Common People is better than Country House - but how?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
somewhat inspired by martin skidmore's comment on the 90s top 100 singles fallout thread.

lyrically both songs are critical of a social stereotype, and social divides in a more general sense.

both songs are 'fun', designed for indie-pub-disco jinx and singing along boisterously

so what is it that elevates 'common people' so far above 'country house' in people's minds? one answer is that in the videos Damon and co. buffoon it up for the cameras with irritating glee while Jarvis launches himself into the limelight proper by not smiling and exhibiting effortless cool just on the right side of arrogance - and these images perhaps always stick in people's minds now.

but my main question to you is whether you really think one song is better written than the other - and why? the more detailed the answer the better. also feel free to bring other big socially critical britpop hits of the time into the equation.

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 12:45 (twenty years ago)

"Common People" has a great epic quality. And Pulp hadn't become the irritating, ubiquotoids that Blur were by the point they recorded "Country House" (altough I never quite understood the ire "Country House" inspired). Then again, I quite liked Leisure, so clearly I don't know what I'm talking about when it comes to all things Blur.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 15 November 2004 12:48 (twenty years ago)

Please strike that comma between irritating and ubiquotoids.

I should also say that "Common People" had a great mock-epic quality.

In any case, it's simply a better song, no matter how one chooses to slice it.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 15 November 2004 12:49 (twenty years ago)

I think "Common People" tells a better story than "Country House", Jarvis' singing is better, more "Edgy", more vituperative, more convincing, perhaps? Pulp, as in the band, sound better on "Common People", they play with a bit more er oomph, they sound like they mean it a bit more. Plus, Pulp were very good at ramping up the dynamics of the tune as it goes along. CH is a little flat. Damon's faux cockernee act on CH is quite annoying. That said, I listened to CH a little while ago (I dutifully went out and bought both of the CD singles on the week of release to keep Oasis off the top, and I still have them both.) and actually I didn't think it was bad at all. The little middle 8 is very nice, I quite enjoyed it. Generally speaking, I prefer Blur to Pulp, but not in this case.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 15 November 2004 12:53 (twenty years ago)

'common people' has that nice personal touch. after the opening couplet you know something about the singer - HE went to St Martin's as well...you might say it's about him as much as it's about her/him AND her. 'country house' is probably more mocking because it doesn't have that same introspective factor.

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 12:58 (twenty years ago)

Also it is disingenuous to describe "Common People" as "fun," as it is a rather savage attack on social strata slummers which is sung with a fair degree of semi-reluctant venom by someone who actually is working class (Cocker) as opposed to someone who pretends to be (Albarn).

On a musical level "Common People" triumphs because it bases itself on a template (early Roxy) which in 1995 was less careworn and overused than the Ray Davies/Madness template on which "Country House" is based. The Moroder pulse of "Common People" betrays some regard for Futurism; add to that the fact that the song has three different levels of intensity to which it gradually builds up - and then a fourth, quite unexpectedly, near the end ("you will NEVER" at which latter word the band sound like the National Grid has suddenly been switched on), and it compares favourably with the mono-dimensional trot of "Country House."

Crucially it is those moments of The Great Escape where Blur choose to embrace failed Futurist hyperreality - "He Thought Of Cars," "Yuko And Hiro" - that they are most powerful emotionally.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 15 November 2004 12:59 (twenty years ago)

i desribe it as fun because of it's effect at discos/parties, but the tone of the track never really conveys the same sense of disdain the lyrics do anyway.

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 13:00 (twenty years ago)

It comes down the angle that the story is delivered from - Jarvis is somewhat more believable, and presents a more convincing class differential for the listener. Whereas Blur, it doesn't really cut much rug.

I may be quite bias, because the idea of coming from a pretty shit background and then pulling some girl from a wealthly background is a lot more familiar to me, and I think it both amusing and true. I think people find it harder to connect in that way to Country House, which will be more remembered as a record that was sold to number 1 through cheap CDs.

