― amateur!!st, Tuesday, 2 November 2004 23:58 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 00:09 (twenty years ago)
― AleXTC (AleXTC), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 00:14 (twenty years ago)
― AleXTC (AleXTC), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 00:15 (twenty years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 00:27 (twenty years ago)
― the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 00:32 (twenty years ago)
I tend to forget I even have it, but it does have some nice things on it.
― Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 00:35 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 00:41 (twenty years ago)
― debden, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 14:38 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 14:44 (twenty years ago)
― Bumfluff, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 15:07 (twenty years ago)
― AleXTC (AleXTC), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 15:26 (twenty years ago)
― Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 15:50 (twenty years ago)
john, john and paul, respectively.
but i definitely understand yr point, as there are a few other songs from that period where i'm similarly (and happily) confused. john and paul hadn't fully developed the distinct vocal timbres of their later years, so they do sound more raw and more alike. and the harmony lines are such that it's sometimes hard to tell which is the lead and which is the harmony.
the song that's always sounded the most (to me anyway) like it's sung by a "beatles" voice that belongs to neither paul nor john (nor george nor ringo) is "i want to hold your hand" (though i've come to realize john more or less owns that one).
i like the beatles' "baby it's you" more than the shirelles'.
but i like arthur alexander's "anna" more than the beatles'.
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 16:09 (twenty years ago)
Always loved Baby It's You on the BBC album. Fave track on it and it was released as a single too.
― mms (mms), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 16:13 (twenty years ago)
his version is also beautiful, but more urbane and sophisticated. Lennon's is adolescent and urgent.
― debden, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 16:15 (twenty years ago)
yeah we did the 'twist + shout' appraisal over here
I Hate Please, Please Me
― piscesboy, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:25 (twenty years ago)
I've always thought you can hear bits of flem/phlegm? shooting out of his throat towards the end... "shake it up baby now!"..it's kind of a heroic performance...more rock n roll than the Sonics.
― Bumfluff, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:29 (twenty years ago)
― Bumfluff, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:30 (twenty years ago)
― darin (darin), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:50 (twenty years ago)
― 57 7th (calstars), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:53 (twenty years ago)
― briania (briania), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 18:03 (twenty years ago)
i mean yeah the original is fucking great too--the beatles chose really great records to cover, pretty much as a rule--but this is something really special.
p.s. arthur alexander is a really interesting singer. he sings in such a way--with the traces of a lisp, and a lot of breathiness--that makes you think he's got a very limited range and problematic breath control... i.e. all the signposts of earnestness/fragility/etc. but as it turns out he has a GREAT range and GREAT breath control/pacing ... (which might only occur to you if you listen closely and often). he's amazing.
― amateur!!st, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 19:26 (twenty years ago)
c'mon: that's the sound of young scotland 1981!
― amateur!!st, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 19:28 (twenty years ago)
can someone give bacharach a nobel prize or something?
― amateur!!st, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 19:55 (twenty years ago)
― xx, Thursday, 4 November 2004 00:01 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 4 November 2004 00:12 (twenty years ago)
― dave k, Thursday, 4 November 2004 02:47 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 4 November 2004 03:04 (twenty years ago)
― AleXTC (AleXTC), Thursday, 4 November 2004 04:12 (twenty years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 10 October 2005 09:56 (nineteen years ago)
― sean gramophone (Sean M), Monday, 10 October 2005 10:30 (nineteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6Bdi_rTSig
― by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 02:42 (fourteen years ago)
It's a nice cover but I prefer Smith's cover. The Beatles make it sound fun but I've always found it to be a sexy, yearning song and their rendition doesn't scrap on the sexy at all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08uSz2M-LhI
― Moka, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 03:38 (fourteen years ago)
They were good at covers, but much better at originals.
― You're Twistin' My Melody Man! (Geir Hongro), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 10:44 (fourteen years ago)
challenging opinions
― lyrics is weak, like taco bell drive-thru speakers (symsymsym), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 11:09 (fourteen years ago)