Pop dropped booty-shaking and went conservative like presidential politics in 2004--Bartlett's Theory at Salon.com seems questionable to me

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
What do ya think of this theory for music in 2004? I have my doubts.

Goodbye, pimps and hos!
The year's biggest pop stars dropped the skanky booty-shaking, and -- like much of the country -- chose a conservative path.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Thomas Bartlett, salon.com

Dec. 14, 2004 | "Quoth Jay-Z: "You can't be running around in jerseys when you're 30 years old."
The oracle spoke, the people listened. Jay-Z, with his new fondness for suits and button-up shirts, best set the year's tone: Maturity was in, clean-cut was in. An old-fashioned, elegant idea of what was stylish was ascendant. In popular music, this was the year of the white suit, of the rakishly angled hat.

The new aesthetic was everywhere: in the retro-utopian ballrooms of R. Kelly's "Happy People" and Outkast's "I Like the Way You Move" videos; in the speak-easy vibe of Beyoncé's "Naughty Girl" video; in the "Ed Sullivan Show" theme of the "Hey Ya" video; in the sudden celebrity of P. Diddy's natty manservant, Farnsworth Bentley. Nelly, the man who brought us "Hot in Herre," released a record called "Suit." And look at what happened to Christina Aguilera! I don't know how they got the skank out of that girl, but now she's dressing in '20s-style flapper dresses with a coquettish curly bob. Even Britney is grown up, married with children. In the upper echelons of hip-hop and pop, it was out with the hoodies and gold chains, and in with a more classically moneyed style, with all the trappings of wealth and maturity. Out with bling, in with bespoke.

This may have been most transparent in fashion and in visual aesthetics, but it also came through loud and clear in the year's most successful music. In place of the forward-looking, sparse, jabbing production and challenging harmonic terrain that had been so dominant in hip-hop and pop, there was a new emphasis on warmth and fullness, on sumptuous orchestrations and comfortable, well-worn harmonies and baroquely florid arrangements. Perhaps taking a cue from an increasingly politicized culture -- where the hysterical response to an exposed nipple at the beginning of the year put pop culture on notice -- the most popular music stayed conservative, channeling the sepia-toned lushness of classic soul and pop.
Consider the two greatest critical/commercial triumphs of the year: Usher and Kanye West. Rapper/producer and critic's darling Kanye had more impact on the sound of pop music this year than any other single artist, both with his own singles ("Through the Wire," "Jesus Walks") and productions for other artists (Twista's "Slow Jamz" and "Overnight Celebrity"; Alicia Keys' "You Don't Know My Name"). Kanye's music is built on the analog warmth and nostalgic crackle of old soul samples and smoothly sophisticated string orchestrations, and "Slow Jamz" might be the distilled essence of it all: lyrics referencing great slow jam artists of the past ("Marvin Gaye, some Luther Vandross, a little Anita," for starters), a couple of nostalgia-inducing soul samples, a silky smooth, string-laden arrangement, but also a finicky complexity to the way it's all fit together, with Twista's lightning-fast rapping interlocking precisely with the sample above it.
What's extraordinary about Usher is simply the magnitude of his success; that a straight-up R&B crooner, singing thoroughly unmodern ballads like "Burn" and "Confessions (Part 2)," could be not just a big seller, but also a hip, young celebrity with real glamour and star power. Usher's female counterpart, Alicia Keys, has an appeal based entirely on her nostalgic evocations of classic soul, and by the air of "class" provided by a grand piano. The flashy piano run in the chorus of her hit "You Don't Know My Name" was an extreme example of the kind of gushingly complex flourishes so in vogue this year. Usher and Keys currently hold the No. 2 spot on the Billboard singles chart with their duet "My Boo," a slick, sentimental ballad that represents everything unadventurous, retiring, and uninteresting about this year's pop music.
Notable by their absence in 2004 were Timbaland and the Neptunes, the producers who had been such dominant commercial and artistic forces for the last few years, their lean, sharp-edged tracks replaced by Kanye's warm, rounded, lushly blended fantasias. The Neptunes have finally come storming back with one of their oddest, and coolest, productions, Snoop's "Drop It Like It's Hot," currently at the top of the charts. And if there's any justice, the brilliant new Timbaland-produced Ludacris track, "The Potion," will be joining it there soon. But until the recent release of those songs, this year had produced nothing with the bumping minimalism of Missy Elliott's Timbaland hits like "Get Ur Freak On" and "Work It," or the out-of-nowhere strangeness of Kelis' Neptunes-produced "Milkshake." Those songs were part of a daring, forward-thinking spirit in pop music, testing the bounds of how abstract and alien it was possible for a hit song to be. But that pretty much evaporated this year.
Instead we got Usher's slow-burning ballads, the downy-soft warmth of "I Don't Wanna Know" by piano-playing crooner Mario Winans, the smooth, placid synth-strings of Eamon's "Fuck It (I Don't Want You Back)," the delicate and complex sample of Chinese music that runs behind the entirety of Christina Milian's "Dip It Low," and Prince's nostalgia-driven comeback hit, "Musicology." Another emblematic success story is Maroon 5, a band that sneaks a sleek, retro, Stevie Wonder-inspired vibe into their otherwise lily-white smooth pop. Their record, "Songs About Jane," which yielded hits like "This Love" and "She Will Be Loved," was actually released in June 2002. It's no coincidence that this was the year for it to finally become such an enormous hit.

