anyone heard it yet?
― piscesboy, Tuesday, 21 December 2004 15:10 (twenty years ago)
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 15:26 (twenty years ago)
― paulhw (paulhw), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 15:31 (twenty years ago)
― mark e (mark e), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 15:55 (twenty years ago)
― piscesboy, Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:10 (twenty years ago)
"Like Eating Glass" is pretty amazing, I haven't been able to stop listening to it all week. Probably the best song on the album.
― Matt Boch (Matt Boch), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 18:06 (twenty years ago)
I've got a big crush on this band.
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 21:27 (twenty years ago)
Wow, an NME-indie record in 2004 I'm not immediately predisposed to hate.
(That cover is rubbish though)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 23 December 2004 16:37 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 December 2004 16:40 (twenty years ago)
― tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Thursday, 23 December 2004 16:56 (twenty years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 23 December 2004 17:44 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 December 2004 18:14 (twenty years ago)
― Nancy Boy (Nancy Boy), Thursday, 23 December 2004 18:19 (twenty years ago)
― still bevens (bscrubbins), Thursday, 23 December 2004 19:01 (twenty years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 23 December 2004 19:06 (twenty years ago)
Posting images not working out..
― still bevens (bscrubbins), Thursday, 23 December 2004 19:08 (twenty years ago)
― I'm serious ... Ti-i-i-i-im (deangulberry), Thursday, 23 December 2004 19:08 (twenty years ago)
ihttp://www.drownedinsound.com/images/6959.jpg
It's a nice record!
― nabiscothingy (nory), Thursday, 23 December 2004 19:16 (twenty years ago)
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 23 December 2004 19:18 (twenty years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 23 December 2004 19:19 (twenty years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 23 December 2004 19:20 (twenty years ago)
― bloc party 4 life, Thursday, 23 December 2004 19:23 (twenty years ago)
― I'm serious ... Ti-i-i-i-im (deangulberry), Thursday, 23 December 2004 19:24 (twenty years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 23 December 2004 19:26 (twenty years ago)
― I'm serious ... Ti-i-i-i-im (deangulberry), Thursday, 23 December 2004 19:27 (twenty years ago)
Is there and old version as well?
― JoB (JoB), Thursday, 23 December 2004 20:28 (twenty years ago)
― nabiscothingy (nory), Thursday, 23 December 2004 21:00 (twenty years ago)
― Nancy Boy (Nancy Boy), Friday, 24 December 2004 03:03 (twenty years ago)
― Nancy Boy (Nancy Boy), Friday, 24 December 2004 03:04 (twenty years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 24 December 2004 03:10 (twenty years ago)
so franz ferdinand 2005 then....
― elwisty, Saturday, 25 December 2004 01:54 (twenty years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Saturday, 25 December 2004 05:27 (twenty years ago)
― splooge (thesplooge), Saturday, 25 December 2004 09:58 (twenty years ago)
Don't worry -- like the Rapture and Franz Ferdinand, I will grow to like them at the very moment ILM decides they suck.
― STOP WITH YOUR PTANS (natepatrin), Saturday, 25 December 2004 17:26 (twenty years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 26 December 2004 15:04 (twenty years ago)
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Sunday, 26 December 2004 15:07 (twenty years ago)
― jake b. (cerybut), Monday, 27 December 2004 00:32 (twenty years ago)
― elwisty, Monday, 27 December 2004 02:40 (twenty years ago)
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Monday, 27 December 2004 04:17 (twenty years ago)
― Crackity (Crackity Jones), Monday, 27 December 2004 15:53 (twenty years ago)
London Tube gigs = Dud x infinity
― elwisty, Monday, 27 December 2004 23:31 (twenty years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 10:01 (twenty years ago)
Can I be the first to mention late 90s R*d**h**d on this thread, if they were divested of much of the moping and kept the shimmering textures and guitars that don't sound like guitars and serrated Jonny Greenwood solos and good drums.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 12:36 (twenty years ago)
My favourite bit in there is the raygun sound that appears midway through the guitar solo in Positive Tension.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 12:42 (twenty years ago)
― Hari Ashurst (Toaster), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 16 January 2005 14:10 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 14 February 2005 04:42 (twenty years ago)
I have seen them twice and while the new stuff kills live it just never connected with me the way SA did.
-- BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, July 5, 2008 12:41 AM (2 days ago) Bookmark Link
this is otm
-----
really
-- The Brainwasher, Friday, July 4, 2008 11:00 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark Link
yes. i love this record very much
― J0rdan S., Monday, 7 July 2008 19:04 (seventeen years ago)
disappointed that this isn't a "hey guys...snakes on a plane!" revive
― some dude, Monday, 7 July 2008 19:07 (seventeen years ago)
idk their last album debuted at #2 in the uk and just outside the top 10 here, so we should probably save that for hot hot heat or the vines or something
― J0rdan S., Monday, 7 July 2008 19:11 (seventeen years ago)
mercury is a real mess
ok cap'n save-a-horrible band
― some dude, Monday, 7 July 2008 19:17 (seventeen years ago)
lol you like my brightest diamond
― J0rdan S., Monday, 7 July 2008 20:47 (seventeen years ago)
you shouldn't be using "you like horrible rock bands" as a zing in general
― J0rdan S., Monday, 7 July 2008 20:48 (seventeen years ago)
^ this is unforgivable btw
― Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 7 July 2008 20:50 (seventeen years ago)
A "discbox" for a single??!! http://blocparty.sandbag.uk.com/Store/DII-69-2-disc+set+and+membership.html
I like how the 12" is "heavy weight" but the 7" is "heavyweight".
This seems insane. Especially when odds are that this is going to be sonically horrendous, thus pointless to own on anything bar MP3.
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 07:09 (seventeen years ago)
eh
they've already released two separate one-off singles (iirc) and maybe they realized that the only people actually paying real money for them were diehards who would go in on something like a "discbox" for a (most definitely sonically horrendous) single
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 8 July 2008 07:28 (seventeen years ago)
i mean certainly there are bloc party fans out there who will pay 8 pounds for this + the opportunity to take place in nonsense like pre-ordering albums
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 8 July 2008 07:31 (seventeen years ago)
Especially when odds are that this is going to be sonically horrendous
just checking nick : is this a reference to the fact that jacknife lee is still involved with the production, or a general sweep at the band ?
― mark e, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 07:39 (seventeen years ago)
I don't know who's involved production wise, and obviously you can't really tell just off the website stream, but Mercury to me sounds like an almighty mush, and given past form I can't imagine this is going to sound like The Notwist or Shearwater in terms of levels and clarity once it's on CD.
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 07:51 (seventeen years ago)
One-off singles = Two More Years, Flux, and now this.
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 07:54 (seventeen years ago)
Little Thoughts too, yes? (although it was forcibly jammed on the US version of Silent Alarm)
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 08:03 (seventeen years ago)
Ah yes; didn't think of that one as it was prior to the debut album.
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 08:19 (seventeen years ago)
Then of course there's the debut EP, half of which got re-recorded and included on the debut album.
As a rule, I really like one-off singles.
I just listened to Flux (to contextualise, I'm listening to The Notwist a lot at the moment); it was fucking horrific. Made me feel ill. So I opened it in Audacity and had a look at the waveform. Solid blue bar approx 80% of the time. Urgh. I didn't get all the way through it, and it's given me a headache.
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 08:30 (seventeen years ago)
Sick you're as dull as Lex and Geir at this point.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 09:11 (seventeen years ago)
I appreciate that.
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 09:12 (seventeen years ago)
Sorry that was an open goal, but surely you would at least appreciate some occasions where a complete barrage of compressed synthetic noise is actually what a song NEEDS? Especially a song like Flux.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 09:15 (seventeen years ago)
I don't particularly like Flux but I can't for the life of me imagine wanting it to be more spacious or subtle.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 09:17 (seventeen years ago)
If the wave form causes you pain, turn it off...
― Mark G, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 09:19 (seventeen years ago)
You can have compressed synthetic noise and it not sound like Flux, though - Young Gods spring to mind, the first track on the last Acoustic Ladyland album, Breathe by Prodigy, shitloads of other things. I don't want everything to be spacious and subtle, with things like Flux I just want... some actual build & release, some physical impact in the low-end. It's just a mush with no definition and no excitement.
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 09:26 (seventeen years ago)
Accident & Emergency by Patrick Wolf.
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 09:29 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah but the difference between Flux and the songs you mention is that the band are rubbish at doing build and release - any production job would struggle to overturn that.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 09:30 (seventeen years ago)
The break at the end of So Here We Are disagrees with you, although not much else they've done disagrees.
I've talked in the past on ILE about reading something years ago about current directors growing up watching awful pan&scan videos of films and assuming that's how they were made initially, with all the random focus changes and camera movements and jerking and confusion, and that when these new guys go onto make their own films, that's what they do, so even the full shebang widescreen versions are crazily edited, jerky, confusing (especially action sequences), and I wonder if Bloc Party and Coldplay have grown up listening to Radio 1 and that's why their songs don't have any dynamic variance in them.
If something's going to be a constant barrage than I need, and I appreciate a lot of other people do not need, a degree of detail and texture to be involved with, to keep my attention, and Bloc Party haven't done that.
