can someone tell me why 2001 was 'the best year for music in recent memory'?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
because i don't quite agree.

maura, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

unless you mean that 2001 signaled the beginning of the fall of the record industry empire, i would argue that 2001 was maybe okay for music, but not rip-roaring or anything. there were lots of pleasures that were fleeting (and while pop connoiseurs might argue that the 'fleeting pleasure' is the hallmark of a good pop song, i would argue that a lot of the pop songs i heard didn't even work on that level—merely rubbing the surface of many a pop song wiped away any fleeting sense of pleasure i felt from them) and lots of exasperation-inducing moments ('what's going on,' the 'raw rock' spaghetti being thrown at the wall and slipping down over and over and over again, the further rolling back of male/female roles, with special emphasis on the virgin/whore dichotomy/blend).

is the trumpeting of 2001 as 'exciting,' etc sheer hype, or hope? i would say it's a mix of the two, with more emphasis on the latter. (think pangloss.)

maura, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Perhaps because most record reviewers have a selective Attention Defecit Disorder.

Gage-o, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, sheeit, this is just a matter of personal preference, innit? (Not to defuse any hot arguements or anything, which I'm sure won't happen.) (And not that I have anything to add to this thread except my own feelings re: this year, which I'd say was a fine one, yessir.)

David Raposa, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i assume that maura is calling me out on me calling out that hosebag sweeny. ;)

i called it the best year for music in recent memory because when i was putting together my own faves of 2001 list (note how i didnt say best of) i had 50 fucking cds and almost as many singles, more than any year in easily the last six. (and thats not even counting the reissues.) i have not been monitoring the ups and downs of the music industry proper, the sales figures or the market trends. and frankly i dont wanna. it would more than likely depress me and i would recant. maybe the whole entertainment industry is about to collapse in a toilet of it's own making. on one hand: yay! bye bye. no..wait...that's the only hand. so maybe - for you, for everyone else - it wasnt such a good year. but compared to the scorched earth policy advertised by that fucking salon essay it was the land of milk and honey.

jess, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

A good question that needed to be asked.

As I stated in a thread in June, I think the quality of music overall actually stays the same from year to year due to the overwhelming number of records released in every imaginable genre. The real question is what the individual listener actually had an opportunity to hear, not whether what was out there was good or not. How can somebody call a year in music "good" or "bad" when there were 50,000 records released and s/he only heard 200 - 300 at the very most?

Mark, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

ILM 'multiplied by' MP3 = 2001

K-reg, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, "good year in music" / "bad year in music" is always going to be a discussion of trends more so than quality, isn't it? In any year, there will be enough brilliant records out there somewhere that you can spend all 12 months listening to top- notch material and thus deem the year wonderful. "Good year" / "bad year" discussion always seems to be more of a big picture, a question of whether this year seemed promising, whether it was exciting, whether it seemed important. It's an attempt not to rate the quality of the year's releases, but to historicize. To put it another way, an (American) football game that ends 49-0, with seven spectacular, amazing touchdowns, might not get called a "good game" -- but a 35-34 nailbiter would be, not because it's substance was better but because it was exciting to watch. And I don't think looking at "the year in music" this way can be tagged as just "rockist": a year-end good/bad wrap-up of pretty much anything falls into the same line of thinking, almost by definition. The point isn't to statistically average out the quality of the year's releases and call 2001 a 6.2 kind of year, it's to see some sort of greater meaning among the whole.

Accepting this logic, I can see why someone might be a tad disappointed by this year. It's a bit difficult to get away from one's personal experience when talking about this, but I didn't see a lot of really invigorating things happening this year -- plenty of great, great releases, but very little that seemed like a great door being kicked down, very little that would make you, twenty years later, feel happy to have been around listening to music in this particular year. The only place I felt that -- and this was possibly just the IL* influence in effect -- was in terms of pop, which I think came through this year feeling very strong and very vital. (If nothing else, a superb indicator of this is the number of new and at least mildly interesting pop stars to emerge and take root this year.)

That's completely just me, though -- and the first part is not really a complaint, as I've had a great year of genre expansion and new discoveries. But, I dunno ... granting that we're talking in that historical sense, what big wonderful developments have you guys come across this year?