(x-post)

3underscore (___), Monday, 15 November 2004 13:01 (twenty years ago)

think people find it harder to connect in that way to Country House

which people tho?


marcello probably nails it, and makes the difference seem more obvious. but we know too much about the characters writing and performing the songs. and i couldn't help but wonder what someone would think hearing the two for the first time today and knowing nothing about either band.

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 13:05 (twenty years ago)

(xpost)

Well the "Common People" CD single was £1.99 in the first week of release, but even that couldn't get it past the immovable Singing Squaddies at number one. Whereas EMI with its big marketing budgets and bigger loss-margin flexibility had no problem with getting "Country House" to number one ahead of the more (at the time) cash-strapped Creation vis-a-vis "Roll With It."

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 15 November 2004 13:12 (twenty years ago)

'Common People' still did remarkably well to outsell Michael & Janet Jackson in it's week of release tho

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 13:15 (twenty years ago)

and i'm not sure that's because it was considered such a great song. assume the Radio 1 support at the time was truly enormous, as not many other big radio stations at the time would've touched it i would've thought.

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 13:17 (twenty years ago)

This is correct. Commercial radio in '95 was still wary of Britpop in general and preferred to stick to a stout hessian diet of Celine, Hucknall, Wet Wet Wet etc. (and obv also Robson & Jerome).

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 15 November 2004 13:22 (twenty years ago)

As "Country House" is so obviously better than "Common People", this entire thread is of course invalid.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 November 2004 13:23 (twenty years ago)

Marcello OTM in everythign he's said. Geir is still complety and utterly MENKO and is thus VOID.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 15 November 2004 13:44 (twenty years ago)

come on Geir, unless you've explained it before, don't bother posting such comments without backup

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 13:49 (twenty years ago)

"Country House" is just another Blur song. "Common People" was a benchmark.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 15 November 2004 13:50 (twenty years ago)

There's a real level of pathos and disgust in CP, partly due to Jarvis' delivery, partly due to the lyrics, partly due to the way the actual tune develops. CH by contrast sounds like a drunken, misanthropic and condescending piss-take.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 15 November 2004 13:51 (twenty years ago)

CH by contrast sounds like a drunken, misanthropic and condescending piss-take.

Exactly. Like I said. Just another Blur song.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 15 November 2004 13:52 (twenty years ago)

Alex you hurt me in my heart. Blur have done at least 20 great songs that aren't (quite) like that at all!

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 15 November 2004 13:56 (twenty years ago)

I like Blur.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 15 November 2004 13:58 (twenty years ago)

Cool!

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 15 November 2004 14:08 (twenty years ago)

because there is some affection for the subject of the song!

(as well as what was said above)

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 15 November 2004 14:09 (twenty years ago)

Lyrically and stylistically CP beats CH to a, er, pulp (sorry!).

And let's get down to the fundamentals - it's got a fantastic melody, while CH is irritating and trite.

stew, Monday, 15 November 2004 14:26 (twenty years ago)

I can only speak for me.

But "Country House" sounded like it was trying to make me join in. That's a very bad start. And what it was asking me to join in with seemed to be some sort of game, exercise, whatever without an ounce of love, passion or dedication.

Whereas "Common People" screamed out from the TV at me and made me want to tell everyone about it.

[xpost: god yes better melody]

Acme (acme), Monday, 15 November 2004 14:29 (twenty years ago)

I don't think there's much difference between the appeal of the two, it's just that "Common People" is a little bit better as a song, really. More exciting, catchier, wittier lyrics, etc.

The Good Dr. Bill (Andrew Unterberger), Monday, 15 November 2004 14:31 (twenty years ago)

A: I wouldn't fuck to Country House

Sonny, Ah!!1 (Sonny A.), Monday, 15 November 2004 14:45 (twenty years ago)

The long version of Common People is six mins plus.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 15 November 2004 14:47 (twenty years ago)

At any rate common people had the better video clip.

king of the eyesores (papa november), Monday, 15 November 2004 14:50 (twenty years ago)

"Common People" sounds like La Dusseldorf so is obviously better than a ninth-rate Kinks/XTC abortion like "Country House". Also I've never listened to any attention to any of the words on "Country House".

