― jess, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Gage-o, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
he is the comfortable safe "grown-up" side of music fandom: it is no surprise hardly.
― mark s, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andy K., Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
when yr best feature is a reprinted bit of lester bangs' liner notes yr in trouble.
― Douglas, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― stevo, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Arthur, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
There was A LOT of puzzling, inconsequential stuff--wow, big surprise! I can't wait to hear what mark s. has to say about it.
― the pinefox, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I also bought the 2K1 volume, w/ the hopes of the good stuff outweighing the naff stuff. Haven't read it yet, though; given Hornby's involvement (and that rather sketchy article in the New Yorker Music Issue), I'm not sure if it'll be any good. ("Greil Marcus raises the stakes w/ Sleater-Kinney"; yeah, that's fresh - where's Dave Marsh on Springsteen?)
However, I can say that the list of Notable Essays in 1999 (in the back of the 2K version) is MUCH better than the Notable Essays of 2000. (The 1999 list is where Douglas is most apparent, I'm guessing, listing articles from Last Plane & Cometbus & TWAS.) Isn't that ballyhooed Courtney Love piece just a rewrite of Steve Albini's Heckler essay?
BTW, I'm not sure if it's been noted yet, but that Lester Bangs piece was in the 2000 edition.
― David Raposa, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
pf: hv you read mr h. on football and if so what did you think? eg fever pitch but also has he continued to write since (if not why not eh?)
― Tom, Saturday, 29 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
(new yorker presumably online to subscribers only?)
so grate is our client's hornby-hatred that all other criticism is merely to his mind in effect unwarranted further praise, and ignored as such. That is the essence of our case, m'lud.
er yes, actually yes i *do* recall hostility was in the air, pf: but not its exact justifixication — can you (re)outline the basis fr yr dislike for those not sat at our table?
― none of your god damn business, Friday, 28 February 2003 02:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 28 February 2003 02:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 28 February 2003 02:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― chaki (chaki), Friday, 28 February 2003 03:41 (twenty-two years ago)