Learn me to be a third-rate amateur LAPTOP JOCKEY

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Obviously, I want to minimize expenditures. I have FL Studio 4, but all/most of the good patches and softsynths included are demo versions meaning I can't save my arrangements and mixes. Wha's a good, cheap softsynth for to satisfy my desire to create ambient techno along the lines of autechre ca. Anti EP? What's the word on Simsynth?

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 22:38 (twenty-one years ago)

use the buzzmachines!

g--ff (gcannon), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 23:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Drew Daniel and Momus to thread.

Steely Zan (AaronHz), Tuesday, 28 December 2004 23:55 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.smartelectronix.com/

Disco Nihilist (mjt), Wednesday, 29 December 2004 02:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, I'm more of a sampler guy than a softsynth guy, but here's my two cents:

as far as cheap and cheerful with options, Reason might be the way to go- it has that dreaded "Groovebox" factor- ie. it sounds like a trashy trance record as soon as you get it going- but it does have an array of options/instruments and it's cheap. A good entry level tool I reckon.

more expensive, all around better for real deal sequencing and softsynth hosting: Logic. I have had plenty of fun with some of the softsynths that Logic hosts, esp. the Steinberg Model-E, the Neon, the Tassman, and the Lounge Lizard (Rhodes emulator).

There are some amazing softsynths now but some are real CPU hogs, such as the Arturia Moog Modular V, which is crashing all the time lately on my laptop.

Still, I reckon it's still a lot of fun to get your mitts on a Roland SH-101 or any older synth and just enjoy the real thing. Best of the both worlds, surf and turf etc.

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Wednesday, 29 December 2004 09:56 (twenty-one years ago)

i say ableton live all the way.

cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 29 December 2004 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

in terms of softsynths, check out the impOscar, the albino, or absynth. those don't hog your CPU too much.

cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 29 December 2004 15:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Logic rules but I like having my Polysix

Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Wednesday, 29 December 2004 15:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Wish its memory fucking worked

Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Wednesday, 29 December 2004 15:38 (twenty-one years ago)

SING OVE RMP3s

chaki in charge (chaki), Wednesday, 29 December 2004 18:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm still using the first version of Reason and loving it, though I'm not sure how it'd work for getting super post-Autechre abstracted; the stuff I do still have pretty conventional pop-grid formats.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 29 December 2004 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)

"the stuffs I do still have"

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 29 December 2004 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I do all my softsynth stuff in Cubase and just use Reason as a glorified drum sequencer.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 29 December 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not interested in doing Autechre, post-1995 stylee stuff -- more interested in their melodic compositions.

Jordan -- Cubase supports softsynth? I aherm tried it out (took a class, even) and I thought it needed an actual synth to work.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Wednesday, 29 December 2004 19:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Reason is uber-great for drums, no question. It’s a bit of a pain in the ass to draw in modifications or effects tweaks or anything linear like that—the whole thing keeps you to a grid a bit, I think, though maybe that’s just me—but when it comes to the sound and the ease-of-use, I can’t think of anything I’d rather use.

I think Drew should outline for us how he did the last record, possibly providing set-up files and patches along the way. I was trying the other day to get a sound that clean and spacious, and the room kept filling up too quick.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 29 December 2004 19:13 (twenty-one years ago)

*blushes* thanks for your interest. I don't want to go on and on about SPT working methods because it might come off as narcissistic or something. Fighting clutter in a mix of something you are working on is hard; it helps to just experiment with mute-ing half of what you've made and seeing if it still holds up. Another thing that helps is sequencing with a kit of individual stabs and hits that you have constructed- if you pile too many "full" loops on top of other loops things start to flam and cancel each other out and go muddy. But I don't know how you work so I'm not sure if this is a helpful thing to say or not. (as I said, I'm pretty sampler based and not an expert where synthesis is concerned.) Having honest friends who will tell you when something isn't working is definitely a good thing too . . .

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Friday, 31 December 2004 02:29 (twenty-one years ago)

has anyone used the new version of live? (im looking at you cutty...)would it be suitable to replace cubase for sequencing/recording? Does it work with vst instruments? I sometimes struggle to use cubase, but I've never gotten comfortable with it. Older versions of live worked really well for looping, but how does ver 4 stand up for sequencing? I'd love a live-like interface for doing cubase-like work.

Elliot (Elliot), Friday, 31 December 2004 03:24 (twenty-one years ago)

The abelton site has extensive demostration videos for live. If you want to know more about the product, you should go there first.

I do not know what your midi needs are, but live seems to do the trick well enough. It seems to be geared towards generating sound quickly, rather than oriented towards extremely detailed and user-configurable midi editing. The premise of the program is still based around looping audio, it is not full blown midi suite. Live seems extremely intuitive and allows a very quick workflow. I do not use it currently, but everybody I know who does use it is in love with version 4. It will be my next software purchase.

It does support VST instruments.