Ol' Dirty Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 15 November 2004 14:56 (twenty years ago)

now imagine Damon singing CP and Jarvis singing CH

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 14:58 (twenty years ago)

The former is a lot harder to imagine than the latter, I think.

The Good Dr. Bill (Andrew Unterberger), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:11 (twenty years ago)

No, I can't manage the latter.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:13 (twenty years ago)

now if only Teh Shat would cover CH, or better yet Park Life ("i get up...when i want EXCEPT...on tuesdays when i....get....rudely awakened...by the dust....man")

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:20 (twenty years ago)

i sang country house at karaoke a couple weeks back - not a good choice! the words are all crammed together

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:21 (twenty years ago)

Teh Shat would handle that somehow

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:23 (twenty years ago)

Music-wise it's all about the rythm. Common People's very cleverly put together - it starts with a sequencer line and holds that tempo until halfway through where the sequencers stop and the track starts slowly speeding up to it's crescendo. Combine that with an evolving story and you've got a powerful bit of work. As a dancefloor/live track it utterly storms it due to this reason.

Country House on the other hand has got that rumpa-rumpa tuba smarties rythm to it, it seemed too much like "here's the SINGLE! one for the mums to dance to at the Wedding Reception!", it also showcased the side of Parklife that was utterly annoying and twatish in even greater glory, the video was a big pile of malnourished dog skat, the Vs. Oasis thing was stupid and tedious, Keith Allen, The Groucho, Fat fucking Les, Cool Brittania, Retaking The Flag and for fucks sake Damon "HE" doesn't live in a very big house in the country - YOU DO.

Ach. Maybe that's the root of it - the Pulp song is inclusive, a dancefloor full of people rumbopping to it is a room of people revelling in their common-ness, cheap thrills, teenage kicks. The story is believable, well observed and witty and deep down has a point to make. The Blur song on the other hand . . . . look, Damon, we KNOW that rich city people get second homes. The fucking CHEEK of that band at the time - "hey kids, this is what Engerland is really like! Oi! Oi!" "Sheiit, Damon, I've never looked out of my fucking window or read a newspaper, you know what I've been living in a bubble all my fucking life and Hallelujah you've opened the Doors of Perception on Merrie England for me!".

Hateful, awful, stupid record.

Bernard the Butler (Lynskey), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:26 (twenty years ago)

very convincing

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:29 (twenty years ago)

I don't think "Country House" is any more patronizing and hypocritical than "Common People," though.

The GOod Dr. Bill (Andrew Unterberger), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:33 (twenty years ago)

Why is "Common People" patronizing?

Ol' Dirty Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:35 (twenty years ago)

i don't think he thinks it is

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:37 (twenty years ago)

Let the boy speak for himself!

Ol' Dirty Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:39 (twenty years ago)

I don't know, something about "Common People" has started rubbing me the wrong way. Everyone faults "Country House" for seeming so superior to the rich when Albarn was no one to talk, but I don't see what makes Cocker such a working class hero--the guy is as glamorous as glamorous gets, and after the huge success of His n Hers, I imagine he wasn't so bad off either. doing so badly himself. How many working class heroes do you know that use cigarette holders? The song is such an obvious attempt to associate integrity and legitimacy with being poor or common, with such an exclusivist "you'll never be like one of us, rich girl" attitude that to me, seems just as bad as anything "Country House" does.

I don't think this should necessarily get in the way of enjoyment of the song--it's an us vs. them anthem, and all us vs. them anthems are diminuitive and patronizing in some way. I just don't think it's right for people to champion "Common People" but fault "Country House" for pretty much the exact same reasons.

The Good Dr. Bill (Andrew Unterberger), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:47 (twenty years ago)

with such an exclusivist "you'll never be like one of us, rich girl" attitude that to me, seems just as

No, one of them. He wasn't saying he was one of the common people. He was saying She thought he was...

