― chaki, Sunday, 23 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tim, Sunday, 23 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Gage-o, Sunday, 23 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― todd burns, Sunday, 23 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Brock K., Sunday, 23 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― todd burns, Monday, 24 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Gage-o, Monday, 24 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― marek, Monday, 24 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tim, Monday, 24 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― jess, Monday, 24 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tim, Tuesday, 25 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I don't think your idea of street rap idioms going on in IDM, as facetious, as it sounded on paper is that far off from what the new American guard of IDM has in mind. I think Kid606, from his earlier releases, brought back a definite punk attitude, as well as Lesser. It doesn't seem like, to me, that the Europeans were ever interested in the cult of personality like the Americans, at least in regards to showing their face, unlike Richard D. James who would show his ugly mug and make up stories of sleeping 2 hours a day and having 20 albums worth of material in the can for release at any time. A shortness in press and a reluctance to talk about their music has sort have been my impression of Germans and some English IDM groups, while an eagerness and brashness seems to me to be the American style. So maybe it is more of a cult of personality that defines the American conception of the IDM artist as more of a rock star than an artist. I'm always reminded to the Cex track 'Fur Coat' when talking about this where he has a mock skit where 'micro-house' blew up and all of these IDM artists are at the MTV music awards instead of Britney and all of the pop stars of today. Is that far off? Yes. Is a less faceless and more pronounced genre of IDM coming up? Yes. As long as it continues to get in with Bjork, I'm sure Madonna will pick up where she left off in a couple of years, since she seems to latch on to the current trends a few years late, anyhow. Back to the original topic...you have to look farther than Warp to find IDM now. Because Warp was amazing in 95 as Momus indirectly contends. But today? Just another label, IMO.
― todd burns, Tuesday, 25 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― chiznaki, Friday, 28 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tim, Friday, 28 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― todd burns, Friday, 28 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
it would also seem likely that the purely mathematical base of IDM (autechre etc) will continue to lose some ground as people gravitate both to more easily-digestible or melodic variations, or more innovative genre-cutting strands of the movement.
and yes, IDM is a truly abominable name. but only if you consider what it actually stands for...
― david, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
He says hes always done both. He just doesnt release everything. He's been jamming in bands with his mates and making electronic music since his early teens. I heard Yee King and him jam sometimes.
― chaki, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― bob snoom, Thursday, 3 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Jeff W, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ben Williams, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Plus, there's literally hundreds of IDM producers working in this general area *right now*, so if the area hasn't been explored enough it's not due to a lack of artists trying (or, presumably, an audience listening).
Oh, and "insatiable desire for the new" = something of a myth, I think. House has barely changed in fifteen years and it's still the most popular form of dance music in the UK. Boards & Canada and Plaid are perhaps the most classicist of the Warp artists and (apart from Prefuse 73) have received the most respect recently. Dance music has just as much reverence for the past and emphasis on continuity as any other area of music, and if anything it only grows stronger as time passes.
― Tim, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Yes... but this is because dance music is formally exhausted. Doesn't mean there isn't good new stuff coming out all the time, but that frisson (however temporary and superficial it may be) that only the shock of the new can provide is gone... so naturally, tradition comes to the fore (it's really time for a dance music canon).
In the case of IDM... well, it's always worked within a more limited space than most other forms of dance music. (It's defined by the fact that you can't dance to it, for a start.) The only new thing that's happened with IDM in the last 3 years or so is glitch; lovely, but not what you'd call a broad palette. Has anyone really done anything with glitch that Oval didn't cover with 94 Diskont? I like Jan Jenelik, Fennesz et al, but ultimately I don't know that I need to keep more than a couple of those discs around the house... they're not "all the same" by any means, but they're not particularly different either...
― Ben Williams, Saturday, 5 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Actually, this is more of a problem than with most artforms when you're dealing with a music in which form has for the most part been defined as content (the fact that this is less true for house than, say, techno being one reason for its longevity)...
― Tracer Hand, Saturday, 5 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Jeff W (genrephobe and proud), Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
And the artists have to take some of the responsibility for being separate from jungle, because a) said separation was their schtick to begin with, and b) their music is largely unsuited for dancing (Gareth says drill & bass club-nights can go off, but I've never been to one where more than one or two people actually used the dancefloor, and even then it wouldn't have been AT or Squarepusher who was playing).
