Reynolds best of 2001

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Earlier than usual, it's here:

http://members.aol.com/blissout/faves2001.htm

It seems a little more reserved than usual this year, a little less surprising. Normally I find this list a good way of discovering new stuff, but this year I know most of it already! Somehow it seems a little disapointing.

Any thoughts?

Robin, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

My friend, put down your hot scalding breakfast drink and get thee here quick like.

David Raposa, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh, and does it feel to anyone else like he's getting old? a lot less dancy stuff than usual. Maybe the man himself can explain...

Robin, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I liked it -- it doesn't hurt that his list wasn't too far from my own (I find the Brassy-lovin' a little baffling, though). As far as exposure to new things...yes, it was a little thin on the ground. But may be because I got exposed to a lot more new things on ILM than I would have otherwise.

My only complaint is that there was not enough Kathleen Hanna bashing. What he had was good, but it didn't go far enough. ;-)

Nicole, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Nicole there is more Hanna bashing in the director's cut. :)

But yeah, there is a distinct ILM effect isn't there? These days, one reviewer gets an early copy of a cd, turns it into mp3s which find their way onto the web. We all listen to it, start to discuss it to death on ILM. Two months later it's in the shops, a month later you open Uncut and see the review and think "this old news, man. I was listening to shit months ago." Something like that?

Omar, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Is anyone getting young/younger?

Andy K., Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm more immature than I used to be. Does that count?

David Raposa, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

you take that irreverence over to ile right now, buddy.

jess, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Can't be bothered analysing it. SR likes some things, dislikes others, is the same age as me so probably a bit knackered and, from what he said to me off-board re. things post-9/11, finding it difficult to get worked up one way or the other about the music thing. It happens.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

In re:

..."from what he said to me off-board re. things post-9/11, finding it difficult to get worked up one way or the other about the music thing": One can't begrudge another human being his reactions, of course -- if that's how he feels, fine -- but there was a truly incredible amount of suffering and cruelty in the world prior to 9/11. The attacks on the World Trade Center were a terribly concentrated example of the horror that the people of, say, El Salvador, or Peru under Fujimori, have been suffering on a smaller but no less nationally devastating scale for years, even decades. If it's hard to get worked up about music in the wake of 9/11, then it should have been hard to get worked up about music in the wake of East Timor, or Northern Ireland, or the English colonial project in Africa, or the American landgrab that dispossessed every Native American tribe of land they'd lived on for thousands of years. For me, the whole point of music is that it stands as a foil to the things that weigh down on us, but this posting is already too heavy-handed. Anybody know whatever happened to Chris & Cosey? "Put Yourself In Los Angeles" is just wonderful pre-apocalyptic stuff.

John Darnielle, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

john i was going to say exactly the same thing. i mean, reynolds isn't even american, it's not like it happened down the street. there's been more than 5000 dead somewhere across the ocean in days before.

ethan, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But John, I think it's human nature to feel more deeply the suffering in your own backyard (Reynolds lives in Manhattan, I believe.) I understand your point, though.

Mark, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

nobody told me reynolds lived in manhattan!

ethan, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think he's playing the DL.

Mark, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

He was so much younger then, he's older than that now ; )

Simon, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

There is a rather nasty callousness about some of these comments

Eg If it's hard to get worked up about music in the wake of 9/11, then it should have been hard to get worked up about music in the wake of East Timor, or Northern Ireland…… Which shows an idiotic insensitivity to the difference between knowing horrorific violence is taking place and witnessing it first hand.

One can't begrudge another human being his reactions, of course well then don’t.

stevo, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Okay I've just read them, and I will admit to not being nearly as interested as I was when I read his installment of a couple of years ago - not because his writing is worse, because it's not, and not because there's less to get excited about, either - which there is - and not even because I think S is tired of shit (which he may be) - but because his earlier writing was a sneak peek into what to me was a thoroughly undocumented world - London clubs and pirate radio. His enthusiasm for these unknown subjects bubbled over into mine in a deliciously foreign penetration. Now he's excited about, well, generally the same stuff that I am. Still it's good readin. I am applying for my uncut version today...

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I've even heard quite a lot of these records, and my music consumption this year has fallen off quite significantly, due to moving to/life in Washington DC which was superfixated on work & politics even before 9-11. I'll be requesting the director's cut, often for music crit unedited ramblings & theoretical deadends are always more enjoyable to me.
Re: Kath Hanna, eh, I have more of a problem with half-assed feminism than I do w/any kind of half-assed musicmaking.

daria gray, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I've got no problem with people finding it hard to care about music post-9/11. I hate with an undying passion anyone who tells others that they shouldn't care, or that they can only care about x & y and not z. But Reynolds isn't doing the latter (in the "radio edit" - all that I've seen so far - I don't think he even mentions the attack) so I don't think there's much basis for attacking him.