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Nitsuh, just when the hell are you gonna start a blog? I think I'm speaking for a few of us... must it be done by petition?

Andy K., Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'll sign the petition.

Sean, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Agree with Mark: No human being can possibly listen to enough music to judge that a given year is good or bad, in the objective sense.

It can be interesting to hear about why a particular person had a good or bad year, when taken in personal context and not filled with snide Salon-style sniping and bile.

But given that there's so much out there to hear, it's more useful to assume (or imagine, or pretend) that this year is in fact objectively the best year for music ever. Use that as a launching point for exploration: if we don't feel like it was the best year ever, maybe that means we need to open our ears to something new, hear more records, or different records.

This attitude seems to me more fun, and more likely to lead to new discoveries, than saying "bad year" and pressing skip.

Ian, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Nu—metal went from frat-boy party rock (Limp Bizkit, Kid Rock) to dark, family-hating grunts (Staind, Slipknot). This transformation of the youth means everything, dark clouds are on the horizon.

Andy, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It's pretty hard to say if a year is better than another, because over time it gets hard to remember what actually happened each year. Afterall, it's not like musical trends work themselves out and are wrapped up in a nice package at year's end, and start afresh the next. Time doesn't work that way obviously. I usually just try to think of the past year and my general impression of it and decide if it was good or not-so-good (as someone pointed out this is mostly personal since in any given year there are bound to be plenty of great releases). But there are trends that can make a year in music more or less enjoyable, and obviously there are years when more of your favorite bands happen to release albums. For me, I'd say that in the mainstream or "pop" (not my pop tho) world, the year was a ucky as they all are, the trends are all awful: nu-metal (sux), rap (unlistenable), boy bands/girl divas (horrible - this is what soul & rnb turned into?), etc. etc. The last year I can actually remember feeling excited about chart music was maybe 1989 when the Cure and Love & Rockets both had #1 singles I think (in the US). Even when grunge broke it did nothing for me since so much of it was stillborn (if you had been into grunge, it was already pretty much over by the time Nevermind came out). Still, in my "pop" world this was a good year: A lot of labels I like had consistently strong releases, there was sort of a culmination of the indiepop/retro synth thing going on (a lot of good records came out this year, i think it is pretty much played out now), similarly the renewed interest in El Records and the like seemed to peak this year, there were a lot of noteworthy reissues, and there were some decent new dance sounds emerging amid the petering out of the trance trend (sorry, I liked trance but it has gotten boring,..) Also, I got a lot of stuff, and wasn't often disappointed. If I had been, I would have gotten less (tending to get gun shy if there are too many letdowns). I mean, I'm sure I got over 100 albums that were released this year that will end up being keepers. SO I figure it was a pretty good year...

g, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

should read: "...in the mainstream or "pop" (not my pop tho) world, the year was as sucky as they all are..."

btw, what if anything do people use to spell check yr ILM posts? I am a terrible typist...

g, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

didnt nu metal go from dark family hating stuff (korn) to party music then back again.

chaki, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes Chaki - I was about to post that thought as well. (And anyways if we presume that the rise of nu-metal and punk-pop are connected, we'd also have to factor in the rise of Sum 41 and continuing ascendancy of Blink 182).

Tim, Wednesday, 26 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Re: Nitsuhblog. I don't want to distract him from his novel.

N., Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I was initially thinking that it'd been a terribly grim year for music, and then I made my list of best-of-the-year nominees and boy did it go on for a while. I mean, any year that produces "Stroke of Genius" can't be the worst. And _Een Rondje Holland_? _Plays Well_? I'm happy to be alive 'cause it means I can hear them!

But I have to agree w/ Maura etc. that there's not a New Thing that I'm really excited about--that is, there were few non-reissues I heard this year that made me want MORE STUFF LIKE THIS! RIGHT NOW! the way that, say, hip-hop in general affected me in '88 or the !!! 12" did a couple of years ago...