― Tim, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Barnaby (Barnaby), Sunday, 15 June 2003 18:36 (twenty-two years ago)
oh, the side splitting humour.
― frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Sunday, 15 June 2003 19:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― chaki (chaki), Sunday, 15 June 2003 22:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mr. Diamond (diamond), Sunday, 15 June 2003 22:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mike Taylor (mjt), Monday, 16 June 2003 03:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 16 June 2003 03:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― gaz (gaz), Monday, 16 June 2003 03:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mike Taylor (mjt), Monday, 16 June 2003 03:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Millar (Millar), Monday, 16 June 2003 03:12 (twenty-two years ago)
And is it because the era of the laptop auteur is over?
― Mike Taylor (mjt), Monday, 16 June 2003 03:13 (twenty-two years ago)
etcetcet
Round and roundWith love we'll find a way just give it timeRound and roundWhat comes around goes aroundI'll tell you why-rattm.
― msp, Monday, 16 June 2003 03:47 (twenty-two years ago)
even warp and tigerbeat6 have found new ways to move on....m.
― msp, Monday, 16 June 2003 03:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Millar (Millar), Monday, 16 June 2003 03:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― chaki (chaki), Monday, 16 June 2003 07:27 (twenty-two years ago)
i like my tinkly bonk music and can scratch my chin along with the best of them, but churning out the same old same old isn't doing anyone any favours.
― frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Monday, 16 June 2003 08:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 16 June 2003 09:19 (twenty-two years ago)
probably not.
― frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Monday, 16 June 2003 09:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 16 June 2003 10:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 16 June 2003 10:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Old Fart!!! (oldfart_sd), Monday, 16 June 2003 11:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 16 June 2003 11:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Old Fart!!! (oldfart_sd), Monday, 16 June 2003 11:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 16 June 2003 12:28 (twenty-two years ago)
what you should make of that is the correct assumption that µ-ziq has not changed his sound appreciably since 1996 (much like everybody else)
― Millar (Millar), Monday, 16 June 2003 21:35 (twenty-two years ago)
IDM?!?!? Isn't that the thing where they have some tinkly New Age tune, and stick about 5 different jungle records going at 10 times the speed on top of it?!??!?
― Old Fart!!!
― ǝɟɟɐzǝɟ (☪), Saturday, 13 December 2008 11:10 (seventeen years ago)
He said that like it was a bad thing.
Here is the clue: manifesto of infinite progression = bad thing. Records that sound like dope hybrids of acid, John Zorn and post-Bitches Miles = good thing. Records that sound boring = bad thing.
― Me and Ruth Lorenzo, Rollin' in the Benzo (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 13 December 2008 12:44 (seventeen years ago)
Just to get it out of the way, half the people on The Intelligent Dance Music mailing list hated the name from before "IDM" entered the critical vocabulary. The nomenclature alone was enough to raise the ire of most critics that covered electronica. There are some artists within the field (Ae) whose recordings may very well be viewed in a hundred years like the developmental arc of important academic composers. Its a narrow appreciation, but its more of a legacy than most outsider electronica gets.
But the music itself just got progressively insular and resistent to hybridization (which is the death knell for just about any electronic genre, excepting house for some reason). The fans migrated over to microhouse/mnml, which someone here glibly but correctly described as "the IDM its okay to like".
― derelict, Saturday, 13 December 2008 15:34 (seventeen years ago)
Frankly, I love IDM (and frankly think it's silly that people are still hung up on the name) inflected microhouse and techno, and would take it over soul/deep oriented sounds any day of the week. I really very much resent the notion that this (or any sort of sound design oriented "computer" music) is inherently bad. Just because it became insular and alienating (as a professor I had would always say w/r/t to modernist literature - which this parallels well enough this - it lost the audience), really shouldn't mean it has to be thrown out. Granted I'm talking more about method and sound design practises than the actual product.
― Girlfriend, you've been scooped like ice cream (mehlt), Saturday, 13 December 2008 17:29 (seventeen years ago)
I was listening to some Boxcutter not too long ago, really crazy vaguely drill n' bass type stuff, fused with more contemporary dubstep sounds, and it just sounded fantastic to me.
― Girlfriend, you've been scooped like ice cream (mehlt), Saturday, 13 December 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)