Is It Better For Dance Music That It's More Underground, Or Is That Snobby & Elitist?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Is It Better For Dance Music That It's More Underground, Or Is That Snobby & Elitist?

Meko, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 08:43 (twenty years ago)

I completely fail to see why grime is included in an article allegedly about dance music, unless it's simply another opportunity for Petridish to have a go at music about which he understands nothing.

I realise that, as far as Petridish is concerned, that would include most forms of music.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 08:48 (twenty years ago)

I find it odd how the sales of Fatboy Slim's new album are held up as an important barometer for judging dance music's health in 2004. The Prodigy even more so! We don't judge British rock music's health based on the sales for the latest Oasis album. There's little appreciation for the fact that dance music inevitably mutates and transforms regardless of its relative popularity vis a vis rock or hip hop. And citing grime as an example of dance music's current edgy but unpopular underground status just suggests that Petridish is basically unaware of what's happening in actual dance music and was just casting around for a genre he had a CD of.

I suspect he might be half-right (or, at least, don't know for certain that he's wrong) when he talks about the uncoolness of britpop et al being a roundabout plus for dance music back in the mid-nineties - audiences for rock concerts are currently more style-conscious and drug-friendly than they've ever been, making that scene more appealing for people who would have more likely automatically chosen dance music in the mid-nineties. It's true to say that drugs and dance music are no longer the natural fit they once were; on the other hand I'm suspicious of his suggestion that once his generation stopped taking drugs they suddenly realised the music was crap. More likely scenario: they're settling down, having kids, and suddenly concerned that their expanding cellulite flabs won't look too flattering on the dancefloor. Which I could easily imagine taking the enjoyment out of going to clubs.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 09:21 (twenty years ago)

I've never taken ecstacy.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 09:28 (twenty years ago)

but you've danced?

bulbs (bulbs), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 09:31 (twenty years ago)

Yep.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 09:40 (twenty years ago)

I hope you danced.

Ronan Keatign for legal reasons, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 09:48 (twenty years ago)

I danced, but I did not ingest.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 09:53 (twenty years ago)

It's true to say that drugs and dance music are no longer the natural fit they once were

what does that mean?

:| (....), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:12 (twenty years ago)

as I said on the other thread, he is pretty clueless. and as I also said there, if anything dance music is "cooler" than ever now. how does he argue that it was cooler when it had consumed the entire country? I think he uses the word hipster or whatever, seems odd given that most of the big dance things this year are "cool", if anything.

It's so infuriating that that crap is in a national newspaper, why is there such a gigantic market for dead in the head aging writers who want to demolish anything approaching a dream or a spark that's around with their own broadsheet brand of "sobering honesty". His fucking bullshit "I've been there" attitude is just such typical fuel for vague head-nodding among idiots everywhere.

I dunno, he's not even worth it, but it IS annoying. Also at this stage it's the third fucking article, in about 3 years, JUST LEAVE THE FUCKING "DYING" GENRE ALONE.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:17 (twenty years ago)

and yeah maybe it is better that dance is more underground, fuck petridis and fuck the Guardian and their pompous lazy readers. I am going to listen to the DK7 at a very high volume.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:19 (twenty years ago)

grimes part of UKG which is still dance music. thats most likely why its included.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:21 (twenty years ago)

grime is also in that UK dance lineage i think.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:25 (twenty years ago)

actually, he could have mentioned dizzee's showtime and the streets' last album to see that dance(-related?) artists are still pretty doing well commercially.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:27 (twenty years ago)

I mean that I've noticed that a) speed and coke are more popular than they used to be across the board, and b) more people are taking ecstasy at rock and hip hop gigs or events. Part of the reason that I think all of these types of music are more likely to be played together these days - or liked by the same audience - is that the audience's chemical composition is quite flexible and receptive to all of these styles, and the previous tendency for people to associate drugs with dance music and vice versa has broken down a bit.

