Depeche Mode v Duran Duran

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Just because Ned's thread on 'Music for the Masses' got me thinking about 'Rio' and it struck me that being made to choose between these two would amount to trial by ordeal. Half of me wants to close my eyes and fall into the lap of Depeche, but to do so in spite of Duran Duran would just reek of denial.

It's not a choice I think I could make.

Stephen Stockwell (Stephen Stockwell), Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:47 (twenty years ago)

sorry, it's most certainly one i can make. the mode. obviously.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)

To save my life, with my back to the wall in a gunfight, I'd probably agree with you. But what a cost...

Stephen Stockwell (Stephen Stockwell), Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:56 (twenty years ago)

alternative title for this thread: fiendish vs mrs fiendish ;)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:58 (twenty years ago)

Is there an imputation of marital shenanigans between the two here?

Stephen Stockwell (Stephen Stockwell), Thursday, 13 January 2005 13:02 (twenty years ago)

not at all. it's just this would probably be our ur-musical argument. we could bore for britain on this one.

which i'm starting to do here. come on, people. be casting your votes for the mighty mode.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 13 January 2005 13:13 (twenty years ago)

What's a/an 'ur-musical' argument?

Stephen Stockwell (Stephen Stockwell), Thursday, 13 January 2005 13:19 (twenty years ago)

The Mode are clearly a pale imitation of their influences (Motorhead, Saxon, Arthur Mullard/Hilda Baker, The Brotherhood of Man etc.). It's Duran Duran all the way. Plenty of saxophone solos too. Plus, Duran Duran are taller on average.

KeithW (kmw), Thursday, 13 January 2005 13:20 (twenty years ago)

i'm gonna come round your house and bust your other hip, keith.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 13 January 2005 13:23 (twenty years ago)

x-post: the original, the one above all others. i think we were arguing about duran duran before we'd even held hands.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 13 January 2005 13:24 (twenty years ago)

i'm gonna come round your house and bust your other hip, keith.

Well, that'll certainly rule me out from asshopping.

KeithW (kmw), Thursday, 13 January 2005 13:25 (twenty years ago)

Oh, hang on Keith. 80's sax breaks per se are dubious at best. That said, DD did them exceptionally well.

Stephen Stockwell (Stephen Stockwell), Thursday, 13 January 2005 14:31 (twenty years ago)

Hehe

I quite like sax breaks. My favourite '80s sax breaks are probably Careless Whisper and... Well, my heart tells me it's got great sax on it, but I haven't heard it for years... Sade's Smooth Operator. Is it sax on "Decomposing Trees" by Galaxie 500? I like that too. Sorry, a bit off topic this.

In all seriousness, I like some Duran Duran and some Depeche Mode, for entirely different reasons. Both their names start with D. I like "Fly on the Windscreen" and "New Moon on Monday" best. Depeche Mode ought to attempt an ill-advised covers album though (maybe they have for all I know).

KeithW (kmw), Thursday, 13 January 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

martin gore's done two, yes.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 13 January 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)

Two?! That means they win. What songs?

KeithW (kmw), Thursday, 13 January 2005 14:48 (twenty years ago)

The first one had "Motherless Child" and "Never Turn Your Back On Mother Earth" on it.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 14:49 (twenty years ago)

Never heard these tracks, but a quick look up on the web suggests a slightly more adventurous choice of songs than the Duran Duran effort.

KeithW (kmw), Thursday, 13 January 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)

and actually "ill-advised" wouldn't be fair: both counterfeits are fine, fine albums. there's one track on the second one that's a piece of shiversome wonder ... though i can't quite remember which, and even looking at the tracklisting on amazon doesn't jog my memory. it might be the nico one ...

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 13 January 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

I like the first one more than the second but both are grand -- not only that, but the first one was the first time I ever heard songs by the Comsat Angels, Durutti Column and Tuxedomoon.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 13 January 2005 15:08 (twenty years ago)

Rio > Depeche Mode's recorded output

Edward Bax (EdBax), Thursday, 13 January 2005 15:59 (twenty years ago)

I don't know the detail about general critical concensus, but Duran Duran always fared better in Look-in.

KeithW (kmw), Thursday, 13 January 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)

The Mode.