Douglas, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

What Jess said really. And I noticed around April that I wasn't listening to any old records any more just going to the shops like a maniac and returning with another collection of great new music. No Nitsuhian big doors being kicked in to be sure but just a feeling that there was far more interesting and good music to enjoy since maybe 95/96 maybe even 91. But then again 2001 overall was a pretty ace year for me. Maybe that counts too?

Omar, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

six years pass...

I just went to the barber's and 'Can't Get You Out Of My Head' was playing on a screen. I was slightly enthralled, out of the corner of my eye, by Kylie Minogue.

Later 'If You're Not The One' came on and I was reminded of how I once had to stop and hang around a market stall where that song was playing, so I could hear it to the end. But maybe that wasn't 2001. Still, it was a earlier-00s pop #1.

the pinefox, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:05 (eighteen years ago)

2001 was pretty good. Depends what kinda stuff you're talking about tho...

Bodrick III, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:53 (eighteen years ago)

'If You're Not The One' came on and I was reminded of how I once had to stop and hang around a market stall where that song was playing, so I could hear it to the end

This is inconceivable. I would pay money to not hear this song ever again.

ledge, Thursday, 20 March 2008 17:09 (eighteen years ago)

pinefox is completely right here, i am on the verge of tears or should be.

or something, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:23 (eighteen years ago)

2001 was a fun year to be reading ILM that's for sure.

Mark Rich@rdson, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:34 (eighteen years ago)

Hot Albums

1. Linkin Park - Hybrid Theory
2. Britney Spears - Britney
3. Backstreet Boys - Black & Blue
4. Enya - A Day Without Rain
5. Janet Jackson - All For You
6. Blink-182 - Take Off Your Pants And Jacket
7. Alicia Keys - Songs in A Minor
8. Destiny's Child - Survivor
9. Creed - Weathered
10. Aaliyah - Aaliyah
11. 'N Sync - Celebrity
12. Staind - Break The Cycle
13. Nickelback - Silver Side Up
14. System of a Down - Toxicity
15. Pink - M!ssundaztood
16. Eminem - The Marshall Mathers LP
17. P.O.D. - Satellite
18. Michael Jackson - Invincible
19. Jennifer Lopez - J.Lo
20. Necrophagist - Onset Of Putrefaction

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 21 March 2008 00:01 (eighteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_100_No._1_Hits_of_2001_%28USA%29

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 21 March 2008 00:02 (eighteen years ago)

2001 sucked

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 21 March 2008 00:02 (eighteen years ago)

this^^

banriquit, Friday, 21 March 2008 00:04 (eighteen years ago)

Onset Of Putrefaction is classic

latebloomer, Friday, 21 March 2008 00:05 (eighteen years ago)

2001 was a lousy year in almost every respect (rip a.c.c.)

omar little, Friday, 21 March 2008 00:06 (eighteen years ago)

I am genuinely agog at the high position of Enya there.

In canon-building terms, 2002 has surely trumped 2001? It's hard to think of any other year that compares, really.

Matt DC, Friday, 21 March 2008 00:07 (eighteen years ago)

1987. 1988. 1989.

banriquit, Friday, 21 March 2008 00:08 (eighteen years ago)

Enya is one of the best albums on that list!

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 21 March 2008 00:08 (eighteen years ago)

sad but true

omar little, Friday, 21 March 2008 00:20 (eighteen years ago)

10. Aaliyah - Aaliyah

Tape Store, Friday, 21 March 2008 00:21 (eighteen years ago)

wait how the hell did Necrophagist make that list

J0hn D., Friday, 21 March 2008 04:49 (eighteen years ago)

<3<3<3<3 2001

The Reverend, Friday, 21 March 2008 05:01 (eighteen years ago)

No. Cause it wasn't. 2002 was (as in best since 1996, that is)

Geir Hongro, Saturday, 22 March 2008 00:50 (seventeen years ago)

haters are fucking insane

blueski, Saturday, 22 March 2008 01:16 (seventeen years ago)

What is so canonical about 2002? According to either Matt or Geir standards?

I thought the consensus was that 2002 was a great year for singles but not so much for albums... Whereas 2001 had both in spades.