I think this is good in a lot of ways - most of the big dance music I like at the moment works as ecstasy music but not in the constrained, constricted sense it did when Ibiza/ecstasy hype was at its most overbearing in the late nineties. Dance music has partially rediscovered the magpie tendencies which characterised it at the end of the eighties and start of the nineties - ironically the current electro-house sound strikes me as being more "balearic" than dance has been in ages.

Titchy I agree that grime has a dance lineage but it's undeniable that the audience is entirely different to the one the article focuses on - which is the rave/house/techno/trance sounds of big white clubs throughout the nineties.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:29 (twenty years ago)

you could say that grime has the same kids into it that would have been into jungle though a decade back. and if jungle isnt part of dance in the UK, i dont know what to say. (i see what youre saying about this being about the 'whiter' side of dance though).

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:34 (twenty years ago)

Oh look I definitely agree but I wouldn't be surprised if Petridish was barely aware of jungle at the time. Except for the groundbreaking work of Goldie, LTJ Bukem and Roni Size maybe :-(

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:36 (twenty years ago)

ok, but fuck prog-jungle or prog-D&B! shy fx was the man!

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:39 (twenty years ago)

I was gonna put "groundbreaking" in scare quotes but it seemed too obvious.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:43 (twenty years ago)

They were groundbreaking - without the inverted commas - for their time, Tim, so let's not be retrospectively inverse-snobbish about them.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:47 (twenty years ago)

yeah that is true. and some of it was good too.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:48 (twenty years ago)

The trouble with Roni Size in particular is that his records have never reflected just how astonishing Reprazent were(/are?) live - we saw them a few times in the mid-'90s and the degree of interaction and intensity between the musicians was worthy of '70s Miles or any-decade Sun Ra or flamenco at its fieriest.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:52 (twenty years ago)

Yeah that was actually the other reason I left them out! Although while I love Timeless, some of Logical Progressions and especially disc 2 of New Forms I'd say a lot of the claims made on their behalf by the media were bullshit. I mean, it's the same sort of thing that rankles when one reads Petridish on grime - the sense that good music is being praised in a manner that gets it all wrong.

xpost I would have loved to have seen Reprazent at that point.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:53 (twenty years ago)

"11.55", "Timestretch", "It's A Jazz Thing" etc = totally groundbreaking.

"Hot Stuff", "Ballet Dance", "Share The Fall", "Trust Me", etc. = groundscraping, which is obviously much better than most d&b LPs.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:55 (twenty years ago)

i have a tape of roni size live on radio one which is incredible. it actually sounds 'harder' and punchier than their album, which was one of the things i always found dissapointing about it.

i dont get how petridis has got it that wrong about grime. it IS still often at UKG tempos (though not enough of the time anymore it seems) and its played by the DJS that were into UKG, the scene its in, is still part of UKG, really.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:00 (twenty years ago)

I would agree that Petridish is preaching to the casual dabblers of a decade or so ago who bought the "canonical" half-dozen d&b albums and nil else - we are talking Guardian readers, after all; can I have a half-pound of Peshay to go with my Ocean Colour Scene, mate?

IMO the real "canon" would be the Drum & Bass Selection series of Surburban Base comps (Vols 1-4), The Joint compilation, the various Ray Keith-compiled Renegade Selector comps around, the Routes From The Jungle comp that Kodwo put together, and all the tapes I did of Rush FM, Touchdown FM, etc. between about 1991-5, if you want a truer reflection of the scene at the time. Oh yes, and also the Torque/No U-Turn comp which isn't to everyone's taste but I kind of dug it.

And there were elderly dullards at the time complaining that it had all gone to seed since the halycon days of Shoom back in '87 when it were all fields round here...

