punkism

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
As long as we're talking about rockists, we might as well bring up the subset that takes rockist values and narrows them down even further from "real instruments/creative singer-songwriting/rebellion rules; teenpop/robo-synth shit sucks" into even deeper generational divides (Buzzcocks good; Green Day bad), even more sound-and-fury garbage about "corporate sell-outs" (the Crass-mocked, Chumbawamba-paint-toss-victim, genre-killing-via-CBS-signing Clash to thread), higher tendency for the music itself and not just the criticism to be diametrically opposed to rockist strawmen (disco, metal), deeper you-had-to-be-there-maaaan retro-fixated dead-end preaching, even more rhetoric about music about revolution and resistance and how it's not enough to just dance because that's mindless consumerism.

I've boiled it down to the most contentious debate-starting shit but my position on this is a bit more nuanced. I just want to see what the general consensus is on this.

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:51 (twenty years ago)

I think it sucks ass.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:52 (twenty years ago)

yeah it sucks.

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:54 (twenty years ago)

hahaha Well that's this thread wrapped up!

(Nate, perhaps you'd have had better luck starting this thread 6 hours ago.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:58 (twenty years ago)

I was at my day job! I was going to post it before work but I was short on time. Hellfuck and shitrain.

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:15 (twenty years ago)

(Buzzcocks good; Green Day bad)

This seems to encapsulate it well. In a nutshell, I think it has more to do with the passing of "the moment." At their time, the Buzzcocks were entirely original (or at least relatively fresh)...a bracing blast of pop played with buzzsaw guitars and adrenalized velocity. It was new, exciting, genuine and relatively unprecedented, and it was a timely reaction against. Against boring, flabby, needlessly complicated, pompous sonic flab. Hell, to some, it was even considered dangerous. It was the sound of something brand new that renounced the seemingly inescapble sonic soylent green that farted out of mainstream radiostations.

But, that moment's gone. Punk Rock, like many other genres/movements before and after it -- hello, Hip Hop -- became subsumed by the establishment. It became de-fanged and housebroken. Now, sadly, Punk Rock has become just another style. Nothing especially new or dangerous about it. That's why bands like Green Day -- or their lesser offspring like Good Charlotte and Blink 182 etc. -- are worthy of such ire. They're not taking any chances, they're just putting on the uniform and following the earlier template. Yawn.

The ultimate "Punkist" statement (to use MC Transmanaicon's term) would be: "Punk Rock is dead. Sorry, but you missed it. Get your own youth culture" or "Hey buddy, 1982 called and wants its mohawk back."

But, this is more a matter of cumudgeonly oldsters like myself bemoaning the passage of time. As I've mentioned on another thread, i have an eleven year old nephew who is rabidly immersing himself in heavy metal and punk. I take great, imperious pains to point out the difference between "genuine"/old school punk bands like the Ramones and the Clash and meaningless newjack poser bands like Good Charlotte and Sum-41. He nods obediently, but ultimately doesn't give a fuck what I say about it (nor should he, really). To his unbiased ears, it all sounds good -- who cares which came first, etc.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:39 (twenty years ago)

QED

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:46 (twenty years ago)

I'm not that interested in this thread but there was, as usual, something about this in the Onion. Something like "Area Punk Decries Today's Punks As Bandwagon Jumpers," in which the OG punk says something like "And what about the Sex Pistols? The original Filthy Lucre reunion tour. I was there, dude!"

Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:50 (twenty years ago)

I would search for all the threads where Frank Kogan (who I miss around here) talks about "punk" as a superword, or I would link to Mark Sinker's (ditto) article on punk but, y'know, I'm lazy.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:57 (twenty years ago)

Punk means about as much to me as, say, "acid rock". A genre I enjoy but have no real vested interest in as far as extra-aesthetic philosophizing. Thanks for apparently temporarily saving music about a year before I was born, guys. If it weren't for you bored suburban white kids might've just listened to the Cars and Van Halen instead until rap came along.

Oh, wait.