Tim, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"Which shows an idiotic insensitivity to the difference between knowing horrorific violence is taking place and witnessing it first hand."

That difference is callousness itself. If I am only horrified by the evil stuff in my backyard and not by the same stuff or worse in my fellow man's, then I am quite callous indeed.

John Darnielle, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm with John on this one, frankly...

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes, but by John's definition it's the American pschye itself that is callous, and I doubt this thread is the best place to express dissatisfaction with the American psyche.

Tim, Tuesday, 18 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

To be sure, Tim, and yet...

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

John: how Simon feels about music or anything is his business, not yours. You don't know the whole story so I would suggest that you cease making crass, generalised comments until you do.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The best of contained things i've heard (Pulp, Bjork and Radiohead) and stuff i have'nt and never will (Matmos). I just cannot keep up with All the Stuff that's out there ,for various reasons (money and inability to locate them), so Reynolds lists always proved helpful.

Russell, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i think i'm basically in agreement with tim and marcello (shocker!) here, but maybe marcello shouldn't have posted a rather vague and unsubstatiated (least of all by the man himself) off-hand comment about something someone else said to them *off board.*

thinking you hafta care about one thing and *anything* else is a massive misnomer. perhaps someone who witnessed first hand the destruction of a large chunk of their city (which except for those living in nyc, i don't think many of us alive today and on these boards can say...unless marcello or mark s are old enuff to remember the blitz, ho ho) can be forgiven for not now (*or* then) worrying about east timor or rwanda or anything else. enforced guilt over the "world crisis" strikes me as a very sub-maximumrocknroll (and thats saying something indeed) armchair highschool leftist life philosophy.

jess, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

In re: "thinking you hafta care about one thing and *anything* else is a massive misnomer" No, it isn't. It's intellectually dishonest to be utterly devastated by the massive human suffering down the block and not by the same suffering endured by others. To find the suffering of one's friends tragic and that of strangers uninteresting is a mark of, at best, immaturity. If I claim to oppose injustice only when I'm wrongly jailed, then guess what? I don't actually care about injustice: just about my own well-being. I can claim that what really riles me is the injustice of it, but claiming something doesn't make it so. The observation above, however, that this whole discussion springs from an attributed, unpublished comment, is well-taken, so I'll quit pissing people off now.

John Darnielle, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i think the difference lies in the fact that mssr. reynolds (again, unattributed, yes i know) wasn't claiming to oppose terrorism and world injustice through his disinterest in music. judging by his comments in the wire he - and a lot of people, myself and others on the board included - were expressing an exhaustion over worrying about something as un-essential (and no matter how important it is to us, it wont feed us, clothe us, or love us) as music. it took me a long time to work up the energy to write about music again in the face of 9/11. and it's no fib to say that my aesthetic values were deeply altered by it.

are we honestly supposed to care as deeply felt about everyman walking down the street as we are to those closest to us? are we really supposed to care as deeply about places we've never visited as our own community? if so, then i envy you john, because you've obviously got a well of empathy and emotional reserve that i do not. as it stands i barely have enough hours or energy in the day to find time to care about my family-friends-lovers-myself than little blahblah living on the otherside of the world; this line of reasoning is one step away from sally struthers-esque profession guilting. i've had to face this intellectual/moral absolutism one too many times in my youth to take it very seriously now.

jess, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Everyone's just TOO intelligent. Help.

Russell, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

quiet you.

jess, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

can we talk about the records again? i can't believe he likes that TOK 'Chi Chi Man' track! [at least i presume it's that which he's talking about]. totally over-the-top offensive lyrics

michael, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

John: it is not "intellectually dishonest" to care more about misfortunes which might involve yourself or people close to you. It is human. Like it or not, that is how human beings are.

And as for you Jess, fuck off. Am I not allowed to say ANYTHING about ANYBODY without providing 176,000 transcribed pages of evidence? It was a passing comment which I thought was of relevance to the subject under discussion. I certainly didn't foresee some fuckwit troll who has never posted here before barging their way in and making some stupid "care-about-East-Timor" comments.

I repeat that THESE THINGS HAPPEN. SOME OF US, EVEN WHEN PROFESSIONALLY INVOLVED, DO NOT FEEL THE NECESSITY TO LIVE AND BREATHE MUSIC 24 HOURS A DAY. WHEN YOU GET OLDER, YOU VERY NATURALLY WANT TO MOVE ON TO OTHER THINGS. THAT'S CALLED HUMANITY.

And another thing Jess. The Blitz was no laughing matter. Imagine 9/11 happening every day for four years. That's what the Blitz was like. And I don't have to have been alive in 1941 to know that either.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think there is an enormous difference in maturity or morality or honesty or whatever you'd like to call it between caring more about close-proximity suffering and caring *only* about close-proximity suffering.

Marcello - John D. is not a "fuckwit troll", he writes and runs a very good music site. Admittedly that wouldn't disbar him from being a fuckwit troll but in this case I don't think he is - and he's posted before on a few threads.