Disco Nihilist (mjt), Friday, 31 December 2004 04:19 (twenty-one years ago)

to make this more clear:

The midi is used fire a vst instrument, which is then recorded in the internal live audio editor or put directly into the arrangement page. If you decide to record the loop as audio you can do so in the internal audio editor, which will allow you to edit and process the audio loop with vst effects. Once you are done editing, you can dump the loop into the arrangement window and process it further through envelope/filter/effects automation. I believe midi parameter info can also be automated in the arrangement window, but I am not 100% sure.

Again, it is imho the most intuitive software out there. The workflow design is brilliant and it allows you to work quickly and efficently without having to jump through a lot of hoops to realize an idea. I am a hardcore hardware using electronic music nazi and I even like making music with abelton live.

Disco Nihilist (mjt), Friday, 31 December 2004 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)

disco OTM. it's really amazing (live).

i've almost stopped using digital performer completely and have been doing almost everything in live. i really love it. download the demo and do the tutorial. it's the most intuitive program out there if you are working mainly with samples and loops. plus, it supports all vst and audio unit plug-ins.

cutty (mcutt), Friday, 31 December 2004 06:14 (twenty-one years ago)

*sigh* I wish someone would make a decent Impulse Tracker-style tool for Windows XP...

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 31 December 2004 10:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Okay, I had previously only used a really simple early version of Live, I just installed and ran Live 4 on OS X and it is pretty great, and I take it all back- it is definitely the best entry level tool around, its ease of use, smooth interface, and expanded MIDI hosting is pretty damn impressive, really quite a great tool.

I still have some lingering doubts at the compositional level because it makes endlessly tweaking loops that play over and over so addictive and fun that it maybe blinds people to the overall "macro" shape of a finished "song", but what the hey. It's still a great piece of software. So I'm just swelling the already loud chorus of hell yeahs here . . .

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Saturday, 1 January 2005 11:38 (twenty-one years ago)

can I mix mp3's with ableton live?

33rd rate n00b wants to laptop DJ to an audience of one, Saturday, 1 January 2005 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah Live is the shit

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 1 January 2005 20:25 (twenty-one years ago)

the only caveat I can think of with Live is to use your ears when time stretching / tempo adjusting audio files; the artifacts are extremely distinctive, and give the application away immediately. I've heard certain people exaggerate the artifacts into interesting & musical results, but most people just seem to tolerate the glitches as a necessary evil to meet their desired tempo, and they're just timestamping the music by doing so...

Drew's comment about composing macro song structures rings true; I'm not going to be giving up a waveform editor (mine's Pro Tools but anything works) to finish things up, but Live is going to make it a lot easier to improvise & painlessly play around with the sounds to compose those songs. Live = the jam session, PT = the sheet music.

otherwise, Live's the software i've been waiting a decade for, to the extent that I'm scared to start using it now that it's here... but I saw v4's MIDI implementation, broke down, finally ordered it last week.

(Jon L), Sunday, 2 January 2005 01:12 (twenty-one years ago)

two months pass...
Guardian article today on Ableton et al. with quotes from Cut Copy and our v.own Twitch of the artists Optimo.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 10 March 2005 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)

two years pass...

*bump*

latest suggestions, por favor

john. a resident of chicago., Tuesday, 29 January 2008 02:55 (eighteen years ago)

what's the best, cheapest controller keyboard on the market?

burt_stanton, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 03:12 (eighteen years ago)

xp

its the same as its every been it depends on what you want to do. if you want something that includes everything out of the box and will be reliable go for pro tools/logic/cubase/ableton/fruity loops/sonar/digital performer.

these are all sequencers with HD recording facilities that come bundled with a basic sampler, some fxs and usually a synth or two.

secondly get some sort of soundcard/interface for your laptop, again you've got a million options, any of the big names make decent enough interfaces.

Crackle Box, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 12:53 (eighteen years ago)

cheap ass controller stuff m-audio or edirol

Crackle Box, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 12:55 (eighteen years ago)

if you're planning to use samples and vsts more than big loops - and aren't thinking too much about recording live instruments -i'd really recommend Renoise.

never acid again, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 13:12 (eighteen years ago)

if you have a mmid range laptop i wouldnt use ableton on vista. i had nothing but trouble on my new 2gig laptop with 2 gig of ram, absolute nightmare and was running worse than the 733 i had just replaced. roll back to xp or weep endlessly. as for controllers, behringer do ones for less than £100 with loads of lights so yu can use it in the dark. its not very sturdy but if you are only using it at home or get a case its fine for gigs. As for VSTs the Korg legacy collection is fantastic. If your producing techno the nepheton and drumazon vsts are perfect 808 and 909 copies. Another good software for djin is traktor, piece of piss to use and runs well on crappy computers.

straight, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 15:09 (eighteen years ago)

yeah if you're going to use ableton to its fullest, you need serious processing power

winston, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 03:02 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.