the new iPod Shuffle - Enjoy Uncertainty

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.apple.com/ipodshuffle/

Random is the New Order
Welcome to a life less orderly. As official soundtrack to the random revolution, the iPod Shuffle Songs setting takes you on a unique journey through your music collection — you never know what’s around the next tune. Meet your new ride. More roadster than Rolls, iPod shuffle rejects routine by serving up your favorite songs in a different order every time. Just plug iPod shuffle into your computer’s USB port, let iTunes Autofill it with up to 240 songs(1) and get a new experience with every connection. The trail you run every day looks different with an iPod shuffle. Daily gridlock feels less mundane when you don’t know what song will play next. iPod shuffle adds musical spontaneity to your life. Lose control. Love it.

john'n'chicago, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)

I hope whoever wrote that got fired.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:08 (twenty years ago)

Along with the guy that designed those shitty silhouette ads!

.adam (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:08 (twenty years ago)

Haha, but they work!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

Although yeah, the whole "uncertainty" thing is hilarious. Time to write a new brief!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:11 (twenty years ago)

Dear Apple,

Might I suggest:

Shufflegasm
Shuffletastic
Ipod Micro: featuring Shuffletech
iSchaffel

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)

That last one was the first thing I thought of!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)

so far i've pretty much only played my ipod on "shuffle songs" mode

rentboy (rentboy), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)

I find the shuffle feature impossible to use (mostly cuz I have 10 or so hour long continuous mixes which invariably come up and sort of defeat the purpose of mixing.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:14 (twenty years ago)

I would get one, but I still want something with a mic. The iRiver N10 is so sexy, but overpriced...

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:19 (twenty years ago)

"Do not eat iPod shuffle."
--apple

Jimmy Mod always makes friends with women before bedding them down (ModJ), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:20 (twenty years ago)

yeah i have about 10-15 long mixsets too. but being only 10 files out of 8000+ files, they don't come up very often.

but i usually play those when i'm riding my bike, so that i don't wind up with some slow ballady thing playing while i'm trying to SHRED!

rentboy (rentboy), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:22 (twenty years ago)

I have about 3000 files on my iPod, but it seems to keep going back to the albums and collections with more than 30 songs in them more often than the other ones. Only about 3% or so of the songs are from my P-Funk collection, but it keeps going to a P-Funk track maybe every 10 songs or so.

Then again, I have a device that can store 100 songs by Parliament and/or Funkadelic. And decides to randomly play said songs at every opportunity. And I'm complaining.

What's this place, Biblevania? (natepatrin), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:27 (twenty years ago)

I like that its 1/2 the cost of the regular ipod but holds 5% as much.

major jingleberries (jingleberries), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:33 (twenty years ago)

That's Apple for you.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:34 (twenty years ago)

I would get one, but I still want something with a mic.

But you can get a mic for the iPOD.

I think the *iSHUFFLE* is silly. I want to decide myself to go from Harry Pussy to Junior Boys...

stevie nixed (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:35 (twenty years ago)

Yeah Spencer, shame on you for not having an iPod!

.adam (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)

I like that its 1/2 the cost of the regular ipod but holds 5% as much.

yes, but it's also a lot less than comparable sized flash players. i'm curious, but the lack of display and loss of control (isn't that what the iPod is all about?) is uninspiring.

john'n'chicago, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:39 (twenty years ago)

if you got an ipod as a gift, do you still have a right to complain about them? i feel so conflicted.

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:46 (twenty years ago)

xpost to my previous post: that being said, the fact that it's flash makes it a hell of a lot more attractive to take to the gym and run with come springtime. no moving parts. no skips. also, at $150 for gig, it doesn't seem like i'm buying someone in palo alto an aeron (sp?) chair should i buy it.

john'n'chicago, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:48 (twenty years ago)

The fine print at the bottom of the website:


* Music capacity is based on 4 minutes per song and 128Kbps AAC encoding.

* Do not eat iPod shuffle.

* Rechargeable batteries have a limited number of charge cycles and may eventually need to be replaced. Battery life and number of charge cycles vary by use and settings. See www.apple.com/batteries for more information.

* Some computers require either the optional iPod shuffle Dock or a USB cable extender (sold separately).

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:49 (twenty years ago)

based on my 256Meg iRiver, I figure I could probably store about 120 - 150 songs on this thing (the Gig sized). at $149 it's significantly cheaper than any of the alternatives for the size (i never wanted to spend $249 for a flash player when the mini is quadruple the size). since i'd use it for running, i probably don't need anything more than that. as to the battery dying in a two years, my iRiver looks/feels/sounds like a relic and it's only two years old anyway. i just read about 2 and 5Gig flash memory coming to market sometime this year. i'll figure i'd want to replace this thing ultimately anyway. in other words, i'm on the hook and apple need only reel me in.

john'n'chicago, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 20:03 (twenty years ago)

massive xpost

I would get one, but I still want something with a mic. The iRiver N10 is so sexy, but overpriced...