Tim F, Saturday, 22 March 2008 06:34 (seventeen years ago)

It's probably reflective of more recent obsessions on my part but 2002 now seems like this horribly strange year in between 9/11 and the invasion of Iraq, and everything else just looming in the background, gearing up...

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 22 March 2008 07:05 (seventeen years ago)

2001 was ok. If only every year could include an album as brilliant as Discovery...

billstevejim, Monday, 24 March 2008 01:05 (seventeen years ago)

C'mon and kick me

billstevejim, Monday, 24 March 2008 01:05 (seventeen years ago)

My top thirty albums for that year would be something like:

Discovery
Iron Flag
Rooty
Aaliyah
Ayia Napa 2001
The Blueprint
Fever
Total 3
Miss E... So Addictive
The Hot Shots II
Revelling/Reckoning
Broken Silence
Superlongevity
Rock Action
Vespertine
Hypercity
The Cold Vein
The Sound of the Pirates II
Tarantula
Bodily Functions
We Love Life
Is This It?
Whatever
Survivor
Amnesiac
In Search Of...
Pop Ambient 2001
Wanderlust
Geogaddi
Dark Days, Bright Nights

I'd really struggle to come up with as strong a list for any other year this decade.

2000 was a much stronger year for albums than I realised at the time, too.

Tim F, Monday, 24 March 2008 08:43 (seventeen years ago)

^^^^
proof

or something, Monday, 24 March 2008 09:09 (seventeen years ago)

2001 signaled the beginning of the fall of the record industry empire

before opening this thread I assumed it was started this year. so ^^ is prescient, as obvious as it seemed at the time to anyone listening to music on their computer, or even to me! yet in 2001 the bizzers and mainstream critics were burrowing deep in their holes. 'the men don't know but the lil girls understand'

m coleman, Monday, 24 March 2008 11:25 (seventeen years ago)

come to think of it, I think it's odd to compare years of pop music. I can't imagine why 2001 would be better or worse than 2002 or 2003, really. I was probably listening to similar records in all of them. The main differences between years, I suppose, are a) the odd record comes out that distinguishes a year (but even these things are hard to pin down: 69 Love Songs is a case in point, people probably can't even agree when it was released, let alone when it impacted on them), b) we change, and we have contingently different experiences of various instances of pop.

But otherwise I probably couldn't really say any year this decade has been better than any other for pop.

the pinefox, Monday, 24 March 2008 11:32 (seventeen years ago)

Bands reformed
Devourment
Electric Light Orchestra (with new members except for original members, Jeff Lynne and Richard Tandy)
Level 42

Monkees
Roxy Music
Zebra

kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 24 March 2008 12:04 (seventeen years ago)

What is so canonical about 2002? According to either Matt or Geir standards?

Lots of great albums by really good veteran acts that had been around for ages. The music the kids are into hasn't been worthy of attention since the mid 80s anyway, with a possible exception for the mid 90s Britpop boom.

Geir Hongro, Monday, 24 March 2008 16:12 (seventeen years ago)

2002 also saw a slight improvement in chart pop, though, as R&B and hip-hop - at least here in Europe - got less dominant and was partly replaced by 80s influence electro pop and Blondie-influenced "punk pop".

Geir Hongro, Monday, 24 March 2008 16:14 (seventeen years ago)

The music the kids are into hasn't been worthy of attention since the mid 80s anyway I was a kid.

-- Geir Hongro, Monday, March 24, 2008 4:12 PM (2 minutes ago)

jim, Monday, 24 March 2008 16:16 (seventeen years ago)

geirbot.jpg

sleeve, Monday, 24 March 2008 16:18 (seventeen years ago)

Daft Punk's "Discovery" came out this year, so it was a good year.

Bodrick III, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:23 (seventeen years ago)

eleven years pass...

The top ten doesn't reflect how good this year was.

recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 April 2019 00:43 (six years ago)

What a great year!

Lifehouse – Hanging by a Moment

I luuuurrved this song (only semi-ironically). It became a gag with my significant other; I would belt the heck out of the chorus at the slightest provocation.

get your hand outta my pocket universe (morrisp), Tuesday, 2 April 2019 03:28 (six years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.