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:04 (twenty years ago)

i still think 'New Forms' is a fine 'album'

i'm no longer interested in the position (as opposed to 'health' or 'status') of a vague 'dance music' movement conceptually as something to root for or lament the change (as opposed to loss) of - it's backward. everyone knows in reality the genres and mutations within what was always remarkably easy to define as 'dance music' will always have fans. it's a non-story (imo Petridis flaw here is not so much his dismissive pessimism but that it's worth writing about at all). underground overground whatever - new channels make things less black and white, less external/internal (just as it's been suggested John Peel 'lost' gatekeeper status) with no mezzanine common ground. why not work to plur (sorry) the divides, deny they still exist - eclecticism is worth championing because there isn't a person in the world worth time who only likes one particular type of artistic ethos. that might not make for such a provocative article tho i suppose.

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:15 (twenty years ago)

The trouble with Roni Size in particular is that his records have never reflected just how astonishing Reprazent were(/are?) live

this worked the other way round for some dance acts (uh, Faithless) - if you're able to actually imagine a period in the mid 90s where tracks like 'Insomnia' and 'Salva Mea' actually did seem 'astonishing' (and i bet they especially were blasted out at Trade or wherever too)

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:26 (twenty years ago)

it seem that one has to be a complete mongol to write about music for the guardian nowadays (john l walters excepted) and there really was nothing wrong w/ roni size, but i don't think anyone was ever saying there was. his mix of it's alright bu nuyorican sould justifies his entire career for me, let alone the couple of times i saw reprazent live.

stelfox, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:28 (twenty years ago)

x-post to Steve: The short and long of it is that the "right people" are disinterested in and/or afraid to champion and market eclecticism. The values of globalisation.

B.A.R.M.S. (Barima), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:32 (twenty years ago)

aw i love that mix - at least the first few minutes (i always had a problem with long remixes that ultimately kinda went nowhere after an amazing start, often negating the 'mixing in/out' principle)

xpost

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:32 (twenty years ago)

I very clearly remember how awesome "Salva Mea" in particular sounded in clubs when it was originally out. I still like that first Faithless album a lot, despite the coffee tables which were subsequently erected and the fact that Tory Dido got her start with it/them.

The thing with Petridish/Grauniad is that these things always get commissioned the same way - editor: "oi, no more dance music awards at the brits, 2500 words by tomorrow morning please" - because it's always easier to proclaim the "death" of a scene in order to placate a readership for the most part still wishing it was 1971; things were SO much easier when there were only four bands to keep track of, hmmm?

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:53 (twenty years ago)

If you media analyze certain types of dance and electronic music they are marginalized in British media:

Dave Mothersole [deep house, tech house etc] and Rev Milo [house, punk funk, synth-pop, electro etc] are on obscure times of night on Kiss 100, whilst the daytime Kiss 100 is filled with utter pap

Radio 1: The Breezeblock is only 2 hours a week and way after midnight.

IXtra does not [adequately] cover techno, electro, tech-house, microhouse, experimental electronic/ IDM etc prefering to promote other forms of music instead.

6 Music plays far too much boring mid based trad rock songs bands and does not adequately cover electronic, beats, blips and dance music etc. They have a weekly token show called 6 Mix - but should expand their coverage to take in similar music played by the likes of Dave Mothersole [kiss 100], Rev Milo [Kiss 100] and Nick Luscombe [Xfm]

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:04 (twenty years ago)

"IXtra does not [adequately] cover techno, electro, tech-house, microhouse, experimental electronic/ IDM etc prefering to promote other forms of music instead."

1xtra is promoted as a 'black/urban music station' though, which doesnt include the above genres.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:06 (twenty years ago)

Er I don't think it would make sense for 1xtra to cover any of the musics you suggest for it, and it's doing more than its fair share to cover underrepresented styles of music.

ha x-post

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:07 (twenty years ago)

But neither do Radio 1 and 6 Music ..thats my point ...between them BBC have carved up music scenes...but don't play enough of the music that interests me !