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:02 (twenty years ago)

(I feel like making a mix CD filled with stuff like Boz Scaggs' "Lowdown" and Stretch's "Why Did You Do It" and Steely Dan's "The Royal Scam" and Climax Blues Band's "Couldn't Get It Right" and other "bloated" mid '70s stuff that punk "rescued" us from)

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:05 (twenty years ago)

"Rockism" = BAD
"Punkism" = GOOD

...because Rockism is conservative (Rock and its values should prevail) and Punkism is progresseive (Punk is dead, move on).

daavid (daavid), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:29 (twenty years ago)

I haven't seen a lot of punks suggesting things to "move on" to (Back From the Grave comp album covers ahoy -- cartoons of zombie punk rockers killing grunge/disco/rap fans)

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:30 (twenty years ago)

noise!

peter smith (plsmith), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:31 (twenty years ago)

That's `cos they're kids who don't know better.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:32 (twenty years ago)

Surely "punkism" isn't saying "move on" so much as "bring back REAL punk"!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:33 (twenty years ago)

HAS ANYONE HEARD THE NEW DESTILLERS ALBUM


(ps - this totally described me up until like 11th grade)

Spinning Down Alone You Spin Alive (ex machina), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:34 (twenty years ago)

punkism is bad, but not NEARLY as bad as reggaeism... probably the most elitist-fuck of all genres.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:36 (twenty years ago)

PEOPLE WHO LIKE "UNDERGROUND HIP HOP"

Spinning Down Alone You Spin Alive (ex machina), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:37 (twenty years ago)

xpost:
Well, except for probably Classicism.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:40 (twenty years ago)

gygax what about the ska music?

still bevens (bscrubbins), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:45 (twenty years ago)

you mean, like madness?

ronald thomas contlygax! (gygax!), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:46 (twenty years ago)

Everyone needs to buy that Das Oath album. It's soooooo good.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:52 (twenty years ago)

"Rockism" = BAD
"Punkism" = GOOD
...because Rockism is conservative (Rock and its values should prevail) and Punkism is progresseive (Punk is dead, move on).

-- daavid (dvdmontie...), November 12th, 2004

Punkism is just as conservative.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:54 (twenty years ago)

everybody is guilty of it. It's natural. You are always gonna have fonder memories of some of the stuff you loved when you were young and think it was better then what kids hear now. Sometimes you will be right and sometimes you will be wrong. I'm reminded of that all the time on ILM cuzza the younger people on here who wax nostalgic about stuff from the early 90's that I never really paid that much attention to. Pulp will never be a touchstone for me. Even though I like them okay. I've gotten two cds in the mail recently that have nostalgic songs about 1991 on them! (or maybe it was 92. and they shall know us.... and some band called oxford collapse.) (i also got a cd with a 1976 song on it and one with a 1977 song on it.) anyway, that Das Oath album is almost as good as a DRI album! See, I try to ignore my nostalgic leanings every chance I get. (I will admit to some jackrabidisms from time to time. pretty boy pop-punk bands get my goat a little cuz i do remember when punk was a refuge from pretty boys and inhabited by freaks and weirdos and uglies. i felt this way in the 80's too though when i was still in high school. the straight-edge kidz in CT. were too jockish for me even though i liked the music okay and some of them were my friends. i didn't like the way the new guard would turn their backs when the adolescents or mdc would come to town. they seemed snobby to me and way too self-assured for punk rock. hardcore became like the marine corps. hiding from normal people was one of the great boons of punk. but i DO think there is still great punk rock being made. when i stop looking for new cool stuff is the day that i will have succumbed to oldfogeyitis. it doesn't seem to have happened yet.)

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 12 November 2004 01:14 (twenty years ago)

"Rockism"=BAD
"Punkism"=BADASS
"Rapism"=BAD (eubonics for "good")

les niz, Friday, 12 November 2004 01:44 (twenty years ago)

I agree with your assessment of punkism, sans the "bad" half

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Friday, 12 November 2004 03:42 (twenty years ago)

Uh...punk isn't dead. If you think it is, you're listening to the wrong bands.

babyalive (babyalive), Friday, 12 November 2004 05:32 (twenty years ago)

thank you babyalive

cinniblount (James Blount), Friday, 12 November 2004 05:43 (twenty years ago)

It became de-fanged and housebroken.

So what??

My name is Kenny (My name is Kenny), Friday, 12 November 2004 06:38 (twenty years ago)

So what??

Do you like your food pre-chewed, Kenny?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 12 November 2004 06:42 (twenty years ago)

Boz Scaggs

See, I dunno. I don't care about punk saving us from this dude, I've just never anything (including the song you name) from him which connected at all.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 12 November 2004 06:44 (twenty years ago)

I succumbed to oldfogeyitis quite awhile ago. I've lost any sense of guilt about it at this point. But I liked what you posted, Scott. xxpost

Bimble (bimble), Friday, 12 November 2004 06:46 (twenty years ago)

I don't accept "edge" as the lone criteria of quality, is all I'm saying.

