the fact that my hard drive was getting larger and larger with MP3s (most of which I rarely, if ever, listen to!).

But now, even though I'm aware of my recent lack of effort in forming a dialogue with my music, I'm not entirely sure that it's beneficial for me to do it with any sort of the rabidness that I used to exhibit. Or to rabidly do anything for that matter. Like many of other people mentioned, I channeled a lot of my energy into making music, writing, and making art, that while they will probably not be appreciated by others, I feel is a good form of expression and growing within myself.

King Korn Carn, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 17:27 (twenty-one years ago)

would like to hear your thoughts milton. I notice that a lot of the music you seem to regard has a rather spiritual quality to it.

At the risk of bringing this conversation to a down-to-earth level :), what might this music be, Milton? I'm curious.

King Korn Carn, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not sure what he meant by that really, I'm curious too.

this thread is missing something without the porn. perhaps we should start over on the noise board.

(Jon L), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh I thought a lot of the stuff you posted to an ambient thread seemed to be very ambient/floaty/spiritual.

and you posted a ton of it.

hector (hector), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 17:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I suspect I may be suffering from keeping-up-fatigue

I thought this referred to the thread itself, momentarily.

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 28 October 2004 00:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm wary of turning into Hornby by the time I'm 30

That guy casts a long shadow over ILM.

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 28 October 2004 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I think what bugs me about some of the hand-wringing over music (or whatever other void-filling activity) is that we aren't really well-suited to just kind of doing nothing and becoming utterly free of the need for anything at all whatsoever, kind of the Buddhist ideal, it seems to me. Not really the doing nothing part, but the not needing to do anything (not needing to do nothing) part. And maybe that is the path to true freedom, but I don't find it very attractive. You can get to the point where anything you do could be viewed as some sort of attempt to gloss over your own impermanence, to prop up the illusion of ego (if you buy that sort of talk). I find that a bit tiresome. I find a naturalistic view that starts with the given of our being primates more helpful, actually.

Not that anyone was talking about Buddhism, but the sort of question asked at the start of this thread, pushed to its extreme, could point in that sort of direction.

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 28 October 2004 00:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Chogyam Trungpa, Andrew Weil. . .

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 28 October 2004 00:26 (twenty-one years ago)

(Buddhism may have been presented as a "middle way" but that was only by comparison to the crazy ascetic shit that was going on in India at the time.)

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 28 October 2004 00:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Songs with the word void in them:

Siouxsie and the Banshees: Love in a Void
The Raincoats: [I think they have a song with the word void in it, but I can't actually make out what they are saying in this case]

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 28 October 2004 00:32 (twenty-one years ago)

There's a lot of music I would not have wanted to miss out on.

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 28 October 2004 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)

OMG like LOL don't U just totally luv my new weblogg?

cdwill, Thursday, 28 October 2004 03:02 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not even a matter of filling a void. Sometimes it's a matter of making it possible to go on.

I think what I might have been thinking when I said this was: if I just stopped buying CDs (and maybe similar things) and attempted to focus on doing something about my problems (with my job topping the list), I think maybe I would just go under (i.e., suicide).

Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 28 October 2004 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)

answer to original question:

yes.

cis (cis), Thursday, 28 October 2004 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I think what bugs me about some of the hand-wringing over music (or whatever other void-filling activity) is that we aren't really well-suited to just kind of doing nothing and becoming utterly free of the need for anything at all whatsoever, kind of the Buddhist ideal, it seems to me. Not really the doing nothing part, but the not needing to do anything (not needing to do nothing) part. And maybe that is the path to true freedom, but I don't find it very attractive. You can get to the point where anything you do could be viewed as some sort of attempt to gloss over your own impermanence, to prop up the illusion of ego (if you buy that sort of talk).

Although you stated it properly above, I think your commentary is misleading of the Buddhist ideal. It speaks more to the idea that nothing NEEDS to be done, rather than nothing SHOULD be done. The difference is that one implies an attachment to an activity while the other implies a constant enjoyment of everything without a necessary fixation on [a] particular[s]. It's not meant to be a total rejection of the material, so much as a rejection of the attachment to the material. Perhaps to make a more concrete example, enjoying music without feeling that you need it; you can live with it, you can live without it. You can collect tons of CDs, thousands of them, and enjoy them all, but if the entire collection is stolen, you couldn't care less because you're still enjoying everything.