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 09:34 (seventeen years ago)
just heard the new single, awful.
― Bee OK, Thursday, 10 July 2008 05:02 (seventeen years ago)
I turned this off after hearing "my Mercury's in retrograde" for or five times and then the drums come in. Has anyone actually ever sat Kele down and said 'look, your lyrics are terrible, the harder you try the more embarrassing they are'.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 10 July 2008 08:51 (seventeen years ago)
They were just nonsensical enough to jive very very nicely with his wide-eyed delivery on the first album and become ignorable silliness that might JUST be profound if you were to pay attention when stoned. Everything past then has been awful.
― Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 10 July 2008 08:52 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah the first album lyrics just sort of slip past you, everything since has pretty much shouted in your face 'PAY ATTENTION TO ME I AM PROFOUND!' and they are all the worse for it.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 10 July 2008 08:55 (seventeen years ago)
i agree in principle but still think that their bigger issue is in shit like totally harnessing matt and not being able to write a decent ballad. the lyrics have been pretty embarrassing but endearingly so imo, and i hate this position usually, but i'm okay with kele just going all out with his im profound tendencies as compared to most other brit rock. then again im a fanboy so i could see how it would be obnoxious. i still think they are sonically interesting ("interesting" at bad points like 'mercury') which at least always keeps me optimistic.
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 10 July 2008 09:01 (seventeen years ago)
There was lots of "press" about the lyrics on the 2nd album being inspired by 'lots of nights on cocaine in Hoxton realizing how empty things are' or some such bullshit. And lots of pictures of him wearing a shirt reading "Eat Junk = Become Junk." Seriously, fuck the fuck off.
― Savannah Smiles, Thursday, 10 July 2008 09:04 (seventeen years ago)
"Eat Junk - Become Junk" is a Six.By Seven song. The moment I realised his lyrics were shite was the bit about being bought foie gras and or whatever.
The exciting thing about the first album was how it sounded both like a band playing live and being REALLY EXCITING (those drums! that guitar!), and also like a deliberately dense studio record. They seem to have lost that first part since, and I don't think they or their producers are subtle or talented enough to do the latter part properly yet.
― Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 10 July 2008 09:08 (seventeen years ago)
"Eat Junk - Become Junk" is a Six.By Seven song.
I didn't know that. But I'm sticking with 'fuck off' re: the sentiment.
― Savannah Smiles, Thursday, 10 July 2008 09:11 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ad9M1_-pEs
― Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 10 July 2008 09:13 (seventeen years ago)
Intimacy:
01 Ares 02 Mercury 03 Halo 04 Biko 05 Trojan Horse 06 Signs 07 One Month Off 08 Zephyrus 09 Better Than Heaven 10 Ion Square
― J0rdan S., Monday, 18 August 2008 20:35 (seventeen years ago)
^^don't have much faith, based on this tracklist
This is going to be even more pretentious than the last one isn't it? Except for One Month Off which will be the usual one moaning about how people have to go to work, and Better Than Heaven which will be the one that gets them on Radio 2.
― Matt DC, Monday, 18 August 2008 20:38 (seventeen years ago)
This is going to be even more pretentious than the last one isn't it?
"it's being described as 'wildly experimental' in parts and 'simply classic Bloc Party' in others."
so yes
― J0rdan S., Monday, 18 August 2008 20:39 (seventeen years ago)
the other day i was defending their future by saying that mercury was just a one off single that they put out just because they can, but i guess i took the loss there
i'm probably their biggest backer on this board but im kind of dreading hearing this
― J0rdan S., Monday, 18 August 2008 20:41 (seventeen years ago)
Playing this for the first time in ages. Stands up amazingly well.
― Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 6 January 2012 18:30 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah it's really good, back when Kele's lyrics didn't make any obvious sense.
― pandemic, Friday, 6 January 2012 18:32 (thirteen years ago)
Actually I'll play this now.
― pandemic, Friday, 6 January 2012 18:33 (thirteen years ago)
The three 'delicate' songs (Blue Light, This Modern Love, So Here We Are) are just absolutely beautiful.
― Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 6 January 2012 18:35 (thirteen years ago)
Did you ever write about this record when it came out?
― pandemic, Friday, 6 January 2012 18:38 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah, I reviewed it for Stylus. On iPhone so can't link but google will find it easy peasy.
― Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 6 January 2012 20:02 (thirteen years ago)
Actually there's a link up the thread.
http://www.stylusmagazine.com/review.php?ID=2746
― markers, Friday, 6 January 2012 20:14 (thirteen years ago)
Thx guys
― pandemic, Friday, 6 January 2012 21:05 (thirteen years ago)