Rio > Depeche Mode's recorded output

Bah. Violator > Rio > everything else Duran Duran ever did

Mike Salmo (salmo), Thursday, 13 January 2005 17:06 (twenty years ago)

Such different beasts, really. To me, Duran Duran were just fabulously cool, libidinous, late Saturday night coked-out party music, whereas t'Mode were just a bit more dour and deviant and introspective and pervy (I mean, not compared to Coil or anything, but certainly compared to the Durans).

They served different ends. I'd say Tears for Fears (at the time, though certainly not since) attempted to occupy a bit of the same turf as Depeche Mode...or at least more so than Duran Duran.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:01 (twenty years ago)

I reckon that a few people will be interested in this:

DEPECHE MODE & THE STORY OF ELECTRO-POP - Q/ Mojo Special edition

Now on sale in the UK:

DEPECHE MODE & THE STORY OF ELECTRO-POP

A 148-page collector's edition from the makers of Q & MOJO
The Complete DEPECHE MODE story with new interviews and more...
Also Starring DAVID BOWIE, THE HUMAN LEAGUE, NEW ORDER, KRAFTWERK, TALKING HEADS, JAPAN, PET SHOP BOYS, GARY NUMAN, SOFT CELL and more
Exclusive New Interviews
The '80s Bands That Times Forgot
50+ Essential Albums & Songs Reviewed

On sale from 14 January. Published as a Q Special Edition in the UK and a MOJO Special Edition overseas, including the US. Available in all good newsagents or by ordering online from here...

Source: MOJO Magazine

DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)

Hmm...but is it any good?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)

I saw it in the newsagents today, I will probably get it tomorrow/ or the weekend.

Quick flick through seems well put together and also goes beyond the Top 40, so DAF, Throbbing Gristle, Cabaret Voltaire are featured.

Also featured Propaganda and Art of Noise.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:45 (twenty years ago)

i was planning on getting it tomorrow. good weekend lazy reading. the NME ones on punk and madchester were pretty good, certainly. it's usually worth it for the pictures alone: early mode/human league pix are top.

i'm concerned by the fact the mighty OMD aren't mentioned in the puff, but hey.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:16 (twenty years ago)

Seriously, "Rio" is a great candidate for Most Overrated Song Ever Recorded. FFS, it's the worst Duran Duran single by miles!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:18 (twenty years ago)

All I'm going to do is just type this message out and post it. You can pretty much gauge from there on out what my response will be. (But it will have been a pretty close race!)

Oh! And Dan, how the hell is "Rio" overrated? Don't you have to be critically acclaimed first before being considered "overrated"? Since when have any critics at all fawned over DD? I mean, I can see how "Rio" might be a tired example of a Good Duran Duran Song by the non-critical musical commentator, but, damn, it's far from being even, well, "rated".

(This is coming from someone who can't stand "Rio" the single, BTW, though the "Rio Pt. 2" song is quite good.)

Samantha Baker (Dee the Lurker), Thursday, 13 January 2005 22:12 (twenty years ago)

i'm concerned by the fact the mighty OMD aren't mentioned in the puff, but hey.

Yeah, did the world pretty much forget OMD or what?

David A. (Davant), Friday, 14 January 2005 02:38 (twenty years ago)

There's a strong enough UK profile to warrant a few goodies like remastered/bonus tracks for the first three albums, a B-sides comp, radio session comp too I think. And Andy McCluskey scored a fair amount of Atomic Kitten cash via his songwriting for them, so that's nice. One could wish for more, though.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 14 January 2005 02:44 (twenty years ago)

FFS, it's the worst Duran Duran single by miles!

I'd sooner cite "New Moon on Monday" for that prize.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 14 January 2005 03:22 (twenty years ago)

Man, I love "New Moon on Monday," that's a wonderful chorus. Its absence on Decade always bugged me.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 14 January 2005 03:25 (twenty years ago)

You know why it wasn't on Decade, right?

(Ha ha ha ha, I have *such* weak resolve when it comes to trying to stop being a fan geek.)

Samantha Baker (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 14 January 2005 03:52 (twenty years ago)

Uh, no...why?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 14 January 2005 03:53 (twenty years ago)

"NMOM" is a decent song and all, but as far as 7&TRT-era singles go, I much prefer "Union of the Snake".