My name is Kenny (My name is Kenny), Friday, 12 November 2004 06:54 (twenty years ago)

What about the Punky Reggae Party? Wasn't that supposed to bring Love and Unity? Wasn't the most famous figure in Punk Rock a huge fan of reggae and dub music? Doesn't his guitar player now have a radio show on which he regularly plays reggae and glam rock, which he is a huge fan of, particularly David Bowie, even if he did steal much of his Bowie's equipment?

Some of the problem is that some of the rhetoric of the original punk movement was taken way too literally, even at the time, the same way Frenchy theory was taken literally in US universities, when across the Atlantic they were only joking and playing.

Conclusion: punkism is punk's punk.

Ken L (Ken L), Friday, 12 November 2004 07:25 (twenty years ago)

He's a punk's punk.

Bimble (bimble), Friday, 12 November 2004 07:28 (twenty years ago)

Make It Punky.

What you gonna play know James?

Dee Dee, I don't know. But whatever I play, it's got to be punky. Can you count it off, can you count it off?

One-Two-Three-Four!

Ken L (Ken L), Friday, 12 November 2004 08:09 (twenty years ago)

Punkism = claiming that Stravinsky was, in fact, a punk. A few people insisted on this to me on another thread, as though anyone that overturns accepted aesthetic standards is therefore a punk. They speak as though punks actually invented artistic rebellion in the 1970s, and that Stravinsky was just a rare man who was ahead of his time.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 12 November 2004 08:23 (twenty years ago)

I don't even know who's a punk anymore. I mean, the song title is "Judy is a Punk", but then it turns out that Jackie is the punk and Judy is a runt. When you can't trust the Ramones to get it straight, then fuck it.

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Friday, 12 November 2004 08:35 (twenty years ago)

"Out on the road today, I saw an Exploited sticker on a Cadillac,
/ A little voice inside my head said don't look back, you can never look back . . . ."

Drew Daniel, Friday, 12 November 2004 09:06 (twenty years ago)

"Punkism = claiming that Stravinsky was, in fact, a punk"

i said that on that other thread. i was kinda kidding. ijust meant rebel, really. but i don't really have a problem attaching recent definitions to people from the past. you can call people whatever you want. charles ives was a rocker!! Danbury Hardcore Lives!!!!!

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 12 November 2004 14:30 (twenty years ago)

Scott, I figured you were kidding, but others took your statement and ran with it.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 12 November 2004 15:06 (twenty years ago)

remember article in onion:

"90's punk decries punk bands of today"

Spinning Down Alone You Spin Alive (ex machina), Friday, 12 November 2004 15:50 (twenty years ago)

read upthread, Jon.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 12 November 2004 16:15 (twenty years ago)

"Ire" for Green Day? Jeez, they've written some good pop songs.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 November 2004 16:19 (twenty years ago)

WE WANT THE PUNK
GIVE UP THE PUNK
YAW
WE WANT THE PUNK
GIVE UP THE PUNK
DA DADA DA DA
OOO OOO OOO OOO
YEAH

LSTD (answer) (sexyDancer), Friday, 12 November 2004 16:32 (twenty years ago)

"Out on the road today, I saw an Exploited sticker on a Cadillac,
/ A little voice inside my head said don't look back, you can never look back . . . ."

Actually when the Ataris recorded their candy-ass cover of "Boys Of Summer" (still the best song they've ever done, embarassingly) they changed the lyric to "Black Flag sticker."

miccio (miccio), Friday, 12 November 2004 17:01 (twenty years ago)

re Nate's comments upthread about mid 70s stuff that punk 'saved' us from, this may be of interest:
http://www.lnreview.co.uk/music/004196.php

zebedee (zebedee), Friday, 12 November 2004 17:16 (twenty years ago)

Almost everything I've read dealing with the original American or English punks deflates the myth that they were totally opposed to classic rock....anyone who still believes that A) crazy or B) is buying into third-hand party line dogma.....Lydon loves prog and kraut, the Minutemen love CCR, the Clash always were basically classic rockers, Greg Ginn was a Deadhead, Rollins and Mackaye listened to Ted Nugent, etc etc....it's been pointed out on many other threads on ILM, but I think it bears repeating on this one.