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:08 (twenty years ago)

6 Music is far too conservative and rockist and Radio 1 is far too niche tokenist stick into obscure slots after midnight

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:11 (twenty years ago)

there's no point any of these people doing anything to try and cater for me because i'm unlikely to read it or listen to it either way - but perhaps i am a bad example.

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:12 (twenty years ago)

the rave's headline act was the Ratpack, an unsurprisingly forgotten duo whose big number was a rave cover of a Suzanne Vega song, except with lyrics about dope)

twat

stelfox, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:13 (twenty years ago)

PETRIDISH!!! hahahaha!!! Man, that just gets funnier & funnier. He's got a funny foreign name!!! hahaha

bham, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:13 (twenty years ago)

there's nothing wrong with that statement at all tho stelfox! but then i didn't read it as that derogatory of the Ratpack (they WERE forgotten, because they never escaped 1992)

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:16 (twenty years ago)

they have never been forgotten in E8. i was only listening to them this weekend and they were terrific. and it's the "unsurprisingly" that gets me. everything he writes has this horrible smarmy air about it.

stelfox, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:28 (twenty years ago)

it's not all surprising that they were 'forgotten' tho, in the sense that they were on the brink of chart sucess 12 years ago (why not them if SUAD, Altern 8, Urban Hype, Slipmatt etc.?) but somehow didn't manage a big hit (unless 'Captain Of Your Ship' made the top 40 and i have a feeling it did - but by then they were seen as a bit of a 'joke' by a lot of people, perhaps like Altern 8 and SUAD (we're talking by '94) - purists and the likes of Petridis alike it seems)

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:39 (twenty years ago)

Not a Top 40 hit.

In '94 Petridish was probably still listening to his Moose and Cud records.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:43 (twenty years ago)

That may be so, but he always draws attention to the fact that "I was a big dance fan - I wrote for Mixmag!" as a way of conferring legitimacy upon dismissal of dance to readers who were probably only half-aware of it in the first place. He's actively encouraging lazy attitudes with an article like this: superficially defending his love of 90s dance music while simultaneously implying that rock had it right all along.

It's like the inverse of indie guilt.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:04 (twenty years ago)

OTM

B.A.R.M.S. (Barima), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:16 (twenty years ago)

Petridish has become the Tom Cox of dance music writing, past it, irrelevant, nothing interesting to say about contemporary music, except to look back - and say it was better in the past, and making a botched job of music history.

Today i received an email from Kultureflash
http://www.kultureflash.com/current/a weekly london based listings email newsletter

there are 3 indicative events centred around electronic/ dance music, that i have highlighted below.

There seems to be growing eclectic trend at the moment of live artist performance, combined with spinning a diverse range of music from multiple DJs across the spectrum taken in experimental electronic music, breaks, electro, house, techno, tech-house etc


DJ / PERFORMANCE SHITKATAPULT: T.RAUMSCHMIERE, APPARAT...
93 Feet East
Wednesday 3 November [8pm]

150 Brick Lane, E1 T:020.7247.3293 Tube: Aldgate East/Liverpool St.
£8


Autumn can kick ya -- it rains, Guardian-job-section subscriptions are in line for the post-uni of you, and career/life/sexual health re-assessment for the rest of you as you realise that indeed this year will end too! And to really put the boot in, little buggers run round London blowing fireworks up outside your windows. But don't forget, you are special, special people have special needs, and what you need to kick back is tech-shpunk label Shitkatapult and their special music. Anniversary celebrations are due and to mark the occasion these kooky, house rocking, techno bods have released a DVD/LP thingy, and have invited you all to its launch at East End staple 93 Feet East. Founding fathers T.Raumschmiere and Apparat are presiding with Das Bierbeben, gwEm, Motor, Phon.o and Alex Paterson (The Orb), live and on das decks -- the place is gonna be packed. This DVD/LP Strike 50: V.A. / Special Musick for Special People is not a chocolate-box affair, though it is a treat. Think long term: it's more of a full spice rack, you need one. Random pickings include Elastic Heads, Richard Devine, Sami Koivikko and Hakan Libdo + docu-style extras -- give your autumn a slap, have beats all the way to Xmas.