Every action has a reaction, and this year's was crunk: jagged, brutal and in your face. If the decadent streak in this year's music was the product of an engorged culture crumbling under the weight of its own wealth and waste, crunk was the barbarians at the gate.

There's nothing smooth about crunk: beats that sound like they're blasting out of a crappy car stereo that can't quite handle the volume, shrill synth sounds, often just a single sliding oscillator, way up high, with nothing in between but the (usually aggressive) rapping. Led by hit-making producer Lil Jon, crunk was a generous pinch of salt in what otherwise could have been a cloyingly sweet year.
A cynic might say that the trend toward sweet, smooth, retro sounds was evidence of an art form losing its youth and freshness, becoming self-conscious, but I don't think that's what's happening here. Music doesn't develop in a straight line. It moves in fits and starts, reactions and counterreactions, a pendulum swinging back and forth, with each generation correcting, and usually overcompensating for, the excesses of the previous one: the romantic torrents of Berlioz and Chopin replaced the cerebral, methodically structured classicism of Haydn and Clementi; punk-rock sharpened its fangs to puncture the bloat of prog-rock and scratch the glossy facade of disco. The last few years have been dominated by the brutal minimalism of Timbaland and Missy (and a legion of imitators), the glittering, brash futurism of the Neptunes; by pimped-out guys and skanked-out girls. What more natural reaction than lush orchestrations and an elegant white suit?
But there's also more than a whiff of conservatism to the whole thing, of playing it safe, of new money trying to pass for old because it's more respectable. After all the excitement of the hip-hop high life, of rap moguls like P. Diddy and Jay-Z shattering the glass ceiling, even the rebel kings are putting on suits and telling people to grow up. There's also an air of post-Nipplegate timidity, fear of Michael Powell and the "moral" watchdogs. Sex is still being sold, of course, but more subtly, without all the sweat and physicality, without the big-ass Timbaland beats and booty shaking.
In a year of such intense political polarization, so much anger and activism, it's surprising that popular music has withdrawn into relative conservatism, that major statements like Eminem's searing "Mosh" were so rare. Or maybe not. Just as often as popular music provides a rallying cry, giving voice to people's angers and frustrations, it can provide an escape from them."

steve-k, Friday, 24 December 2004 08:11 (twenty-one years ago)

que?

derrick (derrick), Friday, 24 December 2004 08:24 (twenty-one years ago)

He cites Usher as a traditional r'n'b crooner, while never mentioning that Usher's biggest hit "Yeah" was done with foul-mouthed raw rockin beat producer Lil' Jon. How does "Yeah" fit into the thesis? And is traditional r'n'b crooning "conservative" in a political sense?

He mentions the Outkast "The Way You Move" video(wasn't this 2003?) as somehow supporting his view, when part of that video is just a standard booty-shakin exercise, without any retroswing dance R. Kelly stepping elements. He wasn't watching enough videos if he thinks much of the booty-shaking was dropped. Where do the women-hating lyrics on the latest Nas, Snoop, and Lil' Jon cds fit into this theory?

He does acknowledge Lil' Jon but calls him a reaction to the alleged conservative safeness of Usher. Huh? Lil' Jon's style is no new reaction to traditional r'n'b, he's part of a Southern tradition that included the 2 Live Crew, and his bubblecrunk productions show his smoother side. Lil' Jon had his hand in quite a number of hits this year, so why isn't Bartlett calling the year the triumph of crunk! Also, who are all these rebels now wearing suits that he's referring to? Jay Z ain't wearing a suit in his video with Linkin Park.