I've enabled the mic, and different sampling rates on my iPod. They were all there, but crippled by Apple for some reason. But if you also whack Linux on the machine Installers, the mic works properly, and you can record, even through headphones, and change the sample rate. Yay!

What an odd product. All MP3 players offer random play. This is a small MP3 player which does.

Acme (acme), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 20:43 (twenty years ago)

But it offers random *load* on a player that doesn't hold your entire collection.

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 20:45 (twenty years ago)

I would get one, but I still want something with a mic.
But you can get a mic for the iPOD.

how much?

also:
I've enabled the mic, and different sampling rates on my iPod. They were all there, but crippled by Apple for some reason. But if you also whack Linux on the machine Installers, the mic works properly, and you can record, even through headphones, and change the sample rate. Yay!

what?!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 20:59 (twenty years ago)

Also it has TUX instead of an apple.

Matt Boch (Matt Boch), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 21:03 (twenty years ago)

The New iPod Shuffle - Enjoy Apple Making a Mint Off of People Like You Because You're Stupid

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 21:39 (twenty years ago)

The New iPod Shuffle - So Small and Cute You'll Forget It's an Overpriced Half-Assed mp3 Player

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 21:39 (twenty years ago)

I find the shuffle feature impossible to use (mostly cuz I have 10 or so hour long continuous mixes which invariably come up and sort of defeat the purpose of mixing.)

yeah i have about 10-15 long mixsets too. but being only 10 files out of 8000+ files, they don't come up very often.

PEOPLE MAKE A SMART PLAYLIST THAT ONLY PLAYS SONGS BETWEEN TWO AND FIVE MINUTES AND YOUR SHUFFLE PROBLEMS ARE SOLVED.

cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 21:41 (twenty years ago)

I really think they ought to just make a little mp3 player with no storage at all. Stick a USB port on the end of it and give it the ability to read standard file formats. Then you could use it with a stick USB drive or a fatty USB hard drive or whatever. That would at least be somewhat interesting...

But then Apple's almost never been particularly interested in making a product that wasn't self-contained, difficult or impossible to upgrade, and proprietary as fuck.

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 21:42 (twenty years ago)

(FWIW I don't hate Macs at all. It is true that I am a desktop whore and AMD's bitch, but I got no beef with Macs so long as they are real machines and not tiny little things you can't even put a better hard drive into...)

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 21:44 (twenty years ago)

this is useful for jogging since it won't crash. the ipod hard drive always crashes when i run with it if i put it in my pocket or armband. the only surefire crashproof way to run with a regular ipod is to hold it in your hand, since that cushions any jostling.

plus it can be used a usb harddrive. a 1gig usb harddrive costs around $80us, so the 1gig ipod shuffle is essentially a $70 mp3 player.

pinder (pinder), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 21:48 (twenty years ago)

The New iPod Shuffle - So Small and Cute You'll Forget It's an Overpriced Half-Assed mp3 Player

except at $150 for a Gig of memory it's not overpriced relative to it's competitors. and half-assed? because it lacks a screen? for it's market (gym goers/athletes), i'm not sure this is going to be as big a deal as it initally seems. i think about when i trained for a marathon, i'd just load up my 256Meg flash player and go. i rarely looked at the screen cuz i was, like, bouncing around and couldn't focus on it anyway.

john'n'chicago, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 21:51 (twenty years ago)

Apple's almost never been particularly interested in making a product that wasn't self-contained, difficult or impossible to upgrade, and proprietary as fuck.

I would argue that this is half-true, and I'm officially a dual-platform user. A G4 is actually quite expandable. I've hot-rodded mine with a Pioneer internal DVD-RW and some Western Digital IDE drives, and they've worked without a hitch. The "Life Savers"-coloured iMacs from a few years ago, however, are another story.

I've got mixed feelings about the new iShuffle (which doesn't actually have to play in shuffle mode) - as gimmicky as it seems, a USB memory stick with a built-in MP3 player could be useful, given the price.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 21:57 (twenty years ago)

I'm officially a dual-platform user who has let his use of Mac slip due to circumstances largely beyond his control... And I know that some Macs can be upgraded (at one point I had one of the pretty translucent G3s), but their business model does turn me off a LOT when I see shit like the cube and that new tiny thing they're coming out with now. (I love how everyone around my office now is going "and it doesn't even have a display" as if somehow they've forgotten that - except for Mac - most manufacturers tend to make it obvious that the display is a separate hardware choice.)