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:50 (twenty years ago)

Working class people can't be glamorous?!??! Anyway, that aside, I believe "Common People" was written about experiences when Cocker was a struggling art student not a successful pop star.

Ol' Dirty Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:51 (twenty years ago)

'country house' is about sneering at the rich cuz it feels good to sneer, 'common people' is about sneering at the rich cuz they sneer at the poor. there's an element of desperation and then anger in 'common people' that's nowhere present in 'country house'.

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:51 (twenty years ago)

... and Mark is right above

Ol' Dirty Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:51 (twenty years ago)

The often missed, long version, verse.

Like a dog lying in a corner
they will bite you and never warn you
Look out
they'll tear your insides out
'cos everybody hates a tourist
especially one who thinks
it's all such a laugh
yeah and the chip stain's grease
will come out in the bath
You will never understand
how it feels to live your life
with no meaning or control
and with nowhere else to go
You are amazed that they exist
and they burn so bright
whilst you can only wonder why

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:51 (twenty years ago)

xpost ta.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:52 (twenty years ago)

There's something so tediously arch about Pulp at their commercial peak - 'Common People', 'Sorted For Es and Whizz' 'Mis-shapes' etc that I cannot listen to them.

I quite like Country House.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:56 (twenty years ago)

Funny that, I don't hate Blur but I hate "Country House"

Ol' Dirty Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 15 November 2004 15:57 (twenty years ago)

'Common People' made fun of all the (sometimes wide-eyed) European foreigners that had started to arrive in greater numbers to live and study in the UK in the early 90s..it definitely had a xenophobic, reactionary element to it...

thomas, Monday, 15 November 2004 16:00 (twenty years ago)

Many x-posts, Blount otm.

Pulp's Glamour wasn't about cigarette holders etc. It was always about Queen Mum ashtrays, paisley carpets and Friday night tarts. I think it became more prevailent as the Different Class cheques started rolling in as they were covering their backs after being the band who for years were all about a quite un-glamourous and localised view of a certain city. When the band went huge I think they did adopt Ironic Glamour rather than Glamour.

Blur were always suspect, and as such their social-commentary stuff seemed a lot more po-faced and silly - they were keeping up the Cockerny Lads thing in their music when they were hanging with Hirst, and whats more those who weren't the myriad of 6th form girls who bought the albums could vaguely remember them being some shoegaze footnote. There was a sense of opportunism about them, and the pretty boy faces and cheeky grins didn't help. Hmm, not explaining myself well here so, hey.

All this aside, I'll still go with the point that Country House is a rumpy-pumpy tuba hoedown and Common People has the neccesary adrenaline.

Bernard the Butler (Lynskey), Monday, 15 November 2004 16:07 (twenty years ago)

Re: Blount's point

Therein lies the difference and therein - Cocker's lyrics always had an undercurrent of anger, disaffection and frustration to them, whether sexual, social or whatever. Albarn's always seemed to be saying little more than "ooh isn't this a frightful pickle". His near-refusal to write first person just reinforced it. Jarvis wasn't afraid to get inside his main character's point of view, usually with spot-on success. His characters made often embarrasing admissions, made mistakes, unforseen things happened to them. Damon's were pure Charactures who were perfect in their story and self, who rarely evolved during the song (the one exception I can think of is Tracy Jacks, and thats hardly Pulitzer character development). And whilst Damon's was a world of disaffected businessmen, quango's, mods and cockles with the odd bit of existentialist angst thrown in (hardly ever in the same track), Jarvis's was a world of teenager's frightened sexuality, penniless students, dirty old men and confused housewives.

Hang on, I don't actually like or care about either band . . . I'm off the pub.

Bernard the Butler (Lynskey), Monday, 15 November 2004 16:21 (twenty years ago)

i wonder if Albarn feared 'first person' because he actually was worried it would make people hate him even more and made a judgement that acting more as chirpy observant commentator would be more diffusive...kinda backfired i guess.