(xpost)

The reason "NMOM" isn't on Decade is because the band could NOT stand that song. I mean, there was a REAL hatred of it, and they wished to quickly bury it. That's also why they didn't perform it at all in the Sing Blue Silver tour (which was actually the tour to support the album "NMOM" was on) and in fact didn't perform it live at all until the shows they performed in 2000, by which time they'd (probably) gotten over their loathing of the track and included it in the Greatest comp and a mix of it in Night Versions and Strange Behaviour.

Um, some do speculate that the reason the band grew to hate "NMOM" is because the video was such a time-consuming and tiring affair to shoot. You've presumedly heard how lengthy the "uncut", cinematic version of the "NMOM" video, right? If not, then I'll let you know -- that version is 18 minutes long. Imagine how long it would take to create a music video that long. Imagine hearing that song as many times as it would take to shoot that video. I've heard that John Taylor, to this day, can't stand to look at that video even once, because of all the bad memories and negative associations from the video shoot.

Samantha Baker (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 14 January 2005 04:09 (twenty years ago)

There's a strong enough UK profile to warrant a few goodies like remastered/bonus tracks for the first three albums, a B-sides comp, radio session comp too I think. And Andy McCluskey scored a fair amount of Atomic Kitten cash via his songwriting for them, so that's nice. One could wish for more, though.

Thanks for that, Ned. You know, as soon as I posted that question, I realized it was transfered guilt on my part, and that I had forgotten about OMD, never mind the world. Now I can assuage it by searching out some of this stuff. They were so much more than "Enola Gay", after all.

David A. (Davant), Friday, 14 January 2005 04:34 (twenty years ago)

i r a total geek ... i just ordered this mojo depeche mode book! 10 pounds (however much that is in US currency), plus postage no doubt.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 14 January 2005 05:08 (twenty years ago)

It's just a bad song, they're right. "Union of the Snake" is alright -- but nothing off that album has really aged particularly well, it seems.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 14 January 2005 05:16 (twenty years ago)

You mean it sounds "dated", right? Hey, I like that "dated" sound. The fact that it sounds like it was released in 1983 makes it all the more charming, in my own personal opinion-oriented viewpoint. Um, that plus the fact that that album conjures up so many personal memories for me means I will hold the album in higher esteem than you would.

Samantha Baker (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 14 January 2005 05:36 (twenty years ago)

so...duran duran's coming to town in a couple of months, should i go see them? anyone seem them live recently? what should i expect?

manuel (manuel), Friday, 14 January 2005 05:42 (twenty years ago)

Some might argue that no one appreciates 'dated' music more than myself (being an ardent Killing Joke supporter and all), but I was more referring to how Seven & the Ragged Tiger sounds like a bit of a rush-job (compared to the band's first two, inarguably stellar records). There's not a great deal of meat on those songs. "Union of the Snake" still reminds me of high school and whatnot, but I think you'd agree that it doesn't hold a candle to, say, "New Religion" or "Planet Earth".

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 14 January 2005 05:43 (twenty years ago)

Duran Duran sound a lot more dated to me. And not in a good way.
Depeche Mode has more bite, more balls.

Star Cauliflower (Star Cauliflower), Friday, 14 January 2005 05:50 (twenty years ago)

http://www.autobahn.com.br/Depeche_Mode/DM_1.jpg
Depeche Mode has more bite, more balls.

Look, i love Depeche Mode, but I'd never say they had either bite or balls in huge supply.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 14 January 2005 05:58 (twenty years ago)

Alex (and anyone else interested):

Actually, the band started recording their debut album in December of 1980, began releasing singles from the album in February 1981, and released the album worldwide on June 15, 1981. So I suppose you could consider their debut album to be a "rush job". In terms of Rio -- the first song off the album to be written, i.e. personal favorite "Last Chance On The Stairway", was written on August 27, 1981, the first Rio-connected single was released on November 16 of that same year, the rest of the album was recorded during the spring of 1982, and the album was released on May 10 of that same year, so that album took even less time overall than did their debut album. (Oh, BTW, the Rio most North Americans know and love? It was released six months afterward, after the band toured extensively, released several singles, done numerous TV appearances, and hired David "the person Dee would propose marriage to if she were twenty years older" Kershenbaum to create remixed versions of several of the songs off Rio.)