I don't see the failure of Timbaland and the Neptunes to have as many hits as they've had in the past to signify a return to conservatism analogous to Republican conservative success at the ballot box.

steve-k, Friday, 24 December 2004 08:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Slick r'n'b balladry has always co-existed with rap and more upbeat r'n'b and ocassionally reached the charts. Here in D.C. we have a quiet storm radio station, and Luther Vandross and others have always retained popularity, sometimes(often?) among folks listening to hiphop.

I do understand rejecting the "Alicia Keys can play the piano so she's more authentic" nonsense, but it's not like there's score of Alicia Keys, and even if there were, is that conservative in a political manner?

steve-k, Friday, 24 December 2004 08:37 (twenty-one years ago)

It's a fun concept, but WAY overreaching; buddy goes too far to prove his idea's pervasiveness, and opens himself up to way too many holes. It's just not a good argument. This would have been better as a silly side paragraph 'conspiracy theory', rather than a full-fleshed essay.

derrick (derrick), Friday, 24 December 2004 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)

The examples this guys selects are so easily used for the opposite argument that it seems like he's stretching things.

Britney? Married with kids maybe, but conservative? Never. 'My Perogative' could hardly be classed so, what with her bedroom writhings.

Snoop and Pharrell? He shouldn't even have mentioned that track, since it's hardly a family values marathon. Perhaps the reason those artists didn't push anything at the beginning of the year was that the innovative records they'd done were still doing so well.

Eamon? It may have been a faux ballad, but the sentiment wasn't exactly radio-friendly.

Abby (abby mcdonald), Friday, 24 December 2004 11:28 (twenty-one years ago)

way too overarching, agreed.

writers are always trying to make pop culture an analogue of mainstream politics, don't really find it's a successful approach much of the time.

captain easychord (captain easychord), Friday, 24 December 2004 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)

writers are always trying to make pop culture an analogue of mainstream politics, don't really find it's a successful approach much of the time

Agreed. Politics has NO PLACE AT ALL in music nowadays (Don't tell me you actually liked "Mosh" or that DJ Shadow "The Gloaming" remix). And rock critics are morons for always talking about the US election and how sucky it was. Fuck politics.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Friday, 24 December 2004 22:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think Bartlett's analogies work, but I don't agree that "politics has NO PLACE AT ALL in music nowadays..." Why should commentary on politics be left to op-ed columnists and talk-radio hosts?

steve-k, Saturday, 25 December 2004 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)

"Mosh" may not be great, but neither is anything else I've heard from Eminem's latest.

Cliched writing about politics and cliched political lyrics may suck, but declaring anything offlimits seems worse to me.

From a musical point of view, writer Philip Sherburne has criticized Bartlett's writing at Salon in the past, I wonder if he'll weigh in on this piece on his blog or elsewhere.

steve-k, Sunday, 26 December 2004 00:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Bartlett's got a blog of his own, doveman something or other. I wonder if anyone has weighed in there (other than me! ha)...

steve-k, Sunday, 26 December 2004 18:43 (twenty-one years ago)

this is the kind of music criticism that really needs to be flushed down the toilet

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Sunday, 26 December 2004 19:14 (twenty-one years ago)

i mean what a fucking joke, this person should be ashamed. now i'm glad i haven't read salon in years.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Sunday, 26 December 2004 19:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Why should commentary on politics be left to op-ed columnists and talk-radio hosts?

Well, okay maybe I was overstepping it a bit. Political rock criticism is not in and of itself a bad thing, it's just that there's SO DAMN MUCH OF IT. Especially nowadays.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 02:26 (twenty-one years ago)

The whole argument is based on the false premise that conservative attitudes are actually the majority in the US. I call bullshit.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)

if this were olde ilx this thread would have been up to 2,000 posts by now

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

yes, bullshit indeed

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 19:36 (twenty-one years ago)

"if this were olde ilx this thread would have been up to 2,000 posts by now"

I doubt it. This article is so thoroughly idiotic that I can't see anyone jumping to its defense. The articles that prompted a lot of long threads tended to be more about critical concepts anyway (and those are always in flux.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)

salon does it again

Shmool McShmool (shmuel), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 19:47 (twenty-one years ago)

"U2's song "Vertigo" in its title recalled a film from an age when conservative values were predominant, before America lost her innocence..."

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 19:47 (twenty-one years ago)

amateurist OTM; I gave up on salon when they went to subscriber-only service, and every 6 mo. an article like this pops up to remind me what a good choice that was.

derrick (derrick), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 19:53 (twenty-one years ago)

i think the first argument i ever got into on ilm was about which bartlett year-end roundup was worse, 2000 or 2002. (2002 was it, of course).