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 17:05 (twenty years ago)

I'm not sure about this "when Damon pretends to be working class, it's not convincing" talk is coming from. As mentioned upthread, Damon shied away from ever writing in first person, and his "character" songs (all 8473 of them) were about either middle class buffoons ("Tracy Jacks") or spoiled kids ("Jubilee").

"Country House" was their tongue-in-cheek tribute to Dave Balfe, the label head with whom they'd had a years-long love hate relationship. And that's what made it an unspectacular Blur single -- did we really have to hear "character" song #2894? What differentiated this one from all the others Blur recorded?

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Monday, 15 November 2004 17:18 (twenty years ago)

Common People is so much smarter than Country House.

Mr. Snrub, Monday, 15 November 2004 17:23 (twenty years ago)

"character" song #2895 = "Ernold Same" i.e "We got to stop doing these". Which they did.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 15 November 2004 17:27 (twenty years ago)

No, one of them. He wasn't saying he was one of the common people. He was saying She thought he was...

If he's not a common person, then why is it that he understands "what it means to live your life with no meaning or control and with nowhere else to go" (and why was she slumming with him in the first place?)

'Common People' made fun of all the (sometimes wide-eyed) European foreigners that had started to arrive in greater numbers to live and study in the UK in the early 90s..it definitely had a xenophobic, reactionary element to it...

Exactly. "Everybody hates a tourist"? God forbid.

Common People is so much smarter than Country House.

I'll agree to this, and that's the difference between the two songs--because "Common People" is so much more enjoyable executed that "Country House," people overlook the fact that it's really the same type of song.

The Good Dr. Bill (Andrew Unterberger), Monday, 15 November 2004 17:40 (twenty years ago)

it definitely had a xenophobic, reactionary element to it

hmmm, not sure. if it wasn't for the 'she came from Greece' intro, would we even know this?

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 17:46 (twenty years ago)

One point that Common People tries to make, which sorta refutes the argument that Jarvis was posing, is that class doesn't just change if you pretend enough. Implicit in the idea that She couldn't be lower-class if she tried is the idea that he couldn't be upper-class if he tried - or at least it seems to me.

Sonny A. (Keiko), Monday, 15 November 2004 17:55 (twenty years ago)

And though he was writing the song about an earlier time in his life, this still makes his anger more genuine + believable. It's easy to relate to.

Sonny A. (Keiko), Monday, 15 November 2004 17:57 (twenty years ago)

yeah, and you might say this song is as much about deriding the 'proud to be working class' meme as it is deriding wealthy eurogeois types for buying 'ghetto chic' - because both can be equally absurd

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 18:04 (twenty years ago)

The "rum and coca-cola" line in Common People is (maybe) an allusion to the Lord Invader calypso song of the same name. Lyrics mix the tales of yanqui imperialism both economic and sexual:

If you ever go down Trinidad
They make you feel so very glad
Calypso sing and make up rhyme
Guarantee you one real good fine time

Drinkin' rum and Coca-Cola
Go down Point Koomahnah
Both mother and daughter
Workin' for the Yankee dollar

Since the Yankee come to Trinidad
They got the young girls all goin' mad
Young girls say they treat 'em nice
Make Trinidad like paradise

Drinkin' rum and Coca-Cola
Go down Point Koomahnah
Both mother and daughter
Workin' for the Yankee dollar

From Chicachicaree to Mona's Isle
Native girls all dance and smile
Help soldier celebrate his leave
Make every day like New Year's Eve

Drinkin' rum and Coca-Cola
Go down Point Koomahnah
Both mother and daughter
Workin' for the Yankee dollar

In old Trinidad, I also fear
The situation is mighty queer
Like the Yankee girl, the native swoon
When she hear der Bingo croon

Drinkin' rum and Coca-Cola
Go down Point Koomahnah
Both mother and daughter
Workin' for the Yankee dollar

Out on Manzanella Beach
G.I. romance with native peach
All night long, make tropic love
Next day, sit in hot sun and cool off

Drinkin' rum and Coca-Cola
Go down Point Koomahnah
Both mother and daughter
Workin' for the Yankee dollar