Giveaway: we have one copy of the DVD to give away. It'll go to one randomly picked Flasher who can tell us where T.Raumschmiere got his name from.


CLUB / DJ SI BEGG VS. TIPPER, YELLOTONE...
The Telegraph
Saturday 6 November [9pm - 6am]

228 Brixton Hill, SW2 T:020.8678.0666 Tube: Brixton
£10 (advance)


ALT*CTRL deliver in spades this evening with creative noise-master Si Begg and breakbeat pioneer Tipper when they team up and tee-off a live set that promises to run into the larger of the small hours. Support comes from among others The Dexorcist and Point B. For those of you inclined for a little "intellectronica", courtesy of the Wheels Instead of Hooves, make sure you savour the soothing live twitch of Yellotone's elec-trip-hop (whose recent release Tar File Junction on Ai Records is getting heavy rotation at KF HQ) and some suave (possibly microscopic) visuals from Kurst . Expect seriously funky electronic beats and deeply crisp sounds.


CLUB / DJ MATTHEW HERBERT, THE SOFT PINK TRUTH (LIVE)...
Fabric
Saturday 6 November [10pm - 7am]

77A Charterhouse St., EC1 T:020.7344.4444 Tube: Farringdon
general £15 | concessions £12 | students £12


Its all about light and shade at Fabric this weekend. In Room 1, ringleader Matthew Herbert introduces glam-glitch from Brooks before a live spectacle from The Soft Pink Truth. Moonlighting from his day job in Matmos, Drew Daniels is currently reinventing punk anthems as glitchy, bouncy house tracks. Which means wiring the rotting corpses of Crass and Minor Threat to the mains and sending them twitching and lurching toward the floor for zombie robot karaoke fun. Sounds too much like The Wire Christmas party? Relax, Daniels spells innovation F.U.N.K. Next door, unreconstructed males Dave Clarke and Ben Sims grunt, scratch their testicles and tear Room 2 a new arsehole with bleeding-edge techno. Leaving Swayzak to apply a palliative balm of woozy, bleepy grooves direct from their superlative Loops From The Bergerie. Aaaah...

Does Petridish have any idea of what is going on in the Autumn of 2004?

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:17 (twenty years ago)

correct url:

http://www.kultureflash.com/current/

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:18 (twenty years ago)

i quite fancy the Fabric one

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:20 (twenty years ago)

The other weekly London centric e-mail listings newsletter, Flavorpill covers similar events and this week includes a review of Michael Mayer - Touch. Start the betting, What odds of Petridish being aware of this album?

Flavorpill London
http://london.flavourpill.net/mailer/issue54/index.html

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:27 (twenty years ago)

hmmmm, well, what IF broadsheet columnists WERE talking about Mayer or Shitmat or whoever?

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:31 (twenty years ago)

Send Petridish down the Tube
http://www.seedrecords.co.uk/tube/index.html

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:32 (twenty years ago)

Yes, well if I were a broadsheet columnist I would make it my urgent and key business to talk about both Mayer and Shitmat.

But as my name is not Marcello Coren I doubt I shall ever get to be a broadsheet columnist.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:52 (twenty years ago)

Petridish probably thinks a full english breakfast is something you find in a greasy spoon cafe ! and not on a Manchester record label !

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:58 (twenty years ago)

Hahah, judging by his cover pic on Friday Review the other week it would seem that he's been indulging in a few full English breakfasts too many!

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 14:03 (twenty years ago)

as a broadsheet writer i have tried to cover both - to no avail! hell, i couldn't even get them to bite over annie. violent dancehall, however, they appear to quite like.

stelfox, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 14:05 (twenty years ago)

so have i, so let's not get weightist about this. it's not like he's DeRo or anything. being a fat bastard and being a shit writer are not mutually inclusive; of this i am living proof.

stelfox, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 14:07 (twenty years ago)

I'm certainly in no position to be weightist!