As for 7&TRT -- well, the band began recording that album in May of 1983 and released the completed album on November 21 of that same year, but for much of that time in between, the band's either doing very little recording or is taking a lot of time off from recording to either do promotional-type stuff (including a Jools Holland TV special I am *dying* to get my hands on) or recover from various ailments (including Nick's paroxysmal tachycardia and John's, uh, "nose trouble") or visit Cannes, or do whatever it is they did back in France or Montserrat or Sydney. Actually, they did most of their work in Sydney, so they mustn't have done much, comparatively, over there. So, yeah, the band did spend less time on that album than they did on their debut, but they couldn't have spent any less time than they did on Rio, which oddly enough seems to be the album most favored by the rabid fans and casual listeners alike.

I guess you could put the "blame" on the different production styles, as well, you know. Because the first two albums the band released were produced by Colin Thurston (whom you will also know from Talk Talk's debut album, as well as from engineering work he did on David Bowie's Heroes and Iggy Pop's Lust For Life), whereas the 7&TRT album was co-produced by Alex Sadkin, Ian Little, and the band themselves. Um, maybe. This is just a theory at this point. ;)

Samantha Baker (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 14 January 2005 06:52 (twenty years ago)

manuel: I would say go, but don't expect one of the band's finest performances concert-wise. They still put on a great show, but nothing like what they were doing ca. 1987 - 2001, when they were at their absolute finest in terms of live performances. They blew Nile Rodgers away enough to where he declared on VH1 how he had been to 17 DD concerts (this being back in ca. 1999) and that he had yet to see a bad show from them. And one can see from the performances the band did throughout this period on various TV shows (including "Arsenio" and the Leno-era "The Tonight Show") just how sensational their live shows were at that time.

Oh, and if you do decide to go, please don't bother plunking down the extra approx. $275 just to splurge on a "V.I.P. package". I've heard those are total wastes of money and that tons of people have gotten ripped off by this obviously short-sighted and ludicrous offer. I mean, yeah, that price does include membership in the "fan club", but all that entails nowadays is just that you get special access to a website that contains only band photos and a message board. Big deal, huh? *I* in all my super tight schedule-ishness could put together a site consisting of only band photos and a message board.

Samantha Baker (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 14 January 2005 07:09 (twenty years ago)

ITV showed New Romantic/Synth-Pop Forever again last night as part of the excellent Forever series, featuring Duran vs Spandau before a bit on Depeche Mode. great watching clips of the old videos but it was 'Everything Counts' not 'Is There Something I Should Know' that just gave me the most intense little buzz hearing it again and i then spent the next two hours not being able to sleep on account of remembering how freaking awesome music is. for this alone i pick DM.

Stevem On X (blueski), Friday, 14 January 2005 10:48 (twenty years ago)

Oh, I didn't even see this thread and now I feel silly.

Masonic Boom-Boom (kate), Friday, 14 January 2005 10:50 (twenty years ago)

i don't blame Duran for getting fed up with NMOM either, Rio is much better and the intro and chorus make it their best 'end of the night' song.

Stevem On X (blueski), Friday, 14 January 2005 10:51 (twenty years ago)

there was (maybe still is) a wonderful eighties club in edinburgh in the mid-1990s called planet earth; IIRC they began and ended every night with said song.

i remember the DJ trying to get me thrown out after asking for the wedding present six times. heh.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 14 January 2005 11:05 (twenty years ago)

It's still on Simon... I'm amazed you don't go.

KeithW (kmw), Friday, 14 January 2005 11:08 (twenty years ago)

Oh, now you mention Planet Earth, does anyone know which came first: New Romantic the genre or 'new romantic' the lyric? And was one purposely named after the other?

Stephen Stockwell (Stephen Stockwell), Friday, 14 January 2005 11:29 (twenty years ago)

x-post: is it? let's do it, then!

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 14 January 2005 11:39 (twenty years ago)

although it won't be quite the same now they don't make apple hooch.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 14 January 2005 11:39 (twenty years ago)

Oh! And Dan, how the hell is "Rio" overrated? Don't you have to be critically acclaimed first before being considered "overrated"?

