― Mickey, Wednesday, 12 January 2005 03:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 04:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Van der Leun, Wednesday, 12 January 2005 04:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matos W.K. (M Matos), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 04:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 04:18 (twenty-one years ago)
Thanks to the soaring sales of its hip iPods, Apple and Steve Jobs are setto make a bundle of cash in 2005. Amidst all the celebration and excitementabout the iPods, Jobs isn't revealing his dirty little secret about them.The sleek music players contain poisonous lead and other highly toxicmaterials that can cause damage to our brains and reproductive and nervoussystems. Once the little music machines become obsolete, they are dumpedinto landfills or shipped overseas as electronic scrap. Their toxins leachinto our air, land, and water and send poisons into our communities.Especially vulnerable are the children in developing countries who pickthrough the wastes to find parts to sell.
Steve Jobs should do more than celebrate his profits. He should live up tohis good reputation and take responsibility for Apple's iWaste. He shouldharness the company's resources to produce toxic-free iPods and to recyclethe millions of obsolete Apple computers that can poison our communitieswith over 36 million pounds of lead. Up to now, Jobs has chosen anothercourse. His company has no effective program to recycle discarded computersor iPods nor has it eliminated many toxins in its products. It opposeslegislation to recycle electronic waste and produce cleaner machines.Batteries for iPods that fizzle out after a year or two and which aredifficult and expensive to replace are Apple's most recent addition to thegrowing toxic iWaste mass. It's time for Jobs to take another approach.
http://www.computertakeback.com/bad_apple/iwaste_more_info.cfm
Tell Steve Jobs to recycle his iWastehttp://action.computertakeback.com/action/index.asp?step=2&item=10201
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 04:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 04:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 04:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― msp (msp), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 05:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― msp (msp), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 05:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― JD from CDepot, Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)
(Talking shit about iPods is the new talking-about-how-great-iPods-are)
― earinfections (Nick Twisp), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 18:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 18:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 18:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― David Allen (David Allen), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nancy Boy (Nancy Boy), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 19:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― martin m. (mushrush), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 19:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Wednesday, 12 January 2005 20:29 (twenty-one years ago)
I got an iPod for Christmas and promptly sold it. Why? I don't need it; it's just extraneous for me. The only time I'd listen to it is on the train, and I'm seldom on the train more than the duration of 2 or three albums per day; my discman does just fine. I like listening to things as albums. Additionally, most of my music is on LP anyway and thus it would take more effort than it's worth to put it on the iPod. Final reason? It was one of the mini's, so even if I did get crazy, it wouldn't have enough room.
― Ian John50n (orion), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 21:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian John50n (orion), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 21:42 (twenty-one years ago)
Depending what bitrate you rip in, there is always Ned's Pi album...
― martin m. (mushrush), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 21:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian John50n (orion), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)
I do have plans for a remix, though I've not had the time to do it yet.
― martin m. (mushrush), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 21:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 21:57 (twenty-one years ago)