Are you interested in the “uninformed” opinions about music?
How do you know when you've reached the point that you DO know enough to comment?
Do you consider yourself an expert in any area of music criticism/knowledge/whatever?
If not expert, which areas to you consider your "specialties," where you ALWAYS have enough background to engage in discussion?
― Mark, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― ethan, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Country on here I guess. Once I'm not with you fuckers and I'm out in the real world I'm an expert on all music.
― Ronan, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
2. I readily admit that i know too much about Zoot Horn Rollo, the evolution of Neil Peart's drumkit, and the original electronics that David Tudor built for Cage compositions. Too too too much.
3. I am a ninja.
― Gage-o, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Simon, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― dleone, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― g, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― helenfordsdale, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Re: the question ... I think the opinions of the "uninformed" can be hugely valuable so long as they're clearly tagged as both (a) opinions, and (b) "uninformed." Surely it can help lend new perspective to a heated analytical discussion when someone comes along and says, "Well, I know nothing about this, but I've always felt like ..."
I can't really think of any reasonably broad topics in which I consider myself an "expert." This is obviously quite relative to one's company, though, right?
― Nitsuh, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
As a side note, the beginning of this thread reads like this board ought to be renamed ILN, and I count myself among one of the Nitsuh fans (to be honest, I've been admiring his writing since whenever it was he used to post on the indiepop list). So tell us Nitsuh, is there anywhere else we can read your writing (aside from the reviews on AMG, which I know you've discounted in the past). And if not, why?
― Miranda, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― daria gray, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― bnw, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tim, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― anthony, Thursday, 27 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mr Noodles, Friday, 28 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― sundar subramanian, Friday, 28 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
However what I enjoy most on ILM isn’t merely informative ‘knowledge displays’ - e.g. Kompact and the Cologne techno scene - but equally as important the thrill when a contributor offers a completely unexpected perspective on an otherwise familiar record or act- e.g. Robin Carmody on Imagination’s ‘Illusion’, or Marcello on Dollar (both inspiring purchases). After all this group isn’t called I Know A Lot Music but I Love Music. The best writing AFAIC comes from those able to share their passion in an entertaining, thought provoking, and original way.
― stevo, Friday, 28 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom, Friday, 28 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I chose to submit an answer to this thread at the point I felt an opinion brewing inside of me. I think the desire to contribute is the only qualifying factor anyone EVER needs to participate in a forum. And in the same breath, the very subjectivity of the issue sort of renders the question irrelevant.
I'm going to back these people who are proudly "uninformed" in their offerings to this forum. It's far too easy for us to buy into the peculiarly western cult of knowledge - of the "expert" - to distance ourselves from our topic, and to kick around our words as if they were not our own.
Somewhere along the way on our epic rational voyage up our own western arses, we've forgotten that mucic is unavoidably about being human, long before we corrupt it with the need to question and measure whether we each might know enough FACTS about music to earn a voice.
As if anyone could ever know enough FACTS. Facts and knowledge are dubious at best. They're infinite, they change and they're not actually useful on their own. Generally, they're a bad investment.
Music is a tool. It's a language. It's a window for us to share our experiences. Isn't there something dangerously self-referential about objectifying art? Suddenly we individuals aren't enough of and within ourselves - we're asked to validate our feelings with KNOWLEDGE which can be acquired and lost just as easily and superficially as anything else in this market culture we live in.
"As a side note, the beginning of this thread reads like this board ought to be renamed ILN"
- I Love Nothing?
― Stephen Stockwell, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ian M, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)