That theory v. crunk n b's theory
GO
― David Allen (David Allen), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 17:26 (twenty years ago)
― Matt Boch (Matt Boch), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 18:54 (twenty years ago)
G Funk mixed with R and B, or Crunk mixed with R and B?
― David Allen (David Allen), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 19:00 (twenty years ago)
― adam... (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 19:12 (twenty years ago)
― Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Wednesday, 22 December 2004 03:28 (twenty years ago)
ciara alone is making crunk R&B great though. i just wish they didnt have annoying rappers on so many songs.
― splooge (thesplooge), Wednesday, 22 December 2004 11:49 (twenty years ago)
― scg, Wednesday, 22 December 2004 14:36 (twenty years ago)
i know all the other groups that have made stuff similar to crunk like 3-6 mafia, oomp camp, etc etc, and the newer songs like never scared that are crunk songs, but crunk is regarded as lil jon's thing, and only his, even by people that work with him, like pitbull and ying yang twins. theyre rappers, lil jon doesnt really rap in the conventional sense. jon might feature on salt shaker, but its not a crunk song. ditto for trick daddys lets go.
and as far as g-funk, who is ever going to listen to any of the stuff warren g produced outside of his own album a decade ago? good as dj quik/tash/kurupt/daz's stuff was, the west coast has become heavily insulated, because no radically new elements have come out of that region since the mid-late 90s. the dre comment was a bit of an exaggeration, i admit.
― splooge (thesplooge), Wednesday, 22 December 2004 14:47 (twenty years ago)
― m. (mitchlnw), Wednesday, 22 December 2004 17:22 (twenty years ago)