Shmool McShmool (shmuel), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 19:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Nelly, the man who brought us "Hot in Herre," released a record called "Suit."

It was half of the word "Sweat suit" which is actually the exact opposite of what you're arguing, idiot.

David Allen (David Allen), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 20:01 (twenty-one years ago)

amster otm re: salon being pretty damn unreadable for a few years now

jj dncr, Tuesday, 28 December 2004 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)

sadly this doesn't even make the top ten of daft pop pieces at salon (odds are even just this year's top ten)(they gone dowwwnhill).

jj dncr, Tuesday, 28 December 2004 21:06 (twenty-one years ago)

The year's biggest pop stars dropped the skanky booty-shaking, and -- like much of the country -- chose a conservative path.

Ah, fuck this guy's thumb-sucking phlogiston. Think piece summaries from any side are a dime a dozen, lined up like tens of know-it-alls ad nauseum at the end of the year. Last week, on the front page of the LA Times was an article on the hegemony of "skanky booty-shaking" music among the younger season ticket holders the NBA is trying to cultivate. This was lashed in to the usual old fart handwringing on Ron Artest, the disjunct between older season ticket holders and the playas, and the alleged fighting and general breakdown in civilization between the two.

There's also an air of post-Nipplegate timidity, fear of Michael Powell and the "moral" watchdogs. Sex is still being sold, of course, but more subtly, without all the sweat and physicality, without the big-ass Timbaland beats and booty shaking.

"...an air of post-Nipplegate timidity..." waffle-waffle-waffle. "Sex is still being sold" -- no shit, Sherlock. What's subtle about sex in the US of A pop culture?

Berlioz and Chopin replaced the cerebral, methodically structured classicism of Haydn and Clementi; punk-rock sharpened its fangs to puncture the bloat of prog-rock and scratch the glossy facade of disco.

Oh jeekers, he's derived the unified field equation of music in one sentence fragment! More of such eloquent conversation should infect my brain.

Out with bling, in with bespoke.

And conservatism is custom made? The confirmer of false reckonings at the end of the year, possessing glass eyes and the wisdom of ages, so in order to see many things others do not.

George Smith, Tuesday, 28 December 2004 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe i'm warped by living in the south, but were 'timbaland beats' really emblematic or one of the first things people thought of when people thought of 'booty shaking'???

jj dncr, Tuesday, 28 December 2004 21:18 (twenty-one years ago)

[political discussion lashed to ... ]it's just that there's SO DAMN MUCH OF IT. Especially nowadays.

Agree. It's a media obsession, in all topics. One right-now exception: The catastrophe caused by the Sumatran sub-oceanic earthquake. No one has tried to tie that to politics ... yet.

George Smith, Tuesday, 28 December 2004 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Did you not read the ILE thread on the tsunami?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 21:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Nope. The LA Times still gets priority.

George Smith, Tuesday, 28 December 2004 21:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Wise.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 21:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Either he's away or something, or Bartlett wants to let this questionable article speak for itself, as I got no response from him via a posting on his blog and an e-mail to the address on his blog.

steve-k, Wednesday, 29 December 2004 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)

On a related theme, if end of the year thumbsuckers were officially declared dead cliches, it wouldn't hurt the state of journalism.

Unified field theories of pop culture in any subject gimme a rash.

George Smith, Wednesday, 29 December 2004 22:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Yea, but they're certainly provocative.

So Salon's Thomas Bartlett e-mailed me back. He says the editors wrote the blurb about politics, below the headline, not him. He maintains that what will be remembered about 2004 musically will not be crunk hits or other thing but will be Beyonce, Usher and Alicia Keys, and that the year's popular music hits were "less adventurous" than in years past.

Now Jess Harvell on his Blackie Lawless blog has also written about the type of r'n'b that was successful on the charts this year versus in the past year or 2, but his analyis doesn't reach for the broad conclusions that Bartlett does.

steve-k, Thursday, 30 December 2004 06:16 (twenty-one years ago)

six months pass...
Agreed. Politics has NO PLACE AT ALL in music nowadays (Don't tell me you actually liked "Mosh" or that DJ Shadow "The Gloaming" remix). And rock critics are morons for always talking about the US election and how sucky it was. Fuck politics.

holy shit i just heard that Shadow remix of "The Gloaming" for the first time and it totally blew me away. WEAPONS WEAPONS WEAPONS. the beat is sickness.

leonard (tk), Saturday, 9 July 2005 04:22 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.