No. You just have to have a college following rabid enough to insist on playing your stuff at every party but boring enough to only ever pick one song and play it over and over and over and over (see also "Stop!" by Erasure).

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 14 January 2005 12:42 (twenty years ago)

Duran Duran had a rabid college following (in the US I assume)?

Maybe it's just the language, but does that not put them in (typically) quite a "cool" bracket?

Here, they were a bit of a teenybopper band, like the Bay City Rollers.

KeithW (kmw), Friday, 14 January 2005 12:46 (twenty years ago)

A significant portion of the people my age would have used Duran Duran as their preteenybopper obsession band.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 14 January 2005 13:54 (twenty years ago)

i've just spent a delightful half-hour wandering round glasgow listening to music for the masses and trying to find a newsagent that stocked that sodding mojo/Q electropop special. finally got it, hurrah. it looks FUCKING TOP, although the mighty OMD only get a single spread (and it's under the rather insulting heading of "where are they now?"). still. that's my weekend sorted. hurrah.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 14 January 2005 14:53 (twenty years ago)

I've only just realised my wording in the original question suggests album v album, when I was really fishing for feedback on band v band. I still teeter on the fence, but since Duran Duran had more of a loud, short, 'look at me' flash in the pan than Depeche's contemplative consistency and staying power, I'd probably lean to the latter. Just.

Stephen Stockwell (Stephen Stockwell), Saturday, 15 January 2005 15:14 (twenty years ago)

i've just spent a delightful half-hour wandering round glasgow listening to music for the masses and trying to find a newsagent that stocked that sodding mojo/Q electropop special. finally got it, hurrah. it looks FUCKING TOP, although the mighty OMD only get a single spread (and it's under the rather insulting heading of "where are they now?"). still. that's my weekend sorted. hurrah.

Whoah - is there a cover CD?

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Saturday, 15 January 2005 15:37 (twenty years ago)

nope, no CD. but, heh, i really don't think there's a single song mentioned in there that i don't own. i can't work out whether this makes me cool beyond compare or just a bit tragic. either way i give not an iota of a fuck.

the production values are weaker than i'd like for a six-quid magazine. it's beautifully designed but the copy isn't desperately well edited - there's a paragraph in the bowie feature that makes no sense. and they can't tell ian craig marsh from martyn ware: every single picture is miscaptioned. that said: it's still worth picking up if you're even remotely interested in the whole synthpop thang.

there is actually a quote from dave gahan about duran duran too! hang on ...


New Romantics, Blitz Kids ... call them what you would, from Spandau Ballet to Duran Duran, from OMD to Ultravox, the bands all espoused a new sound - and image to match. Frilly shirts, baggy trousers, fluffy hair ... Depeche Mode, whose own sense of style dovetailed perfectly with those others, couldn't help but find themselves caught up in the fashion parade. The group tried to play down the link. "Obviously people who buy Duran Duran records might buy ours as well," Gahan admitted, "but I think we're in a different market." Or, rather, he wished they were.

this was written by someone called dave thompson, who might have benefited from, er, actually looking at some pictures of OMD (and indeed ultravox) before putting finger to keyboard. but i'm being horribly churlish, i know.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 16 January 2005 00:26 (twenty years ago)

midge ure was kinda foppish, if memory serves me right, no?

Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 16 January 2005 01:44 (twenty years ago)

my fave non single is "friends of mine"
i wish "careless memories" was on greatest hits dvd because i don't think i've seen video.

deorgie gavies, Sunday, 16 January 2005 06:39 (twenty years ago)

This week it's the turn of IPC Media to look back on the early 80s:

including Duran Duran and Depeche Mode

NME ORIGINALS: 80s

NME Originals have a new issue, covering the 80s - A-Z of the New Romantics.

Compiled from archive material from NME and Melody Maker in the 80s.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Friday, 21 January 2005 16:07 (twenty years ago)

For me, it's Duran over Depeche all the way - at the beginning of ther careers at least. Depeche didn't approximate the sleaze, purple prose, fat basslines, and 'tude that distinguished Duran's best work (still "Rio" and parts of "Notorious." Anyone willing to defend that record?) until "Music for the Masses."

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Friday, 21 January 2005 18:07 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.