― tracey lamoraux, Friday, 14 January 2005 09:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bumfluff, Friday, 14 January 2005 11:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 14 January 2005 12:29 (twenty-one years ago)
It's very much as if the actor who plays Brent studied this film for the character.
There was a bootleg disc of extra footage: a scene with Paul talking to John for five minutes straight about how silly George was to complain about the cameras in the studio, and how sure he understands it's awkward but they just have to warm up so that they can get a quality document of what we do best you know... and Paul just doesn't seem to notice that the entire time he's talking, the expression on John's face is poison
― (Jon L), Friday, 14 January 2005 19:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Friday, 14 January 2005 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― (Jon L), Friday, 14 January 2005 20:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― real lover, Saturday, 15 January 2005 01:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nic de Teardrop (Nicholas), Saturday, 15 January 2005 01:42 (twenty-one years ago)
There's some book done by people who transcribed every moment of dialogue from all of the Let It Be tapes and it paints a very POSITIVE picture of Paul. Basically, he was the only guy (I don't know--maybe Ringo, too) who wasn't sour about WORKING. He was enthusiastic about making music and doing projects like making the film. George was not. Lennon was strung out on smack.
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 15 January 2005 01:46 (twenty-one years ago)
do you think harry likes the beatles ?and anyway, i don't especially like "let it be" but knowing how hard it is to keep a band working when there are problemns all around, i don't see mccartney as an evil guy for that.
― AleXTC (AleXTC), Saturday, 15 January 2005 01:54 (twenty-one years ago)