Its champions often uphold an ideal of a self-contained musical experience, a long musical work somewhat akin to a symphony, suite, or opera, but few albums seem to approach this ideal. I never quite found Sgt. Pepper's to be as unified as folks say it is, nor do I quite get the "concept" (the Lonely Hearts Club band is singing all of the songs? And?). Pink Floyd is more successful in that they know how to weave songs into one another, recapitulate themes, etc. Pet Sounds succeeds in that it sustains a certain sound, mood, and a sort of adolescenct love/growing pains theme. Gang of Four's "Entertainment" does the same with anxiety about entrapment in a bourgeoise lifestyle. Yes's "Close to the Edge" almost takes the single piece of music idea too far.
But most bands don't seem to be able to pull off the concept album/unified work thing. First of all, unlike symphonies, albums are usually generated first as individual songs, and stitching them together with nice transitions doesn't conceal this. Themed concept albums like Sufjan Stevens's Michigan too often fall back on gimmickry, and rock operas ... let's not go there. Furthermore, most rock and pop musicians just don't have the formal training to write an effective 40-70 minute unified musical work (by which I mean them no disrespect).
More often, great albums are simply collections of songs that represent a period or moment in an artists career. They might have a unified sound, but it's really a stretch to think of them as musical wholes.
If anything, the iPod might leave only the truly unified albums standing -- maybe I'd rather not listen to After The Gold Rush or The Blueprint all the way through, for example, but Dark Side is better intact.
― Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 06:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bumfluff, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 06:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Shmool McShmool (shmuel), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 07:47 (twenty-one years ago)
what will they think of next..
― reo, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 07:52 (twenty-one years ago)
I think you are wrong here. I think most do. It's just that they don't do this as much.
Possibly, but just because they don't tell a story from beginning to end, doesn't mean that there is no logical sequence. How many tracks work in context, and do not work played on their own?
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 08:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 09:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Cheek0 (Cheek0), Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Masked Gazza, Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Masked Gazza, Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Masked Gazza, Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:55 (twenty-one years ago)
Bloody Cds. Albums should be 10 songs 40-45 minutes tops. 80 minute CDs = 2x more filler. Bah!
― Ben Dot (1977), Thursday, 2 December 2004 02:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 2 December 2004 02:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 2 December 2004 02:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 2 December 2004 02:12 (twenty-one years ago)
Ipods dont' really change the way people feel about whole albums. - now there are completeist downloaders. rather than record collectors.
― Savin All My Love 4 u (Savin 4ll my (heart) 4u), Thursday, 2 December 2004 02:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 2 December 2004 02:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 2 December 2004 02:48 (twenty-one years ago)
I kind of think I've overdone it a bit. I'm so track-focussed these days, I've kind of started believing albums that I'll love from start to finish won't be made anymore.
In this new environment, I love music more than I have ever done, but the loss of the album experience must count as the downside, I guess. I think the problem lies, as well with the flexibility of mp3 listening itself, in having too much new stuff coming in (both directly and indirectly as a result of the internet) to have the time to get to know albums. That's why I don't understand those who are even worse than I am, buying dozens and dozens of albums a year. They are often the people who go on about albums being important, but I don't see where they fit in the multiple repeat listens that the important albums in my life have required. Most of the albums I really love, and know inside out, were bought when I was a kid and hadn't got the money to buy many records.
Albums I have that relationship with have slowed down to about one a year now, for me. I just feel I haven't got room in my heart or head for any more than that. Maybe it's nothing to do with the internet. Maybe it's just getting older.
I was listening to Luomo's The Present Lover earlier for the first time, and maybe that would be a candidate. The lush, romantic sweep of it. Though I didn't finish listening to it - ha! I'd just bought three other albums (two were V/A comps) and needed to hear some of them. Plus I was downloading stuff.
So it goes.
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 December 2004 02:53 (twenty-one years ago)
There are very few albums on which I wouldn't at least eliminate one track, given the choice.
― Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 2 December 2004 02:57 (twenty-one years ago)
I'll sit in an old chair and soak them in, far away from my computer. Well, as far away as I can get in this room.
It's the awful halfway house of CD players that I want to confine to the dustbin.
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 December 2004 02:58 (twenty-one years ago)
On the other hand maybe "filler" tracks serve a useful purpose. Do lesser tracks help to lead into greater tracks and in a way cleanse the pallet between the peak moments? Is there room for experimentation without filler & b-sides?
I have a love/hate relationship with Sloop John B. So many times I simply skip past it without a second thought. But when I take the time to listen I actually enjoy the song. I imagine my experience of the album would be much different if I were listening on vinyl. In some ways that song is essential in its awkwardness.
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 2 December 2004 03:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 December 2004 12:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 2 December 2004 12:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 2 December 2004 13:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)
This game will never end.
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)
depends what this stat is based on but isn't it the case that there are more albums being MADE than ever before as well, so how does the ratio of sales vs releases balance against ratios of previous eras?
― Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)
do you mean out of the people that frequently download? if so i disagree. if not then yeh but MOST people (in the broadest sense) still don't download.
― Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:59 (twenty-one years ago)
In fact does anyone know of anywhere online where you can see CD sales breakdowns? (It'd come in very handy when the sort of 'Rock is Dead' or 'the kids are all into xxx these days' grand claims are made.)
― Bidfurd, Thursday, 2 December 2004 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 2 December 2004 17:05 (twenty-one years ago)
At this time of year, quite a lot.
Anyway, it seems that there is still a huge album buying age group from around 20 and up. The kids download tracks rather than albums, but this just means that the album market is changing, and that the album market will increasingly be aimed at a more grownup market.
Of course, what happens in the future depends whether today's 14-year-olds will still download tracks rather than buying albums at 24. I doubt they will.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 2 December 2004 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)
(I'm not even sure you're right about illegal downloaders - if those who dl stuff from me are anything to go by, it's usually individual tracks, but maybe that's a Limewire thing)
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 December 2004 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm not even sure you're right about illegal downloaders
most users i've encountered regardless of the software being used are sharing albums and i doubt that many of them ripped the CDs direct (tho i have in several cases).
― Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Thursday, 2 December 2004 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 2 December 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 2 December 2004 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 2 December 2004 17:30 (twenty-one years ago)