I know alot of people that like punk very much that aren't nearly as doctrinaire as this thread seem to suggest. I'm somewhere in the middle....like I saw that Busted video and did get kinda angry for a bit Alex in NYC style, but I've always thought Green Day were a fantastic pop band, more in spirit with Cheap Trick, who I love lots (but not as clever or funny as Cheap Trick, which is probably a result of their "punkhood" more than anything else)....

I haven't given a shit about hardcore for a very very long time.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 12 November 2004 17:25 (twenty years ago)

Keep in mind Matt that I both own The Filth and the Fury and have seen Ramones: End of the Century (at Block E of all places, my 2nd choice when I found they didn't have Shaun of the Dead playing) and both of them took great pains to point out how awful the music was before Punk Saved Us All. The Pistols DVD kind of balanced it out by juxtaposing ELP with hilarious stop-motion dinosaur film goofiness; the Ramones just had Legs McNeil bitching and whining while they played clips of K-Tel comps (which included such awful decade-ruiners as The Chi-Lites) and more footage of Emerson Lake and Palmer playing what actually appeared to be this really cool sort of droning riffhammer groove (they were already irrelevant by 1976 or so, had zero top 40 singles and didn't have a top ten album after 1974; it's like picking on Winger to explain why Nirvana had to happen). And and and ELP gets invoked again as Ultimate Rock Excess that needed to be crushed in that PBS rock-doc's segment on punk (P-Funk are later invoked in a similar fashion in the rap chapter, BTW... the HELL?), which leads me to wonder how representative of pop music they were circa 1974 as opposed to, say, Sweet (who had three top 10 singles in the US from '73-'76) or, I don't know, the Bay City Rollers (who the Ramones admitted trying to ape in "Blitzkrieg Bop"). Throw in the "I've just seen the Sex Pistols! Die, Pink Floyd poster, die!" scene in 24 Hour Party People and pretty much every chapter in every Barnes & Noble "Entertainment Weekly/Rolling Stone/Soldier of Fortune Present the History of Rock and Roll" book that deals with punk and it makes me want to puke. It doesn't make me want to sell my UK Subs LPs, but maybe if some 45 year-old with a lot of disposable income and $50 he doesn't know what to do with were to call (one of them is on colored vinyl! No reserve!!!!++++)

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Friday, 12 November 2004 18:28 (twenty years ago)

(disclaimer: Emerson, Lake and Palmer is not a band I actually like or something)

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Friday, 12 November 2004 18:28 (twenty years ago)

"And and and ELP gets invoked again as Ultimate Rock Excess that needed to be crushed in that PBS rock-doc's segment on punk (P-Funk are later invoked in a similar fashion in the rap chapter, BTW... the HELL?)"

I know this was just an aside, but... that's just completely wrong on so many levels.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 12 November 2004 18:32 (twenty years ago)

"They have a MOTHERSHIP! That's not street!"

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Friday, 12 November 2004 18:33 (twenty years ago)

MOTLEY CRUE RULES.

Superdeduper, Friday, 12 November 2004 18:34 (twenty years ago)

no nate you're right, it is the usual way that the punk story is told, but reading stuff like No Blacks, No Irish, No Dogs, or England's Dreaming, or This Band Could Be Your Life, you see all sorts of classic rock/dinosaur rock as influences, etc.....But Yeah you're right the way the story is told is usually misleading and just rehashing cliches (not that some of the people involved didn't do alot of foster these beliefs) but I've always looked at punk as part of a continuum of music that I like....being born too late for the revolution, just naturally associate Can with Richard Hell with US Maple, etc....I think lots of the people in punkish bands I know are the same way....Cheap Trick or Steely Dan or Thin Lizzy always seemed like they belonged more with the Pistols to me than not.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 12 November 2004 18:55 (twenty years ago)

I think Steely Dan might be a stretch, just cuz of the musicianship issue... but in general I totally agree. A lot of cultural markers are abritrarily imposed for specific reasons (ie, MARKETING), when really all sorts of things are happening concurrently and feed into each other in a much more complicated miasmic sorta way.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 12 November 2004 18:57 (twenty years ago)

Phil Lynott played on a Johnny Thunders album! The last song on his solo debut name-checks PiL and the Slits! Song isn't as good as "Hey Hey My My" but the guy was desparate to reaffirm he didn't hate punk.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 12 November 2004 19:15 (twenty years ago)

but the guy was desparate to reaffirm he didn't hate punk.

