The girl's parents are seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
According to the suit, the day after the girl took Children's Motrin drops she awoke with a high fever and other symptoms, and lost her eyesight in both eyes within a couple of days.
According to the suit, doctors later concluded the girl had contracted Stevens-Johnson Syndrome -- which is typically caused by an adverse reaction to a drug or virus.
Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Monday, 17 January 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 17 January 2005 18:07 (twenty years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Monday, 17 January 2005 18:07 (twenty years ago)
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Monday, 17 January 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)
(x-post re: the website)
But... I'm not sure about the merit of that suit. I'm not out to defend Tylenol or anything, but it would seem to me that there are always "potential health risks" when administering ibuprofin, aspirin, acetaminophin, or any drug to anyone. People have allergic reactions to things. It's sad, and it's an awful thing to happen to a child, but it happens - the risks are implicit.
But what are you saying with the post -- is it some kind of "told you so" thing for bands that get involved with corporate "sponsorship" (not that this would be an illegitimate response)?
― Chuckling at the Tomkat's Marquee (Ben Boyer), Monday, 17 January 2005 18:37 (twenty years ago)
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Monday, 17 January 2005 19:05 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 January 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Monday, 17 January 2005 19:14 (twenty years ago)
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Monday, 17 January 2005 19:19 (twenty years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Monday, 17 January 2005 19:20 (twenty years ago)
x-post
― Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 January 2005 19:20 (twenty years ago)
So I don't exactly fault the bands but once I actually saw the website, I felt pretty vile. They are marketing painkillers to small children.
― (Jon L), Monday, 17 January 2005 19:22 (twenty years ago)
(fwiw the pharmaceutical industry on the whole is evil evil EVIL. Almost more evil than the petrochemical industry)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 January 2005 19:24 (twenty years ago)
― Brad Laner (Brad Laner), Monday, 17 January 2005 19:34 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 January 2005 19:45 (twenty years ago)
― Martha Stewart and Jeanne-Claude (deangulberry), Monday, 17 January 2005 19:46 (twenty years ago)
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Monday, 17 January 2005 19:56 (twenty years ago)
Ask any parent—if you tell kids what to do, they're sure to do the exact opposite. Tylenol seems to have read that child-rearing chapter, because lately it has been acting like the coolest parent on the block. The pain pill's maker has launched a marketing campaign aimed at young people that has an unusual characteristic: It makes no suggestion—none at all—that they should buy Tylenol.
Since last summer, Tylenol's maker, a unit of Johnson & Johnson called McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals, has spent $2.5 million to fund events in fringe subcultures populated by 18- to 34-year-olds—skateboarding competitions, breakdancing contests, snowboarding exhibitions, and the like.
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Monday, 17 January 2005 20:02 (twenty years ago)
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Monday, 17 January 2005 20:03 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 17 January 2005 20:09 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 January 2005 20:11 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 17 January 2005 20:14 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 17 January 2005 20:22 (twenty years ago)
But I don't think it will work. It's a classic example of advertisers overthinking things a bit. Volkswagen could be sold this way because cars already had the capacity to be cool. Pain relief medication does not have any potential to be cool, IMHO.
― Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 17 January 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)
― mike h. (mike h.), Monday, 17 January 2005 20:26 (twenty years ago)
― Chuckling at the Tomkat's Marquee (Ben Boyer), Monday, 17 January 2005 20:28 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 17 January 2005 20:29 (twenty years ago)
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Monday, 17 January 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)
dude, i'd love free tylenol. our band has to be loud because the drummer can't play quiet and therefore, everyone else is too loud. tylenol is required.m.
― msp (msp), Monday, 17 January 2005 20:34 (twenty years ago)
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Monday, 17 January 2005 23:35 (twenty years ago)
― (Jon L), Monday, 17 January 2005 23:39 (twenty years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Monday, 17 January 2005 23:51 (twenty years ago)
?!?!?
― geeta (geeta), Monday, 17 January 2005 23:54 (twenty years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 00:06 (twenty years ago)
I think the company is counting on the campaign's weirdness to be the hook that'll get bright young hipsters thinking about Tyelnol, thus making them incrementally more likely to choose that brand over all the other practically identical ones on the drug store shelf -- the fact that nobody expects Tylenol to do this, the fact it's WEIRD they should care seems in keeping with many kinds of recent oddball ads using Adult Swim-style surrealism (that Burger King website with the chicken), indie film dryness (the Stephin Merritt-scored thing for Mercury) and 70's culture rehash (Target and Old Navy).
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 00:32 (twenty years ago)
uh-oh... LOCK THREAD!!
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 00:34 (twenty years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 00:39 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 00:45 (twenty years ago)
have some tylenol daddio
OUCH
― heavy d interpol herpes (deangulberry), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 00:58 (twenty years ago)
― geeta (geeta), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 06:33 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 06:40 (twenty years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 06:46 (twenty years ago)
― Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Thursday, 20 January 2005 19:08 (twenty years ago)
http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheMeter/050211.html
― louwittmer, Friday, 11 February 2005 03:57 (twenty years ago)
DEAR GOD.
― kejiseji, Friday, 11 February 2005 04:25 (twenty years ago)