I really hadn't considered the appeal to athletes and gym goers because I'm not one (and I exercise in my home on a stationary bike in front of a TV usually), but that does make some sense.

I didn't say "half-assed" because of the lack of a screen. I meant "half-assed" as in "only a gig when there are players on the market 40 times that size hardly 40 times more expensive." But again... didn't think about y'all joggin' folks. (I'd never jog with my iPod on account of I can't stand earbuds or any other shitty lightweight headphones, and studio cans just don't stay on your head while running, nor are they all that safe when you might have to cross a street or two.)

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 22:10 (twenty years ago)

I didn't say "half-assed" because of the lack of a screen. I meant "half-assed" as in "only a gig when there are players on the market 40 times that size hardly 40 times more expensive." But again... didn't think about y'all joggin' folks. (I'd never jog with my iPod on account of I can't stand earbuds or any other shitty lightweight headphones, and studio cans just don't stay on your head while running, nor are they all that safe when you might have to cross a street or two.)

Understood. As I was saying over on the ILX "Apple Lust Objects" thread, I have a (comparitively speaking) monstrous MP3 Discman that I've just about had it with, AND both the iPod and Mini iPod just seem like too much money to me, BUT the iShuffle makes sense to me, both size- and price-wise.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 22:16 (twenty years ago)

so martin how do you feel about Apple?

57 7th (calstars), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 22:24 (twenty years ago)

Ha ha... That's the weird thing... I really really like OSX and I really really like the G4 and the G5 (and even the G3 for that matter) from a chip engineering standpoint, and I think Mac desktops and to some extent their laptops are ace, and I think their design sense/"look" is cool.

I just think their way of doing business on many fronts is questionable (not that M$ isn't), and I think that many of their products (which obv aren't aimed at a demographic including me) are kinda silly. (Said silly products would include, obv, cube, mini mac, imacs, and other largely non-expandable machines.)

I am happy to see a Mac come out at a price point that isn't ridiculous though. That's great. In the past I always forgave them for being pricey because, let's face it, it does take more time and effort to make something look as nice as it performs (as opposed to some place like Dell where it's obvious that less time is spent on design), but I think it's great Mac is apparently able to compete pricewise now. (Of course that's probably due to the fact that the iPod is making them mountains of cash so they don't need to worry about as large a profit margin on their new inventions.)

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 22:35 (twenty years ago)

Also martin m., they're probably hoping you'll drop $1,000 for a 20-inch LCD display.

Anyway, I already have a regular iPod, and I totally want an iPod Shuffle. I don't really want a Mac Mini--but that's because I already have a laptop. If I were buying someone a desktop, though, I'd buy it in a minute. The cube was dumb because it was expensive; the mini will do great.

mrjosh (mrjosh), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 22:55 (twenty years ago)

But it offers random *load* on a player that doesn't hold your entire collection.

I guess. It's just you already got all the fun you get from random load on a bigger box, and I tend to think that once you're in the hole, why not wait, get further in, and pony up for a better player? But then I didn't pay for my iPod.

what?!

Honestly. I don't leave it booted in Linux for playing, because they haven't got the kernel to work with VBRed MP3s yet, which covers all my great new tracks. But it's (a) fun; (b) has better games - Tetris, Minesweeper and so on; (c) you can reboot back to Mac any time safely and (d) you've got that audio thing back.

It'll probably turn out that there's a radio in there too.

ihttp://www.ipodlinux.org/images/4/43/Linux_On_Ipod1.jpg

Acme (acme), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 00:26 (twenty years ago)

Consarnit, that putting an "i" in front of the image URL never works for me.

Acme (acme), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 00:28 (twenty years ago)


I'm waiting to buy an mp3 player that has a dedicated 'shuffle mode' on/off button, easily accessible on the surface. I wish the iPod had one.

Right now shuffle mode is the best way to listen, but occasionally you land in the middle of an album you want to hear more of, and if you're driving it's a hassle to navigate through 2 or 3 sub-menus to turn it off and then back on.

(Jon L), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 00:37 (twenty years ago)

Dedicated buttons are seriously undervalued in mp3 player design right now.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 00:44 (twenty years ago)

"I'm waiting to buy an mp3 player that has a dedicated 'shuffle mode' on/off button"

That is really my biggest complaint about the ipod. Sometimes the next track on an album should be allowed to come next and the way its set up now its next to impossible for that to happen smoothly.

hector (hector), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 01:23 (twenty years ago)

At least I can afford the iPod shuffle without selling a kidney.