LSTD (answer) (sexyDancer), Monday, 15 November 2004 18:06 (twenty years ago)

Slightly off the point, but nonetheless apt - the photo of all the Live Aid people. Everyone has their arms over each others' shoulder..except Damon "no mates" Albran, who's looking up snarkily while answering a mobile phone. What a prick.
I don't think the "She came from Greece" line is xenophobic - if it's based on a real character, fair enough. Jarvis went off to live in Paris, so he's not exactly a Europhobe.

stew, Monday, 15 November 2004 22:18 (twenty years ago)

"Country House" is the better song musically. It has more chords, it is filled with a lot of references to the most typically English-sounding acts there have been, Madness and Kinks respectively. It is soo obviously fully pop (in the classic English sense, not recent "pop") without hardly any "rock" elements at all. Also it represented a well-deserved breakthrough for Madness as an influence on more recent indie pop. It also has some really great backing vocals, and a truly great middle 8. Not to mention the great singalong chorus, with certain football arena qualities to it (which is always a good good good thing)

"Common People" is OK, with possibly even stronger lyrics and a great video (like "Country House"), but like all other three chord songs it has its limitations. Pulp did better stuff both earlier and later.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 November 2004 22:25 (twenty years ago)

Also, writing about somebody in third person in a typically English way is never a bad thing. Ray Davies was of course the one and only master of that ability, but Damon Albarn occasionally had a thing for it during his mid 90s creative heyday.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 November 2004 22:28 (twenty years ago)


This is such a cliche about Ray Davies. You could fill a book with shit songs in this idiom however to refute your claim that it's "never a bad thing" I suggest "Maxwell's Silver Hammer", "Ob-la-di Ob-la-da" and "The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill". To the second claim that Davies is the "one and only master" I suggest "She's Leaving Home", "Eleanor Rigby", "Dr Robert", "Fool on the Hill", "Lady Madonna" "Sexy Sadie" and "Day Tripper".

everything, Monday, 15 November 2004 23:10 (twenty years ago)

Isn't the "everybody hates a tourist" bit about hating people who are tourists in other people's misery, and incidental to the fact that "she came from Greece". She's a student, not a tourist, in London, and I don't think the tenuous xenophobia claims upthread stand up at all.

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 15 November 2004 23:26 (twenty years ago)

Still Ray Davies has "A Well Respected Man", "Dedicated Follower Of Fashion" and the less well-known but possibly even greater and more heartfelt "She's Bought a Hat Like Princess Marina" to his credit. Certainly some of the greatest lyrics ever.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 November 2004 23:29 (twenty years ago)

By the end of the song it's the singer who wants to live with common people "like you"; it's highly unlikely that Jarvis Cocker would be unaware of how he might be implicated (by his own song) as a "tourist" himself.

Although "you will NEVER understand" sounds accusatory, it's not wholly an expression of class anger & recrimination. It's also sympathetic, regretful, regarding the inaccessibility of the object of desire in question. It romanticises "the common" into the uncommon, in the knowledge that in doing so it recapitulates the girl's "error". The "common people" both attract and repulse BOTH the characters in the song.

Also it is significantly better than "Country House".

RNSW (Neil Willett), Tuesday, 16 November 2004 07:35 (twenty years ago)

it's certainly COOLER than Country House

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Tuesday, 16 November 2004 10:29 (twenty years ago)

Well, I'm not a big fan of Pulp or Common People (most overrated song of the 90s) but then again, Country House has way too many haterz, I think it's the least favourite song of most Blur fanatics. Which is a bit unfair, it's not as bad as it's written off to be.

But I think Lynskey gets it on the rhythmic basis.

Common People has that throbbing, insistent disco beat, while Country House is all half-stymied oompah.

Oompah when done well can be big and brash and wonderful (Sunday Sunday and much of the rest of early Blur) but on Country House it just sounds disjointed. Which I think was the point, conceptually, but still. It makes it less enjoyable musically.

The Grain of Sand in Lambeth That Satan Cannot Find (kate), Tuesday, 16 November 2004 12:57 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.