Tom, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm not sure there's that much of a distinction, Tom. I expect that none of is a Mother Teresa (nor, if Christopher Hitchens' stories are true, was Mother Teresa for that matter), but if your "close proximity" suffering is so great (e.g. you-know-what) it can be physically/mentally impossible to "care" about anyone/anything else. So I didn't "care" about 9/11 because it was only two weeks after Laura's death and there just wasn't any space in me to care other than the abstract "fucking-hell-no-one-deserves-that" type of thinking. One death was enough to cope with without another 4000-odd to add on. Does that make me less of a person than the person who would lament about the state of East Timor but wouldn't actually don khakis and full kit, get on a plane and go and help kick the bastards out, or even boycott any products manufactured in Indonesian "enterprise zones"?

I think it would have been dishonest for Simon to pretend even to have a 24/7 passion for music right after 9/11, given the fact that he lives only a few blocks away and that people he knew/loved might have been caught up in the disaster. Nor can you blame anyone for wanting to listen to, say, Fairport Convention instead of DJ Scud. The idea that, well this gives even more of a reason for music to push forward and confront, is certainly not an invalid one, but perhaps outwith the scope of this particular thread.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think there still is a distinction Marcello - the abstract "fucking hell noone deserves that" kind of caring you talk about is still caring - and there is a difference between that and callousness, I think.

I feel quite bad that in none of these threads I've offered any commentary on the actual piece!

Tom, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I imagine that Reynolds' feelings about catastrophic world events are his to deal with, not ours to play with.

If it's true that he's getting old, staid, tired, predictable, grouchy and backward-looking, then HOORAY! he and I might finally start agreeing on one or two things. But I doubt it.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

And as for you Jess, fuck off.

i see what agreeing with marcello gets ya.

jess, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

and tom, most of the discussion of the reynolds piece was already done on the zeitgeist thread before it devolved into german pronounciation class, no?

jess, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

but god man, what the hell?...no one expects the spanish inquisition i guess...

jess, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

jess, the spanish inquisition is no laffing matter. mistakes were made.

Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

that first part of the pinefox's post - totally agree

, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Interesting nugget: go here to see ethan levelling the "you never posted before" accusation against Marcello that Marcello levels here (though not as a dismissal, mind you). Also, Marcello talking more about suffering, for that matter.

As for the side-issue that has developed, I actually was in limbo when 9/11 happened, as my father had just had a heart attack, and his future was uncertain. Obviously it made the whole NYC thing that much more surreal for me. Dad died on the 17th, which was obviously another blow to the psyche, but I can't say that it affected my ability to get excited about music afterwards. Not to say that Reynolds' reaction is invalid, because people all react to personal tragedy in different ways, and music is also very much a matter of personal taste. If we didn't react to life and music in different ways, boards like this would be useless, no?

Sean Carruthers, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh, and by the way, welcome, John.

Sean Carruthers, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

but i was agreeing with marcello! it wasn't an argument!

ethan, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Thank you, Sean. I shall henceforth be posting under the name "fuckwit troll" for easy identification. - F.T., a.k.a

John Darnielle, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

john if i may say so you were fantastic at the forty watt in athens ga a few months ago.

ethan, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

God this is really anal and boring why don't you all do something else, possibly listen to some records, or take you dog for a walk. Personally i'm gonna ...

NOT ANAL, Thursday, 20 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

ROTM in regard to Playgroup (and Strokes). But where's Shuggie Otis?!?

helenfordsdale, Thursday, 20 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

'and no matter how important it is to us, it wont feed us, clothe us, or love us)'

Oh, but for some, it HAS done, more than many actual humans have.

dave q, Thursday, 20 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I know you were agreeing with him, ethan, which is why I said it wasn't a dismissal. And despite the fact that I initially posed the question, I agree too. At any rate, I just found it an interesting blast from the past, considering the direction this thread took.

Sean Carruthers, Thursday, 20 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I find the Brassy thing a little baffling too, mainly because it came out nearly 4 years ago now! Good album though.

chewshabadoo, Thursday, 20 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

five years pass...

I was going to pick one post from this thread and be all "lol old ilm", but there's at least 12 contenders for that. Pick your own.

Dom Passantino, Monday, 9 July 2007 21:33 (eighteen years ago)

Things were certainly...sincere around these parts then.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 9 July 2007 21:53 (eighteen years ago)

well a few weeks later we were all trading holocaust jokes like it was proto-noise board, so we got brittle pretty quick

strongohulkington, Monday, 9 July 2007 21:56 (eighteen years ago)

God this is really anal and boring why don't you all do something else, possibly listen to some records, or take you dog for a walk. Personally i'm gonna ...
-- NOT ANAL, Thursday, December 20, 2001 1:00 AM (5 years ago) Bookmark Link

wave of the future.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:53 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.