Bruce S. Urquhart (BanjoMania), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 01:29 (twenty years ago)

I'm waiting to buy an mp3 player that has a dedicated 'shuffle mode' on/off button, easily accessible on the surface. I wish the iPod had one.

You can access "Shuffle Mode" at the top level of the iPod menu (if that's any help)

Gator Magoon (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 02:50 (twenty years ago)

I know, but even accessing that top level can be a hassle while I'm driving. I want a button I can find without taking my eyes off the road.

I like the iPod Shuffle's three position switch (off/playlist mode/shuffle mode), but shuffle doesn't get fun until it's crosspollinating a huge music collection...

(Jon L), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 03:24 (twenty years ago)

fun, yes, but the shuffle is such a battery suck, though...

john'n'chicago, Wednesday, 12 January 2005 03:28 (twenty years ago)

So does anyone here have one? Is it cool?

mrjosh (mrjosh), Thursday, 13 January 2005 04:48 (twenty years ago)

I don't usually listen to my iPod on shuffle, but b/c of the iPod shuffle I thought I'd try it and it's pretty great.

mrjosh (mrjosh), Thursday, 13 January 2005 04:51 (twenty years ago)

there's no "party shuffle" function for ipod is there?

LSTD (answer) (sexyDancer), Thursday, 13 January 2005 05:14 (twenty years ago)

No, but that would be awesome.

Against my better judgment, I am edging closer and closer to getting one of these ipod shuffles....

mrjosh (mrjosh), Thursday, 13 January 2005 05:19 (twenty years ago)

i think id like an ishuffle.

i dont have a huge digital music collection at home [because uh, i have my records here], but i have a ton of stuff on my PC at work. my gym happens to be on the same block as my office. normally i just throw stuff on my minidisc walkman but the its a pain in the ass [thank you, propriety software]. so it wouldnt be such a bad idea if i had something small that i could pull some stuff off, without the expectation of more permanent storage, and change up as often as id like.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 13 January 2005 05:22 (twenty years ago)

How to record with your ipod!?!! :D

stupid 4g :(

LSD ARISTOCAT (ex machina), Thursday, 13 January 2005 05:51 (twenty years ago)

thatz whut minidiscz r 4

LSTD (answer) (sexyDancer), Thursday, 13 January 2005 06:02 (twenty years ago)

fuck it im changing my name

Snappy (sexyDancer), Thursday, 13 January 2005 06:06 (twenty years ago)

minidisc players break a lot and cant record uncompressed audio

ZING

LSD ARISTOCAT (ex machina), Thursday, 13 January 2005 06:17 (twenty years ago)

I've had two MiniDisc playaz die on me so far, a Sony and a Panasonic. Recording capability is the first to go.

Nancy Boy (Nancy Boy), Thursday, 13 January 2005 09:19 (twenty years ago)

ah so get a DAT or a Marantz ya cheap dropping shit bastadz

Snappy (sexyDancer), Thursday, 13 January 2005 11:59 (twenty years ago)

Who said anything about dropping anything?

Nancy Boy (Nancy Boy), Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:05 (twenty years ago)

I did! I've broken a couple minidiscs in my time. Not a perfect technology, but the pros outweigh the cons.

Snappy (sexyDancer), Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:16 (twenty years ago)

are flash players (exept for ishuffle or did i miss somethign) and modified ipods any good for like recording concerts from within the audience? or are they just dictaphones.

:| (....), Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:26 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
For all those interested in the prioce, Apple#s markup etc, a good article:

http://www.pcworld.com/resource/article/0,aid,119799,pg,1,RSS,RSS,00.asp

She estimates the 512MB of flash in the cheaper of Apple's two IPod Shuffle models costs the company around $37.50 for each player. That's about two thirds of the estimated total $59 that Apple spends on materials needed to make each 512MB IPod Shuffle. The product retails for $99 giving the company a profit of about $40, or roughly 40 percent.

mei (mei), Friday, 25 February 2005 10:53 (twenty years ago)

Well that makes no sense at all. After material costs, you've got marketing costs, distribution costs, the retailer cut if it's not bought direct from the online Apple store, etc.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 25 February 2005 12:50 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, 60% for the actual manufacturing is pretty normal (if not a bit hight).

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Friday, 25 February 2005 17:42 (twenty years ago)

I doubt the flash costs that much.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 25 February 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, that's some stupid shit on the level of "CDs only cost 5 cents to make, we're being riiiiipppped offfffff!"

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 25 February 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)

three years pass...

Here's a fun trick to add, er, uncertainty to your music: try plugging iPhone headphones into a first-generation iPod Shuffle. Glitchcore!