Lynott used to hang out with the Clash. I don't think he was necessarily desperate to reaffirm anything. If anything, Lynott was that rare breed of the old guard that was seemingly given a free pass by the cogniscenti of Brit Punk.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 12 November 2004 19:33 (twenty years ago)

NOTES

1) I can definitely see potential parallels between say Steely Dan and maybe Television (or the Minutemen!).
2) Phil Lynott singing about the Slits is like some weird, wonderful dream
3) Were the Stooges and the MC5 heavy metal from 1968-1975, and then starting in 1976 they were mysteriously "punk"? (haha Chuck Eddy to thread)

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Friday, 12 November 2004 19:37 (twenty years ago)

Punkism? Sign me up.

Phil Lynott played in a joke band 'The Greedies' with Steve Jones and Paul Cook. Despite the odd awful ballad, Lizzy exemplied the kind of swagger that gave Rockism a good name, and remain irreducibly cool.

Soukesian, Friday, 12 November 2004 23:08 (twenty years ago)

http://www.zanorg.com/prodperso/punk.htm

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 13 November 2004 07:23 (twenty years ago)

argh. since I have insomnia. Here's the lyric in all its glory.

"Talk In '79" by Phil Lynott, Solo In Soho

The Clash were headed for a head on collision
Crash for complete control
The Pistols left behind a swindle and a scandal
That nobody wished to handle
Sham 69 were left in a shambles
Generation X was next

Elvis and Nick Lowe
They had a go
With the help of the Attractions
And Joe Jackson said it wasn't his style
Dave Edmunds survived alive
On top of a Rockpile
Devo didn't know if they were men
Because they couldn't get no satisfaction
The Rats were caught in their own trap
Steve Strange began to change
Ultravox had a system
Kraftwerk nearly beat them
And the Yellow Magic Orchestra missed them
Eno rose for Lowe

The Slits became rasta
And the Buzzcocks played faster and faster with adrenalin
John Cooper Clarke he was smart
The Public Image became Limited
The Police were re-released and came out as a three piece

The Rocky Horror Show became the history of tomorrow
Nina Hagen, she was a German maiden
And the music press revealed their anger
When threatened by the Stranglers

This broadcast was brought to you in 1979
I'm just talking to you over these waves
Not just about another time and another place
And before we knew it
The old wave was gone and controlled

miccio (miccio), Saturday, 13 November 2004 09:23 (twenty years ago)

Keep in mind Matt that I both own The Filth and the Fury and have seen Ramones: End of the Century (at Block E of all places, my 2nd choice when I found they didn't have Shaun of the Dead playing) and both of them took great pains to point out how awful the music was before Punk Saved Us All. The Pistols DVD kind of balanced it out by juxtaposing ELP with hilarious stop-motion dinosaur film goofiness; the Ramones just had Legs McNeil bitching and whining while they played clips of K-Tel comps (which included such awful decade-ruiners as The Chi-Lites) and more footage of Emerson Lake and Palmer playing what actually appeared to be this really cool sort of droning riffhammer groove (they were already irrelevant by 1976 or so, had zero top 40 singles and didn't have a top ten album after 1974; it's like picking on Winger to explain why Nirvana had to happen). And and and ELP gets invoked again as Ultimate Rock Excess that needed to be crushed in that PBS rock-doc's segment on punk (P-Funk are later invoked in a similar fashion in the rap chapter, BTW... the HELL?), which leads me to wonder how representative of pop music they were circa 1974 as opposed to, say, Sweet (who had three top 10 singles in the US from '73-'76) or, I don't know, the Bay City Rollers (who the Ramones admitted trying to ape in "Blitzkrieg Bop"). Throw in the "I've just seen the Sex Pistols! Die, Pink Floyd poster, die!" scene in 24 Hour Party People and pretty much every chapter in every Barnes & Noble "Entertainment Weekly/Rolling Stone/Soldier of Fortune Present the History of Rock and Roll" book that deals with punk and it makes me want to puke. It doesn't make me want to sell my UK Subs LPs, but maybe if some 45 year-old with a lot of disposable income and $50 he doesn't know what to do with were to call (one of them is on colored vinyl! No reserve!!!!++++)
-- MC Transmaniacon (natepatri...), November 12th, 2004.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(disclaimer: Emerson, Lake and Palmer is not a band I actually like or something)
-- MC Transmaniacon (natepatri...), November 12th, 2004.

OTFM

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 13 November 2004 15:24 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
u guys wanna a sikass punk band - fuckin badbrains rok so bad
theyr so sik

maffy, Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:22 (nineteen years ago)

maffy OTM!

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:33 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.