At Uncut four writers (self included) pitched to do Annie! Piers Martin is going to do the review ("well you've written 3000 words about it on your blog already, haven't you?" "fair enough").

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 14:10 (twenty years ago)

it's just that i thought it would be perfect as a feature - it's a good record with backstory, plus she's fit and scandinavian!

stelfox, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 14:14 (twenty years ago)

stelfox, has your Kiss 100 radio pal Rev Milo interviewed Annie yet?

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 14:20 (twenty years ago)

dunno actually. we haven't spoken in an age and i never check his show coz it's on so late. wouldn't be surprised.

stelfox, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 14:21 (twenty years ago)

why is annie only in places like uncut? she should be in smash hits, and heat, and mags like that. 679 dont have a clue.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 14:34 (twenty years ago)

yeah they don't have a clue, they're just one of the most interesting labels out there and one of the few that has any success releasing interesting music right now. well done with the sweeping generalisations and highfalutin jibes at people who are actually doing something useful instead of bitching on the internet.

stelfox, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 14:43 (twenty years ago)

C'mon, Dave, it's not like the song got to 25 despite being really good, now, was it?

Incidentally, Dave Pearce has apparently "parted ways" with the BBC according to FT.

B.A.R.M.S. (Barima), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 14:58 (twenty years ago)

Oh good, can we have the Annie Nightingale Sunday Night Request Show back then please?

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 15:01 (twenty years ago)

see NYLPM for details on Dangerous Dave's 'career trajectory shift'

titchy has a point

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 15:23 (twenty years ago)

well if it's that easy, then...

stelfox, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 15:25 (twenty years ago)

"yeah they don't have a clue, they're just one of the most interesting labels out there and one of the few that has any success releasing interesting music right now. well done with the sweeping generalisations and highfalutin jibes at people who are actually doing something useful instead of bitching on the internet. "

i never said 679 were a shit label, i said they didnt have a clue cos annie isnt doing as well as i thought it would. dont get your panties all in a bunch.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 15:40 (twenty years ago)

"(the rave's headline act was the Ratpack, an unsurprisingly forgotten duo whose big number was a rave cover of a Suzanne Vega song, except with lyrics about dope)"

A few months ago I saw the "unsurprisingly forgotten" Ratpack play to a crowd of about 2000, at least a third of which, I'd guess, were under 20. Petredis really doesn't bother to check his facts, does he?

Wooden (Wooden), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 19:00 (twenty years ago)

as laziness increases smug dismissiveness needs to replace actual knowledge. there's a writer, often a senior one, in nearly every broadsheet like petridis. caught up in their own past and mythology, as if people care.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 4 November 2004 10:14 (twenty years ago)

Incidentally, I do wonder why we continue to direct so much ire solely at Petridis when Andy Gill in the Friday Independent is much, much worse.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:28 (twenty years ago)

easy, because more people read The Guardian !

DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:31 (twenty years ago)

The Inde-what-now?

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:42 (twenty years ago)

it's possible that AP meant the Ratpack were unsurprisingly forgotten by the mainstream dance press and the majority of it's readership. Scooter were 'unsurprisingly forgotten' in the same way until a couple of years back.

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Thursday, 4 November 2004 16:05 (twenty years ago)

that line about the Ratpack is very telling - Petridis slagging off the very act that precipitated his love for dance music. he has to explain why he turned his back on writing for dance mags like Mixmag to move to a more prestigious(and likely higher paying) gig at the Guardian, since he obviously feels guilty about it. E for him now is like what bellbottoms and peace signs represent for corporate ex-hippies: an embarassing reminder that they once believed in something.

Dave M. (rotten03), Friday, 5 November 2004 02:01 (twenty years ago)

The "Deadhead Sticker On A Cadillac" syndrome.

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 5 November 2004 08:14 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.