I find this philosophy very attractive, and in fact, I hope that it is a worldview that someday leaves its stamp on everything I do and feel. I want to enjoy the world, I want to take pleasure in everything, but I never want to feel like that my happiness is dependent on anything external.

King Korn Carn, Thursday, 28 October 2004 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Nahmean?

King Korn Carn, Thursday, 28 October 2004 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I like King Korn Carn very much.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 28 October 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)

And I like you Sick Mouthy! You're one of the few regulars who seems interested in this subject. Also, if I recall correctly from reading your posts from over the past 2-3 years, you're a huge Stone Roses fan, as I am. I think you are also a Wu fan too, right? Or am I misremembering that?

King Korn Karn, Thursday, 28 October 2004 18:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Not a massive Wu fan, but I do like them, yes.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 28 October 2004 18:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Then all is well in the world.

King Karn Carn, Thursday, 28 October 2004 18:31 (twenty-one years ago)

eleven months pass...
This thread could have been great. It also sowed the seeds for Soulseeking on Stylus. Hmmm...

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:35 (twenty years ago)

Did you write Beowulf?

Masked Gazza, Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:48 (twenty years ago)

Yes, he's been waiting for you to drop him a line for 800 years

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:50 (twenty years ago)

What was he doing for the first four hundred odd years?

Masked Gazza, Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:54 (twenty years ago)

Pissed

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:55 (twenty years ago)

Ah.

Masked Gazza, Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:56 (twenty years ago)

That's a LOT of urine.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:56 (twenty years ago)

No, it's true, scout's honour

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:57 (twenty years ago)

Well when urine, it's difficult to get out.

Masked Gazza, Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:58 (twenty years ago)

wots an 'internally-derived pleasure'?

N_RQ, Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:59 (twenty years ago)

six years pass...

This is an interesting thread. Well, except the stupid stuff posted by angry trolls. But I'm curious to hear how some of you who posted nearly 10 years ago feel about all this now.

Poliopolice, Sunday, 15 July 2012 01:21 (thirteen years ago)

Music doesn't replace love, family, friends. But it is basically one of the few things I view as justifying the existence of humanity more broadly. I am not a "spiritual" person, but I'm fairly convinced that whatever most people go into religion or spiritual exploration looking for, I find without trying in music. So while of course it can sometimes become merely a game--however enjoyable and valid as such--to search and find and share new musical discoveries, I believe it has added real meaning to my life. And in fact, the creation/sharing/appreciation of music brings us closer to what I take the original poster of this thread to mean are "more important"--other people. It's one of the things that really counters all of the "atrocities" that humans are capable of--because it proves that we're also capable of incredible and, as far as we know, uniquely human expressions of beauty and investment of meaning.

Unlike religion, architecture, even food--music also tends to have much less potential for destruction: even when we might say it's not very good art, if it moves people (physically, mentally, emotionally) and brings them closer to others (literally or figuratively) then it's still a positive achievement. It's one of the aspects of life without which I believe we merely survive--which has been humanity's lot, and may yet be again (perhaps soon). I don't question the impulse to take stock of ones approach to material acquisitions, etc., but one runs the risk of negating the very things that make life worth living just because they don't necessarily keep us alive.

Of course, I don't think about this stuff very often vis-a-vis music--I'd rather be happy that I'm in the right position in history, place, economics, whatever, to appreciate this distinctly human gift. It's amazing, and I'm never going to apologize for giving it a high priority in my life. Of course I won't be on my death bed withing I'd found that one elusive LP (or certainly wishing I'd listened to more indie rock) but I think I will be glad of the memories, associations, shared experiences, and continual joy of discovery that music gave me in my life, and thankful for the ways it connected me to the people I loved. It's part of who I am, all the geekiness is just part of the process--and I'll have no regrets.

Soundslike, Sunday, 15 July 2012 01:56 (thirteen years ago)

I forgot how much I loved Pro Wrestling for the nes.

bamcquern, Sunday, 15 July 2012 02:24 (thirteen years ago)

Sometimes when I hear a beautiful song or a beautiful story, I feel like I don't need anything else in this world. Sometimes these things seem like the only redeeming things about the world to me.

Poliopolice, Sunday, 15 July 2012 15:53 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.