Seriously: is this weird incompatibility (caused, I can only imagine, by interference from the iPhone headphone mic) well known? I can't find anything about it. Mind, I don't imagine there are too many first-gen Shuffle users out there either.

Special topics: Disco, The Common Market (grimly fiendish), Thursday, 22 January 2009 11:41 (sixteen years ago)

I have a 2gig shuffle, it was all I could afford last year, but I have to say they are a brilliant little device. So fucking small, you get a ton of use out of it. I could see myself buying an Ipod Touch next time I have some money but I reckon I'd still use my shuffle.

Local Garda, Thursday, 22 January 2009 12:00 (sixteen years ago)

the shuffle function is messing up my 4th gen Photo model these days. after using it, none of the song titles are visible or accessible any more through the "Artists" menu. they come up fine when I look through "Albums", and I can still add whole albums to the playlist through "Artists", but it's getting annoying. yesterday the shuffle wouldn't work at all, but I think that when I leave it off long enough to reset this problem goes away.

I would try to update the software but I am away from my regular computer which inspires great fear in any update.

sleeve, Thursday, 22 January 2009 14:53 (sixteen years ago)

Mind, I don't imagine there are too many first-gen Shuffle users out there either.
Still have mine, 1 GB, bought the day it was available to order on apple.com. I have a new nano that I most use, but I do still use the shuffle on occasion- it gets great battery life, and I only have a few songs on there. I use it mostly when I'm walking the dog and don't want to carry too much, although these days it's usually just my phone with some music on the SD card. But anyway- yeah, 1st gen shuffle user here.

lyra, Thursday, 22 January 2009 22:52 (sixteen years ago)

I still have the first gen 1gb shuggle and use it every day. I can't imagine using the newer one, I like the way this one fits in my hand and when it runs out of juice I can just plug it into the USB port of my computer at work.

It's a little wonky, I sometimes have to turn it off, then wait a minute then turn it back on again, but it lasts for several commutes and still "rocks" my world.

dan selzer, Thursday, 22 January 2009 22:56 (sixteen years ago)

I don't imagine there are too many first-gen Shuffle users out there either.
Still rockin' the 500MB "package of Juicy Fruit".

staggerlee, Friday, 23 January 2009 01:02 (sixteen years ago)

one month passes...

new one looks great but you have to use their earbuds?? ech
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_ipod/family/ipod_shuffle

can u do me a kindness (jergins), Wednesday, 11 March 2009 18:52 (sixteen years ago)

I don't think I'd want an iPod to talk back to me.

Jazzbo, Wednesday, 11 March 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

Looks lame, for $30 more you get a lot more space but that's only marginally more useful on a shuffle where you can't pick songs anyway. And the battery life is 2 hours less. And it looks worse. And the headphone thing. This is a weak update.

Euler, Wednesday, 11 March 2009 18:58 (sixteen years ago)

yeah at first i felt like a chump cuz i got a shuffle a few weeks ago, but this just doesn't look too good

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Wednesday, 11 March 2009 19:02 (sixteen years ago)

if I had to replace mine today I'd buy one of the older ones. I'm guessing Apple got a great deal on memory sticks but only in that ugly shape.

Euler, Wednesday, 11 March 2009 19:06 (sixteen years ago)

four weeks pass...

my iPod Shuffle has in the past couple of days played me at least two songs that aren't in my iTunes, and don't come up when I attach it to my computer and scan through the files

consequently I am convinced that artists are paying Apple to have their songs snuck onto iPod Shuffles

tell me I'm not crazy

a steak of romanticism (country matters), Wednesday, 8 April 2009 18:44 (sixteen years ago)

oh man! do you know what songs they are, for shuffle scandal googling purposes? maybe you can figure out what they are by googling the lyrics?

she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Wednesday, 8 April 2009 19:40 (sixteen years ago)

A more likely explanation might be that you have some songs mislabeled?

nabisco, Wednesday, 8 April 2009 19:44 (sixteen years ago)

are the songs by "coldplay?"

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 8 April 2009 19:49 (sixteen years ago)

lol ok I WAS wrong about one of them....it was The The's "Perfect" (9-minute 12" version) which despite being on my computer I didn't know at all

the other one...I'm stumped. but I'm clearly bonkers

a steak of romanticism (country matters), Wednesday, 8 April 2009 19:59 (sixteen years ago)

In fact, I listened to the opening couple of minutes of that The The song, assumed it was by a contemporary singer-songwriter type, and skipped on

it isn't Matt Johnson's greatest hour

a steak of romanticism (country matters), Wednesday, 8 April 2009 20:00 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.